28 Images + 8 Videos
Share on

Loading image...


Overall Score


A 2 year old 2560 x 1440 PC display
32" 2560 X 1440 Pixels 10000000:1 LED Sep 2015
Display Diagonal Display Resolution Contrast Ratio (dynamic) Display Release Date
Ex Demo Hut
Checked 1 hour ago
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Checked 6 hours ago
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
2 Prices from 2 Stores
Get Price Alerts
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

You are subscribed to price alerts for this product

HP ENVY 32 Review

8 Reviews
Missing Some Features
1 Year Old
£134 Over 8 Years
Overall Score

Why Has it Scored 33?

It has average user reviews with 50% of buyers recommending this PC monitor to others. NEC flatpanel monitors have excellent reviews in general.
At over a year old this PC display is slightly out of date, and newer PC displays with more up to date technology are available. View the latest PC screens 2017.
This PC monitor has an energy efficiency classification of A+, however its running costs of £134 over 8 years are in the most expensive 14% of all 2,768 LCD screens that we have compared it to.
It is missing some features:
Quite slow response time

HP ENVY 32 Video Reviews

HP ENVY 32 In-Depth Analysis


Owner Reviews Are Average

The average owner rating of this PC screen is 68% based on 8 owner reviews. 50% of those asked said they would recommend buying it to others.

View all user reviews

HP Has Very Good Flatpanel Monitor Reviews

We checked 2,265 owner and expert reviews (including 484 verified purchases) for HP PC displays and found that on average HP has very good ratings compared to other brands. 89% of those that bought a HP LCD screen would recommend the product that they bought to other buyers.


2560 X 1440 Pixels Display Resolution

The largest display resolution of the ENVY 32 is 2560 x 1440 pixels. That's 78% larger resolution than the most common resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The worst resolution of all LCD screens is 320 x 240 pixels and the best is 5120 x 2880 pixels.

What does "display resolution" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Slow Response Time

The fastest response time of LCD screens is 1ms, the slowest is 55ms, and the average response time is 5.7ms. The ENVY 32's response time of 7ms is fairly slow compared to most other flatpanel monitors. It is in the slowest 19% of all PC screens when ranked by this feature.

What does "response time" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Two HDMI Ports

The HP ENVY 32 is a two HDMI port flatpanel monitor.

What does "HDMI port" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Very Wide Viewing Angle, Horizontal

PC monitors have viewing angles, horizontal of between 17° and 180°, and the average viewing angle, horizontal is 170°. The viewing angle, horizontal of the ENVY 32 of 178° is fairly wide compared to most other PC monitors. It is in the widest 5% of all LCD screens when sorted by this feature.

What does "viewing angle, horizontal" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has a Built-In Speaker(s)

The ENVY 32 has a built-in speaker(s). 53% of LCD screens do not have a built-in speaker(s).

What is a built-in speaker(s)? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit


Released Over a Year Ago

HP released the ENVY 32 in September 2015.

Running Costs

Very High Running Costs

The energy efficiency classification of this PC display is A+, however based on average energy prices we estimate that the ENVY 32 will cost £134 over 8 years to run, which is in the most expensive 14% of all 2,768 LCD screens.

Calculate your own running costs

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers hp n9c43aaabu, hp 2560x1440, hp g8z02aa
Barcodes 00888182929834, 00888182929858, 00888182929865, 00888182929889, 00888182929926, 00888182929933, 00888182929964, 00888182929971, 00889894073655, 00889894073662, 00889894073679, 00889894073686, 00889894073693, 00889894073709, 00889894073716, 00889894073723, 00889894073730, 00889894073747, 00889894073754, 00889899377475, 08881829298104

Other Popular Comparisons With The HP ENVY 32

51% cheaper to run
Vastly better user reviews
2ms faster response time
One less HDMI port