LG 32LF510 vs Panasonic TX-32C300
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

LG 32LF510vsPanasonic TX-32C300

LG 32LF510

77

Overall Score

77

Overall Score

LG 32LF510

£197.99
Our Verdict:
A phenomenally economical to run and top-value 32", 71mm thick TV, with good features
96
Value for Money
Excellent
62
Features
Good Features
77
Age
2 Years Old
96
Running Costs
£34 Over 5 Years
77
Overall Score
Very Good
32" HD No 71mm Jul 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 32"
HD Type HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 71mm
Release Date Jul 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-32C300

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A top-value and very economical to run 32", 89mm thick television, with excellent user reviews and good features
93
Reviews
6 Reviews
98
Value for Money
Excellent
60
Features
Good Features
80
Age
2 Years Old
94
Running Costs
£43 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
32" HD No 89mm Dec 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 32"
HD Type HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 89mm
Release Date Dec 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
LG 32LF510

77

Overall Score

77

Overall Score

LG 32LF510

£197.99
Our Verdict:
A phenomenally economical to run and top-value 32", 71mm thick TV, with good features
96
Value for Money
Excellent
62
Features
Good Features
77
Age
2 Years Old
96
Running Costs
£34 Over 5 Years
77
Overall Score
Very Good
32" HD No 71mm Jul 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 32"
HD Type HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 71mm
Release Date Jul 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-32C300

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A top-value and very economical to run 32", 89mm thick television, with excellent user reviews and good features
93
Reviews
6 Reviews
98
Value for Money
Excellent
60
Features
Good Features
80
Age
2 Years Old
94
Running Costs
£43 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
32" HD No 89mm Dec 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 32"
HD Type HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 89mm
Release Date Dec 2015
Energy Efficiency A+

Top Prices

LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Electrical Experience
LG 32LF510B (32LF510) 32inch LED HD Ready Television
£197.99
Go to Store
Amazon UK
Telev?­zor LG 32LF510B (80 cm) HD Ready
£237.00
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | £197.99-£237.00
RGB Direct
£209.00
Go to Store
Ebuyer Business
Panasonic 32" Black Hd Ready Led Tv With Freeview 1366 X 768 2x Hdmi And 1x U
£209.99
Go to Store
Julipa
Out of stock
£269.00
Go to Store
Home Essentials
Out of stock
£269.00
Go to Store
4 Prices from 4 Stores | £209.00-£209.99
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
29% Off
{Seiki SE24HD02UK
£119.98
Was £170 (29 days ago)
PC World Business
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
6 Reasons For
100Hz Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
The LG 32LF510 has a motion interpolation frequency of 300Hz, but the Panasonic TX-32C300 is only a 200Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (100Hz slower).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Thinner
LG 32LF510 is 71mm thick. That's 18mm thinner than the Panasonic TX-32C300 (89mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Cheaper by £11
The LG 32LF510 costs £11.01 less than the Panasonic TX-32C300.
19% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the LG 32LF510 only costs £34 to run but the Panasonic TX-32C300 costs £43 to run (24% more).
Read more Read less
Much Better User Reviews
The LG 32LF510 has an average user review score of 100%, however the Panasonic TX-32C300 has an average rating of 87% (based on 6 reviews).
Better Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of 86.2%, whereas Panasonic has an average rating of 51.9%.
3 Reasons For
50% Higher RMS Rated Power
The Panasonic TX-32C300 is a 12W RMS rated power TV. That's 6W higher than the LG 32LF510 (6W).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
PC in (D-Sub) Port
The Panasonic TX-32C300 has a PC in (D-Sub) port, however the LG 32LF510 does not have a PC in (D-Sub) port.

The socket (port) to receive input from a PC via a D-sub, which is a connector with a characteristic D-shaped metal shield. Also known as a VGA Port.

A D-sub port is needed to connect your TV to older devices and computers that use a VGA connection - generally those made before 2000.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.

Reviews & Awards

Average User Rating

The LG 32LF510 has better user reviews than the Panasonic TX-32C300. The average user reviews score for the LG 32LF510 is 100% based on 2 reviews, where as the average score for the Panasonic TX-32C300 is 87% based on 6 reviews.
LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Best
5 stars
2 reviews
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
5 stars
4 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
1 review
1 star
0 reviews

Average Brand Rating

LG has a better average brand rating than Panasonic. The average brand rating for LG is 86.22% based on 31,780 reviews, where as the average brand rating for Panasonic is 51.92% based on 1,721 reviews.
LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
LG

86

86

Based on 31,780 reviews
Panasonic

52

52

Based on 1,721 reviews

Date Released

LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
31 months old 26 months old Best

Key Features

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 32LF510
LG
32LF510
4 trees 0.17 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
5 trees 0.21 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Display LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Display Diagonal 32" 32"
High Frequency Rate 200Hz
BEST
Display Resolution
1366 x 768
 1366 x 768
1366 x 768
 1366 x 768
Motion Interpolation Frequency 300Hz
BEST
200Hz
Display Brightness
Horizontal Viewing Angle Unknown - Click to provide data 176°
PQI (Picture Quality Index) Unknown - Click to provide data
PMI (Picture Mastering Index) 300 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
Screen Format Adjustments
Zoom
 Zoom
Zoom
 Zoom
Display Diagonal (metric) 80cm 80cm
Supported Graphics Resolutions
1366 х 768 1366 x 768
 1366 х 768
 1366 x 768
1366 х 768 1366 x 768
 1366 х 768
 1366 x 768
Vertical Viewing Angle Unknown - Click to provide data 176°
 
 
 
Audio LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
RMS Rated Power 6W
BEST
12W
Loudspeaker 2 2
Sound Modes
News Standard
Music Sports
Game Speech
Custom Movie
 News
 Standard
 Music
 Sports
 Game
 Speech
 Custom
 Movie
News Standard
Music Sports
Game Speech
Custom Movie
 News
 Standard
 Music
 Sports
 Game
 Speech
 Custom
 Movie
Speaker 2 2
 
 
 
Power LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Energy Efficiency Class
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
Power Consumption (typical) 25W
BEST
31W
Power Consumption (standby) 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Power Consumption (average) Unknown - Click to provide data 41W
Annual Energy Consumption 37kWh
BEST
45kWh
 
 
 
TV Tuner LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Tuner Type
Digital
 Digital
Digital
 Digital
 
 
 
Performance LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Video Formats Supported
DIVX DIVX HD
MPEG MPEG4
H.264 AVC
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 MPEG
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVC
DIVX DIVX HD
MPEG MPEG4
H.264 AVC
 DIVX
 DIVX HD
 MPEG
 MPEG4
 H.264
 AVC
Audio Formats Supported
MP1 MP2
MP3 AC3
PCM eAAC+
HE-AAC EAC3
HAAC AAC HE
HE-A AAC++
 MP1
 MP2
 MP3
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HAAC
 AAC HE
 HE-A
 AAC++
MP1 MP2
MP3 AC3
PCM eAAC+
HE-AAC EAC3
HAAC AAC HE
HE-A AAC++
 MP1
 MP2
 MP3
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 HAAC
 AAC HE
 HE-A
 AAC++
Image Formats Supported
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
Teletext 2,000 Pages
BEST
1,000 Pages
 
 
 
Management Features LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Number of OSD Languages Unknown - Click to provide data 31
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Thickness 71mm
BEST
89mm
Weight 3.7kg
BEST
5kg
Weight With Stand 4.5kg
BEST
5.2kg
Height (with Stand) 474mm 492mm
Width (with Stand) 734mm
BEST
735mm
Height 438mm 438mm
Width 734mm 735mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Headphone Outputs Unknown - Click to provide data 1
RF Port 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
SCART Port 1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port 1 1
HDMI Version
1.2
 1.2
1.2
 1.2
HDMI Port 1 2
BEST
Audio (L,R) in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Packaging Data LG 32LF510 Panasonic TX-32C300
Package Weight 6.2kg
BEST
6.4kg
Package Height 505mm
BEST
555mm
Package Width 795mm 795mm

Other Similar Comparisons

LG 32LF510
LG
32LF510
£197.99
Superior energy efficiency rating
Larger display diagonal
VS
Samsung HG24EE470
Samsung
HG24EE470
£198.64
Better brand
A lot higher
RMS rated power
Cheaper to run
by £4 over
five years
5.8mm thinner
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Energy efficiency rating is better
A lot larger display diagonal
VS
Grundig 22 VLE 5520
Grundig
22 VLE 5520
£201.99
£7 Cheaper
Vastly thinner
Better brand
Cheaper to run
by £11 over
five years
1W higher RMS
rated power
Wider
horizontal
viewing angle
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Superior energy efficiency rating
Cheaper to run by £10 over five years
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
Samsung UE32J5500
Samsung
UE32J5500
£247.98
Better brand
User reviews
are better
50% faster
motion
interpolation
frequency
A lot higher
RMS rated power
22.4mm thinner
Internet TV
Digital Living
Network
Alliance (DLNA)
certified
Local dimming
Extended PVR
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Faster high frequency rate
7W higher RMS rated power
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Larger display diagonal
More popular
VS
Philips 24PHH4000
Philips
24PHH4000
£174.99
£34 Cheaper
Thinner
Better brand
User reviews
are a bit
better
36% cheaper to
run
PC in (D-Sub)
port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Hugely faster high frequency rate
Energy efficiency rating is higher
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
LG 32LF580
LG
32LF580
£239.00
Better brand
Moderately
better user
reviews
61% thinner
Higher RMS
rated power
11% cheaper to
run over five
years
Internet TV
Digital Living
Network
Alliance (DLNA)
certified
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
User reviews are better
75% faster motion interpolation frequency
Superior energy efficiency rating
Cheaper to run by £7 over five years
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
Samsung UE32K5100
Samsung
UE32K5100
£239.00
Better brand
40% higher RMS
rated power
15% thinner
High Dynamic
Range Imaging
(HDRI)
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
140Hz faster high frequency rate
VS
JVC LT-32C460
JVC
LT-32C460
£180.00
£29 Cheaper
Better brand
Higher RMS
rated power
7% cheaper to
run over five
years
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Considerably better user reviews
Higher RMS rated power
2% thinner
VS
Toshiba 32W3753DB
Toshiba
32W3753DB
£187.98
£21 Cheaper
Better brand
Internet TV
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
100Hz faster high frequency rate
100Hz faster motion interpolation frequency
Common interface (CI) slot
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
Samsung UE32J4100
Samsung
UE32J4100
£189.00
£20 Cheaper
Better brand
User reviews
are better
A lot thinner
8W higher RMS
rated power
3% cheaper to
run over five
years
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Cheaper to run by £6 over five years
A bit thinner
Common interface (CI) slot
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
Hisense H32M2600
Hisense
H32M2600
£189.90
£19 Cheaper
Better brand
A bit better
user reviews
2W higher RMS
rated power
Internet TV
Extended PVR
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Hugely better user reviews
A lot faster motion interpolation frequency
2W higher RMS rated power
13% larger display diagonal
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
Samsung HG28ED690
Samsung
HG28ED690
£190.97
£18 Cheaper
Better brand
Thinner
£12 cheaper to
run over five
years
2° wider
horizontal
viewing angle
Digital Living
Network
Alliance (DLNA)
certified
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Higher RMS rated power
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
LG 32LH570
LG
32LH570
£225.00
Better brand
A lot thinner
16% cheaper to
run over five
years
Internet TV
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Slightly better user reviews
A lot faster high frequency rate
Higher RMS rated power
Energy efficiency rating is higher
25% larger display diagonal
Common interface (CI) slot
VS
Panasonic TX-24CS500
Panasonic
TX-24CS500
£199.00
£10 Cheaper
Cheaper to run
by £19.96
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Internet TV
Digital Living
Network
Alliance (DLNA)
certified
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Faster high frequency rate
Higher energy efficiency rating
2W higher RMS rated power
£1 cheaper to run over five years
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
Samsung UE32J4510
Samsung
UE32J4510
£199.00
£10 Cheaper
Better brand
User reviews
are marginally
better
A lot thinner
Digital Living
Network
Alliance (DLNA)
certified
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
59% higher RMS rated power
Energy efficiency rating is better
8" larger display diagonal
VS
Samsung V24F39S
Samsung
V24F39S
£199.95
£9 Cheaper
Better brand
22% cheaper to
run over five
years
Digital Living
Network
Alliance (DLNA)
certified
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Energy efficiency rating is higher
2W higher RMS rated power
£3 cheaper to run over five years
VS
Samsung UE32J4500
Samsung
UE32J4500
£215.00
Better brand
User reviews
are a little
better
A lot thinner
Internet TV
Digital Living
Network
Alliance (DLNA)
certified
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Ethernet port
LG 32LF510
LG
32LF510
£197.99
Energy efficiency rating is better
8" larger display diagonal
Higher RMS rated power
VS
Samsung T24H390S
Samsung
T24H390S
£198.99
Better brand
13% cheaper to
run over five
years
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
100Hz faster high frequency rate
100Hz faster motion interpolation frequency
Energy efficiency rating is superior
Cheaper to run by £11 over five years
12° wider horizontal viewing angle
High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP)
VS
Hisense LHD32K370
Hisense
LHD32K370
£210.99
Better brand
30mm thinner
Higher RMS
rated power
Internet TV
Digital Living
Network
Alliance (DLNA)
certified
Extended PVR
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
Panasonic TX-32C300
Panasonic
TX-32C300
£209.00
Energy efficiency rating is superior
Cheaper to run by £20 over five years
Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
Common interface (CI) slot
PC in (D-Sub) port
VS
LG 32LF5610
LG
32LF5610
£209.99
Better brand
User reviews
are better
Vastly thinner
8W higher RMS
rated power
Faster high
frequency rate
LG 32LF510
LG
32LF510
£197.99
Energy efficiency rating is higher
25% larger display diagonal
£4 cheaper to run over five years
VS
Samsung HG24ED470
Samsung
HG24ED470
£208.05
Better brand
4W higher RMS
rated power
A little
thinner