DELL U2515H vs DELL U2713H vs DELL U2715H vs DELL UltraSharp 25

(231)
(281)
(138)
(231)
DELL U2713H
DELL U2715H
DELL UltraSharp 25

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Checked 1 hour ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (32 available)
Novatech
Checked 13 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Ebuyer
Checked 13 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (34 available)
ITC Sales
Checked 10 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
PC World Business
Checked 57 minutes ago
Out of stock
Carbon8
Checked 6 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon UK
Checked 18 hours ago
Standard delivery: £7.99
Ebuyer
Checked 13 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (37 available)
Novatech
Checked 13 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon UK
Checked 11 hours ago
Standard delivery: £7.99
Laptops Direct
Checked 16 hours ago
Standard delivery: £9.95
In stock
Debenhams Plus
Checked 16 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (12 available)
Overclockers UK
Checked 7 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The DELL U2515H has two displayPorts quantitys, and so does the DELL U2715H, however the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has one displayPorts quantity.
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL U2515H has two HDMI ports quantitys (as do the DELL U2715H and the DELL UltraSharp 25), however the DELL U2713H only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Lower power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL U2515H has a power consumption (max) of 87W, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 25. That's 43W lower than the DELL U2713H (87W) and 1W lower than the DELL U2715H (87W).
A lot lighter Edit
The DELL U2515H has a weight of 4.4kg (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), however the DELL U2713H is a 5.6kg weight PC monitor (1.2kg heavier) and the DELL U2715H is a 4.9kg weight PC monitor (510g heavier).
41% cheaper to run
Over five years the DELL U2515H is £64.10 cheaper to run than the DELL U2713H and £2.57 cheaper to run than the DELL U2715H. Read more
Considerably better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the DELL U2515H is 100%, however the average rating of the DELL U2713H is 82% (based on 35 reviews) and the average rating of the DELL U2715H is 80% (based on 4 reviews).
Considerably better user reviews
The average user review score of the DELL U2515H is 94%, however the average rating of the DELL U2713H is 80% (based on 246 reviews).
5 Reasons For
A bit bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2713H has a display diagonal of 27" (as does the DELL U2715H), whereas the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 are both only 25" PC monitors (2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

HDCP Edit
The DELL U2713H has an HDCP, whereas the DELL U2515H does not have an HDCP.
8% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 335.7mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 24.66mm bigger than the DELL U2515H () and 0.039999999999964mm bigger than the DELL U2715H ().
5.14cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 68.58cm display diagonal PC monitor (as does the DELL U2715H), whereas the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 are both only 63.44cm display diagonal PC monitors (5.14cm smaller).
Thirteen more awards
The DELL U2713H has 15 awards, but the DELL U2515H has 2 awards and the DELL UltraSharp 25 has 2 awards.
10 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2715H is a 27" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2713H. That's 2" bigger than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (25"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2715H has a viewable size, horizontal of 596.74mm. That's 43.78mm bigger than the DELL U2515H () and 0.039999999999964mm bigger than the DELL U2713H ().
8% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
DELL U2715H is 68.58cm display diagonal, and so does the DELL U2713H. That's 5.14cm bigger than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (63.44cm).
Significantly faster response time Edit
The DELL U2715H has a response time of 6ms, whereas the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 are both 8ms response time PC monitors (2ms slower) and the DELL U2713H is a 68.58ms response time PC monitor (62.58ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the DELL U2715H is two, and so does the DELL U2515H, but the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has one displayPorts quantity.
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL U2715H is two (as do the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25), but the DELL U2713H only has one HDMI ports quantity.
One more USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The DELL U2715H has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
20 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Better selling
The DELL U2715H ranks No. 998 by number of sales, but the DELL U2515H ranks No. 1141, the DELL U2713H ranks No. 52929 and the DELL UltraSharp 25 ranks No. 10530.
Much better user reviews
Based on 134 reviews, the average user review score of the DELL U2715H is 94%, but the average rating of the DELL U2713H is 80% (based on 246 reviews).
8 Reasons For
Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the DELL UltraSharp 25 is two, and so do the DELL U2515H and the DELL U2715H, but the DELL U2713H only has one HDMI ports quantity.
1% higher height adjustment Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 115mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 1mm higher than the DELL U2713H (115mm).
A lot lower power consumption (max) Edit
DELL UltraSharp 25 is 87W maximum power consumption (as does the DELL U2515H), but the DELL U2713H is a 130W maximum power consumption PC monitor (43W higher) and the DELL U2715H is an 88W maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W higher).
28% lighter Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is a 4.4kg weight PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2515H. That's 1.2kg lighter than the DELL U2713H (4.4kg) and 510g lighter than the DELL U2715H (4.4kg).
£20 cheaper
The DELL UltraSharp 25 costs £239.94, whereas the DELL U2515H is £259.98, the DELL U2713H is £298.80 and the DELL U2715H is £335.00.
£64.10 cheaper to run
The DELL UltraSharp 25 only costs £92.29 to run over five years whereas the DELL U2713H costs £156.39 to run (69% more) and the DELL U2715H costs £94.86 to run (3% more). Read more
Expert reviews are a lot better
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has an average expert review score of 100% based on 5 reviews, but the DELL U2713H has an average rating of 82% (based on 35 reviews) and the DELL U2715H has an average rating of 80% (based on 4 reviews).
User reviews are a lot better
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has an average user review score of 94% based on 226 reviews, but the DELL U2713H has an average rating of 80% (based on 246 reviews).

