LG 55UF850 vs LG 55UF950 vs Panasonic TX-55CX680 vs Samsung UE55JU6800
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Reviews & Awards Date Released Manufacturer's Warranty Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Review Analysis Specification
Share on

LG 55UF850vsLG 55UF950vsPanasonic TX-55CX680vsSamsung UE55JU6800

LG 55UF850

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 55UF850

£759.95
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 55" 4K television, with low running costs but representing only middle of the road value for money
90
Reviews
35 Reviews + 3 Awards
69
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
75
Running Costs
£100 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 50.8mm Mar 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 50.8mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
LG 55UF950

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 55UF950

£849.97
£339.03
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 55" 4K TV, with moderate running costs but representing only moderate value for money
93
Reviews
34 Reviews + 7 Awards
66
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
69
Running Costs
£130 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 47.6mm Mar 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 47.6mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Panasonic TX-55CX680

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An award winning and cheap 55" 4K TV, good for watching films
88
Reviews
2 Reviews + 1 Award
84
Value for Money
Very Good
83
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
65
Running Costs
£160 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 56mm Mar 2015 B
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency B
Samsung UE55JU6800

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very highly rated and fully featured 60" 4K television, good for watching films
93
Reviews
9 Reviews
71
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
79
Age
2 Years Old
74
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
60" 4K No 63.2mm Sep 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 60"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 63.2mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
LG 55UF850

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 55UF850

£759.95
Our Verdict:
An award winning and fully featured 55" 4K television, with low running costs but representing only middle of the road value for money
90
Reviews
35 Reviews + 3 Awards
69
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
75
Running Costs
£100 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 50.8mm Mar 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 50.8mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
LG 55UF950

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score

LG 55UF950

£849.97
£339.03
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 55" 4K TV, with moderate running costs but representing only moderate value for money
93
Reviews
34 Reviews + 7 Awards
66
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
69
Running Costs
£130 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 47.6mm Mar 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 47.6mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Panasonic TX-55CX680

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An award winning and cheap 55" 4K TV, good for watching films
88
Reviews
2 Reviews + 1 Award
84
Value for Money
Very Good
83
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
65
Running Costs
£160 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 56mm Mar 2015 B
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency B
Samsung UE55JU6800

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very highly rated and fully featured 60" 4K television, good for watching films
93
Reviews
9 Reviews
71
Value for Money
Good
87
Features
Fully-Featured
79
Age
2 Years Old
74
Running Costs
£110 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
60" 4K No 63.2mm Sep 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 60"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 63.2mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A+

Top Prices

LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
Dealbuyer.com
£759.95
Go to Store
RLR Distribution
Televisions LG 55UF850V Smart 3D Ultra HD 4k 55" LED TV
£769.00
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | £759.95-£769.00
Valutech
LG 55UF950V Smart 55" ULTRA HD 4K LED TV Super Slim Bezel Silver (Brand new, unopened) - on
£849.97
Go to Store
RLR Distribution
Televisions LG 55UF950V Smart 3D Ultra HD 4k 55" LED TV
£1,189.00
Go to Store
Ebuyer Business
Lg 55Inch 4k Led Auditorium Stand Colourprime Wcg Webos 2.0 Tv (incl Magic Remote) Wifi 4.2ch 60w
£1,748.99
Go to Store
Ogormans
£1,799.99
Go to Store
4 Prices from 4 Stores | £849.97-£1,799.99
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Audio T
£599.00
Go to Store
RLR Distribution
Televisions Panasonic Viera TX 55CX680B - 55" LED Smart TV - 4K UltraHD
£689.00
Go to Store
TPS
£699.00
Go to Store
3 Prices from 3 Stores | £599.00-£699.00
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
RLR Distribution
Televisions Samsung UE55JU6800 LED 4K Ultra HD Nano Crystal Smart TV, 55" with Freeview HD and Built-In Wi-Fi
£765.00
Go to Store
Box
£1,110.18
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | £765.00-£1,110.18
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
4 Reasons For
3D
The LG 55UF850 is 3D, and so are the LG 55UF950 and the Samsung UE55JU6800, whereas the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is not.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
Vastly Faster High Frequency Rate
The LG 55UF850 has a high frequency rate of 200Hz (as does the Panasonic TX-55CX680), however the Samsung UE55JU6800 is only a 60Hz refresh rate TV (140Hz slower).

