Share on
Acer Predator XB271H vs LG 24MB35PH

Acer Predator XB271H vs LG 24MB35PH

Acer Predator XB271H
LG 24MB35PH

Top Prices

Ebuyer
Checked 21 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (114 available)
Amazon UK
Checked 25 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
BT Shop
Checked 23 hours ago
Standard delivery: £3.49
In stock
Ebuyer Business
Checked 12 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (46 available)
Novatech
Checked 22 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Ebuyer
Checked 21 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (17 available)

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
3.2" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 27" PC monitor. That's 3.2" bigger than the LG 24MB35PH (23.8"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

4x faster response time Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a response time of 1ms, however the LG 24MB35PH is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Built-in USB hub Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a built-in USB hub, but the LG 24MB35PH does not have a built-in USB hub.
17 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Cheaper to run by £4.11
Over five years the Acer Predator XB271H is £4.11 cheaper to run than the LG 24MB35PH. Read more
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Acer Predator XB271H has an energy efficiency rating of "B", whereas the LG 24MB35PH has a rating of "B".
4 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Acer Predator XB271H (178°).
Marginally wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
£250 cheaper
The LG 24MB35PH is £250.01 cheaper than the Acer Predator XB271H.
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 24MB35PH is "B", whereas the rating of the Acer Predator XB271H is "B".

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the LG 24MB35PH is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the LG 24MB35PH (178°).
More expensive by £250
The Acer Predator XB271H is £250.01 more expensive than the LG 24MB35PH.
5 Reasons Against
3.2" smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a display diagonal of 23.8", whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is a 27" PC monitor (3.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slower response time Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Acer Predator XB271H (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a built-in USB hub Edit
The LG 24MB35PH does not have a built-in USB hub, whereas the Acer Predator XB271H has a built-in USB hub.
Fewer sellers
Only 14 sellers sells the LG 24MB35PH, but 31 shops sell the Acer Predator XB271H. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
5% higher running costs over five years
The LG 24MB35PH costs £81.02 to run which is £4.11 more to run than the Acer Predator XB271H over five years. Show assumptions.

Awards

1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

17 months Ago 17 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 74.35
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 76.91
Purchase price £ 389.99
Total cost of ownership £ 466.90
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 79.48
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 81.02
Purchase price £ 139.98
Total cost of ownership £ 221.00
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.38T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.38 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.4T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27"
BEST
23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Viewable Size, Vertical
336mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
598mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.275 x 0.275
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
69cm
BEST
60.45cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
BEST
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
2W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
-90 - 90 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
120mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
-60 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug & Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.2A
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
Power Consumption (off)
0.45W 0.3W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
29W
BEST
31W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
50kWh 37kWh
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 414mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 139mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 639mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.5kg
Height (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 433mm
Depth (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 271mm
Width (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 569mm
Weight
7.7kg 5.1kg
BEST
Height
415mm 342mm
Depth
268mm 63mm
Width
640mm 569mm

Technical Details

Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sleep timer
Feedback