DELL UP2715K vs Eizo FlexScan EV3237

(31)
(19)
Eizo FlexScan EV3237

Top Prices

Amazon UK
Checked 3 hours ago
Standard delivery: £7.99
In stock
ITC Sales
Checked 6 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Novatech
Checked 21 hours ago
Out of stock
Ebuyer Business
Checked 10 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 3 left!
Amazon UK
Checked 4 hours ago
Standard delivery: £7.99
Ebuyer
Checked 21 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock, only 3 left!

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL UP2715K has a display brightness of 350 cd/m², whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is only a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
10% lighter Edit
The DELL UP2715K is a 7.1kg weight PC monitor. That's 660g lighter than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 (7.8kg).
£605 cheaper
The DELL UP2715K is £604.99 cheaper than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237.
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
More popular
The DELL UP2715K is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 28184 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 ranks No. 133719.
User reviews are a lot better
The DELL UP2715K has an average user review score of 89%, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has an average rating of 70% (based on 2 reviews).
7 Reasons For
4.5" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has a display diagonal of 31.5", whereas the DELL UP2715K is only a 27" PC monitor (4.5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11.5cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is an 80cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the DELL UP2715K is only a 68.5cm display diagonal PC monitor (11.5cm smaller).
60% faster response time Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the DELL UP2715K (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

18% higher height adjustment Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has a height adjustment of 139mm. That's 24mm higher than the DELL UP2715K (139mm).
Significantly lower power consumption (max) Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 105W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the DELL UP2715K is a 170W maximum power consumption PC monitor (65W higher).
Cheaper to run by £183.06
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 only costs £79.47 to run over five years however the DELL UP2715K costs £262.53 to run (230% more). Read more
Expert reviews are a little better
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has an average expert review score of 84% based on 17 reviews, whereas the DELL UP2715K has an average rating of 83% (based on 17 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
4.5" smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL UP2715K has a display diagonal of 27", whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 31.5" PC monitor (4.5" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11.5cm smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The DELL UP2715K is a 68.5cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is an 80cm display diagonal PC monitor (11.5cm bigger).
38% slower response time Edit
The DELL UP2715K is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 (5ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

21% lower height adjustment Edit
The DELL UP2715K has a height adjustment of 115mm. That's 24mm lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 (139mm).
A lot higher power consumption (max) Edit
The DELL UP2715K is a 170W maximum power consumption PC monitor, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 105W maximum power consumption PC monitor (65W lower).
More expensive to run over five years by 230%
Over five years the running costs of the DELL UP2715K are £262.53 which is £183.06 more than the Eizo FlexScan EV3237. Show assumptions.
A little Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the DELL UP2715K is 83%, whereas the average expert rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is 84% (based on 17 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², whereas the DELL UP2715K is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
9% heavier Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is a 7.8kg weight PC monitor. That's 660g heavier than the DELL UP2715K (7.8kg).
£605 more expensive
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is more expensive than the DELL UP2715K by £604.99.
Fewer sellers
Only 8 stores sells the Eizo FlexScan EV3237, but 9 sellers sell the DELL UP2715K. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Five months older
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is older than the DELL UP2715K by five months.
Worse selling
The Eizo FlexScan EV3237 ranks No. 133719 by sales volume, whereas the DELL UP2715K ranks No. 28184.
A lot Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV3237 is only 70%, whereas the average user rating of the DELL UP2715K is 89% (based on 14 reviews).

Awards

6 Awards
chip.com.my: Outstanding
hardware.info: Ulitmate
hardwareluxx.de: Technical Award
hardwareluxx.ru: Technical Award
Trusted Reviews: Recommended
uk.hardware.info: Ulitmate
6 Awards
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
itwriter.ru: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
Lydogbilde.no: Best in Test 5 Star
megaobzor.com/: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

26 months Ago 30 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 256.38
Electricity cost - standby £ 6.15
Total running cost £ 262.53
Purchase price £ 523.00
Total cost of ownership £ 785.53
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 76.91
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 79.47
Purchase price £ 1,127.99
Total cost of ownership £ 1,207.46
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

1.3T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
33
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.39T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.39 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
27" 31.5"
BEST
Display
 LED
 LED
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Supported Video Modes
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
HD Type
 5K Ultra HD
BEST
 5K Ultra HD
HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 392mm
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 696.9mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.116 x 0.116 0.1815 x 0.1815
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal (metric)
68.5cm 80cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 5ms
BEST
Color Gamut
99% Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
218ppi Unknown - Click to provide data
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out
Headphone Outputs
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
Audio Input
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input
DisplayPorts Quantity
2 2
HDMI Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
6 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Number of Upstream Ports
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
32W Unknown - Click to provide data
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated

Design

Colour of Product
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Ergonomics

Height Adjustment
115mm 139mm
BEST
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 344
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
Stand-By LED
 Stand-by LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power LED
 Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
On/off Switch
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Input Current
1.8A Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (typical)
100W 30W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
1.2W 0.5W
BEST
Power Consumption (max)
170W 105W
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12191 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Relative Humidity (H-H)
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
10 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature (T-T)
0 - 50 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
13.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
542.1g
BEST
10.6kg
Height (with Stand)
427.6mm
BEST
578mm
Depth (with Stand)
204.5mm
BEST
245mm
Width (with Stand)
637.3mm
BEST
731mm
Weight
7.1kg
BEST
7.8kg
Height
384.6mm 428mm
Depth
47.9mm 59.5mm
Width
637.3mm 731mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
 Quick start guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
 USB
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 DisplayPort
Manual
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback