DELL E2416H vs DELL SE2416H vs HP EliteDisplay E232e vs HP Pavilion 23xw

(4)
DELL E2416H
HP EliteDisplay E232e
HP Pavilion 23xw

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 1 day ago
Standard delivery: £19.95
Laptops Direct
Checked 17 hours ago
Standard delivery: £9.95
In stock
365games.co.uk
Checked 15 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Wild Arc
Checked 5 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Electronic Accent
Checked 1 day ago
Delivery unknown
No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL E2416H is a 24" PC monitor. That's 0.2" bigger than the DELL SE2416H (23") and 1" bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (23"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2ms faster response time Edit
The DELL E2416H has a response time of 5ms, whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower) and the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both 7ms response time PC monitors (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

VESA mounting Edit
The DELL E2416H supports VESA mounting, and so does the HP Pavilion 23xw, however the DELL SE2416H does not support VESA mounting.
Lighter Edit
The DELL E2416H has a weight of 2.9kg, but the DELL SE2416H is a 3.2kg weight PC monitor (290g heavier), the HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor (720g heavier) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor (340g heavier).
Cheaper by £47
The DELL E2416H costs £82.11, whereas the DELL SE2416H is £129.14.
18 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
7 Reasons For
4% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a viewable size, vertical of 296.46mm. That's 10.04mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (286.42mm).
Moderately bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 527.04mm viewable width PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both only 509.18mm viewable width PC monitors (17.86mm smaller).
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a viewing angle, vertical of 178°, and so do the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 18° wider than the DELL E2416H (178°).
A little wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178° (as do the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw), however the DELL E2416H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
2.1cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a display diagonal (metric) of 60.5cm, however the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both only 58.4cm display diagonal PC monitors (2.1cm smaller).
15% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL SE2416H is an 84% color gamut PC monitor. That's 12% larger than the HP Pavilion 23xw (72%).
10W lower power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a power consumption (max) of 25W, however the HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 35W maximum power consumption PC monitor (10W higher) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 27W maximum power consumption PC monitor (2W higher).
6 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL SE2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 18° wider than the DELL E2416H (178°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (as do the DELL SE2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw), whereas the DELL E2416H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Built-in USB hub Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a built-in USB hub, but the DELL SE2416H does not.
Height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a height adjustment, however the DELL E2416H and the DELL SE2416H do not have a height adjustment.
15% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has an annual energy consumption of 28kWh, however the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 32kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (4kWh higher).
Cheaper to run by £15.39
The HP EliteDisplay E232e only costs £51.27 to run over five years however the DELL E2416H costs £57.94 to run (13% more), the DELL SE2416H costs £52.82 to run (3% more) and the HP Pavilion 23xw costs £66.66 to run (30% more). Read more
6 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL SE2416H and the HP EliteDisplay E232e. That's 18° wider than the DELL E2416H (178°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (as do the DELL SE2416H and the HP EliteDisplay E232e), whereas the DELL E2416H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a two HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232e only has one HDMI ports quantity. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL E2416H. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

VESA mounting Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw supports VESA mounting (as does the DELL E2416H), but the DELL SE2416H does not support VESA mounting.
0.08W lower power consumption (off) Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a power consumption (off) of 0.22W, however the DELL SE2416H is a 0.3W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.08W higher).
User reviews are better
The HP Pavilion 23xw has an average user review score of 100%, whereas the DELL E2416H has an average rating of 95% (based on 4 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
DELL E2416H is only 160° vertical viewing angle, but the DELL SE2416H, the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are all 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° wider).
Narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
DELL E2416H is only 170° horizontal viewing angle. That's 8° narrower than the DELL SE2416H, the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (178°).
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The DELL E2416H does not have a height adjustment (As does the the DELL SE2416H), however the HP EliteDisplay E232e has a height adjustment.
Older by four months
The DELL E2416H is four months older than the DELL SE2416H and three months older than the HP EliteDisplay E232e.
£6.67 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the DELL E2416H costs £57.94 to run which is £5.12 more to run than the DELL SE2416H and £6.67 more to run than the HP EliteDisplay E232e. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL E2416H has an average user score of 95%, but the HP Pavilion 23xw has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
11 Reasons Against
Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL SE2416H has a display diagonal of 23.8", however the DELL E2416H is a 24" PC monitor (0.2" bigger) and the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw are both 23" PC monitors (0.8" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slower response time Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 6ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the DELL E2416H (7ms) and 1ms faster than the HP EliteDisplay E232e and the HP Pavilion 23xw (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL SE2416H has one HDMI ports quantity, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E232e, however the HP Pavilion 23xw only has two HDMI ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL E2416H. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

