Acer Predator XB271H vs LG 24MB35PH

Acer Predator XB271H
LG 24MB35PH

Top Prices

Ebuyer
Checked 17 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (124 available)
Laptops Direct
Checked 21 hours ago
Standard delivery: £9.95
Debenhams Plus
Checked 21 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
Amazon UK
Checked 13 hours ago
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
Ebuyer Business
Checked 6 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (46 available)
Ebuyer
Checked 17 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (15 available)

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
3.2" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 27" PC monitor. That's 3.2" bigger than the LG 24MB35PH (23.8"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

9cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 69cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 9cm bigger than the LG 24MB35PH (60cm).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 24MB35PH (250 cd/m²).
4x faster response time Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a response time of 1ms, however the LG 24MB35PH is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

20% higher height adjustment Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a height adjustment of 150mm, however the LG 24MB35PH is only a 120mm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (30mm lower).
5 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Cheaper to run by £6.67
Over five years the Acer Predator XB271H is £6.67 cheaper to run than the LG 24MB35PH. Read more
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Acer Predator XB271H has an energy efficiency rating of "B", whereas the LG 24MB35PH has a rating of "B".
8 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Acer Predator XB271H (178°).
Marginally wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Vastly lower power consumption (off) Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a power consumption (off) of 0.3W, however the Acer Predator XB271H is a 0.45W power consumption when off PC monitor (0.15W higher).
13kWh lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has an annual energy consumption of 37kWh, however the Acer Predator XB271H is a 50kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (13kWh higher).
Lighter Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 5.1kg weight PC monitor. That's 2.6kg lighter than the Acer Predator XB271H (5.1kg).
£333 cheaper
The LG 24MB35PH is £333.49 cheaper than the Acer Predator XB271H.
More popular
The LG 24MB35PH is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 1951 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the Acer Predator XB271H ranks No. 22942.
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 24MB35PH is "B", whereas the rating of the Acer Predator XB271H is "B".

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the LG 24MB35PH is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the LG 24MB35PH (178°).
34% higher power consumption (off) Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a power consumption (off) of 0.45W. That's 0.15W higher than the LG 24MB35PH (0.3W).
Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H is a 50kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 13kWh higher than the LG 24MB35PH (37kWh).
A lot heavier Edit
The Acer Predator XB271H has a weight of 7.7kg, whereas the LG 24MB35PH is a 5.1kg weight PC monitor (2.6kg lighter).
More expensive by £333
The Acer Predator XB271H is £333.49 more expensive than the LG 24MB35PH.
Less popular
The Acer Predator XB271H is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 22942 by number of sales in our PC monitors, whereas the LG 24MB35PH ranks No. 1951.
8 Reasons Against
3.2" smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a display diagonal of 23.8", whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is a 27" PC monitor (3.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

9cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 60cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is a 69cm display diagonal PC monitor (9cm bigger).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², whereas the Acer Predator XB271H is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The LG 24MB35PH is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Acer Predator XB271H (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

25% lower height adjustment Edit
The LG 24MB35PH has a height adjustment of 120mm. That's 30mm lower than the Acer Predator XB271H (120mm).
Fewer sellers
Only 13 retailers sells the LG 24MB35PH, but 18 retailers sell the Acer Predator XB271H. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Seven months older
The LG 24MB35PH is older than the Acer Predator XB271H by seven months.
9% higher running costs over five years
The LG 24MB35PH costs £83.58 to run which is £6.67 more to run than the Acer Predator XB271H over five years. Show assumptions.

Date Released

14 months Ago 21 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 74.35
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 76.91
Purchase price £ 398.99
Total cost of ownership £ 475.90
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 82.04
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 83.58
Purchase price £ 65.50
Total cost of ownership £ 149.08
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.38T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.38 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.41T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.41 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
11
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27"
BEST
23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Viewable Size, Vertical
336mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Horizontal
598mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.275 x 0.275
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 178°
BEST
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 178°
BEST
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
69cm
BEST
60cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
RMS Rated Power
2W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
-90 - 90 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
120mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
-60 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.2A
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
Power Consumption (off)
0.45W 0.3W
BEST
Power Consumption (typical)
29W
BEST
32W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
50kWh 37kWh
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 139mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 414mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 639mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.5kg
Height (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 432mm
Depth (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 271mm
Width (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 569mm
Weight
7.7kg 5.1kg
BEST
Height
415mm 342mm
Depth
268mm 63mm
Width
640mm 569mm
Feedback