Acer K242HLA vs Asus PA329Q

Acer K242HLA

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Checked 22 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (302 available)
Ebuyer
Checked 8 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (309 available)
Argos
Checked 17 hours ago
Standard delivery: £6.95
GoGoDigital
Checked 5 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon UK
Checked 32 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Ebuyer
Checked 8 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 1 left!
Target PC 1-888-311-4455
Checked 17 hours ago
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
4x faster response time Edit
The Acer K242HLA has a response time of 1ms, but the Asus PA329Q is a 5ms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lighter Edit
The Acer K242HLA has a weight of 3.3kg, however the Asus PA329Q is a 12.5kg weight PC monitor (9.3kg heavier).
Cheaper by £992
The Acer K242HLA costs £992.32 less than the Asus PA329Q.
83% cheaper to run
Over five years the Acer K242HLA only costs £61.28 to run but the Asus PA329Q costs £354.58 to run (479% more). Read more
Better selling
The Acer K242HLA ranks No. 30546 by number of sales, however the Asus PA329Q ranks No. 71984.
Vastly better user reviews
Based on 1 review, the average user review score of the Acer K242HLA is 80%, however the average rating of the Asus PA329Q is 60% (based on 1 review).
5 Reasons For
8" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus PA329Q has a display diagonal of 32", whereas the Acer K242HLA is only a 24" PC monitor (8" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20.28cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Asus PA329Q is an 81.28cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Acer K242HLA is only a 61cm display diagonal PC monitor (20.28cm smaller).
100 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus PA329Q has a display brightness of 350 cd/m², whereas the Acer K242HLA is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² dimmer).
Four HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The Asus PA329Q is a four HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the Acer K242HLA only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer K242HLA is a 24" PC monitor. That's 8" smaller than the Asus PA329Q (32"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

34% smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Acer K242HLA has a display diagonal (metric) of 61cm. That's 20.28cm smaller than the Asus PA329Q (81.28cm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer K242HLA is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus PA329Q (350 cd/m²).
Three less HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The Acer K242HLA has one HDMI ports quantity, however the Asus PA329Q only has four HDMI ports quantitys.
Less retailers
The Acer K242HLA is only stocked by 14 stores, whereas the Asus PA329Q is stocked by 15 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by eight months
The Acer K242HLA is eight months older than the Asus PA329Q.
6 Reasons Against
80% slower response time Edit
The Asus PA329Q is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Acer K242HLA (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

74% heavier Edit
The Asus PA329Q is a 12.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 9.3kg heavier than the Acer K242HLA (12.5kg).
£992 more expensive
The Asus PA329Q is more expensive than the Acer K242HLA by £992.32.
More expensive to run over five years by 479%
The running costs over five years of the Asus PA329Q are £354.58 which is £293.30 more than the Acer K242HLA. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Asus PA329Q ranks No. 71984 by sales volume, whereas the Acer K242HLA ranks No. 30546.
Significantly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Asus PA329Q is only 60%, whereas the average user rating of the Acer K242HLA is 80% (based on 1 review).

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
itwriter.ru: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

17 months Ago 10 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 58.97
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.31
Total running cost £ 61.28
Purchase price £ 99.99
Total cost of ownership £ 161.27
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 354.58
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 354.58
Purchase price £ 1,092.31
Total cost of ownership £ 1,446.89
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.3T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.8T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.8 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
45
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
24" 32"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 24 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 135
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 398.52mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 708.48mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.1845 x 0.1845
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
61cm 81.28cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
1ms
BEST
5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Version
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 4
BEST
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in USB hub
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 6W
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Compatible Memory Cards
 Memory Stick (MS)
 MS PRO
 MS PRO Duo
 MS Pro-HG
 SD
 SDHC
 SDXC
 Memory Stick (MS)
 MS PRO
 MS PRO Duo
 MS Pro-HG
 SD
 SDHC
 SDXC

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 20 - -5
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 60 - -60
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 RUM
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 PER
 DUT
 CZE
 THA
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
 CRO
 IND
 RUM
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 PER
 DUT
 CZE
 THA
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
 CRO
 IND
BEST
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data 21
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.4W
Power Consumption (off)
0.35W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
23W
BEST
138.3W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption
34kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 MPR II
 RoHS
 MPR II
 RoHS
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 15.7kg
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 552mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 350mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 847mm
Weight With Stand
3.6kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
421.2mm
BEST
615mm
Depth (with Stand)
208mm
BEST
240mm
Width (with Stand)
567mm
BEST
735mm
Weight
3.3kg
BEST
12.5kg
Height
335.9mm 615mm
Depth
52mm 240mm
Width
567mm 735mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 AC
BEST
 VGA
 AC

Technical Details

Display Modes
 Picture-in-Picture
 Picture-in-Picture
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 708.48mm
Feedback