Benq EW2750ZL vs Benq GW2750 vs Benq RL2755

(16)
(10)
(119)
Benq EW2750ZL
Benq GW2750
Benq RL2755

Top Prices

Misco
Checked 22 hours ago
Standard delivery: £5.99
In stock, only 3 left!
Amazon UK
Checked 5 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Checked 7 hours ago
Standard delivery: £39.08
PC World Business
Checked 11 hours ago
Out of stock
No prices found
Ebuyer Business
Checked 12 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Novatech
Checked 24 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Misco
Checked 22 hours ago
Standard delivery: £14.39
In stock (29 available)

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
Bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
Benq EW2750ZL is 336.2mm viewable height. That's 0.050000000000011mm bigger than the Benq RL2755 (336.15mm).
4% more display colour count Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL has a display colour count of 16.77M. That's 0.57M more than the Benq GW2750 ().
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
Benq EW2750ZL is 178° vertical viewing angle, and so does the Benq GW2750. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2755 (160°).
8° wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Benq EW2750ZL is 178° horizontal viewing angle (as does the Benq GW2750), but the Benq RL2755 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Benq EW2750ZL is two, and so does the Benq RL2755, but the Benq GW2750 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
31% lighter Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 4.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3kg lighter than the Benq GW2750 (5.5kg) and 1.2kg lighter than the Benq RL2755 (5.5kg).
£10 cheaper
The Benq EW2750ZL costs £189.54, whereas the Benq RL2755 is £199.98.
User reviews are marginally better
The Benq EW2750ZL has an average user review score of 96%, but the Benq RL2755 has an average rating of 94% (based on 103 reviews).
2 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the Benq EW2750ZL. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2755 (160°).
A bit wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (as does the Benq EW2750ZL), whereas the Benq RL2755 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
5 Reasons For
3ms faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the Benq EW2750ZL and the Benq GW2750 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a two HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the Benq EW2750ZL, whereas the Benq GW2750 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Cheaper to run by £53.30
The Benq RL2755 only costs £62.07 to run over five years however the Benq EW2750ZL costs £115.37 to run (86% more) and the Benq GW2750 costs £76.91 to run (24% more). Read more
One more awards
The Benq RL2755 has 2 awards, but the Benq GW2750 has 1 award.

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
75% slower response time Edit
The Benq EW2750ZL is a 4ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Benq GW2750. That's 3ms slower than the Benq RL2755 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Not as many stockists
Only 6 retailers sells the Benq EW2750ZL, however 7 retailers sell the Benq RL2755. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
More expensive to run over five years by 86%
The running costs of the Benq EW2750ZL are £115.37 which is £38.46 more than the Benq GW2750 and £53.30 more than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
8 Reasons Against
Less display colour count Edit
Benq GW2750 is only 16.2M display colours. That's 0.57M less than the Benq EW2750ZL ().
Slower response time Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a 4ms response time PC monitor, and so does the Benq EW2750ZL. That's 3ms slower than the Benq RL2755 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, whereas the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
1.3kg heavier Edit
The Benq GW2750 is a 5.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3kg heavier than the Benq EW2750ZL (5.5kg) and 100g heavier than the Benq RL2755 (5.5kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over one year older
The Benq GW2750 is older than the Benq EW2750ZL by 20 months and older than the Benq RL2755 by 16 months.
24% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the running costs of the Benq GW2750 are £76.91 which is £14.84 more than the Benq RL2755. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Benq GW2750 has received 1 award, the Benq RL2755 has received 2 awards.
7 Reasons Against
Smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 336.15mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.050000000000011mm smaller than the Benq EW2750ZL (336.15mm).
18° narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the Benq EW2750ZL and the Benq GW2750 (160°).
8° narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, whereas the Benq EW2750ZL and the Benq GW2750 are both 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
1.2kg heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2kg heavier than the Benq EW2750ZL (5.5kg) and 100g lighter than the Benq GW2750 (5.5kg).
£10 more expensive
The Benq RL2755 is more expensive than the Benq EW2750ZL by £10.44.
Four months older
The Benq RL2755 is older than the Benq EW2750ZL by four months.
A bit Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Benq RL2755 is 94%, whereas the average user rating of the Benq EW2750ZL is 96% (based on 11 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
PC Advisor.co.uk: Recommended
2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 40 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 115.37
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 115.37
Purchase price £ 189.54
Total cost of ownership £ 304.91
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 76.91
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 76.91
Electricity cost - switched on £ 62.07
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 62.07
Purchase price £ 199.98
Total cost of ownership £ 262.05
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.57T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.57 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
15
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.38T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.38 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.31T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76 50 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83 30 - 83
Viewable Size, Vertical
336.2mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.15mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
597.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data 597.6mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
16.2M Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 5000:1
 5000:1
BEST
 5000:1
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 4ms 1ms
BEST
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out
 Headphone out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Microphone in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Microphone in
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Audio Input
 Audio input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
HDMI Ports Quantity
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
4W 4W 4W
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 15 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
Wall Mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wall mountable
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
17 17 17
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (off)
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
45W 30W 24.21W
BEST
Input Voltage
 90 - 264
BEST
 90 - 264
 90 - 264
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
4.3kg
BEST
5.6kg 5.5kg
Height
458.5mm 489mm 478mm
Depth
194.9mm 191mm 213mm
Width
613.8mm 655mm 639mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 VGA
 HDMI
 VGA
 HDMI
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
28W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Monitor Maximum Video Bandwidth
205 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback