Close
NEC NPL102W
NEC NP-L102
7 Images
Share on

Loading image...

63

Overall Score

NEC NPL102W

An economical to run 10000:1 280 x 800 projector with OK reviews and alright features
10000:1 WXGA (1280x800) No 30dB Feb 2014
Contrast Ratio (typical) Projector Native Resolution 3D Noise Level Release Date

Sorry, currently not available from shops in the United Kingdom.
Check international prices

Notify Me When Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Sorry, no international prices found
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

NEC NP-L102 Review

With very low running costs and representing very good value for money, we have scored the NEC NP-L102 as follows for Summary.
62
1 Review
76
Very Good
52
Average Features
48
3 Years Old
93
£36 Over 1 Year
Overall Score
63
Good

Why Has it Scored 63?

It has average expert reviews with an average expert rating of 70%. Sony projectors have excellent reviews in general.
This projector is over 2 years old and it is likely that newer, better projectors are available. View the latest data projectors 2017.
It has running costs of only £36 over 1 year, which puts it in the cheapest 6% of all 1,763 projectors that we have compared it to.
This NEC projector has some good features, but is also missing a few features:
Has a carrying case
Quite long service life of lamp
Only 280 x 800 resolution
Very dim projector brightness

NEC NP-L102 In-Depth Analysis


Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers necmitsubishi electronics hnpl102w, necmitsubishi electronics npl102w, necmitsubishi electronics l102w, visipax prnpl102w, visipax npl102w, generic npl102w, generic l102w, nec npl102w
Barcodes 00000011331996, 0008.05736E+11, 00746320015361, 00779184227854, 00799198921470, 00805736051650, 00808406263995, 04923113163904, 08057360516506

Other Popular Comparisons With The NEC NP-L102

2 ANSI lumens brighter projector brightness
Higher running costs over five years by £58.26
Brighter projector brightness
More expensive to run over five years by 163%

Feedback