Close

Loading image...
Philips 226V4LAB/75
5 Images

Philips 226V4LAB/75 PC Monitor

21.5" 1920 X 1080 10000000:1 LED Aug 2015
Display Diagonal Display Resolution Contrast Ratio (dynamic) Display Release Date
Enjoy vivid LED pictures with this attractive, glossy design display. Equipped with stereo speakers and SmartControl lite, it's a great choice! SmartContrast is a Philips technology that analyzes... More
£56.53 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

3 Reasons For

Has a Built-In Speaker(s)

The 226V4LAB/75 has a built-in speaker(s). Most of the other medium monitors that came out more than a year ago do not have a built-in speaker(s).

Read more Less Chart Edit

Philips Has Good Reviews for Its PC Screens

Philips medium monitors have good ratings on average and across all flatpanel monitors Philips is one of the better rated brands.

Light

Across all the medium monitors that came out around the same time as the 226V4LAB/75 the weights range from 2.6g to 79kg, and the average weight is 5kg. The 226V4LAB/75 is fairly light (only 3 kilograms) compared to most of the other medium monitors that have been on the market for around the same time as the 226V4LAB/75.

Chart Edit

12 Reasons Against

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

Like most of the other flatpanel monitors of a comparable type and age to the 226V4LAB/75, the 226V4LAB/75 does not have a built-in camera.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Card Reader Integrated

Most PC displays of a comparable type and age to the 226V4LAB/75 do not have a card reader integrated. The 226V4LAB/75 is no exception to this as it too does not have a card reader integrated.

We compared all the other PC displays which also have a card reader integrated to this LCD screen and we think the 2407WFP, or the 2408WFP both from DELL which is also higher rated is also worth considering.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Not 3D

The Philips 226V4LAB/75 is not 3D, although this is within the context that most of the other comparable spec LCD screens that came out more than a year ago are also not 3D.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Only 1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This PC screen has a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is typical of many medium monitors that have been available for more than a year.

Chart Edit

Very Short Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)

The Philips 226V4LAB/75 has a quite short mean time between failures (MTBF) (only 30 hours) compared to most of the other medium monitors that have been available for a similar time to the 226V4LAB/75. Across all the medium monitors that were released one year ago the mean time between failures (MTBF)s range from 30h to 70,000h, and the average mean time between failures (MTBF) is 41,000h.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Very Small Viewable Size, Vertical

The 226V4LAB/75 has one of the smaller viewable size, verticals (only 268.11 millimeters) amongst similar spec PC monitors of this age. The smallest viewable size, vertical of PC displays that have been available for around the same time as the 226V4LAB/75 is 240mm and the biggest is 800mm.

Chart Edit

Only HD HD Type

This PC monitor has a Full HD HD type, which is typical of many medium monitors that have been available for around the same time as it.

Chart Edit

Very Small Display Diagonal (metric)

The Philips 226V4LAB/75 has one of the smaller display diagonal (metric)s (only 54.6 centimeters) amongst similar spec PC screens of this age. Across all the medium monitors that have been on the market for more than a year the display diagonal (metric)s range from 48cm to 89cm.

Chart Edit

Quite Small Viewable Size, Horizontal

The viewable size, horizontals of medium monitors that are a similar age to the 226V4LAB/75 range from 290mm to 800mm. At only 476.64 millimeters, the Philips 226V4LAB/75 has a fairly small viewable size, horizontal compared to most of the other PC monitors of this spec and age.

Chart Edit

Quite Narrow Viewing Angle, Vertical

The Philips 226V4LAB/75 has one of the narrower viewing angle, verticals (only 160 degrees) amongst medium monitors of this age. The viewing angle, verticals of medium monitors that have been on the market for more than a year range from 10° to 180°.

Chart Edit

Quite Narrow Viewing Angle, Horizontal

Across all the PC screens of a comparable spec and age to the 226V4LAB/75 the viewing angle, horizontals range from 18° to 180°, and the average viewing angle, horizontal is 170°. The 226V4LAB/75 has a fairly narrow viewing angle, horizontal (only 170 degrees) compared to most of the other comparable spec flatpanel monitors that are a similar age to the 226V4LAB/75.

Chart Edit

Quite High Power Consumption (off)

Medium monitors that came out more than a year ago have power consumption (off)s of between 0.005W and 350W, and the average power consumption (off) is 1.6W. With a power consumption (off) of 0.5 Watts, the 226V4LAB/75 has a fairly high power consumption (off) compared to most of the other medium monitors that have been on the market for a similar time to the 226V4LAB/75.

