Asus PB328 vs LG 31MU97 vs Philips BDM3275

(7)
(39)
Asus PB328
LG 31MU97
Philips BDM3275

Top Prices

eBay
Checked 3 hours ago
Standard delivery: £275.03
Amazon UK
Checked 3 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Target PC 1-888-311-4455
Checked 3 hours ago
Delivery unknown
eBay
Checked 2 hours ago
Overclockers UK
Checked 1 hour ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
GNeStore_United
Checked 2 hours ago
Delivery unknown
Amazon UK
Checked 10 hours ago
Standard delivery: £5.28
In stock
Misco
Checked 18 hours ago
Standard delivery: £14.39
In stock, only 1 left!
BT Business Direct
Checked 20 hours ago
Standard delivery: £6.00
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
1" bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus PB328 has a display diagonal of 32" (as does the Philips BDM3275), whereas the LG 31MU97 is only a 31" PC monitor (1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

99% more display colour count Edit
Asus PB328 is 1,073.7M display colours. That's 1,056.93M more than the Philips BDM3275 (16.77M).
2x faster response time Edit
The Asus PB328 is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the LG 31MU97 (12ms) and 8ms faster than the Philips BDM3275 (12ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

PC Audio in Edit
The Asus PB328 has a PC Audio in, and so does the Philips BDM3275, whereas the LG 31MU97 does not have a PC Audio in.
£233 cheaper
The Asus PB328 is £232.50 cheaper than the LG 31MU97 and £378.31 cheaper than the Philips BDM3275.
More popular
The Asus PB328 is a more popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 46936 by sales volume in our PC monitors, whereas the LG 31MU97 ranks No. 123454 and the Philips BDM3275 ranks No. 91144.
6 Reasons For
Two HDMI ports quantitys Edit
The LG 31MU97 has two HDMI ports quantitys, however the Philips BDM3275 only has one HDMI ports quantity.
A lot higher RMS rated power Edit
The LG 31MU97 is a 10W RMS rated audio power PC monitor, whereas the Asus PB328 and the Philips BDM3275 are both only 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitors (4W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

9% lighter Edit
The LG 31MU97 is a 7.3kg weight PC monitor. That's 640g lighter than the Philips BDM3275 (7.9kg).
41% cheaper to run
The LG 31MU97 only costs £137.42 to run over five years but the Asus PB328 costs £233.05 to run (70% more) and the Philips BDM3275 costs £143.57 to run (4% more). Read more
Three more awards
The LG 31MU97 has 4 awards, whereas the Asus PB328 has 2 awards and the Philips BDM3275 has 1 award.
User reviews are a bit better
The LG 31MU97 has an average user review score of 77% based on 30 reviews, however the Asus PB328 has an average rating of 75% (based on 4 reviews).
9 Reasons For
Moderately bigger display diagonal Edit
The Philips BDM3275 has a display diagonal of 32" (as does the Asus PB328), however the LG 31MU97 is only a 31" PC monitor (1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

4% bigger viewable size, vertical Edit
The Philips BDM3275 has a viewable size, vertical of 398.52mm. That's 12.49mm bigger than the LG 31MU97 (398.52mm).
A little bigger viewable size, horizontal Edit
The Philips BDM3275 is a 708.48mm viewable width PC monitor, whereas the LG 31MU97 is only a 686.28mm viewable width PC monitor (22.2mm smaller).
2.56cm bigger display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Philips BDM3275 has a display diagonal (metric) of 81.3cm, however the Asus PB328 is only an 81.28cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm smaller) and the LG 31MU97 is only a 78.74cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.56cm smaller).
15% brighter display brightness Edit
The Philips BDM3275 has a display brightness of 350 cd/m², however the Asus PB328 is only a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer) and the LG 31MU97 is only a 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (30 cd/m² dimmer).
PC Audio in Edit
The Philips BDM3275 has a PC Audio in, and so does the Asus PB328, however the LG 31MU97 does not.
Longer mean time between failures (MTBF) Edit
The Philips BDM3275 has a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 70,000h. That's 20,000h longer than the LG 31MU97 (70,000h). Read more

THE Mean time before failure (mtbf) indicates the expected smooth lifetime of the product in terms of its actual use. This is arrived at through extensive testing of the product. After 30,000 hours it may work for another 30,000 but there are no guarantees.

Available from 7 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Expert reviews are better
Based on 1 review, the Philips BDM3275 has an average expert review score of 92%, however the LG 31MU97 has an average rating of 87% (based on 9 reviews).

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
Marginally smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The Asus PB328 is an 81.28cm display diagonal PC monitor, whereas the LG 31MU97 is a 78.74cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.54cm smaller) and the Philips BDM3275 is an 81.3cm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm bigger).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus PB328 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², whereas the LG 31MU97 is a 320 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² brighter) and the Philips BDM3275 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Asus PB328 is a one HDMI ports quantity PC monitor, and so does the Philips BDM3275, whereas the LG 31MU97 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
Hugely lower RMS rated power Edit
Asus PB328 is only 6W RMS rated audio power (as does the Philips BDM3275), but the LG 31MU97 is a 10W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Fewer sellers
Only 8 sellers sells the Asus PB328, but 10 stores sell the Philips BDM3275. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
More expensive to run over five years by 70%
The Asus PB328 costs £233.05 to run which is £95.63 more to run than the LG 31MU97 and £89.48 more to run than the Philips BDM3275 over five years. Show assumptions.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Asus PB328 has received 2 awards, the LG 31MU97 has received 4 awards.
Moderately Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Asus PB328 is only 75%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 31MU97 is 77% (based on 30 reviews).
13 Reasons Against
1" smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 31MU97 has a display diagonal of 31", however the Asus PB328 and the Philips BDM3275 are both 32" PC monitors (1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable size, vertical Edit
The LG 31MU97 has a viewable size, vertical of 386.03mm. That's 12.49mm smaller than the Philips BDM3275 (398.52mm).
22.2mm smaller viewable size, horizontal Edit
The LG 31MU97 is a 686.28mm viewable width PC monitor, whereas the Philips BDM3275 is a 708.48mm viewable width PC monitor (22.2mm bigger).
Moderately smaller display diagonal (metric) Edit
The LG 31MU97 has a display diagonal (metric) of 78.74cm, however the Asus PB328 is an 81.28cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.54cm bigger) and the Philips BDM3275 is an 81.3cm display diagonal PC monitor (2.56cm bigger).
30 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 31MU97 has a display brightness of 320 cd/m², however the Asus PB328 is a 300 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² dimmer) and the Philips BDM3275 is a 350 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (30 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The LG 31MU97 is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Asus PB328 (12ms) and 7ms faster than the Philips BDM3275 (12ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Does not have a PC Audio in Edit
The LG 31MU97 does not have a PC Audio in, but the Asus PB328 and the Philips BDM3275 have a PC Audio in.
40% shorter mean time between failures (MTBF) Edit
The LG 31MU97 has a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 50,000h. That's 20,000h shorter than the Philips BDM3275 (70,000h). Read more

THE Mean time before failure (mtbf) indicates the expected smooth lifetime of the product in terms of its actual use. This is arrived at through extensive testing of the product. After 30,000 hours it may work for another 30,000 but there are no guarantees.

£233 more expensive
The LG 31MU97 is more expensive than the Asus PB328 by £232.50.
Less retailers
Only 3 retailers sells the LG 31MU97, whereas 8 sellers sell the Asus PB328 and 10 retailers sell the Philips BDM3275. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Six months older
The LG 31MU97 is older than the Asus PB328 by six months and older than the Philips BDM3275 by six months.
Worse selling
The LG 31MU97 ranks No. 123454 by sales volume, however the Asus PB328 ranks No. 46936 and the Philips BDM3275 ranks No. 91144.
Lower expert review Score
The LG 31MU97's average expert rating is 87%, however the Philips BDM3275's is 92% (based on 1 review).
9 Reasons Against
Sixty-four times less display colour count Edit
The Philips BDM3275 is a 16.77M display colours PC monitor. That's 1,056.93M less than the Asus PB328 (16.77M).
Slower response time Edit
The Philips BDM3275 is a 12ms response time PC monitor. That's 8ms slower than the Asus PB328 (12ms) and 7ms slower than the LG 31MU97 (12ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI ports quantity Edit
The Philips BDM3275 has one HDMI ports quantity, and so does the Asus PB328, however the LG 31MU97 only has two HDMI ports quantitys.
4W lower RMS rated power Edit
The Philips BDM3275 is a 6W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (as does the Asus PB328), whereas the LG 31MU97 is a 10W RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Heavier Edit
The Philips BDM3275 is a 7.9kg weight PC monitor. That's 640g heavier than the LG 31MU97 (7.9kg).
£378 more expensive
The Philips BDM3275 is more expensive than the Asus PB328 by £378.31 and more expensive than the LG 31MU97 by £145.81.
4% higher running costs over five years
The Philips BDM3275 costs £143.57 to run which is £6.15 more to run than the LG 31MU97 over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse selling
The Philips BDM3275 ranks No. 91144 by sales volume, however the Asus PB328 ranks No. 46936.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Philips BDM3275 has received 1 award, the Asus PB328 has received 2 awards and the LG 31MU97 has received 4 awards.

Awards

2 Awards
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor's Choice
tomshardware.com: Editor's Choice
4 Awards
hardware.info: Ulitmate
ixbt.com: Original Design
pcauthority.com.au: Recommended
uk.hardware.info: Ulitmate
1 Award
mobimaniak.pl: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

22 months Ago 29 months Ago 22 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 230.49
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 233.05
Purchase price £ 427.49
Total cost of ownership £ 660.54
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 135.88
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.54
Total running cost £ 137.42
Purchase price £ 659.99
Total cost of ownership £ 797.41
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 141.01
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.56
Total running cost £ 143.57
Purchase price £ 805.80
Total cost of ownership £ 949.37
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data
No data

Environmental Impact

1.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
30
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.68T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.68 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.71T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.71 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
18
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
32"
BEST
31" 32"
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
BEST
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
 3D
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 2560 x 1440
 4096 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
 4096 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 4096 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
HDCP
 HDCP
Unknown - Click to provide data
 HDCP
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Display SRGB
 Display sRGB
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Display sRGB
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sync-on-green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Separate H/V sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
49 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
29 - 130 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size, Vertical
Unknown - Click to provide data 386.03mm 398.52mm
BEST
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Unknown - Click to provide data 686.28mm 708.48mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
49 - 76 56 - 61 56 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 30 - 134 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.277 x 0.277 0.1675 x 0.1675 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
1,073.7M
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Viewing Angle, Vertical
178° 178° 178°
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
178° 178° 178°
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal (metric)
81.28cm 78.74cm 81.3cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 320 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
4ms
BEST
5ms 12ms
DDC/CI
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 DDC/CI
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
BEST
 16:9
 16:9
BEST
Display Number of Colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
BEST
 PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
BEST
Headphone Outputs
1 1 1
Audio Output
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio output
Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPorts Quantity
1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB 3.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Ports Quantity
1 2
BEST
1
DVI-D Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPorts Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB Type-A Downstream Ports Quantity
4 4 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
AC (power) in
 AC (power) in
Unknown - Click to provide data
 AC (power) in

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
 Built-in camera
RMS Rated Power
6W 10W
BEST
6W
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2 2
TV Tuner Integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
 TV tuner integrated
Built-In Subwoofer
 Built-in subwoofer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Recyclable Material
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 65%
Feet Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metals Free
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)
 Hg (mercury)
 Pb (lead)

Performance

Card Reader Integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Card reader integrated
Unknown - Click to provide data
Mac Operating Systems Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating systems supported
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
Unknown - Click to provide data 50,000h 70,000h
BEST

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed
 Thin client installed

Networking

Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Ethernet LAN
Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 180mm
Height Adjustment
 Height adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Height adjustment
Tilt Angle
20 - -5 -15 - 15 -5 - 20
Tilt Adjustment
 Tilt adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
Swivelling
 Swivelling
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Swivelling
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -170 - 170
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
Pivot
 Pivot
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Pivot
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
 Plug and Play
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
 On/off switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
 CHI (TR)
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 DEU
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
 CHI (TR)
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 DEU
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (SIMPL)
 DUT
 GRE
 DEU
 TUR
 HUN
 KOR
BEST
On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
 B
Power Consumption (PowerSave)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (off)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Power Consumption (typical)
89.9W 53W
BEST
55W
Power Consumption (standby)
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 77kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3658
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Operating Relative Humidity (H-H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
BEST
Energy Star Certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
 Energy Star certified
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
16.5kg 12.3kg 1.5kg
BEST
Package Height
552mm 510mm
BEST
526mm
Package Depth
350mm 152mm
BEST
224mm
Package Width
847mm
BEST
972mm 970mm
Weight With Stand
11.8kg 9.3kg 1.1kg
BEST
Height (with Stand)
625mm 623.5mm
BEST
657mm
Depth (with Stand)
242mm 241.4mm
BEST
270mm
Width (with Stand)
735mm
BEST
736.7mm 742mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.3kg
BEST
7.9kg
Height
431mm 407.5mm 438mm
Depth
66.85mm 52.4mm 61mm
Width
734.4mm 736.7mm 742mm

Packaging Content

Cables Included
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data
User Guide On CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data
 User Guide on CD-ROM
Unknown - Click to provide data

Other Features

Power Consumption (economy Mode)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5W
Power Consumption (active)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 55W
Package Dimensions (WxDxH)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 970 x 526 x 224
Regulatory Approvals
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data CE Mark, FCC Class B, BSMI, KCC, E-standby, ICES-003, KC, J-MOSS, cETLus, EPA, TUV/GS, TUV Ergo, TCO 6.0, PSB, CU-EAC, SEMKO, SASO, KUCAS, UKRAINIAN, PSE, CECP, WEEE
Recyclable Packaging Material
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 100

Technical Details

ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Feedback