Close
Share on
Neovo RX-24
Neovo RX-24

Loading image...

Neovo RX-24 PC Monitor

23.6" 1920 X 1080 LCD Jul 2012
A+
Display Diagonal Display Resolution Display Built-In Speaker(s) Release Date £71.78 Electricity cost over 5 years
Has a built-in speaker(s)
Features Picture-in-Picture support
Quite narrow viewing angle, vertical
See All 2 Prices from 2 Stores | £432.67 | Get Price Alerts
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe

Energy

Running Costs Are OK

The energy efficiency classification of this PC screen is A+, and the RX-24 has an average 8 year running cost of £72 based on typical usage levels and energy prices, which is typical compared to the other 1,092 medium monitors that were released more than two years ago.


Other

Released Over Four Years Ago

This LCD screen was released in July 2012.


Multimedia

Has a Built-In Speaker(s)

The Neovo RX-24 has a built-in speaker(s). Most of the other LCD screens that are a similar age to this flatpanel monitor also have a built-in speaker(s).

What is a built-in speaker(s)? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Ergonomics

Features Picture-in-Picture Support

The Neovo RX-24 features Picture-in-Picture support, as do most of the other PC screens that are a similar age to this PC monitor.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Display

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This LCD screen has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is typical of many medium monitors that were released around the same time as it.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Narrow Viewing Angle, Vertical

Across all the PC monitors of this type and age the viewing angles, vertical range from 10° to 180°, and the average viewing angle, vertical is 170°. With a viewing angle, vertical of only 160 degrees, the Neovo RX-24 has one of the narrower viewing angles, vertical amongst similar spec PC displays of this age.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Narrow Viewing Angle, Horizontal

With a viewing angle, horizontal of only 170 degrees, the Neovo RX-24 has one of the narrower viewing angles, horizontal amongst medium monitors of this age. The narrowest viewing angle, horizontal of PC screens of this type and age is 18°, the widest is 1,800°, and the average viewing angle, horizontal is 170°.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Very Fast Response Time

The average response time of flatpanel monitors of this age and type is 6.1ms. The Neovo RX-24 has a quite fast response time (only 3 milliseconds) compared to most of the other PC displays of a similar age and type to this PC screen.

What does "response time" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers ag neovo 1920x1080, ag neovo b41zza00, ag neovo b41zzs00, neovo rx24black, ag neovo rx24b
Barcodes 04710739591965

Neovo RX-24 Review Sources

To prepare this Neovo RX-24 review we compared this PC monitor to 3,052 other models. For each PC monitor that we compared, we collated thousands of pieces of information including technical specs, reviews, and prices. In total we analysed 692,148 product attributes, 78,562 PC monitor reviews and 8,073,300 historical PC monitor prices from 203 PC monitor retailers. We then picked out the standout features of this PC monitor compared to the other models as well as any areas where this PC monitor is lacking.

Other PC Monitors to Consider

Two times shallower
More display resolution
Higher resolution
40% slower response time
Acer B276

Acer
B276

£ 254.99
Two times shallower
Two years newer
Twice the resolution
Vastly higher annual energy consumption
HP Z Display Z24

HP
Z Display Z24

£ 425.00
Significantly shallower
Better HD type
1920 x 1200 pixels display resolution
Vastly slower response time
DELL U2713H

DELL
U2713H

£ 349.00
2x shallower
Better display type
Newer by one year
Significantly slower response time
DELL U2413

DELL
U2413

£ 199.00
1,053.8M more display colour count
LED Display
1920 x 1200 (WUXGA) graphics resolutions
£52.88 more expensive to run over five years
NEC MultiSync PA242

NEC
MultiSync PA242

£ 756.00
More display colour count
Shallower
Better display type
94% higher running costs over five years
Feedback