Chart Edit

3 Other reasons to consider the Philips 226V4LAB/75

Average Running Costs

The 226V4LAB/75 is typical compared to the other 550 LCD screens of a comparable spec and age that we have assessed for 8 year running costs. Based on average usage levels and energy prices, we estimate the 8 year running cost of the 226V4LAB/75 is £57.

Released Over a Year Ago

This PC display has been on the market for over a year.

LED Display

This flatpanel monitor has an LED display, which is the most commonly found display on PC displays that are a comparable age to it.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Specification

Display
Display Diagonal
Display Resolution
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
Display
3D
Backlight Type
HD Type
HDCP
Display SRGB
Sync-On-Green (SOG)
Separate H/V Sync
Digital Vertical Frequency
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Viewable Size, Vertical
Viewable Size, Horizontal
Aspect Ratio
Pixel Pitch
Display Colour Count
Viewing Angle, Vertical
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Contrast Ratio (typical)
Display Diagonal (metric)
Display Technology
Display Brightness
Response Time
DDC/CI
Native Aspect Ratio
Display Number of Colours
Ports & Interfaces
PC Audio in
DVI-D Ports Quantity
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
DVI Port
Multimedia
Built-In Speaker(s)
Built-In Camera
RMS Rated Power
Number of Loudspeakers
TV Tuner Integrated
Design
Colour of Product
Heavy Metals Free
Performance
Mac Operating Systems Supported
Windows Operating Systems Supported
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
Thin Client
Thin Client Installed
Ergonomics
Height Adjustment
Tilt Angle
VESA Mounting Interfaces
VESA Mounting
Stand-By LED
Power LED
On/off Switch
On Screen Display (OSD) Languages
On Screen Display (OSD)
Power
Power Consumption (off)
Power Consumption (typical)
Power Consumption (standby)
AC Input Frequency
AC Input Voltage
Operational Conditions
Relative Humidity
Storage Temperature (T-T)
Operating Temperature (T-T)
Certificates
Energy Star Certified
EPEAT Compliance
Weight & Dimensions
Package Weight
Package Height
Package Depth
Package Width
Weight With Stand
Height (with Stand)
Depth (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Weight
Height
Depth
Width
Other Features
Power Consumption (active)
Effective Viewing Area
Package Dimensions (WxDxH)
Dimensions (W X D X H) With Stand

Brochures and Manuals

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on £53.97
Electricity cost when on standby £2.56
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on £0.00
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years £56.53
Running costs for this PC monitor have been estimated based on other similar PC monitors. If you know how much electricity and water the Philips 226V4LAB/75uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
0.28T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.28 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 8 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

+- Manufacturer's Description

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers 226v4lab75, home 226v4, home 226v4l, apple 226v4, home 226v4la, apple 226v4l, home 226v4lab, apple 226v4la, apple 226v4lab, phillips 226v4, home 226v4lab00, phillips 226v4l, philips p152520, philips p152520p, phillips 226v4la, phillips 226v4lab, phillips 226v4lab00, philips phi226v4lab
Barcodes 08712581653637

Save Money with These Great PC Monitor Vouchers & Offers

£30 Off
Voucher
£30 Off a £300+ spend
Valid 3 Feb 17 - 31 May 17
5% Off
Voucher
Spend over £49 get up to 5% Off
Valid 6 Feb 17 - 6 Mar 17
Free Next Day Delivery
Voucher
Free Next Day Delivery over £100
Valid 1 Feb 17 - 28 Feb 17
20% Off
Voucher
20% Off First Order
Valid 3 Feb 17 - 31 May 17

See How Other PC Monitors Compare to the Philips 226V4LAB/75

DELL UP2715K vs Philips 226V4LAB/75

DELL UP2715K vs Philips 226V4LAB/75
DELL UP2715K Philips 226V4LAB/75
£ 598.80 £0.00
1,056.93M More Display Colour Count
88% Higher RMS Rated Audio Power
Brighter Display Brightness
Bigger Screen Size
£130.78 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
4.1kg Heavier

Philips 227E6 vs Philips 226V4LAB/75

Philips 227E6 vs Philips 226V4LAB/75
Philips 227E6 Philips 226V4LAB/75
£ 89.99 £0.00
29,970h Longer Mean Time Between Failures
Lower Power Consumption When Off
5.53W Lower Power Consumption When Active
12mm Shallower
9ms Slower Response Time
Older by Four Months

241P6VPJKEB vs 226V4LAB/75

Philips 241P6VPJKEB vs Philips 226V4LAB/75
Philips 241P6VPJKEB Philips 226V4LAB/75
£ 377.60 £0.00
69,970h Longer Mean Time Between Failures
More Display Colour Count
50 Cd/m² Brighter Display Brightness
18° Wider Vertical Viewing Angle
Significantly Lower User Review Score
39% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Feedback