Reasons Against

12 Reasons Against
8% smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2515H is a 25" PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 25. That's 2" smaller than the DELL U2713H and the DELL U2715H (25"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Does not have an HDCP Edit
The DELL U2515H does not have an HDCP, but the DELL U2713H has an HDCP.
24.66mm smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The DELL U2515H has a viewable size, vertical of 311.04mm, however the DELL U2713H is a 335.7mm viewable height PC monitor (24.66mm bigger) and the DELL U2715H is a 335.66mm viewable height PC monitor (24.62mm bigger).
8% smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The DELL U2515H is a 552.96mm viewable width PC monitor. That's 43.74mm smaller than the DELL U2713H () and 43.78mm smaller than the DELL U2715H ().
Smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL U2515H has a display diagonal (metric) of 63.44cm, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 25. That's 5.14cm smaller than the DELL U2713H and the DELL U2715H (63.44cm).
Slower response time Edit
The DELL U2515H has a response time of 8ms (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), but the DELL U2713H is a 68.58ms response time PC monitor (60.58ms slower) and the DELL U2715H is a 6ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The DELL U2515H is a five USB Type-A downstream ports quantity PC monitor (as do the DELL U2713H and the DELL UltraSharp 25), whereas the DELL U2715H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
More expensive by £20
The DELL U2515H is £20.04 more expensive than the DELL UltraSharp 25.
Less retailers
The DELL U2515H is only stocked by 9 stores, whereas the DELL U2715H is stocked by 25 stores and the DELL UltraSharp 25 is stocked by 16 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by one month
The DELL U2515H is one month older than the DELL UltraSharp 25.
Less popular
The DELL U2515H is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 1141 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the DELL U2715H ranks No. 998.
Thirteen less awards
The DELL U2515H has only received 2 awards, whereas the DELL U2713H has received 15 awards.
15 Reasons Against
Slightly smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
DELL U2713H is only 596.7mm viewable width, but the DELL U2515H is a 552.96mm viewable width PC monitor (43.74mm smaller) and the DELL U2715H is a 596.74mm viewable width PC monitor (0.039999999999964mm bigger).
Slower response time Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 68.58ms response time PC monitor. That's 60.58ms slower than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (8ms) and 62.58ms slower than the DELL U2715H (8ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The DELL U2713H is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor (as does the DELL UltraSharp 25), whereas the DELL U2715H only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The DELL U2713H is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 25 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Only five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the DELL U2713H is five, and so do the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25, but the DELL U2715H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Lower height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2713H has a height adjustment of 114mm. That's 1mm lower than the DELL UltraSharp 25 (115mm).
43W higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 130W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 are both 87W maximum power consumption PC monitors (43W lower) and the DELL U2715H is an 88W maximum power consumption PC monitor (42W lower).
1.2kg heavier Edit
The DELL U2713H is a 5.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2kg heavier than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (4.4kg) and 690g heavier than the DELL U2715H (4.4kg).
£59 more expensive
The DELL U2713H is more expensive than the DELL U2515H by £38.82 and more expensive than the DELL UltraSharp 25 by £58.86.
Fewer sellers
Only 5 shops sells the DELL U2713H, but 9 retailers sell the DELL U2515H, 25 retailers sell the DELL U2715H and 16 shops sell the DELL UltraSharp 25. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Four months older
The DELL U2713H is older than the DELL U2515H by three months, older than the DELL U2715H by two months and older than the DELL UltraSharp 25 by four months.
69% higher running costs over five years
The running costs over five years of the DELL U2713H are £156.39 which is £64.10 more than the DELL U2515H, £61.53 more than the DELL U2715H and £64.10 more than the DELL UltraSharp 25. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The DELL U2713H ranks No. 52929 by sales volume, whereas the DELL U2515H ranks No. 1141, the DELL U2715H ranks No. 998 and the DELL UltraSharp 25 ranks No. 10530.
Appreciably Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the DELL U2713H is 82%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U2515H is 100% (based on 5 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 25 is 100% (based on 5 reviews).
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the DELL U2713H is 80%, whereas the average user rating of the DELL U2515H is 94% (based on 226 reviews), the DELL U2715H is 94% (based on 134 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 25 is 94% (based on 226 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
A bit smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
DELL U2715H is only 335.66mm viewable height, but the DELL U2515H is a 311.04mm viewable height PC monitor (24.62mm smaller) and the DELL U2713H is a 335.7mm viewable height PC monitor (0.039999999999964mm bigger).
2% higher power consumption (max) Edit
DELL U2715H is 88W maximum power consumption. That's 1W higher than the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 (87W) and 42W lower than the DELL U2713H (87W).
Heavier Edit
The DELL U2715H has a weight of 4.9kg, but the DELL U2515H and the DELL UltraSharp 25 are both 4.4kg weight PC monitors (510g lighter) and the DELL U2713H is a 5.6kg weight PC monitor (690g heavier).
More expensive by £95
The DELL U2715H is £75.02 more expensive than the DELL U2515H, £36.20 more expensive than the DELL U2713H and £95.06 more expensive than the DELL UltraSharp 25.
Older by two months
The DELL U2715H is one month older than the DELL U2515H and two months older than the DELL UltraSharp 25.
£2.57 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the DELL U2715H costs £94.86 to run which is £2.57 more to run than the DELL U2515H and £2.57 more to run than the DELL UltraSharp 25. Show assumptions.
Expert review Rating is hugely Worse
The DELL U2715H has an average expert score of 80%, but the DELL U2515H has an average expert rating of 100% (based on 5 reviews), the DELL U2713H has an average expert rating of 82% (based on 35 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 25 has an average expert rating of 100% (based on 5 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
2" smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has a display diagonal of 25" (as does the DELL U2515H), but the DELL U2713H and the DELL U2715H are both 27" PC monitors (2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A bit smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
DELL UltraSharp 25 is only 63.44cm display diagonal (as does the DELL U2515H), but the DELL U2713H and the DELL U2715H are both 68.58cm display diagonal PC monitors (5.14cm bigger).
2ms slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 is an 8ms response time PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2515H. That's 60.58ms faster than the DELL U2713H (8ms) and 2ms slower than the DELL U2715H (8ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less displayPorts quantity Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the DELL UltraSharp 25 is one (as does the DELL U2713H), but the DELL U2715H only has two displayPorts quantitys.
Only five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 25 has five USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, and so do the DELL U2515H and the DELL U2713H, however the DELL U2715H only has six USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Not as many stockists
Only 16 retailers sells the DELL UltraSharp 25, however 25 sellers sell the DELL U2715H. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Worse selling
The DELL UltraSharp 25 ranks No. 10530 by sales volume, but the DELL U2515H ranks No. 1141 and the DELL U2715H ranks No. 998.
Fewer awards
Whilst the DELL UltraSharp 25 has received 2 awards, the DELL U2713H has received 15 awards.

