DELL P2415Q vs Samsung U24E850R

(56)
(24)
DELL P2415Q
Samsung U24E850R

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Checked 18 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (96 available)
Amazon UK
Checked 2 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Ebuyer
Checked 4 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (292 available)
ITC Sales
Checked 2 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Laptops Direct
Checked 8 hours ago
Standard delivery: £9.95
Ebuyer
Checked 4 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (18 available)
Amazon UK
Checked 44 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
fone-central
Checked 13 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
Marginally bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL P2415Q has a display diagonal of 23.8", whereas the Samsung U24E850R is only a 23.5" PC monitor (0.3" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

One more displayPorts quantity Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a two displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the Samsung U24E850R only has one displayPorts quantity.
Lighter Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 870g lighter than the Samsung U24E850R (4.2kg).
£45 cheaper
The DELL P2415Q is £45.19 cheaper than the Samsung U24E850R.
More popular
The DELL P2415Q is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 4915 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the Samsung U24E850R ranks No. 21519.
Expert reviews are significantly better
Based on 1 expert review, the DELL P2415Q has an average review score of 84%, whereas the Samsung U24E850R has an average rating of 60% (based on 1 review).
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 55 user reviews, the DELL P2415Q has an average review score of 88%, whereas the Samsung U24E850R has an average rating of 77% (based on 23 reviews).
3 Reasons For
4ms faster response time Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a response time of 4ms, whereas the DELL P2415Q is an 8ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Hugely lower power consumption (max) Edit
Samsung U24E850R is 0.45W maximum power consumption. That's 89.55W lower than the DELL P2415Q (0.45W).
1 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The DELL P2415Q is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Samsung U24E850R (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

89.55W higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL P2415Q is a 90W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the Samsung U24E850R is a 0.45W maximum power consumption PC monitor (89.55W lower).
Fewer sellers
Only 19 shops sells the DELL P2415Q, but 20 sellers sell the Samsung U24E850R. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Three months older
The DELL P2415Q is older than the Samsung U24E850R by three months.
7 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung U24E850R is a 23.5" PC monitor. That's 0.3" smaller than the DELL P2415Q (23.5"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Only one displayPorts quantity Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the Samsung U24E850R is one, but the DELL P2415Q only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Heavier Edit
The Samsung U24E850R has a weight of 4.2kg, but the DELL P2415Q is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor (870g lighter).
More expensive by £45
The Samsung U24E850R is £45.19 more expensive than the DELL P2415Q.
Less popular
The Samsung U24E850R is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 21519 by number of sales in our PC monitors, but the DELL P2415Q ranks No. 4915.
Expert review Rating is hugely Worse
The Samsung U24E850R only has an average expert score of 60%, but the DELL P2415Q has an average expert rating of 84% (based on 1 review).
User review Rating is much Worse
The Samsung U24E850R only has an average user score of 77%, but the DELL P2415Q has an average user rating of 88% (based on 55 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

26 months Ago 22 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 115.37
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 117.93
Purchase price £ 274.80
Total cost of ownership £ 392.73
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.59T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.59 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
15
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Display Diagonal
23.8"
BEST
23.5"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Viewable Size, Vertical
296.46mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
527.04mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.13725 x 0.13725 0.4525 x 0.13575
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.47cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 4ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 98%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 250
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Output
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
2
BEST
1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1.5 - 91.5
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 22
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -25 - 25
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Current Rating
1.8A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
45W 41W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 59kWh
Power Consumption (max)
90W 0.45W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 35 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 VCCI
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 VCCI
 C-Tick
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.7kg
BEST
9.6kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 497mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 320mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 634mm
Weight With Stand
8.7kg 6.7kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
369.53mm
BEST
397.2mm
Depth (with Stand)
205mm
BEST
260.6mm
Width (with Stand)
566.64mm 561mm
BEST
Weight
3.3kg
BEST
4.2kg
Height
336.06mm 336.1mm
Depth
46.93mm 59.3mm
Width
566.64mm 561mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 USB
 AC
 USB
 AC
Manual
 Manual
 Manual
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM

Technical Details

Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicRotation Auto
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 521.28mm
No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback