LG 55UF695 vs LG 55UF770 vs LG 55UF850 vs LG 55UH625

(12)
(8)
(25)
LG 55UF695
LG 55UF770
LG 55UF850
LG 55UH625

Top Prices

Ebuyer Business
Checked 8 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (19 available)
Amazon UK
Checked 14 hours ago
Standard delivery: £7.00
In stock
PC World Business
Checked 8 hours ago
Out of stock
Ebuyer Business
Checked 8 hours ago
Standard delivery: £4.19
In stock (11 available)
Electrical Experience
Checked 21 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Electronic Empire
Checked 5 hours ago
Delivery unknown
Amazon UK
Checked 2 days ago
Standard delivery: £16.39
In stock
Dealbuyer.com
Checked 10 minutes ago
Out of stock
RLR Distribution
Checked 5 hours ago
Out of stock
eBay
Checked 15 hours ago
PC World
Checked 6 hours ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (20 available)
Currys
Checked 33 minutes ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock (10 available)

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Two more USB 2.0 ports quantitys Edit
The LG 55UF695 is a three USB 2.0 ports quantity TV, whereas the LG 55UF850 only has two USB 2.0 ports quantitys and the LG 55UH625 only has one USB 2.0 ports quantity. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

51% thinner Edit
LG 55UF695 is 37.8mm thick. That's 18.9mm thinner than the LG 55UF770 and the LG 55UH625 (56.7mm) and 13mm thinner than the LG 55UF850 (56.7mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Better selling
The LG 55UF695 ranks No. 83299 by number of sales, however the LG 55UF850 ranks No. 142736.
A bit better user reviews
The average user review score of the LG 55UF695 is 98% based on 11 reviews, however the average rating of the LG 55UF770 is 86% (based on 7 reviews) and the average rating of the LG 55UF850 is 95% (based on 8 reviews).
4 Reasons For
Cheaper by £95
The LG 55UF770 costs £100 less than the LG 55UF695, costs £346 less than the LG 55UF850 and costs £95.24 less than the LG 55UH625.
10 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
Energy efficiency rating is better
The LG 55UF770 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", however the LG 55UF695 has a rating of "A", the LG 55UF850 has a rating of "A+" and the LG 55UH625 has a rating of "A+".
Vastly better expert reviews
Based on 1 expert review, the average review score of the LG 55UF770 is 100%, however the average rating of the LG 55UF850 is 76% (based on 17 reviews).
2 Reasons For
3D Edit
The LG 55UF850 is 3D, however the LG 55UF695 is not. Read more

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. Most 3D TVs require you to wear special 3D glasses in order to view the content in 3D, however some of the newer 3D TVs require no 3D glasses at all. Of those TVs that do require glasses, there are two main types of 3D technology: passive and active. Passive 3D uses glasses similar to those that you wear in the cinema. The glasses have polarised lenses which ensure that the correct image is displayed to each eye. The main advantage of passive 3D is that the glasses are very light and comfortable to wear, but it can result in a less bright image. Active 3D uses battery powered glasses which control active shutters in each lens. These shutters constantly open and close very quickly in sync with two different images that are being displayed by the TV. This ensures that the correct image is displayed to each eye. The main advantage of active 3D is that the image is brighter, however the glasses are heavier and more expensive.

3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Energy efficiency rating is higher
The LG 55UF850 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", but the LG 55UF695 has a rating of "A", the LG 55UF770 has a rating of "A+" and the LG 55UH625 has a rating of "A+".
4 Reasons For
23% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UH625 has an annual energy consumption of 114kWh, however the LG 55UF695 is a 140kWh annual energy consumption TV (26kWh higher), the LG 55UF770 is a 123kWh annual energy consumption TV (9kWh higher) and the LG 55UF850 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV (3kWh higher). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

2.7kg lighter Edit
The LG 55UH625 is a 17.8kg heavy TV, whereas the LG 55UF695 is a 20.5kg heavy TV (2.7kg heavier) and the LG 55UF850 is a 20.4kg heavy TV (2.6kg heavier). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

19% cheaper to run
Over five years the LG 55UH625 is £28.84 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF695, £9.61 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF770 and £3.20 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF850. Read more
Energy efficiency rating is better
The LG 55UH625 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", however the LG 55UF695 has a rating of "A", the LG 55UF770 has a rating of "A+" and the LG 55UF850 has a rating of "A+".

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
Not 3D Edit
The LG 55UF695 is not 3D, however the LG 55UF850 is 3D. Read more

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. Most 3D TVs require you to wear special 3D glasses in order to view the content in 3D, however some of the newer 3D TVs require no 3D glasses at all. Of those TVs that do require glasses, there are two main types of 3D technology: passive and active. Passive 3D uses glasses similar to those that you wear in the cinema. The glasses have polarised lenses which ensure that the correct image is displayed to each eye. The main advantage of passive 3D is that the glasses are very light and comfortable to wear, but it can result in a less bright image. Active 3D uses battery powered glasses which control active shutters in each lens. These shutters constantly open and close very quickly in sync with two different images that are being displayed by the TV. This ensures that the correct image is displayed to each eye. The main advantage of active 3D is that the image is brighter, however the glasses are heavier and more expensive.

3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

19% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF695 has an annual energy consumption of 140kWh, however the LG 55UF770 is a 123kWh annual energy consumption TV (17kWh lower), the LG 55UF850 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV (23kWh lower) and the LG 55UH625 is a 114kWh annual energy consumption TV (26kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

2.7kg heavier Edit
The LG 55UF695 is a 20.5kg heavy TV, whereas the LG 55UF850 is a 20.4kg heavy TV (100g lighter) and the LG 55UH625 is a 17.8kg heavy TV (2.7kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

More expensive by £100
The LG 55UF695 is £100 more expensive than the LG 55UF770 and £4.76 more expensive than the LG 55UH625.
Less retailers
The LG 55UF695 is only stocked by 7 stores, whereas the LG 55UF770 is stocked by 13 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
Older by over one year
The LG 55UF695 is one month older than the LG 55UF770 and 13 months older than the LG 55UH625. The LG 55UF695 is the same age as the LG 55UF850.
Higher running costs over five years by £28.84
The running costs over five years of the LG 55UF695 are £155.66 which is £19.23 more than the LG 55UF770, £25.64 more than the LG 55UF850 and £28.84 more than the LG 55UH625. Show assumptions.
Lower energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 55UF695 is "A", however the rating of the LG 55UF770 is "A+", the rating of the LG 55UF850 is "A+" and the rating of the LG 55UH625 is "A+".
6 Reasons Against
One less USB 2.0 ports quantity Edit
The LG 55UF770 is a two USB 2.0 ports quantity TV (as does the LG 55UF850), whereas the LG 55UF695 only has three USB 2.0 ports quantitys. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

Moderately higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF770 has an annual energy consumption of 123kWh, however the LG 55UF695 is a 140kWh annual energy consumption TV (17kWh higher), the LG 55UF850 is a 117kWh annual energy consumption TV (6kWh lower) and the LG 55UH625 is a 114kWh annual energy consumption TV (9kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

Thicker Edit
LG 55UF770 is 56.7mm thick, and so does the LG 55UH625. That's 18.9mm thicker than the LG 55UF695 (56.7mm) and 5.9mm thicker than the LG 55UF850 (56.7mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Older by one year
The LG 55UF770 is one year older than the LG 55UH625.
£9.61 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the LG 55UF770 are £136.43 which is £6.41 more than the LG 55UF850 and £9.61 more than the LG 55UH625 over five years. Show assumptions.
User review Rating is much Worse
The LG 55UF770's average user score is 86%, however the LG 55UF695's is 98% (based on 11 reviews) and the LG 55UF850's is 95% (based on 8 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
One less USB 2.0 ports quantity Edit
The LG 55UF850 has two USB 2.0 ports quantitys (as does the LG 55UF770), however the LG 55UF695 only has three USB 2.0 ports quantitys. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

3kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 55UF850 has an annual energy consumption of 117kWh, but the LG 55UF695 is a 140kWh annual energy consumption TV (23kWh higher), the LG 55UF770 is a 123kWh annual energy consumption TV (6kWh higher) and the LG 55UH625 is a 114kWh annual energy consumption TV (3kWh lower). Read more

The annual energy consumption is the total amount of energy that the TV will use over the course of a whole year, given typical usage levels.

A lower annual energy consumption means that it will cost less each year for you to run your TV.

26% thicker Edit
The LG 55UF850 is a 50.8mm thick TV. That's 13mm thicker than the LG 55UF695 (56.7mm) and 5.9mm thinner than the LG 55UF770 and the LG 55UH625 (56.7mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

13% heavier Edit
The LG 55UF850 has a weight of 20.4kg, however the LG 55UF695 is a 20.5kg heavy TV (100g heavier) and the LG 55UH625 is a 17.8kg heavy TV (2.6kg lighter). Read more

The weight is the total weight of the TV excluding all packaging.

A lighter weight TV will be easier to move around and to mount on a wall. Some of the larger, very heavy TVs may require lightweight partition walls to be reinforced before the TV could be mounted.

More expensive by £346
The LG 55UF850 is £246 more expensive than the LG 55UF695, £346 more expensive than the LG 55UF770 and £250.76 more expensive than the LG 55UH625.
Not as many stockists
The LG 55UF850 is only stocked by 3 stores, however the LG 55UF695 is stocked by 7 sellers and the LG 55UF770 is stocked by 13 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
Older by over one year
The LG 55UF850 is one month older than the LG 55UF770 and 13 months older than the LG 55UH625. The LG 55UF850 is the same age as the LG 55UF695.
Higher running costs over five years by £3.20
The running costs over five years of the LG 55UF850 are £130.02 which is £3.20 more than the LG 55UH625. Show assumptions.
Less popular
The LG 55UF850 is a less popular choice amongst buyers. It ranks No. 142736 by number of sales in our TVs, but the LG 55UF695 ranks No. 83299.
Expert review Rating is hugely Worse
The LG 55UF850 only has an average expert score of 76%, but the LG 55UF770 has an average expert rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
User review Rating is a bit Worse
The LG 55UF850 has an average user score of 95%, but the LG 55UF695 has an average user rating of 98% (based on 11 reviews).
4 Reasons Against
Two less USB 2.0 ports quantitys Edit
The LG 55UH625 is a one USB 2.0 ports quantity TV, whereas the LG 55UF695 only has three USB 2.0 ports quantitys and the LG 55UF850 only has two USB 2.0 ports quantitys. Read more

USB ports are useful for displaying on your TV photos / videos or playing music that is stored on USB key drives. The USB port can also be used for charging devices from your TV (as long as it's switched on), and for installing software updates on the TV.

More USB ports will allow you to connect more USB devices to the TV simultaneously without needing to continuous plug in and unplug cables.

34% thicker Edit
LG 55UH625 is 56.7mm thick, and so does the LG 55UF770. That's 18.9mm thicker than the LG 55UF695 (56.7mm) and 5.9mm thicker than the LG 55UF850 (56.7mm). Read more

The depth of the TV is the thickness of the TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

More expensive by £95
The LG 55UH625 is £95.24 more expensive than the LG 55UF770.
Less retailers
The LG 55UH625 is only stocked by 3 shops, whereas the LG 55UF695 is stocked by 7 shops and the LG 55UF770 is stocked by 13 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 2 Awards
avforums.com: Recommended
Expert Reviews: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

23 months Ago 22 months Ago 23 months Ago 10 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 153.83
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 155.66
Purchase price £ 699.00
Total cost of ownership £ 854.66
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 134.60
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 136.43
Purchase price £ 599.00
Total cost of ownership £ 735.43
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 128.19
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 130.02
Purchase price £ 945.00
Total cost of ownership £ 1,075.02
Details
Electricity cost - switched on £ 124.99
Electricity cost - standby £ 1.83
Total running cost £ 126.82
Purchase price £ 694.24
Total cost of ownership £ 821.06
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.77T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.77 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
20
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.68T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.68 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.65T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.65 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.63T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.63 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
16
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Display Diagonal
55" 55" 55" 55"
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
3D
 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data
 3D
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
High Frequency Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 200Hz Unknown - Click to provide data
3D Type
 Passive
 Passive
 Passive
 Passive
LED Backlighting Type
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
 Direct-LED
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Noise Reduction
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Noise reduction
Motion Interpolation Technology
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
 PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
Supported 3D Technologies
 LG Cinema 3D
 LG Cinema 3D
 LG Cinema 3D
 LG Cinema 3D
PMI (Picture Mastering Index)
1,200 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1,200
Display Technology
 LED
BEST
 LED
 LED
 LED
BEST
Screen Format Adjustments
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Zoom
 16:9
 14:9
 4:3
 Zoom
Display Diagonal (metric)
139cm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm
Supported Graphics Resolutions
 3840 x 2160
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
BEST

