Nine AOC q2963Pm reviewers mentioned in their reviews that it was good value for money. J. Clark mentioned in their review of this PC monitor on Amazon “The movie watching experience cannot be rivalled in this range and at this price it's about as good as it gets for gaming immersion”. John Sealey scored the product 80 out of 100 and he mentioned on Amazon “Good value and looks good”. Mark Twain wrote three years ago “For the money I am happy” in his review of this PC monitor.
Several customers who reviewed this PC monitor considered that it was a bargain for the price. Three years ago Anthro rated the AOC q2963Pm 4 stars and said on Amazon “Edge of screen is a little cheap and weak.”. Jen wrote in her review on Amazon “Verdict 1 star too generousBadly madetemperamental3 failed units in a row within 1 1/2 monthssome parts shoddy cheap plasticPlease spare yourself the headache” although she scored it 20 out of 100. Simon Scarlett mentioned “I was a bit apprehensive at first due to the cost (so cheap”.
One person who reviewed the AOC q2963Pm wrote that it was cheap. Expert website Hexus.net wrote four years ago “Gamers understand that modern graphics cards are able to play the latest games at resolutions way above the standard 1,920x1,080 (1080p) available on a wide range of inexpensive monitors” in their review of the AOC q2963Pm.