Awards

2 Awards
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
SweClockers.com: Good Product
15 Awards
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
CNET.com.au: Editor's Choice
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
Expert Reviews: Ultimate
flatpanels.dk: Top Recommendation
flatpanelshd.com: Highly Recommended
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Good
hwt.dk: Gold Product of the Year
itproportal.com: Best Buy
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
prad.de: Very Good
SweClockers.com: Good Product
ua.gecid.com: Gamer's Choice
vido.com.ua: Recommended
No awards found 2 Awards
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
SweClockers.com: Good Product

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

26 months Ago 29 months Ago 27 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 89.73
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 92.29
Purchase price £ 259.98
Total cost of ownership £ 352.27
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 153.83
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 156.39
Purchase price £ 298.80
Total cost of ownership £ 455.19
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 92.30
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 94.86
Purchase price £ 335.00
Total cost of ownership £ 429.86
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 89.73
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 92.29
Purchase price £ 239.94
Total cost of ownership £ 332.23
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.46T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.46 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.78T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.78 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
20
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.47T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.47 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.46T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.46 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
25" 27"
BEST
27"
BEST
25"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 1600 x 900
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 1600 x 900
 2560 x 1440
 1600 x 900
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 1600 x 900
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 1440p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1440p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1440p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1440p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
Product Type
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Viewable Size, Vertical
311.04mm 335.7mm
BEST
335.66mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
552.96mm 596.7mm 596.74mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.216 x 0.216 0.23 x 0.23 0.2331 x 0.2331 0.216 x 0.216
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
63.44cm 68.58cm
BEST
68.58cm
BEST
63.44cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m² 350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 68.58ms 6ms
BEST
8ms
Color Gamut
99% Unknown - Click to provide data 99% 99%
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6ms Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Audio Output
 Audio output
 Audio output
 Audio output
 Audio output
DisplayPorts Quantity
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
1
HDMI Ports Quantity
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
2
BEST
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
5 5 6
BEST
5
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Feet Colour
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Linux Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Linux operating systems supported
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 90 - 90 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 114mm Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm
BEST
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 21 -21 - 5
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 45 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
 Cable lock slot
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
1.5A 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Current Rating
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
35W
BEST
42W 36W 35W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Power Consumption (max)
87W
BEST
130W 88W 87W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 0 - 12192 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
9.8kg
BEST
10.2kg 10.5kg 9.8kg
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 10.2kg Unknown - Click to provide data 6.8kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
338.7mm
BEST
538.9mm 524.9mm 512.5mm
Depth (with Stand)
46.4mm
BEST
200.3mm 205mm 205mm
Width (with Stand)
569mm
BEST
639.3mm 612.7mm 569mm
BEST
Weight
4.4kg
BEST
5.6kg 4.9kg 4.4kg
BEST
Height
398mm 378.2mm 363.4mm 338.7mm
Depth
205mm 65.6mm 46.4mm 46.4mm
Width
569mm 639.3mm 612.7mm 569mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Cables Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
Manual
 Manual
 Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand included
 Stand included
AC Adapter Included
 AC adapter included
 AC adapter included
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 311.04mm
Feedback