LG 55UF770 vs Panasonic TX-55CX680 vs Samsung UE55JU6800 vs Sony KD-55X8005
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Reviews & Awards Date Released What are They Best Used For Manufacturer's Warranty Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

LG 55UF770vsPanasonic TX-55CX680vsSamsung UE55JU6800vsSony KD-55X8005

LG 55UF770

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score

LG 55UF770

£749.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and critically acclaimed 55" 4K TV, with a fair price and low running costs
94
Reviews
175 Reviews
78
Value for Money
Very Good
85
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Age
2 Years Old
72
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 56.7mm Apr 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56.7mm
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-55CX680

83

Overall Score

83

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and award winning 55" 4K TV, with satisfactory running costs and a fair price
87
Reviews
2 Reviews + 1 Award
83
Value for Money
Very Good
86
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Age
2 Years Old
63
Running Costs
£160 Over 5 Years
83
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 56mm Mar 2015 B
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency B
Samsung UE55JU6800

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A positively reviewed and fully featured 60" 4K television, with low running costs and a reasonable price
93
Reviews
9 Reviews
70
Value for Money
Good
88
Features
Fully-Featured
77
Age
2 Years Old
73
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
60" 4K No 63.2mm Sep 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 60"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 63.2mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Sony KD-55X8005

52

Overall Score

52

Overall Score

Sony KD-55X8005

£849.00
Our Verdict:
A good spec but a little out of date 55" 4K TV, representing inferior value for money
24
Value for Money
Poor
61
Features
Good Features
68
Age
2 Years Old
52
Overall Score
Average
55" 4K No No Oct 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology 3D Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
3D No
Release Date Oct 2015
Energy Efficiency A
LG 55UF770

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score

LG 55UF770

£749.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and critically acclaimed 55" 4K TV, with a fair price and low running costs
94
Reviews
175 Reviews
78
Value for Money
Very Good
85
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Age
2 Years Old
72
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 56.7mm Apr 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56.7mm
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-55CX680

83

Overall Score

83

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and award winning 55" 4K TV, with satisfactory running costs and a fair price
87
Reviews
2 Reviews + 1 Award
83
Value for Money
Very Good
86
Features
Fully-Featured
74
Age
2 Years Old
63
Running Costs
£160 Over 5 Years
83
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 56mm Mar 2015 B
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency B
Samsung UE55JU6800

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A positively reviewed and fully featured 60" 4K television, with low running costs and a reasonable price
93
Reviews
9 Reviews
70
Value for Money
Good
88
Features
Fully-Featured
77
Age
2 Years Old
73
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
60" 4K No 63.2mm Sep 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 60"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 63.2mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Sony KD-55X8005

52

Overall Score

52

Overall Score

Sony KD-55X8005

£849.00
Our Verdict:
A good spec but a little out of date 55" 4K TV, representing inferior value for money
24
Value for Money
Poor
61
Features
Good Features
68
Age
2 Years Old
52
Overall Score
Average
55" 4K No No Oct 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology 3D Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
3D No
Release Date Oct 2015
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
RGB Direct
£749.00
Go to Store
Ebuyer Business
Lg 55Inch 4k Led Webos 2.0 Tv (incl Magic Remote) Wifi 2.0ch 20w
£841.98
Go to Store
Electrical Experience
LG 55UF770V Smart Ultra HD 4k 55"LED TV
£849.99
Go to Store
Atlantic Electrics Ltd
Out of stock
£1,139.00
Go to Store
Box
Out of stock
£1,277.02
Go to Store
5 Prices from 5 Stores | £749.00-£849.99
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Audio T
£599.00
Go to Store
RLR Distribution
Televisions Panasonic Viera TX 55CX680B - 55" LED Smart TV - 4K UltraHD
£689.00
Go to Store
TPS
£699.00
Go to Store
3 Prices from 3 Stores | £599.00-£699.00
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
RLR Distribution
Televisions Samsung UE55JU6800 LED 4K Ultra HD Nano Crystal Smart TV, 55" with Freeview HD and Built-In Wi-Fi
£765.00
Go to Store
Box
Out of stock
£1,110.18
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | £765.00
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
RGB Direct
£849.00
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £849.00
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
29% Off
{Seiki SE24HD02UK
£119.98
Was £170 (29 days ago)
PC World Business
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
7 Reasons For
Higher RMS Rated Power
The LG 55UF770 is a 20W RMS rated power TV, and so do the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Samsung UE55JU6800. That's 10W higher than the Sony KD-55X8005 (10W).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The LG 55UF770 has a common interface (CI) slot, and so does the Samsung UE55JU6800, whereas the Sony KD-55X8005 does not have a common interface (CI) slot.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of shops increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
The LG 55UF770 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the Panasonic TX-55CX680 has a rating of "B" and the Sony KD-55X8005 has a rating of "A".
Considerably Better Expert Reviews
Based on 1 review, the LG 55UF770 has an average expert review score of 100%, whereas the Panasonic TX-55CX680 has an average rating of 90% (based on 1 review).
Better for Watching Films
The LG 55UF770 is better for watching films than the Sony KD-55X8005.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Better for Watching Sport
The LG 55UF770 is better for watching sport than the Sony KD-55X8005.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
8 Reasons For
Faster High Frequency Rate
Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 200Hz refresh rate. That's 140Hz faster than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (60Hz).

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Read more Read less | Edit
10W Higher RMS Rated Power
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as do the LG 55UF770 and the Samsung UE55JU6800), whereas the Sony KD-55X8005 is only a 10W RMS rated power TV (10W lower).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
7.2mm Thinner
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 56mm thick TV, whereas the LG 55UF770 is a 56.7mm thick TV (0.7mm thicker) and the Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 63.2mm thick TV (7.2mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£150 Cheaper
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 costs £599.00, whereas the LG 55UF770 is £749.00, the Samsung UE55JU6800 is £765.00 and the Sony KD-55X8005 is £849.00.
User Reviews Are Appreciably Better
Based on 1 review, the average user review score of the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 100%, but the average rating of the LG 55UF770 is 87% (based on 152 reviews) and the average rating of the Samsung UE55JU6800 is 87% (based on 9 reviews).
Better for Watching Films
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is better for watching films than the Sony KD-55X8005.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Better for Watching Sport
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is better for watching sport than the Sony KD-55X8005.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
Better for Playing Games
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is better for playing games than the Sony KD-55X8005.
When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.
Read more Read less
13 Reasons For
Larger Display Diagonal
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 60" TV. That's 5" larger than the LG 55UF770, the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Sony KD-55X8005 (55").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
3D
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 3D TV, but the LG 55UF770, the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Sony KD-55X8005 are not 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 1,400Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 1,200Hz faster than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Sony KD-55X8005 (200Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
10W Higher RMS Rated Power
The Samsung UE55JU6800 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as do the LG 55UF770 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680), however the Sony KD-55X8005 is only a 10W RMS rated power TV (10W lower).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Bluetooth
The Samsung UE55JU6800 supports Bluetooth (as does the Sony KD-55X8005), however the Panasonic TX-55CX680 does not support Bluetooth.

A Bluetooth connection on your TV means it can send and receive data from Bluetooth-enabled devices, such as headphones, mobile phones or remotes.

A Bluetooth connection on your phone allows you to use many newer wireless devices with your TV, such as wireless headphones and controlling your TV using your phone.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The Samsung UE55JU6800 has a common interface (CI) slot (as does the LG 55UF770), whereas the Sony KD-55X8005 does not have a common interface (CI) slot.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
DVI Port
The Samsung UE55JU6800 has a DVI port, whereas the LG 55UF770, the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Sony KD-55X8005 do not.
Edit
Cheaper to Run by £57 Over Five Years
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is £4 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF770 and £57 cheaper to run than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 over five years.
Read more Read less
One Year Longer Manufacturer's Guarantee
The manufacturer's guarantee provided with the Samsung UE55JU6800 is one year, whereas it is zero years for the LG 55UF770.
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 90.8%, but LG has an average rating of 86.2%, Panasonic has an average rating of 51.9% and Sony has an average rating of 67.5%.
Better for Watching Films
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is better for watching films than the Sony KD-55X8005.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Better for Watching Sport
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is better for watching sport than the Sony KD-55X8005.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
Better for Playing Games
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is better for playing games than the Sony KD-55X8005.
When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.
Read more Read less
2 Reasons For
Wider Horizontal Viewing Angle
The Sony KD-55X8005 is a 178° horizontal viewing angle TV. That's 2° wider than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 (176°).

The horizontal viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the TV screen can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the TV can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the TV to be able to view the screen successfully.

Read more Read less | Edit
Bluetooth
The Sony KD-55X8005 supports Bluetooth (as does the Samsung UE55JU6800), whereas the Panasonic TX-55CX680 does not support Bluetooth.

A Bluetooth connection on your TV means it can send and receive data from Bluetooth-enabled devices, such as headphones, mobile phones or remotes.

A Bluetooth connection on your phone allows you to use many newer wireless devices with your TV, such as wireless headphones and controlling your TV using your phone.

Read more Read less | Edit

Reasons Against

LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
8 Reasons Against
Moderately Smaller Display Diagonal
The LG 55UF770 has a display diagonal of 55" (as do the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Sony KD-55X8005), but the Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 60" TV (5" larger).

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not 3D
The LG 55UF770 is not 3D (As do the the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Sony KD-55X8005), whereas the Samsung UE55JU6800 is 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
2% Thicker
The LG 55UF770 has a thickness of 56.7mm. That's 0.7mm thicker than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 (56mm) and 6.5mm thinner than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (63.2mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Expensive by £150
The LG 55UF770 is £150 more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55CX680.
Older by Six Months
The LG 55UF770 is five months older than the Samsung UE55JU6800 and six months older than the Sony KD-55X8005.
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by £4
Over five years the running costs of the LG 55UF770 are £110 which is £4 more than the Samsung UE55JU6800. Show assumptions.
User Review Rating is Considerably Worse
The average user rating of the LG 55UF770 is 87%, whereas the average user rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 100% (based on 1 review).
Worse Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of only 86.2%, but Samsung has an average rating of 90.8%.
10 Reasons Against
Smaller Display Diagonal
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 55" TV, and so do the LG 55UF770 and the Sony KD-55X8005. That's 5" smaller than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (60").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not 3D
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is not 3D (As do the the LG 55UF770 and the Sony KD-55X8005), but the Samsung UE55JU6800 is 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 200Hz motion interpolation frequency TV, and so does the Sony KD-55X8005. That's 1,200Hz slower than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (1,400Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Narrower Horizontal Viewing Angle
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 176° horizontal viewing angle TV. That's 2° narrower than the Sony KD-55X8005 (178°).

The horizontal viewing angle dictates the maximum angle at which the TV screen can be properly viewed.

A larger viewing angle means that the TV can be watched from many different parts of a room successfully. Conversely, a very small viewing angle means you would effectively have to sit directly in front of the TV to be able to view the screen successfully.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not As Many Stockists
Only 3 stores sells the Panasonic TX-55CX680, however 5 shops sell the LG 55UF770.
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Read more Read less
Seven Months Older
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is older than the LG 55UF770 by one month, older than the Samsung UE55JU6800 by six months and older than the Sony KD-55X8005 by seven months.
54% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
The running costs of the Panasonic TX-55CX680 are £162 which is £52 more than the LG 55UF770 and £57 more than the Samsung UE55JU6800 over five years. Show assumptions.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Inferior
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has an energy efficiency rating of "B", but the LG 55UF770 has a rating of "A+" and the Sony KD-55X8005 has a rating of "A".
Appreciably Lower Expert Review Score
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has an average expert rating of 90%, but the LG 55UF770 has an average expert rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
Worse Brand
Panasonic TVs have an average rating of only 51.9%, however LG has an average rating of 86.2%, Samsung has an average rating of 90.8% and Sony has an average rating of 67.5%.
6 Reasons Against
140Hz Slower High Frequency Rate
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 60Hz refresh rate TV. That's 140Hz slower than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 (200Hz).

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Read more Read less | Edit
12% Thicker
The Samsung UE55JU6800 has a thickness of 63.2mm, however the LG 55UF770 is a 56.7mm thick TV (6.5mm thinner) and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 56mm thick TV (7.2mm thinner).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£166 More Expensive
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is more expensive than the LG 55UF770 by £16 and more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 by £166.
Fewer Sellers
Only 2 stores sells the Samsung UE55JU6800, but 5 retailers sell the LG 55UF770 and 3 sellers sell the Panasonic TX-55CX680.
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Read more Read less
One Month Older
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is older than the Sony KD-55X8005 by one month.
Appreciably Lower User Review Score
The average user rating of the Samsung UE55JU6800 is 87%, whereas the average user rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 100% (based on 1 review).
11 Reasons Against
Smaller Display Diagonal
The Sony KD-55X8005 is a 55" TV, and so do the LG 55UF770 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680. That's 5" smaller than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (60").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not 3D
The Sony KD-55X8005 is not 3D (As do the the LG 55UF770 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680), but the Samsung UE55JU6800 is 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Sony KD-55X8005 is a 200Hz motion interpolation frequency TV, and so does the Panasonic TX-55CX680. That's 1,200Hz slower than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (1,400Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
10W Lower RMS Rated Power
The Sony KD-55X8005 has an RMS rated power of 10W, whereas the LG 55UF770, the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Samsung UE55JU6800 are all 20W RMS rated power TVs (10W higher).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
£250 More Expensive
The Sony KD-55X8005 is more expensive than the LG 55UF770 by £100, more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 by £250 and more expensive than the Samsung UE55JU6800 by £84.
Not As Many Stockists
Only 1 retailer sell the Sony KD-55X8005, however 5 shops sell the LG 55UF770, 3 stores sell the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and 2 stores sell the Samsung UE55JU6800.
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Read more Read less
Energy Efficiency Rating is Inferior
The Sony KD-55X8005 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", but the LG 55UF770 has a rating of "A+" and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 has a rating of "B".
Worse Brand
Sony TVs have an average rating of only 67.5%, however LG has an average rating of 86.2% and Samsung has an average rating of 90.8%.
Worse for Watching Films
The Sony KD-55X8005 is worse for watching films than the LG 55UF770, Panasonic TX-55CX680 and Samsung UE55JU6800.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Worse for Watching Sport
The Sony KD-55X8005 is worse for watching sport than the LG 55UF770, Panasonic TX-55CX680 and Samsung UE55JU6800.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
Worse for Playing Games
The Sony KD-55X8005 is worse for playing games than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and Samsung UE55JU6800.
When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.
Read more Read less

Reviews & Awards

Awards

LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
No awards found
1 Award
Trusted Reviews: Recommended
No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

The LG 55UF770 has better expert reviews than the Panasonic TX-55CX680. The average expert reviews score for the LG 55UF770 is 100% based on 1 review, where as the average score for the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 90% based on 1 review.
LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has the best user reviews out of the four TVs with an average review score of 100% based on 1 review. The LG 55UF770 and Samsung UE55JU6800 have the second best user reviews each with an average review score of 87%.
LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
5 stars
98 reviews
4 stars
31 reviews
3 stars
10 reviews
2 stars
3 reviews
1 star
10 reviews
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
5 stars
6 reviews
4 stars
2 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
1 review
No reviews found

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has the best brand rating with an average brand rating of 90% based on 114,067 reviews. LG has the second best brand rating with an average brand rating of 86% based on 31,780 reviews. Sony has the third best brand rating with an average brand rating of 67% based on 5,078 reviews. Panasonic has the fourth best brand rating with an average brand rating of 51% based on 1,721 reviews.
LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
LG

86

86

Based on 31,780 reviews
Panasonic

52

52

Based on 1,721 reviews
Samsung

91

91

Based on 114,067 reviews
Sony

67

67

Based on 5,078 reviews

Date Released

LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
34 months old 35 months old 29 months old 28 months old Best

What are They Best Used For

Watching Films

When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!

Compare the best TVs for film.

Watching Sport

When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.

Compare the best TVs for sport.

Playing Games

When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.

Compare the best TVs for gaming.

Manufacturer's Warranty

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

3D

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
Best
No
Best
No
Yes
Best
No

High Frequency Rate

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 55UF770
LG
55UF770
14 trees 0.55 tonnes CO2
Panasonic TX-55CX680
Panasonic
TX-55CX680
21 trees 0.8 tonnes CO2
Samsung UE55JU6800
Samsung
UE55JU6800
13 trees 0.52 tonnes CO2 (Best)

Specification

 
 
 
Display LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
Display Diagonal 55" 55" 60"
BEST
55"
HD Type
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
High Frequency Rate 200Hz 60Hz
BEST
Display Resolution
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
Motion Interpolation Frequency 200Hz
BEST
1,400Hz 200Hz
BEST
Display Brightness
Horizontal Viewing Angle Unknown - Click to provide data 176° Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
BEST
Visible Diagonal Screen Size Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 139.7cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Video Mode
2160p 1080i
1080p 720p
480i 480p
720i 576i
576p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
 720i
 576i
 576p
2160p 1080i
1080p 720p
480i 480p
720i 576i
576p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
 720i
 576i
 576p
2160p 1080i
1080p 720p
480i 480p
720i 576i
576p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
 720i
 576i
 576p
2160p 1080i
1080p 720p
480i 480p
720i 576i
576p
 2160p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 480i
 480p
 720i
 576i
 576p
PQI (Picture Quality Index) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Refresh Rate Supported
60 Hz 50 Hz
30 Hz 25 Hz
24 Hz
 60 Hz
 50 Hz
 30 Hz
 25 Hz
 24 Hz
60 Hz 50 Hz
30 Hz 25 Hz
24 Hz
 60 Hz
 50 Hz
 30 Hz
 25 Hz
 24 Hz
60 Hz 50 Hz
30 Hz 25 Hz
24 Hz
 60 Hz
 50 Hz
 30 Hz
 25 Hz
 24 Hz
60 Hz 50 Hz
30 Hz 25 Hz
24 Hz
 60 Hz
 50 Hz
 30 Hz
 25 Hz
 24 Hz
Colour Depth Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
Screen Format Adjustments
Zoom
 Zoom
Zoom
 Zoom
Zoom
 Zoom
Zoom
 Zoom
Display Diagonal (metric) Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm 152cm
BEST
139cm
Supported Graphics Resolutions
3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
1600 x 1200 (UXGA) 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
1600 x 900 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
1440 x 900 1366 х 768
1280 x 800 (WXGA) 1280 x 800
1152 x 870 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
1280 x 720 (HD 720) 1024 x 768 (XGA)
1024 x 768 832 x 624
800 x 600 (SVGA) 800 x 600
720 x 576 720 x 480
640 x 480 640 x 480 (VGA)
720 x 400 1280
 3840 x 2160
 4096 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1440 x 900
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 1024 x 768
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 800 x 600
 720 x 576
 720 x 480
 640 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1280
3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
1600 x 1200 (UXGA) 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
1600 x 900 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
1440 x 900 1366 х 768
1280 x 800 (WXGA) 1280 x 800
1152 x 870 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
1280 x 720 (HD 720) 1024 x 768 (XGA)
1024 x 768 832 x 624
800 x 600 (SVGA) 800 x 600
720 x 576 720 x 480
640 x 480 640 x 480 (VGA)
720 x 400 1280
 3840 x 2160
 4096 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1440 x 900
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 1024 x 768
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 800 x 600
 720 x 576
 720 x 480
 640 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1280
3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
1600 x 1200 (UXGA) 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
1600 x 900 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
1440 x 900 1366 х 768
1280 x 800 (WXGA) 1280 x 800
1152 x 870 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
1280 x 720 (HD 720) 1024 x 768 (XGA)
1024 x 768 832 x 624
800 x 600 (SVGA) 800 x 600
720 x 576 720 x 480
640 x 480 640 x 480 (VGA)
720 x 400 1280
 3840 x 2160
 4096 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1440 x 900
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 1024 x 768
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 800 x 600
 720 x 576
 720 x 480
 640 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1280
3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
1600 x 1200 (UXGA) 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
1600 x 900 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
1440 x 900 1366 х 768
1280 x 800 (WXGA) 1280 x 800
1152 x 870 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
1280 x 720 (HD 720) 1024 x 768 (XGA)
1024 x 768 832 x 624
800 x 600 (SVGA) 800 x 600
720 x 576 720 x 480
640 x 480 640 x 480 (VGA)
720 x 400 1280
 3840 x 2160
 4096 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1440 x 900
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 1024 x 768
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 800 x 600
 720 x 576
 720 x 480
 640 x 480
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1280
Vertical Viewing Angle Unknown - Click to provide data 176° Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
BEST
 
 
 
Audio LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
RMS Rated Power 20W
BEST
20W
BEST
20W
BEST
10W
Loudspeaker 2 2 2 2
Audio System Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Sound Modes
Standard Music
Movie Sports
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
Standard Music
Movie Sports
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
Standard Music
Movie Sports
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
Standard Music
Movie Sports
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
Speaker 2 2 2 2
 
 
 
Smart TV LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
Video App
Netflix
 Netflix
Netflix
 Netflix
Netflix
 Netflix
Netflix
 Netflix
Lifestyle Apps
Skype Samsung Smart View
Samsung Smart Vi
 Skype
 Samsung Smart View
 Samsung Smart Vi
Skype Samsung Smart View
Samsung Smart Vi
 Skype
 Samsung Smart View
 Samsung Smart Vi
Skype Samsung Smart View
Samsung Smart Vi
 Skype
 Samsung Smart View
 Samsung Smart Vi
Skype Samsung Smart View
Samsung Smart Vi
 Skype
 Samsung Smart View
 Samsung Smart Vi
Operating System Version Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Other Features LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
Dimensions (WxDxH) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Sound Enhancement Technology Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Multimedia Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Stereo Sound Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Picture Enhancement Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio Power Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Dimming Type Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Smart TV Applications Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Content Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Dimensions (WxHxD) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Product Dimensions (without Stand, Metric) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Power LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
Energy Efficiency Class
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
Power Consumption (typical) 84W 130W
BEST
85W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (standby) 0.3W
BEST
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption (average) Unknown - Click to provide data 130W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption 123kWh 181kWh 118kWh
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 256W Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
TV Tuner LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
Tuner Type
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
Tuner Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2tuner(s) Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Performance LG 55UF770 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800 Sony KD-55X8005
Network Streaming Service
BBC iPlayer Facebook
Full internet browser Twitter
All 4 App store: Samsung App Store
Blu-Ray and Home Theatr Demand 5
ITV player Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
Skype TV Player
Amazon Prime Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
built-in UHD content App store
Netflix
 BBC iPlayer
 Facebook
 Full internet browser
 Twitter
 All 4
 App store: Samsung App Store
 Blu-Ray and Home Theatr
 Demand 5
 ITV player
 Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
 Skype
 TV Player
 Amazon Prime
 Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
 built-in UHD content
 App store
 Netflix
BBC iPlayer Facebook
Full internet browser Twitter
All 4 App store: Samsung App Store
Blu-Ray and Home Theatr Demand 5
ITV player Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
Skype TV Player
Amazon Prime Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
built-in UHD content App store
Netflix
 BBC iPlayer
 Facebook
 Full internet browser
 Twitter
 All 4
 App store: Samsung App Store
 Blu-Ray and Home Theatr
 Demand 5
 ITV player
 Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
 Skype
 TV Player
 Amazon Prime
 Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
 built-in UHD content
 App store
 Netflix
BBC iPlayer Facebook
Full internet browser Twitter
All 4 App store: Samsung App Store
Blu-Ray and Home Theatr Demand 5
ITV player Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
Skype TV Player
Amazon Prime Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
built-in UHD content App store
Netflix
 BBC iPlayer
 Facebook
 Full internet browser
 Twitter
 All 4
 App store: Samsung App Store
 Blu-Ray and Home Theatr
 Demand 5
 ITV player
 Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
 Skype
 TV Player
 Amazon Prime
 Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
 built-in UHD content
 App store
 Netflix
BBC iPlayer Facebook
Full internet browser Twitter
All 4 App store: Samsung App Store
Blu-Ray and Home Theatr Demand 5
ITV player Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
Skype TV Player
Amazon Prime Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
built-in UHD content App store
Netflix
 BBC iPlayer
 Facebook
 Full internet browser
 Twitter
 All 4
 App store: Samsung App Store
 Blu-Ray and Home Theatr
 Demand 5
 ITV player
 Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
 Skype
 TV Player
 Amazon Prime
 Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
 built-in UHD content
 App store
 Netflix
Video Formats Supported
MP4 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MKV
VOB M4V
TS 3GPP
VRO ASF
MOV M-JPEG
DIVX MPG
MPEG MPEG1
MPEG2 H.263
H.264 M2TS
TP TRP
MTS VP6
VP8 M2T
H.265 VP9
PS SVI
XVID WEBM
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 ASF
 MOV
 M-JPEG
 DIVX
 MPG
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 H.263
 H.264
 M2TS
 TP
 TRP
 MTS
 VP6
 VP8
 M2T
 H.265
 VP9
 PS
 SVI
 XVID
 WEBM
MP4 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MKV
VOB M4V
TS 3GPP
VRO ASF
MOV M-JPEG
DIVX MPG
MPEG MPEG1
MPEG2 H.263
H.264 M2TS
TP TRP
MTS VP6
VP8 M2T
H.265 VP9
PS SVI
XVID WEBM
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 ASF
 MOV
 M-JPEG
 DIVX
 MPG
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 H.263
 H.264
 M2TS
 TP
 TRP
 MTS
 VP6
 VP8
 M2T
 H.265
 VP9
 PS
 SVI
 XVID
 WEBM
MP4 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MKV
VOB M4V
TS 3GPP
VRO ASF
MOV M-JPEG
DIVX MPG
MPEG MPEG1
MPEG2 H.263
H.264 M2TS
TP TRP
MTS VP6
VP8 M2T
H.265 VP9
PS SVI
XVID WEBM
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 ASF
 MOV
 M-JPEG
 DIVX
 MPG
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 H.263
 H.264
 M2TS
 TP
 TRP
 MTS
 VP6
 VP8
 M2T
 H.265
 VP9
 PS
 SVI
 XVID
 WEBM
MP4 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MKV
VOB M4V
TS 3GPP
VRO ASF
MOV M-JPEG
DIVX MPG
MPEG MPEG1
MPEG2 H.263
H.264 M2TS
TP TRP
MTS VP6
VP8 M2T
H.265 VP9
PS SVI
XVID WEBM
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 ASF
 MOV
 M-JPEG
 DIVX
 MPG
 MPEG
 MPEG1
 MPEG2
 H.263
 H.264
 M2TS
 TP
 TRP
 MTS
 VP6
 VP8
 M2T
 H.265
 VP9
 PS
 SVI
 XVID
 WEBM
Audio Formats Supported
MP2 MP3
WMA AC3
PCM eAAC+
HE-AAC EAC3
AAC HE HE-A
AAC++ FLAC
WAV AIFF
APE MIDI
M4A OGG
MPA MID
LPCM
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 AAC HE
 HE-A
 AAC++
 FLAC
 WAV
 AIFF
 APE
 MIDI
 M4A
 OGG
 MPA
 MID
 LPCM
MP2 MP3
WMA AC3
PCM eAAC+
HE-AAC EAC3
AAC HE HE-A
AAC++ FLAC
WAV AIFF
APE MIDI
M4A OGG
MPA MID
LPCM
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 AAC HE
 HE-A
 AAC++
 FLAC
 WAV
 AIFF
 APE
 MIDI
 M4A
 OGG
 MPA
 MID
 LPCM
MP2 MP3
WMA AC3
PCM eAAC+
HE-AAC EAC3
AAC HE HE-A
AAC++ FLAC
WAV AIFF
APE MIDI
M4A OGG
MPA MID
LPCM
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 AAC HE
 HE-A
 AAC++
 FLAC
 WAV
 AIFF
 APE
 MIDI
 M4A
 OGG
 MPA
 MID
 LPCM
MP2 MP3
WMA AC3
PCM eAAC+
HE-AAC EAC3
AAC HE HE-A
AAC++ FLAC
WAV AIFF
APE MIDI
M4A OGG
MPA MID
LPCM
 MP2
 MP3
 WMA
 AC3
 PCM
 eAAC+
 HE-AAC
 EAC3
 AAC HE
 HE-A
 AAC++
 FLAC
 WAV
 AIFF
 APE
 MIDI
 M4A
 OGG
 MPA
 MID
 LPCM
Image Formats Supported
JPG BMP
MPO
 JPG
 BMP
 MPO
JPG BMP
MPO
 JPG
 BMP
 MPO
JPG BMP
MPO
 JPG
 BMP
 MPO
JPG BMP
MPO
 JPG
 BMP
 MPO
Processor Cores Unknown - Click