TV Tuner

Digital Signal Format System
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
 DVB
 DVB-S
 DVB-S2
 DVB-T
 DVB-T2
 DVB-C
 DVB-CI+
Tuner Type
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog
 Analog

Smart TV

Smart TV
 Smart TV
 Smart TV
 Smart TV
 Smart TV
Internet TV
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Internet TV
 Internet TV
 Internet TV
Timeshift
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Timeshift
Video Apps
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
 YouTube
 NetFlix
Operating System Version
4.5 2.0 Unknown - Click to provide data 3.0
Operating System Installed
 NetCast OS
 NetCast OS
 NetCast OS
 NetCast OS

Audio

RMS Rated Power
20W 20W 20W 20W
Number of Loudspeakers
2 2 2 2
Built-In Speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
 Built-in speaker(s)
Dolby Technology
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital
 DTS
 Digital
 DTS
Sound Modes
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
Audio Decoders
 Dolby Digital
 DTX
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTX
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTX
 DTS
 Dolby Digital
 DTX
 DTS
Audio Decoding Technologies
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD
 DTS-HD

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Outputs
1 1 1 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+)
 Common interface Plus (CI+)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface Plus (CI+)
 Common interface Plus (CI+)
Common Interface (CI)
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Common interface (CI)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Ports
1 1 1 1
RF Ports Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2
SCART Ports Quantity
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
PC Audio in
 PC Audio in
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in
1 1 1 1
USB 2.0 Ports Quantity
3
BEST
2 2 1
USB 3.0 Port
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
 DVI port
 DVI port
 DVI port
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Version
 2.0
 2.0
 2.0
BEST
 2.0
BEST
PC in (D-Sub)
 PC in (D-Sub)
 PC in (D-Sub)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Ports Quantity
3 3 3 3
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi)
 Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi)
Consumer Electronics Control (CEC)
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
 SimpLink
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Ports Quantity
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3

Networking

Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
 Wi-Fi
Browser Supported
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Browser supported
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Bluetooth
 Bluetooth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Wi-Fi Standards
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
BEST
Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
 Ethernet LAN
Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
 Miracast
Wi-Fi Direct
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wi-Fi Direct
Browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Browsing
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Browsing

Management Features

Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sleep timer
Smart Modes
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
ECO Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 ECO mode
Programming Period
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 8 day(s)

Performance

Video Formats Supported
 H.265
 H.265
 H.265
 H.265
Audio Formats Supported
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 DTS
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 DTS
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 DTS
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HE-A
 DTS
Teletext Function
 Teletext function
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Teletext function
 Teletext function
Game Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Game mode
Digital Video Recorder (DVR)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Digital Video Recorder (DVR)
 Digital Video Recorder (DVR)
Local Dimming
 Local dimming
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Processor Cores
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4
Teletext
2,000 pages Unknown - Click to provide data 2,000 pages 2,000 pages
Subtitles Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Subtitles function
High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI)

Design

LED Indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicators
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Colour of Product
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Peak Luminance Ratio
65% Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 65%

Ergonomics

VESA Mounting Interfaces
 400 x 400
 400 x 400
 400 x 400
 400 x 400
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting
 VESA mounting

Power

Power Consumption (typical)
96W 84W 80W 78W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby)
0.3W 0.3W 0.3W 0.3W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
BEST
 A+
BEST
 A+
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
140kWh 123kWh 117kWh 114kWh
BEST
AC Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50
 50
Input Voltage
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240
 240
 100
 100 - 240

Certificates

Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) Certified
 Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
 Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
 Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
 Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified

Weight & Dimensions

Depth
37.8mm
BEST
56.7mm 50.8mm 56.7mm
Weight
20.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data 20.4kg 17.8kg
BEST
Package Weight
26.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data 25.9kg 22.2kg
BEST
Weight With Stand
21kg Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 18.1kg
BEST
Depth (with Stand)
248mm 261mm 260.6mm 237mm
BEST
Height (with Stand)
766mm
BEST
778mm 782mm 778mm
Width (with Stand)
1,233mm
BEST
1,240mm 1,234mm 1,240mm
Height
727mm 722mm 727mm 722mm
Width
1,233mm 1,240mm 1,234mm 1,240mm
Package Height
810mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 810mm
Package Width
1,330mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1,330mm

Packaging Content

Desktop Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Desktop stand
Batteries Included
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Batteries included
Handheld Remote Control
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Handheld remote control
Cables Included
 AC
 AC
 AC
 AC
Manual
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Manual
Feedback