Acer G276HL vs Asus MX279H vs Benq GW2760 vs Benq RL2755

(178)
(318)
(119)
Acer G276HL
Asus MX279H
Benq GW2760
Benq RL2755

Top Prices

Misco
Checked 20 hours ago
Standard delivery: £5.99
In stock (62 available)
Amazon UK
Checked 8 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
BT Shop
Checked 21 hours ago
Standard delivery: £3.49
In stock
Ebuyer
Checked 20 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (10 available)
AWD-IT
Checked 5 hours ago
Out of stock
No prices found
Ebuyer Business
Checked 9 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Novatech
Checked 21 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Misco
Checked 20 hours ago
Standard delivery: £14.39
In stock (29 available)

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
Acer G276HL is 178° vertical viewing angle (as do the Asus MX279H and the Benq GW2760), but the Benq RL2755 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Acer G276HL is 178° horizontal viewing angle, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Benq GW2760. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (170°).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer G276HL is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Benq GW2760 and the Benq RL2755. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Asus MX279H (300 cd/m²).
39% lower power consumption (off) Edit
The Acer G276HL is a 0.36W power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.14W lower than the Asus MX279H ().
Hugely lighter Edit
The Acer G276HL has a weight of 3.5kg, but the Asus MX279H is a 5.2kg weight PC monitor (1.7kg heavier), the Benq GW2760 is a 5.3kg weight PC monitor (1.8kg heavier) and the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (2kg heavier).
Cheaper by £7
The Acer G276HL costs £193.14, whereas the Asus MX279H is £241.38 and the Benq RL2755 is £199.98.
7 Reasons For
11% wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Asus MX279H has a viewing angle, vertical of 178° (as do the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760), however the Benq RL2755 is only a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Asus MX279H has a viewing angle, horizontal of 178°, and so do the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (170°).
1% bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Asus MX279H has a display diagonal (metric) of 68.6cm. That's 0.019999999999996cm bigger than the Benq GW2760 ().
One more HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Asus MX279H has two HDMI ports quantitys (as does the Benq RL2755), however the Benq GW2760 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
67% higher RMS rated power Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 4W higher than the Benq GW2760 (4W) and 2W higher than the Benq RL2755 (4W). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

16 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Nine more awards
The Asus MX279H has 10 awards from expert review sites, whereas the Benq GW2760 has 1 award and the Benq RL2755 has 2 awards.
6 Reasons For
18° wider viewing angle, vertical Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Acer G276HL and the Asus MX279H. That's 18° wider than the Benq RL2755 (160°).
Slightly wider viewing angle, horizontal Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (as do the Acer G276HL and the Asus MX279H), whereas the Benq RL2755 is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq GW2760 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as do the Acer G276HL and the Benq RL2755), whereas the Asus MX279H is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
VESA mounting Edit
The Benq GW2760 supports VESA mounting (as does the Benq RL2755), but the Asus MX279H does not support VESA mounting.
Lower power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
Benq GW2760 is 0.3W power consumption when in PowerSave mode. That's 0.2W lower than the Asus MX279H and the Benq RL2755 (0.5W).
Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 2 expert reviews, the Benq GW2760 has an average review score of 98%, whereas the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews) and the Benq RL2755 has an average rating of 75% (based on 16 reviews).
6 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² (as do the Acer G276HL and the Benq GW2760), but the Asus MX279H is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Five times faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor. That's 5ms faster than the Acer G276HL (1ms), 4ms faster than the Asus MX279H (1ms) and 3ms faster than the Benq GW2760 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Benq RL2755 is two, and so does the Asus MX279H, but the Benq GW2760 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
VESA mounting Edit
The Benq RL2755 supports VESA mounting (as does the Benq GW2760), however the Asus MX279H does not support VESA mounting.
£54.84 cheaper to run
The Benq RL2755 is £32.79 cheaper to run than the Asus MX279H and £54.84 cheaper to run than the Benq GW2760 over five years. Read more
User reviews are marginally better
Based on 103 reviews, the Benq RL2755 has an average user review score of 94%, but the Acer G276HL has an average rating of 93% (based on 177 reviews), the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 88% (based on 283 reviews) and the Benq GW2760 has an average rating of 20% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Significantly slower response time Edit
The Acer G276HL has a response time of 6ms, whereas the Asus MX279H is a 5ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster), the Benq GW2760 is a 4ms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (5ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI ports quantity Edit
The number of HDMI ports quantitys on the Acer G276HL is one (as does the Benq GW2760), but the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Not as many stockists
The Acer G276HL is only stocked by 1 shop, however the Asus MX279H is stocked by 17 sellers and the Benq RL2755 is stocked by 7 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over two years
The Acer G276HL is nine months older than the Benq GW2760 and two years older than the Benq RL2755.
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The Acer G276HL has an average user score of 93%, but the Benq RL2755 has an average user rating of 94% (based on 103 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer G276HL, the Benq GW2760 and the Benq RL2755 (300 cd/m²).
4ms slower response time Edit
The Asus MX279H has a response time of 5ms, but the Acer G276HL is a 6ms response time PC monitor (1ms slower), the Benq GW2760 is a 4ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster) and the Benq RL2755 is a 1ms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not support VESA mounting Edit
The Asus MX279H does not support VESA mounting, however the Benq GW2760 and the Benq RL2755 support VESA mounting.
0.2W higher power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 0.5W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (as does the Benq RL2755), whereas the Benq GW2760 is a 0.3W power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.2W lower).
Higher power consumption (off) Edit
Asus MX279H is 0.5W power consumption when off. That's 0.14W higher than the Acer G276HL ().
1.7kg heavier Edit
The Asus MX279H has a weight of 5.2kg, however the Acer G276HL is a 3.5kg weight PC monitor (1.7kg lighter), the Benq GW2760 is a 5.3kg weight PC monitor (100g heavier) and the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor (300g heavier).
More expensive by £48
The Asus MX279H is £48.24 more expensive than the Acer G276HL and £41.40 more expensive than the Benq RL2755.
Older by over two years
The Asus MX279H is one month older than the Acer G276HL, ten months older than the Benq GW2760 and two years older than the Benq RL2755.
£32.79 more expensive to run over five years
The Asus MX279H costs £94.86 to run which is £32.79 more to run than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The Asus MX279H's average expert score is 80%, however the Benq GW2760's is 98% (based on 2 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The Asus MX279H's average user score is 88%, however the Acer G276HL's is 93% (based on 177 reviews) and the Benq RL2755's is 94% (based on 103 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
0.019999999999996cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 68.58cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Asus MX279H is a 68.6cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm bigger).
Slower response time Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the Acer G276HL (1ms), 1ms faster than the Asus MX279H (1ms) and 3ms slower than the Benq RL2755 (1ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the Acer G276HL, whereas the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
4W lower RMS rated power Edit
Benq GW2760 is only 2W RMS rated audio power, but the Asus MX279H is a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W higher) and the Benq RL2755 is a 4W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (2W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Heavier Edit
The Benq GW2760 is a 5.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 1.8kg heavier than the Acer G276HL (5.5kg), 100g heavier than the Asus MX279H (5.5kg) and 200g lighter than the Benq RL2755 (5.5kg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over one year older
The Benq GW2760 is older than the Benq RL2755 by 15 months.
88% higher running costs over five years
The running costs of the Benq GW2760 are £116.91 which is £22.05 more than the Asus MX279H and £54.84 more than the Benq RL2755 over five years. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Benq GW2760 has received 1 award, the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards and the Benq RL2755 has received 2 awards.
Significantly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Benq GW2760 is only 20%, whereas the average user rating of the Acer G276HL is 93% (based on 177 reviews), the Asus MX279H is 88% (based on 283 reviews) and the Benq RL2755 is 94% (based on 103 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
Narrower viewing angle, vertical Edit
Benq RL2755 is only 160° vertical viewing angle. That's 18° narrower than the Acer G276HL, the Asus MX279H and the Benq GW2760 (160°).
Slightly narrower viewing angle, horizontal Edit
Benq RL2755 is only 170° horizontal viewing angle, but the Acer G276HL, the Asus MX279H and the Benq GW2760 are all 178° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
2W lower RMS rated power Edit
The Benq RL2755 has an RMS rated power of 4W, however the Asus MX279H is a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (2W higher) and the Benq GW2760 is a 2W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (2W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Higher power consumption (PowerSave) Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a power consumption (PowerSave) of 0.5W, and so does the Asus MX279H. That's 0.2W higher than the Benq GW2760 (0.5W).
Heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 2kg heavier than the Acer G276HL (5.5kg), 300g heavier than the Asus MX279H (5.5kg) and 200g heavier than the Benq GW2760 (5.5kg).
£7 more expensive
The Benq RL2755 is more expensive than the Acer G276HL by £6.84.
Not as many stockists
Only 7 shops sells the Benq RL2755, however 17 shops sell the Asus MX279H. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Benq RL2755 has received 2 awards, the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards.
Hugely Lower expert review Score
The Benq RL2755 only has an average expert rating of 75%, but the Asus MX279H has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews) and the Benq GW2760 has an average expert rating of 98% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 10 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
ferra.ru: Recommended
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwaremx.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Silver
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
1 Award
voz.vn: Recommended
2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

49 months Ago 49 months Ago 40 months Ago 25 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ -
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ -
Electricity cost - switched on £ 94.86
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 94.86
Purchase price £ 241.38
Total cost of ownership £ 336.24
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 115.37
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 116.91
Electricity cost - switched on £ 62.07
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Total running cost £ 62.07
Purchase price £ 199.98
Total cost of ownership £ 262.05
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.47T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.47 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
12
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.58T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.58 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
15
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.31T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.31 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported Video Modes
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
 HDCP
 HDCP
Display SRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 336.15mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 597.6mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
160°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
170°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 5000:1
 5000:1
 5000:1
BEST
 5000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.6cm
BEST
68.58cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms 5ms 4ms 1ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
 Audio input
DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data Bang & Olufsen ICEpower Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 6W
BEST
2W 4W
Number of Loudspeakers
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Built-In Subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating Systems Supported
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Picture-in-Picture
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Picture-in-Picture
Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 140mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 20 - -5 -5 - 20 -5 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
Unknown - Click to provide data
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
 VESA mounting
BEST
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
Number of OSD Languages
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 17 17
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
LED Indicators
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators

Power

Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Power Consumption (off)
0.36W
BEST
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
25.8W 37W 26W 24.21W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.49W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 100
 100-240
 9
 90-264
 90
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 100
 100-240
 9
 90-264
 90
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 100
 100-240
 9
 90-264
 90
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 100
 100-240
 9
 90-264
 90

Operational Conditions

Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
0 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 MPR II
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 MPR II
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 MPR II
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 MPR II
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg 7.2kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 537mm 490mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 114mm
BEST
132mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 700mm
BEST
715mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
3.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
432mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 488mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
179mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 215mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width (with Stand)
623.5mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 641mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
3.5kg
BEST
5.2kg 5.3kg 5.5kg
Height
373.38mm 441.3mm 380mm 478mm
Depth
40.64mm 225.2mm 57mm 213mm
Width
622.3mm 622.6mm 641mm 639mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
BEST
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
BEST
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
BEST
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual

Other Features

Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
HDMI
 HDMI
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Products Included
1pc(s) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Placement Supported
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback