LG 49UF770 vs LG 49UF850 vs Samsung UE50JU6800
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Reviews & Awards Date Released What are They Best Used For Manufacturer's Warranty Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Review Analysis Specification
Share on

LG 49UF770vsLG 49UF850vsSamsung UE50JU6800

LG 49UF770

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score

LG 49UF770

£525.00
Our Verdict:
A very cheap and positively reviewed 49" 4K television, with low running costs and very good features
91
Reviews
462 Reviews
90
Value for Money
Excellent
82
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Age
2 Years Old
72
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
49" 4K No 56.7mm Apr 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 49"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56.7mm
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
LG 49UF850

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 49UF850

£699.00
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 49" 4K TV, good for watching sport
91
Reviews
62 Reviews + 3 Awards
71
Value for Money
Good
85
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Age
2 Years Old
79
Running Costs
£86 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
49" 4K No 51.3mm Mar 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 49"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 51.3mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE50JU6800

81

Overall Score

81

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 50" 4K TV, with low running costs but representing only average value for money
92
Reviews
16 Reviews + 1 Award
63
Value for Money
Good
83
Features
Fully-Featured
78
Age
2 Years Old
70
Running Costs
£120 Over 5 Years
81
Overall Score
Excellent
50" 4K No 63.2mm Sep 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 50"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 63.2mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A
LG 49UF770

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score

LG 49UF770

£525.00
Our Verdict:
A very cheap and positively reviewed 49" 4K television, with low running costs and very good features
91
Reviews
462 Reviews
90
Value for Money
Excellent
82
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Age
2 Years Old
72
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
49" 4K No 56.7mm Apr 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 49"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56.7mm
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
LG 49UF850

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 49UF850

£699.00
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 49" 4K TV, good for watching sport
91
Reviews
62 Reviews + 3 Awards
71
Value for Money
Good
85
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Age
2 Years Old
79
Running Costs
£86 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
49" 4K No 51.3mm Mar 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 49"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 51.3mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE50JU6800

81

Overall Score

81

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 50" 4K TV, with low running costs but representing only average value for money
92
Reviews
16 Reviews + 1 Award
63
Value for Money
Good
83
Features
Fully-Featured
78
Age
2 Years Old
70
Running Costs
£120 Over 5 Years
81
Overall Score
Excellent
50" 4K No 63.2mm Sep 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 50"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 63.2mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
RLR Distribution
Televisions LG 49UF770V Smart Ultra HD 4k 49" LED TV
£525.00
Go to Store
Ebuyer Business
Lg 49Inch 4k Led Webos 2.0 Tv (incl Magic Remote) Wifi 2.0ch 20w
£584.93
Go to Store
Electrical Experience
LG 49UF770V Smart Ultra HD 4k 49"LED TV
£699.99
Go to Store
CompAdvance
Out of stock
£730.99
Go to Store
4 Prices from 4 Stores | £525.00-£699.99
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
RLR Distribution
Televisions LG 49UF850V Smart 3D Ultra HD 4k 49" LED TV
£699.00
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £699.00
eBay
Samsung UE50JU6800 50" 4K Nano Crystal Smart TV UHD (Brand new, unopened)
£434.00
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £434.00
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
10% Off
{Samsung UE22K5000
£133.85
Was £149 (5 days ago)
Amazon UK
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
3 Reasons For
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Superior Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 49UF770 is "A+", whereas the rating of the LG 49UF850 is "A+" and the rating of the Samsung UE50JU6800 is "A".
Expert Reviews Are Marginally Better
Based on 1 review, the average expert review score of the LG 49UF770 is 80%, whereas the average rating of the LG 49UF850 is 76% (based on 15 reviews).
7 Reasons For
3D
The LG 49UF850 is a 3D TV, but the LG 49UF770 and the Samsung UE50JU6800 are not 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
92% Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
The LG 49UF850 is a 1,600Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 200Hz faster than the LG 49UF770 (1,400Hz) and 1,460Hz faster than the Samsung UE50JU6800 (140Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Local Dimming
The LG 49UF850 features local dimming, however the Samsung UE50JU6800 does not feature local dimming.

'Local Dimming' on a TV is a function that dims certain sections of the backlight to control the level of light/color intensity in a given part of the screen.

Local dimming can be used to make blacks on the screen appear darker and richer by removing the backlight behind them.

Read more Read less | Edit
24% Thinner
The LG 49UF850 has a thickness of 51.3mm, however the LG 49UF770 is a 56.7mm thick TV (5.4mm thicker) and the Samsung UE50JU6800 is a 63.2mm thick TV (11.9mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Cheaper to Run by £29 Over Five Years
The LG 49UF850 only costs £86 to run over five years however the LG 49UF770 costs £109 to run (27% more) and the Samsung UE50JU6800 costs £115 to run (34% more).
Read more Read less
Superior Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 49UF850 is "A+", whereas the rating of the LG 49UF770 is "A+" and the rating of the Samsung UE50JU6800 is "A".
Two More Awards
The LG 49UF850 has 3 awards, but the Samsung UE50JU6800 has 1 award.
8 Reasons For
Larger Display Diagonal
The Samsung UE50JU6800 is a 50" TV. That's 1" larger than the LG 49UF770 and the LG 49UF850 (49").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
£91 Cheaper
The Samsung UE50JU6800 costs £91 less than the LG 49UF770 and costs £265 less than the LG 49UF850.
Expert Reviews Are a Little Better
Based on 1 expert review, the average review score of the Samsung UE50JU6800 is 80%, however the average rating of the LG 49UF850 is 76% (based on 15 reviews).
User Reviews Are a Little Better
Based on 15 user reviews, the average review score of the Samsung UE50JU6800 is 91%, however the average rating of the LG 49UF770 is 88% (based on 252 reviews) and the average rating of the LG 49UF850 is 87% (based on 31 reviews).
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 90.6%, whereas LG has an average rating of 86.2%.
Better for Watching Films
The Samsung UE50JU6800 is better for watching films than the LG 49UF770.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Better for Watching Sport
The Samsung UE50JU6800 is better for watching sport than the LG 49UF770.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
Better for Playing Games
The Samsung UE50JU6800 is better for playing games than the LG 49UF770.
When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.
Read more Read less

Reasons Against

LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
12 Reasons Against
Smaller Display Diagonal
The LG 49UF770 is a 49" TV, and so does the LG 49UF850. That's 1" smaller than the Samsung UE50JU6800 (50").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not 3D
The LG 49UF770 is not 3D (As does the the Samsung UE50JU6800), whereas the LG 49UF850 is 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
15% Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The LG 49UF770 is a 1,400Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 200Hz slower than the LG 49UF850 (1,600Hz) and 1,260Hz faster than the Samsung UE50JU6800 (140Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
A Bit Thicker
The LG 49UF770 has a thickness of 56.7mm, however the LG 49UF850 is a 51.3mm thick TV (5.4mm thinner) and the Samsung UE50JU6800 is a 63.2mm thick TV (6.5mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£91 More Expensive
The LG 49UF770 is more expensive than the Samsung UE50JU6800 by £91.
Five Months Older
The LG 49UF770 is older than the Samsung UE50JU6800 by five months.
27% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
The running costs of the LG 49UF770 are £109 which is £23 more than the LG 49UF850 over five years. Show assumptions.
Marginally Lower User Review Score
The average user rating of the LG 49UF770 is 88%, whereas the average user rating of the Samsung UE50JU6800 is 91% (based on 15 reviews).
Worse Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of only 86.4%, but Samsung has an average rating of 90.6%.
Worse for Watching Films
The LG 49UF770 is worse for watching films than the LG 49UF850 and Samsung UE50JU6800.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Worse for Watching Sport
The LG 49UF770 is worse for watching sport than the LG 49UF850 and Samsung UE50JU6800.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
Worse for Playing Games
The LG 49UF770 is worse for playing games than the LG 49UF850 and Samsung UE50JU6800.
When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.
Read more Read less
7 Reasons Against
3% Smaller Display Diagonal
The LG 49UF850 is a 49" TV, and so does the LG 49UF770. That's 1" smaller than the Samsung UE50JU6800 (50").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
£265 More Expensive
The LG 49UF850 is more expensive than the LG 49UF770 by £174 and more expensive than the Samsung UE50JU6800 by £265.
Fewer Sellers
Only 1 retailer sell the LG 49UF850, but 4 stores sell the LG 49UF770.
The smaller the number of stores that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Read more Read less
Six Months Older
The LG 49UF850 is older than the LG 49UF770 by one month and older than the Samsung UE50JU6800 by six months.
Moderately Lower Expert Review Score
The average expert rating of the LG 49UF850 is only 76%, whereas the average expert rating of the LG 49UF770 is 80% (based on 1 review) and the Samsung UE50JU6800 is 80% (based on 1 review).
Moderately Lower User Review Score
The average user rating of the LG 49UF850 is 87%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 49UF770 is 88% (based on 252 reviews) and the Samsung UE50JU6800 is 91% (based on 15 reviews).
Worse Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of only 86.2%, but LG has an average rating of 86.4% and Samsung has an average rating of 90.6%.
8 Reasons Against
Not 3D
The Samsung UE50JU6800 is not 3D (As does the the LG 49UF770), however the LG 49UF850 is 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
11x Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Samsung UE50JU6800 is a 140Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 1,260Hz slower than the LG 49UF770 (1,400Hz) and 1,460Hz slower than the LG 49UF850 (1,600Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Does Not Feature Local Dimming
The Samsung UE50JU6800 does not feature local dimming, whereas the LG 49UF850 features local dimming.

'Local Dimming' on a TV is a function that dims certain sections of the backlight to control the level of light/color intensity in a given part of the screen.

Local dimming can be used to make blacks on the screen appear darker and richer by removing the backlight behind them.

Read more Read less | Edit
Thicker
Samsung UE50JU6800 is 63.2mm thick, but the LG 49UF770 is a 56.7mm thick TV (6.5mm thinner) and the LG 49UF850 is a 51.3mm thick TV (11.9mm thinner).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Less Retailers
Only 1 retailer sell the Samsung UE50JU6800, whereas 4 stores sell the LG 49UF770.
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Read more Read less
34% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Over five years the running costs of the Samsung UE50JU6800 are £115 which is £6 more than the LG 49UF770 and £29 more than the LG 49UF850. Show assumptions.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Lower
The Samsung UE50JU6800 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", however the LG 49UF770 has a rating of "A+" and the LG 49UF850 has a rating of "A+".
Fewer Awards
Whilst the Samsung UE50JU6800 has received 1 award, the LG 49UF850 has received 3 awards.

Reviews & Awards

Awards

The LG 49UF850 has more awards than the Samsung UE50JU6800. The LG 49UF850 has 3 awards, where as the Samsung UE50JU6800 has 1 award. Compare all award winning TVs.
LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
No awards found
3 Awards Best
audiovision.de: Recommended avforums.com: Recommended Expert Reviews: Recommended
1 Award
benchmark.pl: Good Product

Average Expert Rating

The LG 49UF770 and Samsung UE50JU6800 have the best expert reviews out of the three TVs each with an average review score of 80%. The LG 49UF850 has the second best expert reviews with an average review score of 76% based on 15 reviews.
LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
Best
5 stars
0 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
5 stars
4 reviews
4 stars
8 reviews
3 stars
1 review
2 stars
1 review
1 star
0 reviews
Best
5 stars
0 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Average User Rating

The Samsung UE50JU6800 has the best user reviews out of the three TVs with an average review score of 91% based on 15 reviews. The LG 49UF770 has the second best user reviews with an average review score of 88% based on 252 reviews. The LG 49UF850 has the third best user reviews with an average review score of 87% based on 31 reviews.
LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
5 stars
169 reviews
4 stars
46 reviews
3 stars
17 reviews
2 stars
5 reviews
1 star
15 reviews
5 stars
23 reviews
4 stars
4 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
4 reviews
Best
5 stars
11 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
3 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has a better average brand rating than LG. The average brand rating for Samsung is 90.61% based on 112,790 reviews, where as the average brand rating for LG is 86.22% based on 31,780 reviews.
LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
LG

86

86

Based on 32,825 reviews
LG

86

86

Based on 31,780 reviews
Samsung

91

91

Based on 112,790 reviews

Date Released

LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
34 months old 35 months old 29 months old Best

What are They Best Used For

Watching Films

When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!

Compare the best TVs for film.

Watching Sport

When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.

Compare the best TVs for sport.

Playing Games

When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.

Compare the best TVs for gaming.

Manufacturer's Warranty

LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
No data No data 1 year

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

3D

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
Best
No
Yes
Best
No

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 49UF770
LG
49UF770
14 trees 0.54 tonnes CO2
LG 49UF850
LG
49UF850
11 trees 0.43 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Samsung UE50JU6800
Samsung
UE50JU6800
15 trees 0.57 tonnes CO2

Review Analysis

Product Quality

Reviews for the Samsung UE50JU6800 mention that product quality was very good, and reviews for the LG 49UF770 mention that product quality was good.
LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
  • Don't get me wrong the picture quality was excellent…
    Kevin M - September 2015
  • Once you have messed around a little with them to get it to suit how you want it the picture quality is outstanding to me…
    Amazon Customer - November 2015
  • Sound quality is very good as is the build quality…
    Amazon Customer - August 2015
  • Easy to use and set up and the picture quality is amazing…
    Laura L - February 2016
  • As the quality is considerably better…
    Tescodirect - February 2016
  • Sound quality seems good enough, although on-set speakers never compete with a surround sound system…
    Tescodirect - February 2016
  • The main thing you watch it for - the picture quality which is very good…
    Susman - July 2015
  • The sound quality isn't the best…
    Jared - August 2015
  • Excellent picture quality and easy to navigate menu's…
    Steve B - January 2016
  • Very good picture quality…
    Jared - August 2015
  • No data
  • The picture quality is very good.
    Sully - December 2015
  • Picture quality superb and smart hub works well for us…
    MR MT CARTER - November 2015
  • Ease of Use

    Reviews of both the LG 49UF850 and the LG 49UF770 mention that the ease of use was excellent.
    LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
  • It is faster an easier to use…
    Dave S. - September 2015
  • The people who created this colorful user interface are great…
    Dave S. - September 2015
  • The menus are great and the cursor you get with the remote is such a brilliant concept…
    Dave K. - December 2015
  • Every thing about this is so good can't see where people had problems with the remote it's very simple to use…
    Ebbeachbum - November 2015
  • Setting up was simple.
    Jim G. - September 2015
  • Everything else works fine, has a great picture and very easy to use interface…
    Amazon Customer - January 2016
  • Easy to use and set up…
    Laura L - February 2016
  • The box has handles on either side so moving it around is pretty easy though it will require two people…
    Dave K. - December 2015
  • Great picture, easy to set up, impressive features…
    Barry - August 2015
  • It's quicker to use and more responsive…
    Tech-junkie - February 2016
  • The versatile remote control…
    Whathifi.com - May 2015
  • The magic remote is fantastic very easy to use…
    JUSTIN H CONSIDINE - January 2016
  • Great picture, simple to use, nothing to dislike…
    Amazon Customer - February 2016
  • Glasses included also very comfortable…
    Mr. S. Heptinstall - January 2016
  • Excellent picture, easy to set up and use…
    Philip B. Hodgson - April 2016
  • Really quick, really intuitive…
    Robotfish - December 2015
  • No data

    Picture Quality

    Reviewers of the Samsung UE50JU6800 thought the picture quality was very good, and thought the LG 49UF770 picture quality was good.
    LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
  • Don't get me wrong the picture quality was excellent…
    Kevin M - September 2015
  • Once you have messed around a little with them to get it to suit how you want it the picture quality is outstanding to me…
    Amazon Customer - November 2015
  • Less then 3 months old and half the screen has gone dark, flickering…
    Amazon Customer - February 2016
  • Easy to use and set up and the picture quality is amazing…
    Laura L - February 2016
  • The colour depth is amazing, incredibly black blacks and very accurate colours…
  • The main thing you watch it for - the picture quality which is very good…
    Susman - July 2015
  • Excellent picture quality and easy to navigate menu's…
    Steve B - January 2016
  • Very good picture quality…
    Jared - August 2015
  • Brilliant great picture and amazing picture quality with a magic remote even better…
    Haynezy - December 2015
  • The magic remote and picture quality are very good…
    Matt - October 2015
  • No data
  • The picture quality is very good.
    Sully - December 2015
  • The colours were dazzling…
    CAPTAIN CLEGG - February 2016
  • Picture quality superb and smart hub works well for us…
    MR MT CARTER - November 2015
  • Remote Control

    People thought the remote control of both the LG 49UF850 and the LG 49UF770 was excellent.
    LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
  • The menus are great and the cursor you get with the remote is such a brilliant concept…
    Dave K. - December 2015
  • Every thing about this is so good can't see where people had problems with the remote it's very simple to use…
    Ebbeachbum - November 2015
  • Also the magic Remote is fantastic…
    FeRRaR1 - January 2016
  • The "magic" remote takes a bit of getting used to…
    Jim G. - September 2015
  • The remote is nifty once you get the hang of it…
    Computer user - January 2016
  • The design is ergonomic and sits well in the hand and the function on each button/ symbols are well laid out & having only a few buttons you soon learn what they are – really how often do you actually read the, manual, on your remote? It is not one of those “busy” remotes where there are tons of input buttons…
    Susman - July 2015
  • Our thoughts on the supplied Magic Remote 2015…
    Susman - July 2015
  • Easy set up, smart remote a bonus…
    Miker - February 2016
  • Brilliant great picture and amazing picture quality with a magic remote even better…
    Haynezy - December 2015
  • Setting up the magic remote to control other devices is easy…
    Danyc - July 2015
  • The versatile remote control…
    Whathifi.com - May 2015
  • The magic remote is fantastic very easy to use…
    JUSTIN H CONSIDINE - January 2016
  • My only gripe is with the remote, which is very clever.
    Philip B. Hodgson - April 2016
  • No data

    Price

    Reviewers thought the LG 49UF770 price was excellent, but thought the LG 49UF850 price was only average.
    LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
  • Very happy and at an excellent price!
    AndyC - November 2015
  • Looks very nice in the lounge and not cheap and plastic looking stand either, quite substantial…
    Barbara - March 2016
  • Stunning image, excellent value, easy to use, love it…
    Daniel - December 2015
  • For the money £549 think this is a bargain, oh and the missus loves it…
    Mr. C. S. Falconer - November 2015
  • Fantastic value and superb quality easy to set up & use…
    Mr N G P Le brun - November 2015
  • Great value item, phenomenal picture quality…
  • Awesome price, buy now!
    Batteredburrito - October 2015
  • Good price, good size, delivery was well on time…
    Craig Lyon - August 2015
  • Great value…
    BobbyG - July 2015
  • You get everything you need for a very good price…
    Special Order 937 - March 2016
  • The look hasn't really changed a great deal from the 2014 version…
    Digitalversus.com - April 2015
  • Overall good value product…
    Emilgeorge4321 - November 2015
  • No data

    Design

    Reviews of all 3 products mention that the design was excellent.
    LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
  • Beautiful, stylish and responsive slab of technology…
    Jeremy Teoh - December 2015
  • The box has handles on either side so moving it around is pretty easy though it will require two people…
    Dave K. - December 2015
  • That's a pretty common issue with slim bezel designs…
    Craig CF - March 2016
  • It is great for entering text on the keyboard scroll wheel is pretty neat too…
    Susman - July 2015
  • The design is ergonomic and sits well in the hand…
    Susman - July 2015
  • This is a fantastic and good looking 43" television…
    Ossian - July 2015
  • The design is attractively minimal…
    Rolo - August 2015
  • Moving images are smooth and stutter free…
    Martin E. - August 2016
  • Slim frame with a neat look…
    Christopher talbot - January 2016
  • In that sense it is a resounding success, with a classic appearance that uses a reasonably slim panel…
    Avforums.com - June 2015
  • Beautiful clear images…
    Robotfish - December 2015
  • The smart function is very easy plus very fast and smooth to use…
    CAPTAIN CLEGG - February 2016
  • With the film having loads of desert shots, well shots from another planet they looked picturesque and beautiful…
    CAPTAIN CLEGG - February 2016
  • Beautiful picture…
    Graeme Ramage - August 2016
  • Sound Quality

    For both the LG 49UF770 and the LG 49UF850 reviewers thought the sound quality was excellent.
    LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
  • Can't fault the picture or sound in any way, installing it was easy…
    Davy - March 2016
  • Better than average sound…
    Go4brendon - December 2015
  • Sound quality is very good as is the build quality…
    Amazon Customer - August 2015
  • The sound is adequate…
    Dace - January 2016
  • Sound quality seems good enough, although on-set speakers never compete with a surround sound system…
    Tescodirect - February 2016
  • The sound quality isn't the best…
    Jared - August 2015
  • Sound better than expected…
    Barbara - March 2016
  • Brilliant picture, brilliant sound…
    JohnDoe - July 2015
  • Sound is average.
    Mr. M. J. Fresh - December 2015
  • Picture quality and sound from setup are great too…
    STrowsdale - August 2015
  • It offers a strong picture performance and decent sound…
    Whathifi.com - May 2015
  • The sound is very good the picture quality is superb…
    Clive - January 2016
  • The sound is very decent, with some reasonable oomph…
    Mr. S. Heptinstall - January 2016
  • Sound department is exceptional…
    Emilgeorge4321 - November 2015
  • Sound is good with Movie mode selected…
    John Harrison - December 2015
  • Sound - this is good…
    Robotfish - December 2015
  • No data

    Specification

     
     
     
    Display LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Display Diagonal 49" 49" 50"
    BEST
    HD Type
    4K
     4K
    4K
     4K
    4K
     4K
    High Frequency Rate 200Hz
    BEST
    Display Resolution
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    Motion Interpolation Frequency 1,400Hz 1,600Hz 140Hz
    BEST
    Display Brightness 400 Cd/m²
    BEST
    Supported Video Mode
    2160p 1080p
     2160p
     1080p
    2160p 1080p
     2160p
     1080p
    2160p 1080p
     2160p
     1080p
    PQI (Picture Quality Index)
    PMI (Picture Mastering Index) Unknown - Click to provide data 1,600 Unknown - Click to provide data
    Display Technology
    LED
     LED
    LED
     LED
    LED
     LED
    Screen Format Adjustments
    Zoom
     Zoom
    Zoom
     Zoom
    Zoom
     Zoom
    Display Diagonal (metric) Unknown - Click to provide data 123cm 125cm
    BEST
    Supported Graphics Resolutions
    3840 x 2160
     3840 x 2160
    3840 x 2160
     3840 x 2160
    3840 x 2160
     3840 x 2160
     
     
     
    Audio LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    RMS Rated Power 20W 20W 20W
    Loudspeaker 2 2 2
    Sound Modes
    News Music
    Movie Sports
    Game
     News
     Music
     Movie
     Sports
     Game
    News Music
    Movie Sports
    Game
     News
     Music
     Movie
     Sports
     Game
    News Music
    Movie Sports
    Game
     News
     Music
     Movie
     Sports
     Game
    Speaker 2 2 2
     
     
     
    Smart TV LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Lifestyle Apps
    Skype
     Skype
    Skype
     Skype
    Skype
     Skype
    Operating System Version Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Other Features LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Dimming Type Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Design LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Peak Luminance Ratio Unknown - Click to provide data 65% Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Power LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Energy Efficiency Class
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    Power Consumption (typical) 67W 66W
    BEST
    93W
    Power Consumption (standby) 0.3W 0.3W 0.3W
    Annual Energy Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 96kWh 129kWh
    BEST
    Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 226W
     
     
     
    TV Tuner LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Tuner Type
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
     
     
     
    Performance LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Network Streaming Service
    Netflix Picasa
     Netflix
     Picasa
    Netflix Picasa
     Netflix
     Picasa
    Netflix Picasa
     Netflix
     Picasa
    Video Formats Supported
    DIVX DIVX HD
    H.265
     DIVX
     DIVX HD
     H.265
    DIVX DIVX HD
    H.265
     DIVX
     DIVX HD
     H.265
    DIVX DIVX HD
    H.265
     DIVX
     DIVX HD
     H.265
    Audio Formats Supported
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    PCM eAAC+
    HE-AAC EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ RA-Lossless
    DTS
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     PCM
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     RA-Lossless
     DTS
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    PCM eAAC+
    HE-AAC EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ RA-Lossless
    DTS
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     PCM
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     RA-Lossless
     DTS
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    PCM eAAC+
    HE-AAC EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ RA-Lossless
    DTS
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     PCM
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     RA-Lossless
     DTS
    Image Formats Supported
    JPG MPO
    JPS
     JPG
     MPO
     JPS
    JPG MPO
    JPS
     JPG
     MPO
     JPS
    JPG MPO
    JPS
     JPG
     MPO
     JPS
    Processor Cores Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4
    Teletext Unknown - Click to provide data 2,000 Pages Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Packaging Content LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Remote Control Type Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Cables Included
    AC
     AC
    AC
     AC
    AC
     AC
     
     
     
    Networking LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Wi-Fi Standards
    802.11n 802.11g
    802.11b 802.11ac
    802.11a
     802.11n
     802.11g
     802.11b
     802.11ac
     802.11a
    802.11n 802.11g
    802.11b 802.11ac
    802.11a
     802.11n
     802.11g
     802.11b
     802.11ac
     802.11a
    802.11n 802.11g
    802.11b 802.11ac
    802.11a
     802.11n
     802.11g
     802.11b
     802.11ac
     802.11a
     
     
     
    Management Features LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Smart Modes
    Cinema Game
    Standard Sports
    Vivid Photo
    Music Natural
    Movie
     Cinema
     Game
     Standard
     Sports
     Vivid
     Photo
     Music
     Natural
     Movie
    Cinema Game
    Standard Sports
    Vivid Photo
    Music Natural
    Movie
     Cinema
     Game
     Standard
     Sports
     Vivid
     Photo
     Music
     Natural
     Movie
    Cinema Game
    Standard Sports
    Vivid Photo
    Music Natural
    Movie
     Cinema
     Game
     Standard
     Sports
     Vivid
     Photo
     Music
     Natural
     Movie
    Number of OSD Languages Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 27
     
     
     
    Weight & Dimensions LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Thickness 56.7mm 51.3mm
    BEST
    63.2mm
    Weight Unknown - Click to provide data 16.2kg 13.4kg
    BEST
    Weight With Stand Unknown - Click to provide data 17.4kg 14.5kg
    BEST
    Depth (with Stand) 261mm 260.6mm
    BEST
    310.5mm
    Height (with Stand) 701mm 699mm 706.4mm
    Width (with Stand) 1,104mm 1,095.1mm
    BEST
    1,128.9mm
    Height 645mm 649.5mm 654.4mm
    Width 1,104mm 1,095.1mm 1,128.9mm
     
     
     
    Ports & Interfaces LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Headphone Outputs Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
    Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1 1
    RF Port Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2
    SCART Port 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1 1
    Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in 1 1 1
    USB 2.0 Port 2 2 3
    BEST
    USB 3.0 Port 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    HDMI Port 3 3 4
    BEST
    USB 3.0 Type-A Port 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3 1.3
     
     
     
    Packaging Data LG 49UF770 LG 49UF850 Samsung UE50JU6800
    Package Weight Unknown - Click to provide data 21.2kg 18.9kg
    BEST
    Package Height Unknown - Click to provide data 730mm
    BEST
    748mm
    Package Width Unknown - Click to provide data 1,197mm
    BEST
    1,362mm

    Other Similar Comparisons

    LG 49UF770
    LG
    49UF770
    £525.00
    Energy efficiency rating is higher
    £29 cheaper to run over five years
    VS
    Samsung UE55MU6470U
    Samsung
    UE55MU6470U
    £524.99
    Same Price
    Better brand
    Better for
    watching films
    11% larger
    display
    diagonal
    4% thinner
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    20% larger display diagonal
    Thinner
    VS
    Panasonic TX-40EX603E
    Panasonic
    TX-40EX603E
    £483.33
    Faster motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    £35.99 cheaper
    to run
    Local dimming
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    20% larger display diagonal
    50 cd/m² brighter display brightness
    Thinner
    Common interface (CI) slot
    VS
    Philips 40PFT5500
    Philips
    40PFT5500
    £419.99
    £14 Cheaper
    56% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Better energy
    efficiency
    rating
    30% faster
    motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    VS
    LG 50LF561
    LG
    50LF561
    £410.36
    £24 Cheaper
    Better user
    reviews
    42% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Thinner
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    Considerably better user reviews
    Slightly larger display diagonal
    VS
    LG 49UH668
    LG
    49UH668
    £400.00
    £34 Cheaper
    35% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    better
    Local dimming
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    1" larger display diagonal
    VS
    Panasonic TX-49EX600
    Panasonic
    TX-49EX600
    £399.00
    £35 Cheaper
    Faster motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    Good for
    watching films
    Very good for
    playing games
    Very good for
    watching sport
    £9.65 cheaper
    to run
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    One year longer manufacturer's guarantee
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    Better for playing games
    0.5mm thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE50J6240
    Samsung
    UE50J6240
    £469.00
    80% faster
    motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    Better energy
    efficiency
    rating
    24% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Local dimming
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    Expert reviews are hugely better
    20% larger display diagonal
    50 cd/m² brighter display brightness
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    Better for playing games
    0.8mm thinner
    Common interface (CI) slot
    VS
    Philips 40PFT6550
    Philips
    40PFT6550
    £399.00
    £35 Cheaper
    Cheaper to run
    by £63 over
    five years
    Faster motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    Superior energy
    efficiency
    rating
    3D
    Local dimming
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    User reviews are better
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    Better for playing games
    Slightly thinner
    Larger display diagonal
    VS
    Samsung UE48J5510
    Samsung
    UE48J5510
    £479.00
    260Hz faster
    motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    £32 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Local dimming
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    0.5mm thinner
    Internet TV
    Ethernet port
    VS
    Samsung UE50J6100
    Samsung
    UE50J6100
    £488.99
    User reviews
    are better
    Higher energy
    efficiency
    rating
    £29 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    1" larger display diagonal
    VS
    LG 49LF630
    LG
    49LF630
    £439.00
    38% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    better
    Thinner
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    21% thinner
    Larger display diagonal
    VS
    Grundig 43 VLE 6621
    Grundig
    43 VLE 6621
    £370.39
    £64 Cheaper
    77% faster
    motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    Cheaper to run
    by £45.65
    Superior energy
    efficiency
    rating
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    One year longer manufacturer's guarantee
    7" larger display diagonal
    Brighter display brightness
    3.9mm thinner
    Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
    Common interface (CI) slot
    VS
    Philips 43PUS6162
    Philips
    43PUS6162
    £369.00
    £65 Cheaper
    Cheaper to run
    by £61 over
    five years
    Better user
    reviews
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    30% cheaper to run
    Higher RMS rated power
    8" larger display diagonal
    Brighter display brightness
    A little thinner
    VS
    Haier LEF42V200
    Haier
    LEF42V200
    £368.89
    £65 Cheaper
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better Benchmark.pl review score
    Much better user reviews
    A little better expert reviews
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    2" larger display diagonal
    Thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE48JU6400
    Samsung
    UE48JU6400
    £509.99
    Better energy
    efficiency
    rating
    31% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Local dimming
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    Larger display diagonal
    Thinner
    0% cheaper to run
    VS
    Panasonic TX-L32E30
    Panasonic
    TX-L32E30
    £536.00
    Expert reviews
    are a lot
    better
    Four
    loudspeakers
    30% faster
    motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Faster motion interpolation frequency
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    Better for playing games
    VS
    Samsung UE50KU6000
    Samsung
    UE50KU6000
    £537.00
    User reviews
    are better
    Local dimming
    DVI port
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    10W higher RMS rated power
    A lot thinner
    Larger display diagonal
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    VS
    LG 49LJ515
    LG
    49LJ515
    £329.90
    £104 Cheaper
    £57.61 cheaper
    to run
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better for watching sport
    20% larger display diagonal
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    VS
    Samsung HG40EE670
    Samsung
    HG40EE670
    £422.97
    £11 Cheaper
    Cheaper to run
    by £62 over
    five years
    Superior energy
    efficiency
    rating
    17% thinner
    DVI port
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    Samsung UE50JU6800
    Samsung
    UE50JU6800
    £434.00
    Better brand
    One year longer manufacturer's guarantee
    Larger display diagonal
    Better for watching sport
    Better for watching films
    Better for playing games
    VS
    Sony KDL-43W756
    Sony
    KDL-43W756
    £430.00
    £4 Cheaper
    Significantly
    faster motion
    interpolation
    frequency
    £45 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    8% thinner