Lenovo LT2013S
Lenovo LT2013
5 Images
Share on

Loading image...


Overall Score

Lenovo LT2013S

A very economical to run 1600 x 900 PC screen with OK reviews but inferior features
19.5" 1600 X 900 Pixels 500000:1 LED Jun 2013
Display Diagonal Display Resolution Contrast Ratio (dynamic) Display Release Date
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Go to Store
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
1 Price from 1 Store | £93.00
Get Price Alerts
Sorry, no international prices found
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Lenovo LT2013 Review

With low running costs but good reviews, we have ranked the Lenovo LT2013 number 996 across all PC monitors.
4 Reviews
Missing Some Features
4 Years Old
£47 Over 8 Years
Overall Score

Why Has it Scored 40?

It has average expert reviews and below average user reviews with an average overall rating of 67%. NEC flatpanel monitors have excellent reviews in general.
This PC monitor is over 2 years old and it is likely that newer, better LCD screens are available. View the latest PC displays 2017.
It has running costs of only £47 over 8 years, which puts it in the cheapest 13% of all 2,772 flatpanel monitors that we have compared it to.
This Lenovo PC monitor is missing some features:
Does not have a built-in USB hub
Does not have a built-in speaker(s)
Only 1600 x 900 pixels display resolution

Lenovo LT2013 In-Depth Analysis


Expert Reviews Are Average

The average expert rating of this LCD screen is 70% based on two expert reviews from sites including PC Mag and

View all expert reviews

Lenovo Has Very Good LCD Screen Reviews

We checked 168 owner and expert reviews (including 16 verified purchases) for Lenovo PC screens and found that on average Lenovo has very good reviews compared to other brands. 25% of those that bought a Lenovo PC screen would recommend the product that they bought to other buyers.

Value For Money

Mediocre Value for Money

The product has excellent reviews but mediocre features and is over 6 months old. However at £93.00 it is cheaper than 86% of flatpanel monitors.


Does Not Have a Built-In USB Hub

Like most other flatpanel monitors, the Lenovo LT2013 does not have a built-in USB hub. 84% of flatpanel monitors do not have a built-in USB hub.

What is a built-in USB hub? Less Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Speaker(s)

Like most other flatpanel monitors, the Lenovo LT2013 does not have a built-in speaker(s). 53% of PC monitors do not have a built-in speaker(s).

What is a built-in speaker(s)? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Only 1600 X 900 Pixels Display Resolution

The Lenovo LT2013 has a maximum display resolution of 1600 x 900 pixels. That's 31% smaller display resolution than a 1920 x 1080 pixels LCD screen, which is the most common resolution. Across all flatpanel monitors the best resolution is 5120 x 2880 pixels and the worst is 320 x 240 pixels.

What does "display resolution" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit


Released Over Four Years Ago

Lenovo released the LT2013 in June 2013.

Running Costs

Low Running Costs

Based on fine usage levels and energy prices we estimate that the 8 year running cost of the LT2013 is only £47, which is in the cheapest 13% of all 2,772 PC displays.

Calculate your own running costs

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers lenovo americas lenovoamericas60abaar1us, lenovo americas 1600x900, lenovo americas lt2013s, lenovo 60abaar1us, lenovo 1600x900, lenovo lt2013s, lenovo lt2013p
Barcodes 00062131462768, 00088022119733, 00803982938473, 00807320177760, 00809392589991, 00887770180107, 00887942154028, 00887942154066, 00887942154073, 00887942154080, 00887942154097, 00887942154110, 00887942154141, 00887942154189, 00887942154257, 05054533649323, 08877701800848, 08879421540288

Other Popular Comparisons With The Lenovo LT2013

User reviews are vastly better
19% bigger display diagonal
11% wider viewing angle, vertical
£7 More Expensive
£8 Cheaper
Vastly better user reviews
Faster response time
£1.28 more expensive to run over five years
User reviews are hugely better
£9 More Expensive
11% wider viewing angle, vertical
6% cheaper to run
Wider viewing angle, horizontal
£24 More Expensive
£33 Cheaper
User reviews are hugely better
7% higher running costs over five years