LG 55EG910 vs LG 55UF950 vs LG 55UG870
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Size and Dimensions Reviews & Awards Date Released What are They Best Used For Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Review Analysis Specification
Share on

LG 55EG910vsLG 55UF950vsLG 55UG870

LG 55EG910

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 55EG910

£1,249.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and award winning 55" Full HD television, with average running costs but representing only average value for money
98
Reviews
106 Reviews + 1 Award
54
Value for Money
Average
87
Features
Fully-Featured
79
Age
2 Years Old
67
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" Full HD Yes 48.9mm Sep 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology Yes
Thickness 48.9mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A
LG 55UF950

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 55UF950

£849.97
£339.03
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 55" 4K TV, with moderate running costs but representing only moderate value for money
93
Reviews
34 Reviews + 7 Awards
66
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
69
Running Costs
£130 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 47.6mm Mar 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 47.6mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A
LG 55UG870

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score

LG 55UG870

£1,399.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but 3 year old 55" 4K TV, with low running costs but representing only average value for money
56
Value for Money
Average
84
Features
Fully-Featured
76
Age
2 Years Old
74
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 98mm Mar 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 98mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
LG 55EG910

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 55EG910

£1,249.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and award winning 55" Full HD television, with average running costs but representing only average value for money
98
Reviews
106 Reviews + 1 Award
54
Value for Money
Average
87
Features
Fully-Featured
79
Age
2 Years Old
67
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" Full HD Yes 48.9mm Sep 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology Yes
Thickness 48.9mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A
LG 55UF950

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 55UF950

£849.97
£339.03
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 55" 4K TV, with moderate running costs but representing only moderate value for money
93
Reviews
34 Reviews + 7 Awards
66
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
69
Running Costs
£130 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 47.6mm Mar 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 47.6mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A
LG 55UG870

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score

LG 55UG870

£1,399.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but 3 year old 55" 4K TV, with low running costs but representing only average value for money
56
Value for Money
Average
84
Features
Fully-Featured
76
Age
2 Years Old
74
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 98mm Mar 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 98mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A+

Top Prices

LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
RGB Direct
£1,249.00
Go to Store
Crampton and Moore
LG 55EG910V 55"Curved FULL HD OLED 3D Smart TV
Out of stock
£1,299.00
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | £1,249.00
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Valutech
LG 55UF950V Smart 55" ULTRA HD 4K LED TV Super Slim Bezel Silver (Brand new, unopened) - on
£849.97
Go to Store
RLR Distribution
Televisions LG 55UF950V Smart 3D Ultra HD 4k 55" LED TV
£1,189.00
Go to Store
Ebuyer Business
Lg 55Inch 4k Led Auditorium Stand Colourprime Wcg Webos 2.0 Tv (incl Magic Remote) Wifi 4.2ch 60w
£1,748.99
Go to Store
Ogormans
£1,799.99
Go to Store
4 Prices from 4 Stores | £849.97-£1,799.99
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
RLR Distribution
Televisions LG 55UG870V Smart 3D Ultra HD 4k 55" Curved LED TV
£1,399.00
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £1,399.00
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
29% Off
{Seiki SE24HD02UK
£119.98
Was £170 (31 days ago)
PC World Business
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
2 Reasons For
OLED/QLED Technology
The LG 55EG910 features OLED/QLED technology, however the LG 55UF950 and the LG 55UG870 do not.

OLED and QLED TVs use organic material that creates light when electricity is passed through it. This means that they do not require a back light, unlike standard LED TVs.

OLED and QLED TVs have much higher contrast than LED TVs as they have no back light. They also have a fast response rate, rich colours and a wide viewing angle. They are also cheaper to run.

Read more Read less | Edit
User Reviews Are Better
The average user review score of the LG 55EG910 is 100%, however the average rating of the LG 55UF950 is 94% (based on 18 reviews).
5 Reasons For
A Lot Higher RMS Rated Power
The LG 55UF950 has an RMS rated power of 40W, however the LG 55EG910 and the LG 55UG870 are both only 20W RMS rated power TVs (20W lower).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Four Loudspeakers
The LG 55UF950 is a four loudspeaker TV, whereas the LG 55UG870 only has two loudspeakers.

The number of loudspeakers is the total number of speakers provided with the TV, either inside the TV casing or as external speakers.

A greater number of speakers will allow for better quality audio and different frequencies. Multiple external speakers will enable to the TV to play surround sound audio.

Read more Read less | Edit
2x Thinner
The LG 55UF950 has a thickness of 47.6mm, however the LG 55EG910 is a 48.9mm thick TV (1.3mm thicker) and the LG 55UG870 is a 98mm thick TV (50.4mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£399 Cheaper
The LG 55UF950 is £399.03 cheaper than the LG 55EG910 and £549.03 cheaper than the LG 55UG870.
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
3 Reasons For
£32 Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
The LG 55UG870 is £32 cheaper to run than the LG 55EG910 and £25 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF950 over five years.
Read more Read less
Higher Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 55UG870 is "A+", but the rating of the LG 55EG910 is "A" and the rating of the LG 55UF950 is "A".
User Reviews Are Better
Based on 1 user review, the average review score of the LG 55UG870 is 100%, but the average rating of the LG 55UF950 is 94% (based on 18 reviews).

Reasons Against

LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
7 Reasons Against
Lower RMS Rated Power
The LG 55EG910 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as does the LG 55UG870), but the LG 55UF950 is a 40W RMS rated power TV (20W higher).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Only Two Loudspeakers
The LG 55EG910 has two loudspeakers, and so does the LG 55UG870, however the LG 55UF950 only has four loudspeakers.

The number of loudspeakers is the total number of speakers provided with the TV, either inside the TV casing or as external speakers.

A greater number of speakers will allow for better quality audio and different frequencies. Multiple external speakers will enable to the TV to play surround sound audio.

Read more Read less | Edit
1.3mm Thicker
LG 55EG910 is 48.9mm thick, but the LG 55UF950 is a 47.6mm thick TV (1.3mm thinner) and the LG 55UG870 is a 98mm thick TV (49.1mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£399 More Expensive
The LG 55EG910 is more expensive than the LG 55UF950 by £399.
Less Retailers
Only 2 shops sells the LG 55EG910, whereas 4 stores sell the LG 55UF950.
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Read more Read less
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 29%
Over five years the running costs of the LG 55EG910 are £141 which is £7 more than the LG 55UF950 and £32 more than the LG 55UG870. Show assumptions.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Lower
The LG 55EG910 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", however the LG 55UF950 has a rating of "A" and the LG 55UG870 has a rating of "A+".
5 Reasons Against
Does Not Feature OLED/QLED Technology
The LG 55UF950 does not feature OLED/QLED technology (As does the the LG 55UG870), however the LG 55EG910 features OLED/QLED technology.

OLED and QLED TVs use organic material that creates light when electricity is passed through it. This means that they do not require a back light, unlike standard LED TVs.

OLED and QLED TVs have much higher contrast than LED TVs as they have no back light. They also have a fast response rate, rich colours and a wide viewing angle. They are also cheaper to run.

Read more Read less | Edit
Six Months Older
The LG 55UF950 is older than the LG 55EG910 by six months. The LG 55UF950 is the same age as the LG 55UG870.
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 22%
The running costs of the LG 55UF950 are £134 which is £25 more than the LG 55UG870 over five years. Show assumptions.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Worse
The LG 55UF950 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", whereas the LG 55EG910 has a rating of "A" and the LG 55UG870 has a rating of "A+".
Lower User Review Score
The average user rating of the LG 55UF950 is 94%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 55EG910 is 100% (based on 2 reviews) and the LG 55UG870 is 100% (based on 1 review).
7 Reasons Against
Does Not Feature OLED/QLED Technology
The LG 55UG870 does not feature OLED/QLED technology (As does the the LG 55UF950), whereas the LG 55EG910 features OLED/QLED technology.

OLED and QLED TVs use organic material that creates light when electricity is passed through it. This means that they do not require a back light, unlike standard LED TVs.

OLED and QLED TVs have much higher contrast than LED TVs as they have no back light. They also have a fast response rate, rich colours and a wide viewing angle. They are also cheaper to run.

Read more Read less | Edit
20W Lower RMS Rated Power
The LG 55UG870 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as does the LG 55EG910), whereas the LG 55UF950 is a 40W RMS rated power TV (20W higher).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Only Two Loudspeakers
The number of loudspeakers on the LG 55UG870 is two, and so does the LG 55EG910, but the LG 55UF950 only has four loudspeakers.

The number of loudspeakers is the total number of speakers provided with the TV, either inside the TV casing or as external speakers.

A greater number of speakers will allow for better quality audio and different frequencies. Multiple external speakers will enable to the TV to play surround sound audio.

Read more Read less | Edit
Significantly Thicker
The LG 55UG870 is a 98mm thick TV, whereas the LG 55EG910 is a 48.9mm thick TV (49.1mm thinner) and the LG 55UF950 is a 47.6mm thick TV (50.4mm thinner).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£549 More Expensive
The LG 55UG870 is more expensive than the LG 55EG910 by £150 and more expensive than the LG 55UF950 by £549.
Not As Many Stockists
Only 1 seller sell the LG 55UG870, however 2 shops sell the LG 55EG910 and 4 shops sell the LG 55UF950.
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Read more Read less
Six Months Older
The LG 55UG870 is older than the LG 55EG910 by six months. The LG 55UG870 is the same age as the LG 55UF950.

Size and Dimensions

Reviews & Awards

Awards

LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
No awards found
7 Awards
01net.com: 4 Star benchmark.pl: Good Product bozzabench.com: Ultimate Choice EISA.eu: EISA Best Product M3.idg.se: Recommended Pocket Lint: Recommended tek.no: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
No reviews found
Best
5 stars
8 reviews
4 stars
5 reviews
3 stars
2 reviews
2 stars
1 review
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

The LG 55EG910 and LG 55UG870 have the best user reviews out of the three TVs each with an average review score of 100%. The LG 55UF950 has the second best user reviews with an average review score of 94% based on 18 reviews.
LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
Best
5 stars
2 reviews
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
5 stars
14 reviews
4 stars
3 reviews
3 stars
1 review
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Date Released

LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
29 months old Best 35 months old 35 months old

What are They Best Used For

Watching Films

When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!

Compare the best TVs for film.

Watching Sport

When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.

Compare the best TVs for sport.

Key Features

OLED/QLED Technology

OLED and QLED TVs use organic material that creates light when electricity is passed through it. This means that they do not require a back light, unlike standard LED TVs.

OLED and QLED TVs have much higher contrast than LED TVs as they have no back light. They also have a fast response rate, rich colours and a wide viewing angle. They are also cheaper to run.

LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
Best
Yes
No
No

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 55EG910
LG
55EG910
18 trees 0.7 tonnes CO2
LG 55UF950
LG
55UF950
17 trees 0.67 tonnes CO2
LG 55UG870
LG
55UG870
14 trees 0.55 tonnes CO2 (Best)

Review Analysis

Remote Control

For both the LG 55EG910 and the LG 55UF950 reviewers mentioned that the remote control was excellent.
LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
  • From its voice command to its point and click, this remote is responsive…
    LC0202 - February 2016
  • The Magic remote has clearly been designed to make the user experience as easy…
    LC0202 - February 2016
  • The magic remote is quite fun…
    Dave69 - June 2015
  • Brilliant remote too…
    Gerald - November 2015
  • The magic remote is just the best…
    Ricadus - December 2015
  • No data

    Product Quality

    Reviewers thought the LG 55EG910 product quality was excellent, and thought the LG 55UF950 product quality was very good.
    LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
  • Very happy with this, video and picture quality is great as is it functionality…
    John1984 - June 2015
  • Excellent quality of video and the range of accessories provides a multitude of ways to mount the camera with good stability…
    Geoffiatric - May 2016
  • Very easy to use; very good quality picture; and decent sound quality even with the waterproof casing on it…
    Emma1983 - January 2016
  • Good quality videos & photos…
    CVVLondon - April 2016
  • Excellent Picture Quality…
    S. Arnold - December 2015
  • The video quality is fantastic and it works well with the mobile app…
    Cullan123 - February 2015
  • No issues and picture quality is excellent…
    Cb - August 2016
  • Not the quality, that is very good even from set alone.
    Adey - July 2016
  • Very small, easy to use, good price and takes amazing quality pictures…
    Ks999 - August 2015
  • Superb bit of equipment easy to uses and excellent quality…
    Tigerbish - January 2016
  • For the price you are entitled to expect great picture quality…
    Hansolo AU - August 2015
  • Picture quality is incredible…
    EkronTharmer - May 2015
  • Picture quality is superb, takes a bit of tinkering to get it spot on.
    Paganbunion - May 2015
  • No data

    Picture Quality

    Reviewers of the LG 55EG910 thought the picture quality was excellent, and thought the LG 55UF950 picture quality was very good.
    LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
  • Very happy with this, video and picture quality is great as is it functionality…
    John1984 - June 2015
  • Excellent Picture Quality…
    S. Arnold - December 2015
  • Its art slim Curved screen gives for the perfect viewing angle from almost anywhere in the room…
    LC0202 - February 2016
  • No issues and picture quality is excellent…
    Cb - August 2016
  • The colours and contrast are amazing…
    Alan - January 2017
  • Excellent picture with such vivid colours…
    Amazon Customer - January 2017
  • Also, having the contrast too high loses detail in the dark areas, they just get too black…
    S. Arnold - December 2015
  • Infinite contrast…
    Joeindien23 - November 2016
  • For the price you are entitled to expect great picture quality…
    Hansolo AU - August 2015
  • Picture quality is incredible…
    EkronTharmer - May 2015
  • Picture quality is superb, takes a bit of tinkering to get it spot on.
    Paganbunion - May 2015
  • No data

    Specification

     
     
     
    Display LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Display Diagonal 55" 55" 55"
    HD Type
    4K
     4K
    4K
     4K
    4K
     4K
    High Frequency Rate 200Hz
    BEST
    Display Resolution
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    Motion Interpolation Frequency
    Comb Filter
    3D
     3D
    3D
     3D
    3D
     3D
    Display Brightness
    Supported Video Mode
    2160p
     2160p
    2160p
     2160p
    2160p
     2160p
    PMI (Picture Mastering Index) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2,000
    Display Technology
    OLED LED
     OLED
     LED
    OLED LED
     OLED
     LED
    OLED LED
     OLED
     LED
    Screen Format Adjustments
    Auto Zoom
    16:9
     Auto
     Zoom
     16:9
    Auto Zoom
    16:9
     Auto
     Zoom
     16:9
    Auto Zoom
    16:9
     Auto
     Zoom
     16:9
    Display Diagonal (metric) 139cm Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm
    Supported Graphics Resolutions
    3840 x 2160
     3840 x 2160
    3840 x 2160
     3840 x 2160
    3840 x 2160
     3840 x 2160
     
     
     
    Audio LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Subwoofer RMS Power Unknown - Click to provide data 20W Unknown - Click to provide data
    RMS Rated Power 20W 40W
    BEST
    20W
    Loudspeaker 2 4
    BEST
    2
    Sound Modes
    News Standard
    Music Movie
    Sports Game
     News
     Standard
     Music
     Movie
     Sports
     Game
    News Standard
    Music Movie
    Sports Game
     News
     Standard
     Music
     Movie
     Sports
     Game
    News Standard
    Music Movie
    Sports Game
     News
     Standard
     Music
     Movie
     Sports
     Game
    Speaker 2 4 2
     
     
     
    Smart TV LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Operating System Version Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Design LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Peak Luminance Ratio Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 65%
     
     
     
    Power LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Energy Efficiency Class
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    Power Consumption (typical) 110W 105W
    BEST
    84W
    Power Consumption (standby) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
    Annual Energy Consumption 161kWh 153kWh 123kWh
    BEST
     
     
     
    TV Tuner LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Tuner Type
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog Signal Format System
    PAL SECAM
    NTSC
     PAL
     SECAM
     NTSC
    PAL SECAM
    NTSC
     PAL
     SECAM
     NTSC
    PAL SECAM
    NTSC
     PAL
     SECAM
     NTSC
     
     
     
    Performance LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Video Formats Supported
    DIVX DIVX HD
    H.265
     DIVX
     DIVX HD
     H.265
    DIVX DIVX HD
    H.265
     DIVX
     DIVX HD
     H.265
    DIVX DIVX HD
    H.265
     DIVX
     DIVX HD
     H.265
    Audio Formats Supported
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    PCM eAAC+
    HE-AAC EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ RA-Lossless
    DTS
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     PCM
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     RA-Lossless
     DTS
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    PCM eAAC+
    HE-AAC EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ RA-Lossless
    DTS
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     PCM
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     RA-Lossless
     DTS
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    PCM eAAC+
    HE-AAC EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ RA-Lossless
    DTS
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     PCM
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     RA-Lossless
     DTS
    Image Formats Supported
    JPG MPO
    JPS
     JPG
     MPO
     JPS
    JPG MPO
    JPS
     JPG
     MPO
     JPS
    JPG MPO
    JPS
     JPG
     MPO
     JPS
    Teletext Unknown - Click to provide data 2,000 Pages 2,000 Pages
     
     
     
    Packaging Content LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    3D Glasses Quantity 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Management Features LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Smart Modes
    Personal Cinema
    Standard Sports
    Vivid Game
    Photo
     Personal
     Cinema
     Standard
     Sports
     Vivid
     Game
     Photo
    Personal Cinema
    Standard Sports
    Vivid Game
    Photo
     Personal
     Cinema
     Standard
     Sports
     Vivid
     Game
     Photo
    Personal Cinema
    Standard Sports
    Vivid Game
    Photo
     Personal
     Cinema
     Standard
     Sports
     Vivid
     Game
     Photo
     
     
     
    Weight & Dimensions LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Thickness 48.9mm 47.6mm
    BEST
    98mm
    Weight 12.8kg
    BEST
    19kg 21.7kg
    Weight With Stand 15kg
    BEST
    22.2kg 24.2kg
    Depth (with Stand) 208mm
    BEST
    240mm 236mm
    Height (with Stand) 760mm 773mm 773mm
    Width (with Stand) 1,228mm
    BEST
    1,236mm 1,241mm
    Height 719mm 722mm 723mm
    Width 1,225mm 1,236mm 1,241mm
     
     
     
    Ports & Interfaces LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Headphone Outputs Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
    Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1 1
    RF Port 2 3
    BEST
    2
    SCART Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
    RS-232 Port 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    Composite Video in 1 1 1
    Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in 1 1 1
    USB 2.0 Port 3
    BEST
    2 2
    USB 3.0 Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
    HDMI Port 3 4
    BEST
    3
    USB 3.0 Type-A Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
    Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3
     
     
     
    Packaging Data LG 55EG910 LG 55UF950 LG 55UG870
    Package Weight 20.4kg
    BEST
    26.5kg 29.7kg
    Package Height 225mm
    BEST
    810mm 813mm
    Package Depth 810mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Package Width 1,435mm 1,330mm
    BEST
    1,360mm

    Other Similar Comparisons

    LG 55EG910
    LG
    55EG910
    £1,249.00
    Better brand
    Better for watching films
    £3 cheaper to run over five years
    3D
    OLED/QLED technology
    VS
    Sony KD-65XE7096
    Sony
    KD-65XE7096
    £1,238.08
    £11 Cheaper
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    Better for
    watching sport
    15% larger
    display
    diagonal
    4.9mm thinner
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    LG 55UF950
    LG
    55UF950
    £849.97
    16% thinner
    Cheaper to run by £4 over five years
    3D
    VS
    Samsung QE55Q6F
    Samsung
    QE55Q6F
    £935.00
    Better brand
    Better for
    watching films
    OLED/QLED
    technology
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Better brand
    Energy efficiency rating is superior
    Cheaper to run by £16 over five years
    3D
    VS
    Philips 55HFL7011T
    Philips
    55HFL7011T
    £1,481.03
    Vastly thinner
    25W higher RMS
    rated power
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Vastly better user reviews
    Better brand
    28% cheaper to run
    Excellent for watching films
    3D
    VS
    Sony KD65SD8505
    Sony
    KD65SD8505
    £1,479.99
    Significantly
    faster high
    frequency rate
    Excellent for
    playing games
    Larger display
    diagonal
    Excellent for
    watching sport
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Better energy efficiency rating
    18% cheaper to run over five years
    3D
    VS
    Samsung HG55EE890
    Samsung
    HG55EE890
    £1,477.23
    Better brand
    43.3mm thinner
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Cheaper to run by £34 over five years
    3D
    VS
    Samsung 65MU8000
    Samsung
    65MU8000
    £1,475.00
    Better brand
    20W higher RMS
    rated power
    16% larger
    display
    diagonal
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Better brand
    3D
    VS
    Sharp LC-65XUF8772ES
    Sharp
    LC-65XUF8772ES
    £1,463.98
    600Hz faster
    high frequency
    rate
    Thinner
    43% higher RMS
    rated power
    One more
    loudspeaker
    Better for
    playing games
    Larger display
    diagonal
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Energy efficiency rating is higher
    £28 cheaper to run over five years
    3D
    VS
    Samsung UE55MU8009
    Samsung
    UE55MU8009
    £1,340.86
    £58 Cheaper
    Vastly thinner
    Better brand
    Better for
    watching films
    50% higher RMS
    rated power
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Better user reviews
    Energy efficiency rating is higher
    £28 cheaper to run over five years
    3D
    VS
    LG OLED55B7
    LG
    OLED55B7
    £1,449.00
    Hugely thinner
    Better for
    watching films
    Higher RMS
    rated power
    OLED/QLED
    technology
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Better brand
    Better for watching films
    Better for watching sport
    11% larger display diagonal
    Better for playing games
    3D
    VS
    Panasonic TX-49ESW504
    Panasonic
    TX-49ESW504
    £1,361.80
    £37 Cheaper
    18% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Thinner
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Better brand
    140Hz faster high frequency rate
    £60 cheaper to run over five years
    Energy efficiency rating is higher
    Better for playing games
    3D
    VS
    Sony KD-55XE9305
    Sony
    KD-55XE9305
    £1,395.00
    £4 Cheaper
    58mm thinner
    Higher RMS
    rated power
    Better for
    watching films
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Better brand
    140Hz faster high frequency rate
    35% cheaper to run over five years
    Energy efficiency rating is better
    3D
    VS
    Sony KD55XE9305BU
    Sony
    KD55XE9305BU
    £1,395.00
    £4 Cheaper
    Vastly thinner
    Vastly higher
    RMS rated power
    LG 55UG870
    LG
    55UG870
    £1,399.00
    Better brand
    Cheaper to run by £55 over five years
    80Hz faster high frequency rate
    Better for watching sport
    Better for playing games
    VS
    Sharp LC-70LE747
    Sharp
    LC-70LE747
    £1,395.00
    £4 Cheaper
    Significantly
    thinner
    22% larger
    display
    diagonal
    LG 55UF950
    LG
    55UF950
    £849.97
    Better brand
    Significantly higher RMS rated power
    Four loudspeakers
    £4 cheaper to run over five years
    Common interface (CI) slot
    VS
    Panasonic TX-58DX750
    Panasonic
    TX-58DX750
    £849.00
    £1 Cheaper
    Better for
    watching films
    Thinner
    Better for
    watching sport
    3" larger
    display
    diagonal
    LG 55UF950
    LG
    55UF950
    £849.97
    A lot higher RMS rated power
    Four loudspeakers
    Better for watching sport
    3D
    Ethernet port
    Common interface (CI) slot
    VS
    LG 55LH630
    LG
    55LH630
    £847.49
    £2 Cheaper
    Cheaper to run
    by £64 over
    five years
    Superior energy
    efficiency
    rating
    15% thinner
    LG 55UF950
    LG
    55UF950
    £849.97
    Better 01net.com review score
    Five more awards
    Better Benchmark.pl review score
    Expert reviews are better
    20W higher RMS rated power
    Four loudspeakers
    Better for watching sport
    Cheaper to run by £11 over five years
    3D
    Built-in subwoofer
    VS
    Samsung UE65KU6500
    Samsung
    UE65KU6500
    £925.00
    Better user
    reviews
    Better brand
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Better for
    watching films
    Larger display
    diagonal
    LG 55UF950
    LG
    55UF950
    £849.97
    Very good for watching sport
    3D
    VS
    Samsung UE55KS9000
    Samsung
    UE55KS9000
    £899.00
    Better brand
    One more awards
    Higher
    Whathifi.com
    review score
    Higher
    Avforums.com
    review score
    Higher Trusted
    Reviews review
    score
    Higher Les
    Numeriques.com
    review score
    Better expert
    reviews
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    better
    Very good for
    watching films
    34% higher RMS
    rated power
    22% cheaper to
    run
    Zero point one
    more
    loudspeakers
    LG 55UF950
    LG
    55UF950
    £849.97
    50% higher RMS rated power
    Cheaper to run by £57 over five years
    3D
    VS
    Samsung UE65MU6220
    Samsung
    UE65MU6220
    £799.00
    £51 Cheaper
    Better brand
    16% larger
    display
    diagonal
    LG 55UF950
    LG
    55UF950
    £849.97
    Two more loudspeakers
    50% higher RMS rated power
    Thinner
    3D
    VS
    LG 60UJ651
    LG
    60UJ651
    £799.00
    £51 Cheaper
    Superior energy
    efficiency
    rating
    Cheaper to run
    by £19 over
    five years
    9% larger
    display
    diagonal
    Better for
    watching sport
    LG 55UF950
    LG
    55UF950
    £849.97
    11% larger display diagonal
    3D
    VS
    Samsung UE49KS8000
    Samsung
    UE49KS8000
    £799.00
    £51 Cheaper
    Better brand
    One more awards
    Better Trusted
    Reviews review
    score
    Better
    Avforums.com
    review score
    Better
    Whathifi.com
    review score
    Better
    Audiovideohd.fr
    review score
    Better
    01net.com
    review score
    Better
    Tweakers.net
    review score
    Better
    Benchmark.pl
    review score
    Better expert
    reviews
    34% higher RMS
    rated power
    Cheaper to run
    by £30 over
    five years
    13% thinner
    Zero point one
    more
    loudspeakers