Does not have a built-in USB hub Edit
The DELL SE2416H does not have a built-in USB hub, however the HP EliteDisplay E232e has a built-in USB hub.
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The DELL SE2416H does not have a height adjustment (As does the the DELL E2416H), whereas the HP EliteDisplay E232e has a height adjustment.
Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The DELL SE2416H does not support VESA mounting, however the DELL E2416H and the HP Pavilion 23xw support VESA mounting.
A lot higher power consumption (off) Edit
DELL SE2416H is 0.3W power consumption when off, but the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 0.22W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.08W lower).
Heavier Edit
The DELL SE2416H is a 3.2kg weight PC monitor. That's 290g heavier than the DELL E2416H (3.3kg), 430g lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E232e (3.3kg) and 50g lighter than the HP Pavilion 23xw (3.3kg).
£47 more expensive
The DELL SE2416H is more expensive than the DELL E2416H by £47.03.
Less retailers
Only 2 retailers sells the DELL SE2416H, whereas 20 stores sell the DELL E2416H. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
3% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the DELL SE2416H costs £52.82 to run which is £1.55 more to run than the HP EliteDisplay E232e. Show assumptions.
10 Reasons Against
1" smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e has a display diagonal of 23" (as does the HP Pavilion 23xw), whereas the DELL E2416H is a 24" PC monitor (1" bigger) and the DELL SE2416H is a 23.8" PC monitor (0.8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 10.04mm smaller than the DELL SE2416H (286.42mm).
17.86mm smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
HP EliteDisplay E232e is only 509.18mm viewable width (as does the HP Pavilion 23xw), but the DELL SE2416H is a 527.04mm viewable width PC monitor (17.86mm bigger).
Slightly smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 58.4cm display diagonal PC monitor (as does the HP Pavilion 23xw), whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.1cm bigger).
29% slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 7ms response time PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 23xw. That's 2ms slower than the DELL E2416H (7ms) and 1ms slower than the DELL SE2416H (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the DELL SE2416H, whereas the HP Pavilion 23xw only has two HDMI ports quantitys. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL E2416H. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports quantitys.

A lot higher power consumption (max) Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 35W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 25W maximum power consumption PC monitor (10W lower) and the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 27W maximum power consumption PC monitor (8W lower).
720g heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 3.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 720g heavier than the DELL E2416H (3.3kg), 430g heavier than the DELL SE2416H (3.3kg) and 380g heavier than the HP Pavilion 23xw (3.3kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
One month older
The HP EliteDisplay E232e is older than the DELL SE2416H by one month.
12 Reasons Against
1" smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a display diagonal of 23" (as does the HP EliteDisplay E232e), whereas the DELL E2416H is a 24" PC monitor (1" bigger) and the DELL SE2416H is a 23.8" PC monitor (0.8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 286.42mm viewable height PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E232e. That's 10.04mm smaller than the DELL SE2416H (286.42mm).
17.86mm smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
HP Pavilion 23xw is only 509.18mm viewable width (as does the HP EliteDisplay E232e), but the DELL SE2416H is a 527.04mm viewable width PC monitor (17.86mm bigger).
A bit smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 58.4cm display diagonal PC monitor (as does the HP EliteDisplay E232e), whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 60.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.1cm bigger).
29% slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 7ms response time PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E232e. That's 2ms slower than the DELL E2416H (7ms) and 1ms slower than the DELL SE2416H (7ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

12% smaller color gamut Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 72% color gamut PC monitor. That's 12% smaller than the DELL SE2416H (72%).
13% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has an annual energy consumption of 32kWh, however the HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 28kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (4kWh lower).
Marginally higher power consumption (max) Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 27W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the DELL SE2416H is a 25W maximum power consumption PC monitor (2W lower) and the HP EliteDisplay E232e is a 35W maximum power consumption PC monitor (8W higher).
340g heavier Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 3.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 340g heavier than the DELL E2416H (3.3kg), 50g heavier than the DELL SE2416H (3.3kg) and 380g lighter than the HP EliteDisplay E232e (3.3kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Six months older
The HP Pavilion 23xw is older than the DELL E2416H by two months, older than the DELL SE2416H by six months and older than the HP EliteDisplay E232e by five months.
More expensive to run over five years by 30%
Over five years the running costs of the HP Pavilion 23xw are £66.66 which is £8.72 more than the DELL E2416H, £13.84 more than the DELL SE2416H and £15.39 more than the HP EliteDisplay E232e. Show assumptions.

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

17 months Ago 13 months Ago 14 months Ago 18 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 56.40
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 57.94
Purchase price £ 82.11
Total cost of ownership £ 140.05
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 51.28
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 52.82
Purchase price £ 129.14
Total cost of ownership £ 181.96
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 48.71
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 51.27
Electricity cost - switched on £ 64.10
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 66.66

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.26T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.26 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.33T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24"
BEST
23.8" 23" 23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
 HDCP
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 296.46mm
BEST
286.42mm 286.42mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 527.04mm
BEST
509.18mm 509.18mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76 50 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.27675 x 0.27675 0.2745 x 0.2745 0.265 x 0.265 0.265 x 0.265
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 60.5cm
BEST
58.4cm 58.4cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms 7ms 7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 84%
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 96ppi

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 150mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 22 -5 - 25 -2 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
BEST
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
BEST
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
BEST
 On/off switch
BEST
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
16.3W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.22W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
22W 20W 19W
BEST
25W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 28kWh
BEST
32kWh
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 25W
BEST
35W 27W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 95 20 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 10 - 80 20 - 80 20 - 70
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.2kg
BEST
6.2kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data 4kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
427.58mm 423.1mm 512.4mm 403.2mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
180mm 179.9mm 189mm 150.8mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
566.96mm 556.6mm 549.3mm 531.8mm
BEST
Weight
2.9kg
BEST
3.2kg 3.6kg 3.3kg
Height
334.58mm 330.1mm 336.9mm 322.2mm
Depth
50.5mm 55mm 49.6mm 50.6mm
Width
566.96mm 556.6mm 549.3mm 531.8mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
BEST
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
BEST
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
BEST
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Stand Included
 Stand included
 Stand included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC adapter included
User Guide On CD-ROM
 User Guide on CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback