Close
Share on
Cello C26103
Cello C26103

Loading image...

Cello C26103

26" Full HD 800:1 60Hz Oct 2012
A
Display Diagonal HD Type Contrast Ratio (typical) High Frequency Rate Release Date £46.30 Electricity cost over 5 years
Good high def TV
Reasonably priced
Poor owner reviews
5 Reviews
1 Price from 1 Store | £218.86 | Get Price Alerts
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe

Price

Reasonably Priced

A few people reckoned that the product was a bargain for the price. Intensivecarenurse said on Amazon “I'm happy to say that I feel I have got a great deal yet again” in their review. Three years ago Tuohy rated the Cello C26103 80 out of 100 and mentioned “The remote is light and cheap, as are the plastics on the set.” in their review of the Cello C26103.

Two customers who bought it agreed that it was good value for money. Three years ago Intensivecarenurse wrote on Amazon “Fantastic TV, Fantastic Price” in their review. Tuohy gave it a score of 80 out of 100 and said “If you need this eg you want to use it in a boat, caravan or motorhome then it is good value against the alternatives ie Kogan”.

Read more Less

Energy

Running Costs Are OK

The efficiency rating of this TV is A, and the C26103 has an average 5 year running cost of £47 based on typical energy prices and usage levels, which is typical compared to the other 582 TVs of a similar spec and age.


Reviews

Poor Owner Reviews

C26103 owners on average rated this TV 64 out of 100. Owners don't rate this television very highly.

Cello Has Good Television Reviews

Based on 383 owner and expert reviews (including 34 verified purchases), Cello has good ratings for its televisions. Cello also has good ratings specifically within its small display diagonal televisions range.


Features

Good Remote Control

One Cello C26103 reviewer who reviewed the Cello C26103 considered that it had a good remote control.

Inferior Technical Features

One Cello C26103 owner who reviewed it said that it did not have good features. Tuohy wrote “However if you do not need these features there are better tellys from LG, Samsung etc”.


Design

Poor Design

One Cello C26103 owner considered that the Cello C26103 was not smooth. Tuohy wrote “Playback is not entirely smooth of NTSC although a region 2 disc was fine” nonetheless they gave it a rating of 80 out of 100.


Audio

Good Sound Quality

One customer who reviewed the Cello C26103 wrote that it had good sound quality. Intensivecarenurse wrote “4) Great sound modes & not at all tinny” in their review of the Cello C26103.

Very Low RMS Rated Power

The average RMS rated power of comparable spec televisions that have been available for more than two years is 13W. With an RMS rated power of only 5 Watts, the Cello C26103 has one of the lower RMS rated powers amongst TVs of this age.

What does "RMS rated power" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Display

Good High Def TV

Several customers considered that this TV was good at displaying high definition TV. Intensivecarenurse gave this TV a rating of 5 stars and wrote on Amazon three years ago “5) Full HD”. Intensivecarenurse also said “Believe that plasmas cannot be HD (correct me if Im wrong”.

Full HD

Full HD

The display resolution of this TV is Full HD, which is the most frequently found HD type on televisions of a comparable spec and age to it. Full HD TVs have a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

Full HD TVs have a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

What does "HD type" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Not 3D

The Cello C26103 is not 3D. Most of the other TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as this TV are also not 3D.

Televisions which are 3D that might be worth considering include the 32LB650, or the 32LY760 both from LG or the Samsung UE37ES6300U.

What does "3D" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Average High Frequency Rate

At 60 hertz, the Cello C26103 has a relatively standard high frequency rate compared to most of the other similar spec TVs that have been available for more than two years.

It may also be worth considering one of the alternative 60Hz refresh rate televisions currently available including the Panasonic TX-L32E30, the Cello C22103 (£166.79), or the Philips 32PFK4309 which all of have better reviews.

If this television high frequency rate is not fast enough for you then you might want to look at the TX-32CS600 (100Hz and higher rated), the TX-32CS510 (£274.99) (100Hz and higher rated), or the TX-24CS500 (£149.99) (100Hz and higher rated) all from Panasonic.

What does "high frequency rate" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

The highest display resolution supported by the Cello C26103 is 1920 x 1080 pixels. That's 98% more display resolution than the most common display resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels.

A 1920 x 1080 pixels display resolution is in fact the best supported display resolution amongst all TVs of this spec and age.

A 1366 x 768 pixels display resolution is the worst supported display resolution across comparable types of TV.

