Benq RL2455 vs Samsung S22B420BW

(167)
Benq RL2455
Samsung S22B420BW

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Checked 23 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (40 available)
Amazon UK
Checked 17 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Carbon8
Checked 4 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon UK
Checked 5 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Marajo Limited
Checked 19 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
9% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 24" PC monitor. That's 2" bigger than the Samsung S22B420BW (22"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a display diagonal (metric) of 60.96cm. That's 5.08cm bigger than the Samsung S22B420BW (55.88cm).
4ms faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a response time of 1ms, but the Samsung S22B420BW is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

6 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
6 Reasons For
Height adjustment Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a height adjustment, but the Benq RL2455 does not have a height adjustment.
Swivelling Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a swivelling, but the Benq RL2455 does not have a swivelling.
Pivot Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a pivot, however the Benq RL2455 does not have a pivot.
Cheaper by £14
The Samsung S22B420BW costs £13.75 less than the Benq RL2455.
9% cheaper to run
Over five years the Samsung S22B420BW only costs £65.64 to run but the Benq RL2455 costs £71.78 to run (9% more). Read more
Better selling
The Samsung S22B420BW ranks No. 121777 by number of sales, however the Benq RL2455 ranks No. 128285.

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Does not have a height adjustment Edit
The Benq RL2455 does not have a height adjustment, whereas the Samsung S22B420BW does.
Does not have a swivelling Edit
The Benq RL2455 does not have a swivelling, whereas the Samsung S22B420BW has a swivelling.
Does not have a pivot Edit
The Benq RL2455 does not have a pivot, but the Samsung S22B420BW has a pivot.
More expensive by £14
The Benq RL2455 is £13.75 more expensive than the Samsung S22B420BW.
Older by ten months
The Benq RL2455 is ten months older than the Samsung S22B420BW.
Higher running costs over five years by £6.14
The running costs over five years of the Benq RL2455 are £71.78 which is £6.14 more than the Samsung S22B420BW. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The Benq RL2455 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 128285 by number of sales in our PC monitors, however the Samsung S22B420BW ranks No. 121777.
4 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW is a 22" PC monitor. That's 2" smaller than the Benq RL2455 (22"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

10% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a display diagonal (metric) of 55.88cm. That's 5.08cm smaller than the Benq RL2455 (55.88cm).
4ms slower response time Edit
The Samsung S22B420BW has a response time of 5ms, but the Benq RL2455 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Less retailers
The Samsung S22B420BW is only stocked by 2 stores, whereas the Benq RL2455 is stocked by 8 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.

Awards

1 Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

41 months Ago 31 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 69.22
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 71.78
Purchase price £ 129.99
Total cost of ownership £ 201.77
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 64.10
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 65.64
Purchase price £ 116.24
Total cost of ownership £ 181.88
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.36T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.36 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.33T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24"
BEST
22"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1680 x 1050
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1680 x 1050
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 12000000:1
BEST
 12000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.276 x 0.276 0.282 x 0.282
Display Colour Count
16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
160° 160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
170° 170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
60.96cm
BEST
55.88cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Input
 Audio input
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture
 Picture-in-Picture
Unknown - Click to provide data
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 115
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 100mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 22
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
BEST
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
 Pivot
BEST
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
17 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
27W 25W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Input Voltage
 96 - 264
BEST
 96 - 264
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.7kg 5.5kg
BEST
Package Height
420mm 406mm
BEST
Package Depth
134mm
BEST
192mm
Package Width
650mm 582mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
4.1kg 4.1kg
Height (with Stand)
435mm 359.25mm
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
189mm
BEST
220mm
Width (with Stand)
579mm 505.5mm
BEST
Weight
4.1kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
435mm 331.5mm
Depth
189mm 60.25mm
Width
579mm 505.5mm

Other Features

Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback