Close
Share on
Cello C50238
Cello C50238
2 Images

Loading image...

Cello C50238

£416.40
50" Full HD 5000:1 78mm Jan 2014
A
Display Diagonal HD Type Contrast Ratio (typical) Depth Release Date £152.06 Electricity cost over 5 years
Owner reviews are poor
Inferior sound quality
Inferior picture quality
3 Reviews
Misco £416.40 Go to Store
TV Village £479.99 Go to Store
See All 8 Prices from 8 Stores | £416.40 - £499.99 | Price Trend | Get Price Alerts
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe

Price

Price Has Gone Up by £126.81 (30%)

There was a cheaper price of £219.99 on eBay 34 days ago.Our unique forecasting algorithm looks at historic price trends and predicts the most likely price change over the next 2 weeks. There is a 90% chance that the price will go back down. However the future is never certain and there remains a 10% chance that the price will actually go up further.

Sign up to price alerts to be notified when the price goes back down.

Reasonably Priced

One Cello C50238 owner thought the Cello C50238 was a bargain for the price. Divoneh said on Amazon “Cheap and definitely not cheerful” in their review.


Display

Full HD

Full HD

The display resolution of this TV is Full HD, which is the most frequently found HD type on comparable spec TVs that have been around for a similar time to it. Full HD TVs have a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

Full HD TVs have a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

1920 X 1080 Pixels Display Resolution

This TV supports a display resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, which is the most commonly supported display resolution on medium display diagonal TVs that are a similar age to it.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Inferior Picture Quality

One Cello C50238 reviewer thought the Cello C50238 did not have good picture quality.

Not 3D

Like most of the other TVs of this age and type, the Cello C50238 is not 3D.

If you are looking for a TV that is 3D then you might want to consider the Samsung UE40H6400 (£249.99), the LG 47LA660 (£279.99), or the Toshiba 40L5453 (£299.00).

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Reviews

Cello Has Good Television Reviews

We checked 383 user and expert reviews (including 17 verified purchases) for Cello TVs and found that on average Cello has good ratings compared to other brands. We also found that Cello has good ratings specifically within its medium display diagonal TVs range.

Owner Reviews Are Poor

On average, based on 6 owner reviews the average owner rating of this TV is 33%. This Cello TV in the bottom 5% of all the televisions of a comparable age and spec when ranked by user rating.


Ports & Interfaces

Has a Common Interface (CI)

The Cello C50238 has a common interface (CI), as do most of the other TVs that have been around for more than two years.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has a PC in (D-Sub)

The Cello C50238 has a PC in (D-Sub), which is unusual. Most of the other TVs that have been on the market for a comparable time to this TV do not have a PC in (D-Sub).

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Management Features

Has an Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)

The Cello C50238 has an Electronic Programme Guide (EPG), as do most of the other TVs of a comparable age and spec to this TV.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Audio

Inferior Sound Quality

Two Cello C50238 owners mentioned in their reviews that the Cello C50238 did not have good sound quality. Divoneh said in their Cello C50238 review “Dreadful picture and sound compared to modern flat screens” and rated the Cello C50238 1 stars.

Quite Low RMS Rated Power

The average RMS rated power of medium display diagonal TVs that have been around for more than two years is 19W. With an RMS rated power of only 16 Watts, the Cello C50238 has a fairly low RMS rated power compared to most of the other TVs of this type and age.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Design

Poor Product Quality

One Cello C50238 reviewer who purchased it said that it was not good quality. Blackradioboy rated it 1 stars and wrote in October “Atrocious picture quality, dreadful sound” in their review.

Difficult to Use

One person reckoned that it was not easy to use. In October Blackradioboy said in their review on Amazon “Awful to use”.


Networking

Does Not Support Wi-Fi

The Cello C50238 does not support Wi-Fi, unlike most of the other TVs of a similar age and type to this television which support Wi-Fi.

There are a number of other televisions which also support Wi-Fi which you might want to consider including the Samsung UE40H6400 (£249.99), the JVC LT-40C750 (£329.00), or the Hisense LTDN40K370 (£267.99) which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Does Not Have an Ethernet Port

The Cello C50238 does not have an ethernet port, unlike most of the other televisions of this age and type which have an ethernet port.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Energy

Running Costs Are Very High

Whilst this TV is rated A for energy efficiency, the C50238 has an average 5 year running cost of £153 based on typical energy prices and usage levels, which is in the most expensive 13% of all 616 televisions of this spec and age.


Other

Released Over Three Years Ago

This Cello TV was released in April 2017.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers cello electronics c50238dvbt2, cello c50238dvbt2, cello 50238dvbt2, cello b0fdza00, cello b0fdzs00
Barcodes 05060062265255

Other TVs to Consider

Sony KDL-55W807 vs Cello C50238

Sony KDL-55W807 vs Cello C50238
Sony KDL-55W807 Cello C50238
£ 599.00 £416.40
Two More USB 2.0 Ports Quantitys
Two SCART Ports Quantitys
Energy Efficiency Rating is Better
Four HDMI Ports Quantitys
£183 More Expensive
Lower RMS Rated Power

LG 55EC930 vs Cello C50238

LG 55EC930 vs Cello C50238
LG 55EC930 Cello C50238
£ 1,334.99 £416.40
Hugely Better User Reviews
Two More USB 2.0 Ports
60% Higher RMS Rated Power
Energy Efficiency Rating is Higher
£919 More Expensive
£19.62 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years

Sony KDL-65W955 vs Cello C50238

Sony KDL-65W955 vs Cello C50238
Sony KDL-65W955 Cello C50238
£ 1,939.93 £416.40
Three USB 2.0 Ports
One More SCART Port
Superior Energy Efficiency Rating
A Lot Higher RMS Rated Power
£1,524 More Expensive
Does Not Have a Common Interface Connection
Feedback