What does "display resolution" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

The Cello C26103 does not feature OLED technology, although keep in mind that most of the other small display diagonal televisions that are a comparable age to this TV also do not feature OLED technology.

What is OLED technology? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

26 Inches Display Diagonal

This is a 26 inches television.

It may also be worth also looking at one of the other 26" TVs currently available including because of their better review scores, the 26LT360, or the 26LN450 both from LG or the Toshiba 26DL933.

TVs with a larger display diagonal that might be worth considering include the T27D590 (27" and higher rated), or the HG28EC675 (28" and higher rated) both from Samsung or the LG 27MT57 (27" and higher rated).

What does "display diagonal" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Other

Released Over Four Years Ago

This television has been on the market since October 2012.


Networking

Does Not Support Wi-Fi

The Cello C26103 does not support Wi-Fi, although this is within the context that most of the other small display diagonal televisions that are a comparable age to this television also do not support Wi-Fi.

We think you might also be interested in alternative TVs which also support Wi-Fi including the Panasonic TX-L32E30, the Samsung HG32EC690, or the Haier LE39M7000.

What is Wi-Fi? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Does Not Have an Ethernet Port

Like most of the other small display diagonal televisions that were launched more than two years ago, the Cello C26103 does not have an ethernet port.

What is an ethernet port? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Performance

Does Not Feature Local Dimming

Like most of the other small display diagonal televisions that have been available for more than two years, the Cello C26103 does not feature local dimming.

What is local dimming? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Ports & Interfaces

Has an AV Input

The Cello C26103 has an AV input. Most of the other small display diagonal televisions that have been available for more than two years also have an AV input.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has a Common Interface (CI) Slot

The Cello C26103 has a common interface (CI) slot, as do most of the other small display diagonal televisions that were released more than two years ago.

What is a common interface (CI) slot? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has a PC in (D-Sub) Port

The Cello C26103 has a PC in (D-Sub) port. Most of the other TVs of a similar age and spec to this television also have a PC in (D-Sub) port.

What is a PC in (D-Sub) port? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Smart TV

Does Not Support Smart TV

The Cello C26103 does not support Smart TV. Most of the other similar spec TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as this TV also do not support Smart TV.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Does Not Support Internet TV

The Cello C26103 does not support internet TV, although this is within the context that most of the other televisions of a comparable spec and age to this TV also do not support internet TV.

What is internet TV? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Management Features

Has an Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)

The Cello C26103 has an Electronic Programme Guide (EPG). Most of the other TVs of a similar spec and age to this TV also have an Electronic Programme Guide (EPG).

What is an Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Weight & Dimensions

Average Depth

At 49 millimeters, the Cello C26103 has a fairly typical depth compared to most of the other comparable spec TVs that came out more than two years ago.

We compared all the other 49mm thick TVs to this TV and we think because of their better review scores, the Sydney, and the Calgary (£250.21) both from SEG or the Samsung T24B300 are also worth considering.

What does "depth" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers cello lnd26382ean
Barcodes 05060062263824, 05060062264715

Cello C26103 Review Sources

To prepare this Cello C26103 review we compared this TV to 4,717 other models. For each TV that we compared, we collated thousands of pieces of information including technical specs, reviews, and prices. In total we analysed 1,041,547 product attributes, 85,382 TV reviews and 3,802,500 historical TV prices from 204 TV retailers. We then picked out the standout features of this TV compared to the other models as well as any areas where this TV is lacking.

Other TVs to Consider

LOEWE Art 32 vs Cello C26103

LOEWE Art 32 vs Cello C26103
LOEWE Art 32 Cello C26103
£ 1,590.00 £0.00
One More USB 2.0 Ports Quantity
Higher RMS Rated Power
Energy Efficiency Rating is Higher
A Lot Faster High Frequency Rate
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by £20.84

Samsung UE22H5600 vs Cello C26103

Samsung UE22H5600 vs Cello C26103
Samsung UE22H5600 Cello C26103
£ 164.99 £0.00
Newer by 17 Months
Hugely Better User Reviews
Energy Efficiency Rating is Higher
One More USB 2.0 Port
Only Two HDMI Ports
19% Smaller Screen Size

Panasonic TX-24CS500 vs Cello C26103

Panasonic TX-24CS500 vs Cello C26103
Panasonic TX-24CS500 Cello C26103
£ 149.99 £0.00
User Reviews Are Significantly Better
Cheaper to Run by £17.54
Superior Energy Efficiency Rating
40% Faster High Frequency Rate
One Less HDMI Ports Quantity
17% Thicker
Feedback