Share on
HP LP2465
HP LP2465
2 Images + 3 Videos

Loading image...

HP LP2465 PC Monitor

24" 1920 X 1200 LCD 554mm Jun 2014
Display Diagonal Display Resolution Display Width Release Date £202.55 Electricity cost over 5 years
1920 x 1200 pixels display resolution
HP PC monitors have good reviews
Does not have a built-in speaker(s)
21 Reviews
1 Price from 1 Store | £150.00 | Get Price Alerts
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product


Released Over Three Years Ago

It was June 2014 when this PC screen was released.


Does Not Have a Built-In Speaker(s)

The HP LP2465 does not have a built-in speaker(s). Most of the other LCD screens of a similar age and spec to this PC monitor do have a built-in speaker(s).

What is a built-in speaker(s)? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit


HP PC Monitors Have Good Reviews

We checked 2,072 owner and expert reviews (including 394 verified purchases) for HP PC monitors and found that on average HP has good reviews compared to other brands. We also found that HP has good reviews specifically for its medium monitors. 91% of those that bought a HP flatpanel monitor would recommend the product that they bought to other buyers.


1920 X 1200 Pixels Display Resolution

The HP LP2465 has a maximum display resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels. That's 11% more display resolution than the most frequently found display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Across all flatpanel monitors of a comparable age and spec to this PC screen the best display resolution is 3440 x 1440 pixels and the worst is 1366 x 768 pixels.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Wide Viewing Angle, Vertical

The viewing angles, vertical of PC screens of a comparable age and type to this LCD screen range from 10° to 180°. The HP LP2465 has one of the wider viewing angles, vertical (178 degrees) amongst PC displays of this age.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has a Sync-On-Green (SOG)

The HP LP2465 has a sync-on-green (SOG), as do most of the other LCD screens of a similar age and type to this flatpanel monitor.

What is a sync-on-green (SOG)? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has a Separate H/V Sync

The HP LP2465 has a separate H/V sync. Most of the other medium monitors that have been around for around the same time as this flatpanel monitor also have a separate H/V sync.

What is a separate H/V sync? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit


Running Costs Are High

The LP2465 has an average 8 year running cost of £203 based on typical energy prices, which makes it one of the more expensive to run comparable spec PC monitors that were released more than two years ago.


Has an Energy Star Certified

The HP LP2465 has an Energy Star certified. Most of the other medium monitors that have been on the market for around the same time as this PC screen also have an Energy Star certified.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers hp ef224a4approved, hp ef224at
Barcodes 00882780065338

HP LP2465 Review Sources

To prepare this HP LP2465 review we compared this PC monitor to 3,052 other models. For each PC monitor that we compared, we collated thousands of pieces of information including technical specs, reviews, and prices. In total we analysed 692,148 product attributes, 78,562 PC monitor reviews and 8,073,300 historical PC monitor prices from 203 PC monitor retailers. We then picked out the standout features of this PC monitor compared to the other models as well as any areas where this PC monitor is lacking.

Other PC Monitors to Consider

A bit better expert reviews
PC review is much better review is better
£280.42 more expensive to run over five years
Eizo FlexScan EV3237

FlexScan EV3237

£ 1,101.00
Cheaper to run by £81.25
Newer by 16 months
Better expert reviews
Dimmer display brightness


£ 349.00
5.1kg lighter
Cheaper to run by £62.02
Better expert reviews
Smaller viewable width


£ 352.76
Hugely lighter
£96.21 cheaper to run
Hugely dimmer display brightness
Samsung S22C200B


£ 104.99
£93.29 cheaper to run
7.7kg lighter
Newer by nine months
Dimmer display brightness
LG 34UM95


£ 661.98
More display colour count
Expert reviews are moderately better
Three less USB 2.0 ports