LG 29UM67-P vs Philips BDM3270

(6)
LG 29UM67-P
Philips BDM3270

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Checked 14 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (13 available)
Overclockers UK
Checked 1 day ago
Out of stock
Office Allsorts
Checked 10 hours ago
Out of stock
Ebuyer Business
Checked 14 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (18 available)
Ebuyer
Checked 1 day ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 5 left!
Direct TVs
Checked 3 hours ago
Standard delivery: £9.95

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
Two times faster response time Edit
The LG 29UM67-P has a response time of 5ms, but the Philips BDM3270 is a 12ms response time PC monitor (7ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

58% higher RMS rated power Edit
The LG 29UM67-P is a 14W RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 8W higher than the Philips BDM3270 (6W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

55% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 29UM67-P is a 53kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 29kWh lower than the Philips BDM3270 (82kWh).
2.6kg lighter Edit
The LG 29UM67-P has a weight of 5.2kg, however the Philips BDM3270 is a 7.8kg weight PC monitor (2.6kg heavier).
Cheaper by £139
The LG 29UM67-P costs £139.26 less than the Philips BDM3270.
36% cheaper to run
Over five years the LG 29UM67-P only costs £93.84 to run but the Philips BDM3270 costs £146.13 to run (56% more). Read more
Energy efficiency rating is better
The LG 29UM67-P has an energy efficiency rating of "B", however the Philips BDM3270 has a rating of "B".
5 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Philips BDM3270 is a 32" PC monitor. That's 3" bigger than the LG 29UM67-P (32"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

10% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
Philips BDM3270 is 81.3cm display diagonal. That's 7.7cm bigger than the LG 29UM67-P (81.3cm).
Height adjustment Edit
The Philips BDM3270 has a height adjustment, whereas the LG 29UM67-P does not have a height adjustment.
14 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Energy efficiency rating is higher
The Philips BDM3270 has an energy efficiency rating of "B", but the LG 29UM67-P has a rating of "B".

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
11% smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 29UM67-P is a 29" PC monitor. That's 3" smaller than the Philips BDM3270 (32"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The LG 29UM67-P has a display diagonal (metric) of 73.6cm. That's 7.7cm smaller than the Philips BDM3270 (81.3cm).
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The LG 29UM67-P does not have a height adjustment, whereas the Philips BDM3270 has a height adjustment.
Less retailers
The LG 29UM67-P is only stocked by 3 shops, whereas the Philips BDM3270 is stocked by 17 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
6 Reasons Against
7ms slower response time Edit
The Philips BDM3270 has a response time of 12ms, whereas the LG 29UM67-P is a 5ms response time PC monitor (7ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower RMS rated power Edit
The Philips BDM3270 has an RMS rated power of 6W. That's 8W lower than the LG 29UM67-P (6W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

36% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Philips BDM3270 is an 82kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 29kWh higher than the LG 29UM67-P (82kWh).
2.6kg heavier Edit
The Philips BDM3270 has a weight of 7.8kg, but the LG 29UM67-P is a 5.2kg weight PC monitor (2.6kg lighter).
More expensive by £139
The Philips BDM3270 is £139.26 more expensive than the LG 29UM67-P.
£52.29 more expensive to run over five years
The Philips BDM3270 costs £146.13 to run which is £52.29 more to run than the LG 29UM67-P over five years. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
techzine.nl: Silver

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

25 months Ago 24 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 92.30
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 93.84
Purchase price £ 244.98
Total cost of ownership £ 338.82
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 143.57
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 146.13
Purchase price £ 384.24
Total cost of ownership £ 530.37
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.47T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.47 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.73T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.73 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
19
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
29" 32"
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 50000000:1
 50000000:1
BEST
Display
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
 Display sRGB
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 23 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 15 - 99
Viewable Size, Vertical
290.2mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
677mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.264 x 0.264 0.277 x 0.277
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
73.6cm 81.3cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
12ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Version
 2.0
 3.0
 3.0 / 2.0
 2.0
 3.0
 3.0 / 2.0
PC Audio Out
 PC Audio out
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
14W
BEST
6W
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Recyclable Material
Unknown - Click to provide data 65%
Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mac Operating Systems Supported
 Mac operating systems supported
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 180mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
5 - 20 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -170 - 170
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
Power Consumption (typical)
36W
BEST
56W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
53kWh
BEST
82kWh
Power Consumption (max)
47W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 100
 100-240
 24
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 100
 100-240

Operational Conditions

Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.9kg 14.98g
BEST
Package Height
814mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
151mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
405mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
6.2kg
BEST
10.8kg
Height (with Stand)
418mm
BEST
657mm
Depth (with Stand)
181mm
BEST
270mm
Width (with Stand)
703mm
BEST
742mm
Weight
5.2kg
BEST
7.8kg
Height
328mm 438mm
Depth
64mm 61mm
Width
703mm 742mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 HDMI
BEST
 HDMI
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Adapter Included
 AC adapter included
Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
Unknown - Click to provide data 31W
Power Consumption (active)
Unknown - Click to provide data 54.6W
Package Dimensions (WxDxH)
Unknown - Click to provide data 970 x 526 x 224
Feedback