Close
Cello C24230
Cello C24230
5 Images
Share on

Loading image...

39

Overall Score

Cello C24230

An economical to run 24" Full HD TV with OK reviews but not very good features
24" Full HD No No Aug 2014
Display Diagonal HD Type 3D OLED Technology Release Date

Sorry, currently not available from shops in the United Kingdom.
Check international prices

Notify Me When Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Sorry, no international prices found
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Cello C24230 Review

With very low running costs but average reviews, we have scored the Cello C24230 as follows for Summary.
55
6 Reviews
22
Missing Some Features
51
3 Years Old
96
£29 Over 5 Years
Overall Score
39
Mediocre

Why Has it Scored 39?

It has below average user reviews with an average user rating of 52%. Samsung televisions have excellent reviews in general.
This TV is over 2 years old and it is likely that newer, better TVs are available. View the latest TVs 2017.
It has an efficiency rating of A+, and its running costs of only £29 over 5 years are in the cheapest 1% of all 4,025 televisions that we have compared it to. View all energy saving TVs.
This Cello TV is missing some features:
Only Full HD
Quite small display diagonal
Does not feature OLED technology
Not 3D

How Big is the Cello C24230?

The Cello C24230 is 560mm wide and 66mm tall. It is 348mm thick and weighs 5.3kg.

Cello C24230 front dimensions

See how big this TV would look in your lounge:

Cello C24230 size in context

Cello C24230 In-Depth Analysis

Reviews

Poor User Reviews

On average, people who bought this TV rated it as 52%. Users don't rate this Cello TV very highly.

View all user reviews

Cello Has Very Good Reviews for Its TVs

Based on 477 expert and owner reviews (including 64 verified purchases), Cello has very good ratings for its televisions.


Features

Only Full HD

The display resolution of this television is Full HD, which is typical of many TVs. Full HD TVs have a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

What does "HD type" mean? Less Edit

Quite Small Display Diagonal

The display diagonals of TVs range from 2" to 110", and the average display diagonal is 46". The display diagonal of the Cello C24230 of only 24" is in the smallest 5% of all televisions when ranked by this feature.

What does "display diagonal" mean? Less Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

Like most other televisions, the Cello C24230 does not feature OLED technology. 98% of TVs do not feature OLED technology.

What is OLED technology? Less Edit

Not 3D

The Cello C24230 is not 3D. 74% of televisions are also not 3D.

What does "3D" mean? Less Edit

Average Thickness

The thickness of the Cello C24230 of 66mm is relatively average compared to most other TVs. It is in the thickest 67% of all TVs when ranked by this feature.

What does "thickness" mean? Less Edit

Does Not Support Wi-Fi

The Cello C24230 does not support Wi-Fi, unlike 59% of TVs which support Wi-Fi.

What is Wi-Fi? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

3D Comb Filter

This TV has a 3D comb filter, which is typical of many televisions.

What does "comb filter" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Only 1366 X 768 Pixels Display Resolution

The highest display resolution supported by the Cello C24230 is 1366 x 768 pixels. That's 49% lower display resolution than the most frequently found resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The resolution of all TVs ranges from 1024 x 768 pixels (worst) to 5120 x 2160 pixels (best).

What does "display resolution" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Low RMS Rated Power

The Cello C24230's RMS rated power of only 6W is very low compared to most other TVs. It is in the lowest 3% of all televisions when ordered by this feature. The RMS rated powers of televisions range from 2W to 120W, and the average RMS rated power is 21W.

What does "RMS rated power" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Does Not Have an Ethernet Port

The Cello C24230 does not have an ethernet port. 64% of TVs do have an ethernet port.

What is an ethernet port? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Dim Display Brightness

The dimmest display brightness of TVs is 50 cd/m², the brightest is 4,000 cd/m², and the average display brightness is 340 cd/m². The display brightness of the Cello C24230 of only 250 cd/m² is quite dim compared to most other TVs. It is in the dimmest 18% of all TVs when sorted by this feature.

What does "display brightness" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has a PC in (D-Sub) Port

The Cello C24230 has a PC in (D-Sub) port, unlike 74% of televisions which do not have a PC in (D-Sub) port.

What is a PC in (D-Sub) port? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has an AV Input

The Cello C24230 has an AV input, which is unusual. 98% of TVs do not have an AV input.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Very Slow High Frequency Rate

The slowest high frequency rate of TVs is 20Hz, the fastest is 3,000Hz, and the average high frequency rate is 260Hz. The high frequency rate of the Cello C24230 of only 60Hz is fairly slow compared to most other TVs. It is in the slowest 12% of all TVs when ranked by this feature.

What does "high frequency rate" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Age

Released Over Three Years Ago

This television was released in August 2014.


Running Costs

Very Low Running Costs

This TV has an efficiency rating of A+. Based on adequate usage levels and energy prices we estimate that the 5 year running cost of the C24230 is only £29, which is in the cheapest 1% of all 4,025 televisions.

Calculate your own running costs

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers cello electronics c24230dvb, cello electronics c24230f, cello electronics 0z50062, cello c24230dvbbl, cello c24230dvbpw, cello c24230dvbwh, cello c24230fled, cello c24230ftv, cello p232000p, code c24230dvb, cello 2x3w
Barcodes 00620977647567, 05060062265552, 05060062265569, 05060062266917

Other Popular Comparisons With The Cello C24230

Frequently Asked Questions About the Cello C24230

User reviews are significantly better
More popular
129% higher running costs over five years
Marginally thinner
19% higher running costs over five years
Hugely better user reviews
38% thinner
£4.81 cheaper to run
A lot smaller display diagonal
User reviews are vastly better
32% higher running costs over five years

Feedback