Acer Predator X34 vs HP ENVY 34

(9)
Acer Predator X34
HP ENVY 34

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Checked 7 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (12 available)
Currys
Checked 26 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (10 available)
eBay
Checked 2 days ago
Overclockers UK
Checked 33 minutes ago
Out of stock
John Lewis
Checked 1 minute ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (74 available)
Microsoft Store UK
Checked 13 minutes ago
Out of stock
PC World Business
Checked 7 hours ago
Out of stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
3x faster response time Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a response time of 4ms, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is a 14ms response time PC monitor (10ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two displayPorts quantitys Edit
The number of displayPorts quantitys on the Acer Predator X34 is two, but the HP ENVY 34 only has one displayPorts quantity.
One more USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys, however the HP ENVY 34 only has three USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
Cheaper by £159
The Acer Predator X34 costs £500.00, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is £659.00.
17 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
£157.83 cheaper to run
Over five years the Acer Predator X34 only costs £3.59 to run whereas the HP ENVY 34 costs £161.42 to run (4396% more). Read more
Energy efficiency rating is higher
The Acer Predator X34 has an energy efficiency rating of "C", but the HP ENVY 34 has a rating of "C".
6 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is an 86.36cm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.36cm bigger than the Acer Predator X34 (86.36cm).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer Predator X34 (350 cd/m²).
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a two HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the Acer Predator X34 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 91kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 2kWh lower than the Acer Predator X34 (91kWh).
Significantly lighter Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a weight of 8kg, whereas the Acer Predator X34 is a 15kg weight PC monitor (7kg heavier).
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The HP ENVY 34 has an energy efficiency rating of "C", whereas the Acer Predator X34 has a rating of "C".

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
Acer Predator X34 is only 86cm display diagonal. That's 0.36cm smaller than the HP ENVY 34 (86.36cm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the HP ENVY 34 (350 cd/m²).
One less HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Acer Predator X34 is one, but the HP ENVY 34 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
3% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 93kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 2kWh higher than the HP ENVY 34 (91kWh).
7kg heavier Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a weight of 15kg, but the HP ENVY 34 is an 8kg weight PC monitor (7kg lighter).
7 Reasons Against
Vastly slower response time Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a response time of 14ms, however the Acer Predator X34 is a 4ms response time PC monitor (10ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one displayPorts quantity Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a one displayPorts quantity PC monitor, whereas the Acer Predator X34 only has two displayPorts quantitys.
One less USB Type-A downstream ports quantity Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys on the HP ENVY 34 is three, but the Acer Predator X34 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports quantitys.
More expensive by £159
The HP ENVY 34 is £159 more expensive than the Acer Predator X34.
Fewer sellers
The HP ENVY 34 is only stocked by 4 sellers, but the Acer Predator X34 is stocked by 21 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by five months
The HP ENVY 34 is five months older than the Acer Predator X34.
Higher running costs over five years by £157.83
The running costs of the HP ENVY 34 are £161.42 which is £157.83 more than the Acer Predator X34 over five years. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 1.03
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 3.59
Purchase price £ 500.00
Total cost of ownership £ 503.59
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 158.96
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.46
Total running cost £ 161.42
Purchase price £ 659.00
Total cost of ownership £ 820.42
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.018T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.018 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
0.8T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.8 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
21
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
34" 34"
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3440 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.232 x 0.232
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
86cm 86.36cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
4ms
BEST
14ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPorts Quantity
2
BEST
1
USB 3.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4
BEST
3
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
7W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

NVIDIA G-SYNC
 NVIDIA G-SYNC
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
130mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 25
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -180 - 180
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.43W
Power Consumption (typical)
0.4W
BEST
62W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.48W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
93kWh 91kWh
BEST
Power Consumption (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data 150W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 9.8kg
Height (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 477.1mm
Depth (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 197.2mm
Width (with Stand)
Unknown - Click to provide data 950.8mm
Weight
15kg 8kg
BEST
Height
455mm 374.1mm
Depth
308mm 93.9mm
Width
825mm 950.8mm

Technical Details

Game Mode
 Game mode
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback