Share on
Cello C85238 vs Samsung ED75E

Cello C85238 vs Samsung ED75E

Cello C85238
Samsung ED75E

Top Prices

No prices found
Misco
Checked 21 hours ago
Standard delivery: £18.00
In stock (26 available)
Transparent
Checked 9 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock
Communications Solutions
Checked 5 hours ago
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
12% larger display diagonal Edit
The Cello C85238 has a display diagonal of 85", however the Samsung ED75E is only a 75" TV (10" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

Higher RMS rated power Edit
The Cello C85238 is a 16W RMS rated power TV. That's 6W higher than the Samsung ED75E (10W). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Energy efficiency rating is higher
The Cello C85238 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", but the Samsung ED75E has a rating of "B".
4 Reasons For
38% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung ED75E is a 400 cd/m² display brightness TV. That's 150 cd/m² brighter than the Cello C85238 (400 cd/m²).
11.3mm thinner Edit
The Samsung ED75E is a 57.7mm thick TV, whereas the Cello C85238 is a 69mm thick TV (11.3mm thicker). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

PC in (D-Sub) port Edit
The Samsung ED75E has a PC in (D-Sub) port, but the Cello C85238 does not. Read more

The socket (port) to receive input from a PC via a D-sub, which is a connector with a characteristic D-shaped metal shield.

£72.72 cheaper to run
The Samsung ED75E only costs £346.34 to run over five years whereas the Cello C85238 costs £419.06 to run (21% more). Read more

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Significantly dimmer display brightness Edit
The Cello C85238 has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², whereas the Samsung ED75E is a 400 cd/m² display brightness TV (150 cd/m² brighter).
11.3mm thicker Edit
The Cello C85238 is a 69mm thick TV. That's 11.3mm thicker than the Samsung ED75E (57.7mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by three months
The Cello C85238 is three months older than the Samsung ED75E.
Higher running costs over five years by £72.72
The Cello C85238 costs £419.06 to run which is £72.72 more to run than the Samsung ED75E over five years. Show assumptions.
3 Reasons Against
14% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung ED75E is a 75" TV. That's 10" smaller than the Cello C85238 (75"). Read more

The display diagonal of a TV is the most common measure of screen size and is the distance from the top left to the bottom right of the visible part of a TV screen excluding any frame or border. One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies.

Significantly lower RMS rated power Edit
The Samsung ED75E has an RMS rated power of 10W, whereas the Cello C85238 is a 16W RMS rated power TV (6W higher). Read more

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Energy efficiency rating is inferior
The Samsung ED75E has an energy efficiency rating of "B", but the Cello C85238 has a rating of "A".

Date Released

21 months Ago 18 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 416.62
Electricity cost - standby £ 2.44
Total running cost £ 419.06
Electricity cost - switched on £ 344.51
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 346.34
Purchase price £ 3,566.87
Total cost of ownership £ 3,913.21
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

2.1T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 2.1 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
53
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1.7T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 1.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
44
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
85"
BEST
75"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
Contrast Ratio (typical)
 5000:1
BEST
 5000:1
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Comb Filter
 3D
BEST
 3D
Noise Reduction
 Noise reduction
Unknown - Click to provide data
Response Time
Unknown - Click to provide data 4ms
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 400 cd/m²
BEST
Contrast Ratio (dynamic)
 5000:1
 5000:1
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Display Refresh Rate Supported
 120 Hz
BEST
 120 Hz

Audio

Audio System
Nicam / A2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
 Built-in speaker
RMS Rated Power
16W
BEST
10W
Loudspeaker
2 2

Design

LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
Colour
 Black
 Black

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
260W 215W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.4W 0.3W
BEST
Energy Efficiency Class
 A
BEST
 A
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 314kWh
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50

TV Tuner

Tuner Type
 Analog
 Analog
Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
Supported TV Bands
 DTV
 DTV
Analog Signal Format System
 PAL
 PAL B
 PAL BG
 PAL D
 PAL DK
 PAL I
 SECAM
 SECAM B
 SECAM B/G
 SECAM D
 SECAM D/K
 SECAM L
 PAL
 PAL B
 PAL BG
 PAL D
 PAL DK
 PAL I
 SECAM
 SECAM B
 SECAM B/G
 SECAM D
 SECAM D/K
 SECAM L

Performance

Plug & Play
 Plug & Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
Video Compression Formats
 MPEG
 MPEG2
 MPEG4
 MPEG
 MPEG2
 MPEG4

Packaging Content

Handheld Remote Control
 Handheld remote control
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
VESA Mounting Interfaces
 400 x 400
 400 x 400
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting

Networking

Ethernet Port
 Ethernet port
Unknown - Click to provide data

Management Features

Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
 Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display (OSD)
 On Screen Display (OSD)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Programming Period
7 day(s) Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Depth
69mm 57.7mm
BEST
Weight
82kg 34.1kg
BEST
Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 44.1kg
Weight With Stand
83kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth (with Stand)
296.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height (with Stand)
1,149mm 959.5mm
BEST
Width (with Stand)
1,906mm 1,676.2mm
BEST
Height
1,102mm 959.5mm
Width
1,906.6mm 1,676.2mm
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,085mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 250mm
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 1,810mm

Ports & Interfaces

Common Interface (CI)
 Common interface (CI)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Outputs
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP)
 High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Coaxial Out
 Digital audio coaxial out
Unknown - Click to provide data
PC in (D-Sub) Port
 PC in (D-Sub) port
 PC in (D-Sub) port
BEST
Common Interface Plus (CI+)
 Common interface Plus (CI+)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Version
 2.0
BEST
 2.0
HDMI Port
3
BEST
1

Technical Details

LED Backlight
 LED backlight
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback