Eizo ColorEdge CX271 vs HP ENVY 34

(7)
(9)
Eizo ColorEdge CX271
HP ENVY 34

Top Prices

Wex Photographic
Checked 16 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock, only 1 left!
DPS Business
Checked 11 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Laptops Direct
Checked 5 hours ago
Standard delivery: £9.95
Debenhams Plus
Checked 5 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
John Lewis
Checked 5 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (74 available)
Microsoft Store UK
Checked 8 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Two times faster response time Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 8ms faster than the HP ENVY 34 (14ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the HP ENVY 34 only has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Hugely lower power consumption (max) Edit
Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is 99W maximum power consumption, but the HP ENVY 34 is a 150W maximum power consumption PC monitor (51W higher).
£48.62 cheaper to run
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 only costs £112.80 to run over five years whereas the HP ENVY 34 costs £161.42 to run (43% more). Read more
User reviews are a lot better
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has an average user review score of 100% based on 4 reviews, but the HP ENVY 34 has an average rating of 87% (based on 6 reviews).
9 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 34" PC monitor. That's 7" bigger than the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 (34"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
HP ENVY 34 is 86.36cm display diagonal. That's 18.36cm bigger than the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 (86.36cm).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 (350 cd/m²).
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the HP ENVY 34 is two, but the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Built-in speaker(s) Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a built-in speaker(s), but the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 does not have a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

Moderately lighter Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a weight of 8kg, but the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is an 8.8kg weight PC monitor (800g heavier).
Cheaper by £334
The HP ENVY 34 costs £744.97, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is £1,078.80.
7 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
A little better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the HP ENVY 34 is 90% based on 3 reviews, but the average rating of the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is 87% (based on 3 reviews).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
7" smaller display diagonal Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has a display diagonal of 27", but the HP ENVY 34 is a 34" PC monitor (7" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A lot smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is only 68cm display diagonal, but the HP ENVY 34 is an 86.36cm display diagonal PC monitor (18.36cm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², but the HP ENVY 34 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is one, but the HP ENVY 34 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Does not have a built-in speaker(s) Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 does not have a built-in speaker(s), whereas the HP ENVY 34 has a built-in speaker(s). Read more

Built in speakers allow you to output sound through the monitor without any need for external speakers.

With built in speakers you can use the monitor like a TV for watch videos to listening to music.

10% heavier Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is an 8.8kg weight PC monitor. That's 800g heavier than the HP ENVY 34 (8kg).
£334 more expensive
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is more expensive than the HP ENVY 34 by £333.83.
Not as many stockists
Only 2 retailers sells the Eizo ColorEdge CX271, however 9 stores sell the HP ENVY 34. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Marginally Lower expert review Score
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has an average expert rating of 87%, but the HP ENVY 34 has an average expert rating of 90% (based on 3 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
Significantly slower response time Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a response time of 14ms, whereas the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is a 6ms response time PC monitor (8ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Higher power consumption (max) Edit
HP ENVY 34 is 150W maximum power consumption. That's 51W higher than the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 (150W).
Older by one month
The HP ENVY 34 is one month older than the Eizo ColorEdge CX271.
Higher running costs over five years by £48.62
Over five years the running costs of the HP ENVY 34 are £161.42 which is £48.62 more than the Eizo ColorEdge CX271. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is considerably Worse
The HP ENVY 34 has an average user score of 87%, but the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 4 reviews).

Awards

1 Award
Ephotozine: Highly Recommended
1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

24 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 110.24
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 112.80
Purchase price £ 1,078.80
Total cost of ownership £ 1,191.60
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 158.96
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.46
Total running cost £ 161.42
Purchase price £ 744.97
Total cost of ownership £ 906.39
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.56T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.56 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
14
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.8T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.8 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
21
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 34"
BEST
Display Resolution
 3440 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1440p
BEST
 1440p
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Digital Vertical Frequency
23.75 - 63 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
15 - 89 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
335.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
596.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2331 x 0.2331 0.232 x 0.232
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
68cm 86.36cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms
BEST
14ms
Color Gamut
99% Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4
BEST
3
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
BEST
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
151.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
0 - 25 -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 344 -180 - 180
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
Number of OSD Languages
9 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicators
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
BEST
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.7W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.43W
Power Consumption (typical)
43W
BEST
62W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.48W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 91kWh
Power Consumption (max)
99W
BEST
150W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
BEST
 RoHS

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
12.8kg 9.8kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
576.5mm 477.1mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
281.5mm 197.2mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
646mm
BEST
950.8mm
Weight
8.8kg 8kg
BEST
Height
402mm 374.1mm
Depth
92mm 93.9mm
Width
646mm 950.8mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback