LG 24MB35 vs Philips 243V5

(8)
(5)
LG 24MB35
Philips 243V5

Top Prices

Amazon UK
Checked 4 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Standard delivery: £20.80
Neths Italia
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
Laptops Direct
Checked 8 hours ago
Standard delivery: £9.95
Misco
Checked 4 hours ago
Standard delivery: £5.99
In stock (42 available)
Ebuyer Business
Checked 18 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 3 left!
PC World Business
Checked 17 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
A bit bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 24MB35 has a display diagonal of 23.8", however the Philips 243V5 is only a 23.6" PC monitor (0.2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The LG 24MB35 has a viewable size, vertical of 296.37mm. That's 3.15mm bigger than the Philips 243V5 (293.22mm).
Slightly bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The LG 24MB35 is a 526.88mm viewable width PC monitor, whereas the Philips 243V5 is only a 521.28mm viewable width PC monitor (5.6mm smaller).
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The LG 24MB35 has a viewing angle, vertical of 178°. That's 18° wider than the Philips 243V5 (160°).
Moderately wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The LG 24MB35 has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°, however the Philips 243V5 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
0.4cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The LG 24MB35 has a display diagonal (metric) of 60.4cm, however the Philips 243V5 is only a 60cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.4cm smaller).
Hugely lower power consumption (off) Edit
LG 24MB35 is 0.3W power consumption when off, but the Philips 243V5 is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W higher).
6 Reasons For
50% higher RMS rated power Edit
The Philips 243V5 has an RMS rated power of 4W. That's 2W higher than the LG 24MB35 (4W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Cheaper by £24
The Philips 243V5 costs £103.97, whereas the LG 24MB35 is £127.49.
20 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
£14.23 cheaper to run
Over five years the Philips 243V5 only costs £48.84 to run whereas the LG 24MB35 costs £63.07 to run (29% more). Read more
Better selling
The Philips 243V5 ranks No. 31670 by number of sales, but the LG 24MB35 ranks No. 212783.
Much better user reviews
Based on 4 user reviews, the average review score of the Philips 243V5 is 95%, but the average rating of the LG 24MB35 is 80% (based on 7 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
2W lower RMS rated power Edit
The LG 24MB35 is a 2W RMS rated audio power PC monitor, whereas the Philips 243V5 is a 4W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (2W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

£24 more expensive
The LG 24MB35 is more expensive than the Philips 243V5 by £23.52.
Less retailers
Only 6 retailers sells the LG 24MB35, whereas 26 shops sell the Philips 243V5. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Over one year older
The LG 24MB35 is older than the Philips 243V5 by 15 months.
29% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the LG 24MB35 are £63.07 which is £14.23 more than the Philips 243V5. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The LG 24MB35 ranks No. 212783 by sales volume, however the Philips 243V5 ranks No. 31670.
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The LG 24MB35's average user rating is 80%, however the Philips 243V5's is 95% (based on 4 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Philips 243V5 is a 23.6" PC monitor. That's 0.2" smaller than the LG 24MB35 (23.6"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A little smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
Philips 243V5 is only 293.22mm viewable height, but the LG 24MB35 is a 296.37mm viewable height PC monitor (3.15mm bigger).
Smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The Philips 243V5 has a viewable size, horizontal of 521.28mm. That's 5.6mm smaller than the LG 24MB35 (521.28mm).
Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
Philips 243V5 is only 160° vertical viewing angle, but the LG 24MB35 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
Narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Philips 243V5 is only 170° horizontal viewing angle. That's 8° narrower than the LG 24MB35 (170°).
1% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
Philips 243V5 is only 60cm display diagonal. That's 0.4cm smaller than the LG 24MB35 (60cm).
Higher power consumption (off) Edit
The Philips 243V5 is a 0.5W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.2W higher than the LG 24MB35 (0.5W).

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

38 months Ago 23 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 61.53
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 63.07
Purchase price £ 127.49
Total cost of ownership £ 190.56
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 46.28
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 48.84
Purchase price £ 103.97
Total cost of ownership £ 152.81
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.31T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.24T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.24 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8"
BEST
23.6"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
Composite Sync
 Composite sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
Separate H/V Sync
 Separate H/V sync
 Separate H/V sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Size, Vertical
296.37mm
BEST
293.22mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
526.88mm
BEST
521.28mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.274 x 0.274 0.272 x 0.272
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.4cm
BEST
60cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 5ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
Headphone Outputs
1 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
1 1

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
2W 4W
BEST
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metals Free
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
Unknown - Click to provide data 30,000h

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
-90 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 CZE
 UKR
 TUR
 HUN
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 CZE
 UKR
 TUR
 HUN
BEST
Number of OSD Languages
14 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Input Current
1.2A Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Power Consumption (typical)
24W 18.05W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 100
 100-240
 24
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 100
 100-240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
10 - 35 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 5kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 415mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 118mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 600mm
Weight With Stand
5.1kg 3.7kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
432mm 420mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
271mm 220mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
569mm 551mm
BEST
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 3.2kg
Height
342mm 344mm
Depth
63mm 52mm
Width
569mm 551mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
BEST
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
User Guide On CD-ROM
 User Guide on CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback