LG 32LF5610 vs Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Review Analysis Specification
Share on

LG 32LF5610vsSharp LC-40CFE5221

LG 32LF5610

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score

LG 32LF5610

£209.99
Our Verdict:
An amazingly highly rated and affordable 32" Full HD TV, with very low running costs and good features
95
Reviews
50 Reviews
98
Value for Money
Excellent
68
Features
Good Features
74
Age
2 Years Old
87
Running Costs
£63 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
32" Full HD No 55.5mm Mar 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 32"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 55.5mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Sharp LC-40CFE5221

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A positively reviewed and very economical to run 40" Full HD television, with good features
89
Reviews
200 Reviews
71
Features
Good Features
77
Age
2 Years Old
89
Running Costs
£61 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
40" Full HD No 67.1mm Jul 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 67.1mm
Release Date Jul 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
LG 32LF5610

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score

LG 32LF5610

£209.99
Our Verdict:
An amazingly highly rated and affordable 32" Full HD TV, with very low running costs and good features
95
Reviews
50 Reviews
98
Value for Money
Excellent
68
Features
Good Features
74
Age
2 Years Old
87
Running Costs
£63 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
32" Full HD No 55.5mm Mar 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 32"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 55.5mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Sharp LC-40CFE5221

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A positively reviewed and very economical to run 40" Full HD television, with good features
89
Reviews
200 Reviews
71
Features
Good Features
77
Age
2 Years Old
89
Running Costs
£61 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
40" Full HD No 67.1mm Jul 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 67.1mm
Release Date Jul 2015
Energy Efficiency A+

Top Prices

LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Dealbuyer.com
Out of stock
£169.95
Go to Store
Ebuyer Business
32" Full Hd Led Tv 1920 X 1080 Resolution 2 X Hdmi 1 X Scart
£209.99
Go to Store
avensys
£289.00
Go to Store
RLR Distribution
Televisions LG 32LF5610 - 32" LED TV - 1080p
£290.00
Go to Store
ARMCO
Out of stock
£351.60
Go to Store
Tekshop247
Out of stock
£540.46
Go to Store
6 Prices from 6 Stores | £209.99-£290.00
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
No prices found
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
10% Off
{Samsung UE22K5000
£133.85
Was £149 (7 days ago)
Amazon UK
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
4 Reasons For
Higher RMS Rated Power
The LG 32LF5610 is a 20W RMS rated power TV. That's 4W higher than the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 (16W).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Thinner
LG 32LF5610 is 55.5mm thick. That's 11.6mm thinner than the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 (67.1mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Much Better User Reviews
The LG 32LF5610 has an average user review score of 92% based on 47 reviews, however the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has an average rating of 77% (based on 99 reviews).
Better Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of 86.2%, whereas Sharp has an average rating of 25.2%.
7 Reasons For
Larger Display Diagonal
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has a display diagonal of 40", but the LG 32LF5610 is only a 32" TV (8" smaller).

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Internet TV
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 supports internet TV, however the LG 32LF5610 does not support internet TV.

Internet TVs allow you to access the internet directly through your TV. Connect your TV to your local network though WiFi or an ethernet cable.

Internet TVs let you watch movies and TV on the internet by connecting directly to services such as BBC iPlayer and YouTube without a computer.

Read more Read less | Edit
Ethernet Port
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has an ethernet port, whereas the LG 32LF5610 does not have an ethernet port.

An ethernet port lets you connect the TV directly to your router with an ethernet cable.

An ethernet connection is more reliable than wifi and is useful if you do not have a wiki network or the wifi signal is weak. Depending on the speed of your wifi network and ethernet connection may be faster than wifi which means less buffering when streaming content to the TV.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has a common interface (CI) slot, whereas the LG 32LF5610 does not have a common interface (CI) slot.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
PC in (D-Sub) Port
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has a PC in (D-Sub) port, whereas the LG 32LF5610 does not have a PC in (D-Sub) port.

The socket (port) to receive input from a PC via a D-sub, which is a connector with a characteristic D-shaped metal shield. Also known as a VGA Port.

A D-sub port is needed to connect your TV to older devices and computers that use a VGA connection - generally those made before 2000.

Read more Read less | Edit
Cheaper to Run by £2 Over Five Years
Over five years the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 is £2 cheaper to run than the LG 32LF5610.
Read more Read less
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the LG 32LF5610 has a rating of "A".

Reasons Against

Reviews & Awards

Average User Rating

The LG 32LF5610 has better user reviews than the Sharp LC-40CFE5221. The average user reviews score for the LG 32LF5610 is 92% based on 47 reviews, where as the average score for the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 is 77% based on 99 reviews.
LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Best
5 stars
36 reviews
4 stars
7 reviews
3 stars
2 reviews
2 stars
1 review
1 star
1 review
5 stars
49 reviews
4 stars
19 reviews
3 stars
13 reviews
2 stars
3 reviews
1 star
15 reviews

Average Brand Rating

LG has a better average brand rating than Sharp. The average brand rating for LG is 86.22% based on 31,780 reviews, where as the average brand rating for Sharp is 25.2% based on 3,180 reviews.
LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
LG

86

86

Based on 31,780 reviews
Sharp

25

25

Based on 3,180 reviews

Date Released

LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
35 months old 31 months old Best

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 32LF5610
LG
32LF5610
8 trees 0.31 tonnes CO2
Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Sharp
LC-40CFE5221
8 trees 0.3 tonnes CO2 (Best)

Review Analysis

Sound Quality

Reviewers thought the LG 32LF5610 sound quality was excellent, and thought the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 sound quality was very good.
LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • Fantastic picture and sound is superb…
    Mike Cross - August 2016
  • Sounds pretty good for a flat panel display…
    G. Masters - October 2016
  • Brilliant so easy to set up picture is really good lovely colour good sound looks great as well with the silver surround cannot fault it would definitely recommend this product…
    Penny b - January 2016
  • The sound is good enough for us to dispense with the extra speakers we used to use…
    Bernard - July 2016
  • Sound is really good too
    Offbeat Dave - February 2016
  • Picture is great quality and sounds great too
    Laura.butler - January 2016
  • The sound is terrible
    Mr G. - July 2016
  • This television has an excellent picture quality; the sound is okay
    Val of London - April 2016
  • Put it on the movie setting and the bass speakers are so distorted
    Zephyr Man - July 2016
  • It can be enhanced with added speakers if you so wished
    Susan - February 2016
  • The picture quality and sound quality is so crisp
    Amazon Customer - January 2016
  • Sound quality is good
    Amazon Customer - January 2016
  • Both the picture and audio are excellent, especially when you consider the price
    Alien937 - February 2016
  • The sound isn't brilliant.
    Flossy - December 2015
  • Product Quality

    Reviewers thought the LG 32LF5610 product quality was excellent, and thought the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 product quality was good.
    LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • As described, great value, great quality…
    Amazon Customer - July 2016
  • Fast Delivery, quality picture and sound Cheers!
    Amazon Customer - January 2016
  • Superb picture quality, highly recommend…
    James Buckland - January 2016
  • Very happy with the quality and discounted price
    James Sorrell - January 2016
  • Excellent quality for a great price
    Laura.butler - January 2016
  • Picture is great quality and sounds great too
    Laura.butler - January 2016
  • The sound and picture quality is fantastic
    Lorraine - April 2016
  • Excellent bargain for a quality product
    Michael collins - January 2016
  • Poor picture quality and build quality is much below what
    Thomas Oldbury - November 2015
  • Poor picture quality and build quality is much below what would be expected from Sharp
    Thomas Oldbury - November 2015
  • This television has an excellent picture quality; the sound is okay
    Val of London - April 2016
  • Good quality and sleek
    Zak Inshya - December 2015
  • A good quality of build
    Zephyr Man - July 2016
  • Specification

     
     
     
    Display LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Display Diagonal 32" 40"
    BEST
    HD Type
    Full HD
     Full HD
    Full HD
     Full HD
    High Frequency Rate 300Hz
    BEST
    Display Resolution
    1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
     1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
    1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
     1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
    Motion Interpolation Frequency 200Hz 200Hz
    Display Brightness 280 Cd/m²
    BEST
    Dynamic Contrast Ratio
    1000000:1
     1000000:1
    1000000:1
     1000000:1
    Supported Video Mode
    1080p
     1080p
    1080p
     1080p
    Screen Format Adjustments
    16:9
     16:9
    16:9
     16:9
    Display Diagonal (metric) 80cm Unknown - Click to provide data
    Supported Graphics Resolutions
    1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
     1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
     1920 x 1080
    1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
     1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
     1920 x 1080
     
     
     
    Audio LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    RMS Rated Power 20W
    BEST
    16W
    Loudspeaker 2 2
    Audio System Unknown - Click to provide data
    Speaker 2 2
     
     
     
    Design LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Mercury Content Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Power LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Energy Efficiency Class
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    Power Consumption (typical) 38W
    BEST
    65W
    Power Consumption (standby) 0.3W
    BEST
    0.5W
    Power Consumption (average) Unknown - Click to provide data 45W
    Annual Energy Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 66kWh
    Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 80W
    Voltage Tolerance Unknown - Click to provide data 20%
     
     
     
    TV Tuner LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Tuner Type
    Digital
     Digital
    Digital
     Digital
    Analog Signal Format System
    Not supported PAL
    SECAM
     Not supported
     PAL
     SECAM
    Not supported PAL
    SECAM
     Not supported
     PAL
     SECAM
     
     
     
    Weight & Dimensions LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Thickness 55.5mm
    BEST
    67.1mm
    Weight 6kg
    BEST
    7.3kg
    Weight With Stand Unknown - Click to provide data 7.6kg
    Width (with Stand) Unknown - Click to provide data 916.8mm
    Height 437mm 532.9mm
    Width 732mm 916.8mm
     
     
     
    Ports & Interfaces LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Headphone Outputs 1 1
    Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    RF Port 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    SCART Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1
    Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    USB 2.0 Port 1 2
    BEST
    HDMI Port 2 3
    BEST
    Audio (L,R) in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    Audio (L,R) Out Unknown - Click to provide data 1
     
     
     
    Technical Details LG 32LF5610 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    RF Input Unknown - Click to provide data 1

    Other Similar Comparisons

    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    User reviews are better
    Vastly thinner
    8W higher RMS rated power
    Faster high frequency rate
    VS
    Panasonic TX-32C300
    Panasonic
    TX-32C300
    £209.00
    £1 Cheaper
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Cheaper to run
    by £20 over
    five years
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    A lot faster motion interpolation frequency
    Higher RMS rated power
    Thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE32J4000
    Samsung
    UE32J4000
    £222.49
    Better brand
    User reviews
    are better
    £25.77 cheaper
    to run
    Higher energy
    efficiency
    rating
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Sharp
    LC-40CFE5221
    £0.00
    Moderately thinner
    Internet TV
    Ethernet port
    PC in (D-Sub) port
    VS
    Samsung UE40J5000
    Samsung
    UE40J5000
    £239.99
    Better brand
    User reviews
    are appreciably
    better
    Better for
    watching sport
    Better for
    watching films
    20% higher RMS
    rated power
    Cheaper to run
    by £6 over
    five years
    Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Sharp
    LC-40CFE5221
    £0.00
    75% faster motion interpolation frequency
    Superior energy efficiency rating
    A lot higher RMS rated power
    Larger display diagonal
    PC in (D-Sub) port
    More popular
    VS
    LG 32LJ590
    LG
    32LJ590
    £215.00
    Better brand
    16% cheaper to
    run
    Wi-Fi
    Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Sharp
    LC-40CFE5221
    £0.00
    VS
    LG 24MT46
    LG
    24MT46
    £139.98
    48% cheaper to
    run
    Considerably
    better user
    reviews
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    VS
    Samsung HG32ED670
    Samsung
    HG32ED670
    £255.08
    Better brand
    Higher energy
    efficiency
    rating
    £14 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    6.4mm thinner
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    10W higher RMS rated power
    7.4mm thinner
    13% larger display diagonal
    VS
    Samsung HG28EE460AK
    Samsung
    HG28EE460AK
    £212.24
    Better brand
    £27 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Higher energy
    efficiency
    rating
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    User reviews are slightly better
    A lot higher RMS rated power
    Thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE32J4500
    Samsung
    UE32J4500
    £215.00
    Better brand
    27% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    Higher RMS rated power
    Larger display diagonal
    7% thinner
    VS
    Panasonic TX-24DS500
    Panasonic
    TX-24DS500
    £219.00
    64% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    50% faster
    motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    Better energy
    efficiency
    rating
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    User reviews are marginally better
    15W higher RMS rated power
    Faster high frequency rate
    Faster motion interpolation frequency
    8" larger display diagonal
    VS
    Sharp LC-24LE250KWH
    Sharp
    LC-24LE250KWH
    £199.99
    £10 Cheaper
    £30 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Significantly
    thinner
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    Better user reviews
    Higher RMS rated power
    Hugely faster high frequency rate
    25% larger display diagonal
    7% thinner
    VS
    Panasonic TX-24CS500
    Panasonic
    TX-24CS500
    £199.00
    £11 Cheaper
    Cheaper to run
    by £40 over
    five years
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    Faster high frequency rate
    Faster motion interpolation frequency
    10W higher RMS rated power
    VS
    Blaupunkt 40/133O
    Blaupunkt
    40/133O
    £229.00
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    better
    8" larger
    display
    diagonal
    2% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Ethernet port
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    Much better user reviews
    70% higher RMS rated power
    Thinner
    VS
    Toshiba 32W3753DB
    Toshiba
    32W3753DB
    £187.98
    £22 Cheaper
    Better energy
    efficiency
    rating
    32% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    Marginally better user reviews
    Thinner
    30% higher RMS rated power
    VS
    Hisense H32M2600
    Hisense
    H32M2600
    £189.90
    £20 Cheaper
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    £14.65 cheaper
    to run
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    67% faster high frequency rate
    50% faster motion interpolation frequency
    20% higher RMS rated power
    3.5mm thinner
    VS
    Hisense LHD32K370
    Hisense
    LHD32K370
    £210.99
    14% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    User reviews are significantly better
    VS
    Samsung T32E310
    Samsung
    T32E310
    £189.00
    £21 Cheaper
    Better brand
    £23.68 cheaper
    to run
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    Thinner
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    12W higher RMS rated power
    Cheaper to run by £2 over five years
    VS
    Toshiba 40L1653DB
    Toshiba
    40L1653DB
    £180.00
    £30 Cheaper
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    20% larger
    display
    diagonal
    Wi-Fi
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    Faster high frequency rate
    14W higher RMS rated power
    VS
    JVC LT-32C671
    JVC
    LT-32C671
    £179.99
    £30 Cheaper
    Cheaper to run
    by £23 over
    five years
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    User reviews are moderately better
    10W higher RMS rated power
    8" larger display diagonal
    VS
    Samsung T24D391
    Samsung
    T24D391
    £179.99
    £30 Cheaper
    Better brand
    Cheaper to run
    by £31 over
    five years
    Thinner
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 32LF5610
    LG
    32LF5610
    £209.99
    Better brand
    User reviews are a lot better
    80% faster high frequency rate
    24.5mm thinner
    Higher RMS rated power
    VS
    Cello C32227F
    Cello
    C32227F
    £176.29
    £34 Cheaper
    6% cheaper to
    run
    3D
    Electronic
    Programme Guide
    (EPG)
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port