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Read more Read less | Edit
35% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the LG 55UF850 is £30 cheaper to run than the LG 55UF950, £57 cheaper to run than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and £1 cheaper to run than the Samsung UE55JU6800.
Read more Read less
Energy Efficiency Rating is Better
The LG 55UF850 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", however the LG 55UF950 has a rating of "A" and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 has a rating of "B".
10 Reasons For
3D
The LG 55UF950 is a 3D TV (as are the LG 55UF850 and the Samsung UE55JU6800), but the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is not 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
Built-In Subwoofer
The LG 55UF950 has a built-in subwoofer, whereas the Samsung UE55JU6800 does not have a built-in subwoofer.

A subwoofer is a specialised bass speaker for your TV, designed to provide punchy and powerful low notes for music and movies. Alternatively, an underground dog.

A built-in subwoofer will give your TV's sound system a serious boost on the low end bass notes. This will be best experienced in the bangs, thumps and explosions of movies, or in bass-heavy music.

Read more Read less | Edit
A Lot Higher RMS Rated Power
The LG 55UF950 has an RMS rated power of 40W, however the LG 55UF850, the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Samsung UE55JU6800 are all only 20W RMS rated power TVs (20W lower).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Four Loudspeakers
The LG 55UF950 is a four loudspeaker TV, whereas the Samsung UE55JU6800 only has two loudspeakers.

The number of loudspeakers is the total number of speakers provided with the TV, either inside the TV casing or as external speakers.

A greater number of speakers will allow for better quality audio and different frequencies. Multiple external speakers will enable to the TV to play surround sound audio.

Read more Read less | Edit
Bluetooth
The LG 55UF950 supports Bluetooth (as does the Samsung UE55JU6800), however the Panasonic TX-55CX680 does not support Bluetooth.

A Bluetooth connection on your TV means it can send and receive data from Bluetooth-enabled devices, such as headphones, mobile phones or remotes.

A Bluetooth connection on your phone allows you to use many newer wireless devices with your TV, such as wireless headphones and controlling your TV using your phone.

Read more Read less | Edit
15.6mm Thinner
The LG 55UF950 has a thickness of 47.6mm, however the LG 55UF850 is a 50.8mm thick TV (3.2mm thicker), the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 56mm thick TV (8.4mm thicker) and the Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 63.2mm thick TV (15.6mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Six More Awards
The LG 55UF950 has 7 awards, but the LG 55UF850 has 3 awards and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 has 1 award.
Better Tweakers.net Review Score
Tweakers.net's LG 55UF950 review gave it a score of 70%, but the LG 55UF850 only has a rating of 60% from the same site.
Better Tek.no Review Score
The LG 55UF950 has a review score of 100% from Tek.no, but the LG 55UF850 only has a rating of 80% from the same site.
5 Reasons For
70% Faster High Frequency Rate
Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 200Hz refresh rate, and so does the LG 55UF850. That's 140Hz faster than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (60Hz).

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Read more Read less | Edit
£161 Cheaper
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 costs £599.00, whereas the LG 55UF850 is £759.95, the LG 55UF950 is £849.97 and the Samsung UE55JU6800 is £765.00.
Expert Reviews Are a Lot Better
The average expert review score of the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 90% based on 1 review, but the average rating of the LG 55UF850 is 77% (based on 20 reviews) and the average rating of the LG 55UF950 is 79% (based on 24 reviews).
User Reviews Are Better
The average user review score of the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 100% based on 1 review, but the average rating of the LG 55UF850 is 83% (based on 18 reviews), the average rating of the LG 55UF950 is 94% (based on 18 reviews) and the average rating of the Samsung UE55JU6800 is 88% (based on 10 reviews).
Better Trusted Reviews Review Score
Trusted Reviews gave the Panasonic TX-55CX680 a review score of 90%, however the LG 55UF950's rating was only 60% from the same site.
6 Reasons For
9% Larger Display Diagonal
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 60" TV. That's 5" larger than the LG 55UF850, the LG 55UF950 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 (55").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
3D
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 3D TV (as are the LG 55UF850 and the LG 55UF950), but the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is not 3D.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
86% Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 1,400Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 1,200Hz faster than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 (200Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Bluetooth
The Samsung UE55JU6800 supports Bluetooth (as does the LG 55UF950), however the Panasonic TX-55CX680 does not support Bluetooth.

A Bluetooth connection on your TV means it can send and receive data from Bluetooth-enabled devices, such as headphones, mobile phones or remotes.

A Bluetooth connection on your phone allows you to use many newer wireless devices with your TV, such as wireless headphones and controlling your TV using your phone.

Read more Read less | Edit
DVI Port
The Samsung UE55JU6800 has a DVI port, whereas the LG 55UF850 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 do not have a DVI port.
Edit
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 90.7%, but LG has an average rating of 86.5% and Panasonic has an average rating of 46.7%.

Reasons Against

LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
13 Reasons Against
A Bit Smaller Display Diagonal
The LG 55UF850 has a display diagonal of 55" (as do the LG 55UF950 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680), whereas the Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 60" TV (5" larger).

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Lower RMS Rated Power
The LG 55UF850 is a 20W RMS rated power TV, and so do the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Samsung UE55JU6800. That's 20W lower than the LG 55UF950 (40W).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Two Less Loudspeakers
The LG 55UF850 has two loudspeakers (as do the Panasonic TX-55CX680 and the Samsung UE55JU6800), however the LG 55UF950 only has four loudspeakers.

The number of loudspeakers is the total number of speakers provided with the TV, either inside the TV casing or as external speakers.

A greater number of speakers will allow for better quality audio and different frequencies. Multiple external speakers will enable to the TV to play surround sound audio.

Read more Read less | Edit
7% Thicker
LG 55UF850 is 50.8mm thick. That's 3.2mm thicker than the LG 55UF950 (47.6mm), 5.2mm thinner than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 (56mm) and 12.4mm thinner than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (63.2mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Expensive by £161
The LG 55UF850 is £161 more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55CX680.
Less Retailers
The LG 55UF850 is only stocked by 2 shops, whereas the LG 55UF950 is stocked by 4 retailers and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is stocked by 3 stores.
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock.
Read more Read less
Older by Six Months
The LG 55UF850 is six months older than the Samsung UE55JU6800. The LG 55UF850 is the same age as the LG 55UF950 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680.
Four Less Awards
The LG 55UF850 has only received 3 awards, whereas the LG 55UF950 has received 7 awards.
Expert Review Rating is Considerably Worse
The LG 55UF850's average expert score is only 77%, however the LG 55UF950's is 79% (based on 24 reviews) and the Panasonic TX-55CX680's is 90% (based on 1 review).
User Review Rating is Considerably Worse
The LG 55UF850's average user score is 83%, however the LG 55UF950's is 94% (based on 18 reviews), the Panasonic TX-55CX680's is 100% (based on 1 review) and the Samsung UE55JU6800's is 88% (based on 10 reviews).
Worse Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of only 86.5%, whereas Samsung has an average rating of 90.7%.
Worse Tweakers.net Review Score
Tweakers.net only gave the LG 55UF850 a review score of 60%, whereas the rating of the LG 55UF950 was 70%.
Worse Tek.no Review Score
Tek.no only gave the LG 55UF850 a review score of 80%, whereas the rating of the LG 55UF950 was 100%.
9 Reasons Against
10% Smaller Display Diagonal
The LG 55UF950 is a 55" TV, and so do the LG 55UF850 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680. That's 5" smaller than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (60").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
£251 More Expensive
The LG 55UF950 is more expensive than the LG 55UF850 by £90, more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 by £251 and more expensive than the Samsung UE55JU6800 by £85.
Six Months Older
The LG 55UF950 is older than the Samsung UE55JU6800 by six months. The LG 55UF950 is the same age as the LG 55UF850 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680.
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 28%
The running costs of the LG 55UF950 are £134 which is £30 more than the LG 55UF850 and £29 more than the Samsung UE55JU6800 over five years. Show assumptions.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Worse
The LG 55UF950 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", whereas the LG 55UF850 has a rating of "A+" and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 has a rating of "B".
A Lot Lower Expert Review Score
The average expert rating of the LG 55UF950 is only 79%, whereas the average expert rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 90% (based on 1 review).
Lower User Review Score
The average user rating of the LG 55UF950 is 94%, whereas the average user rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 100% (based on 1 review).
Worse Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of only 86.5%, but Samsung has an average rating of 90.7%.
Worse Trusted Reviews Review Score
The LG 55UF950 has only received a review score of 60% from Trusted Reviews, but the Panasonic TX-55CX680 has a score of 90%.
12 Reasons Against
10% Smaller Display Diagonal
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 55" TV, and so do the LG 55UF850 and the LG 55UF950. That's 5" smaller than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (60").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not 3D
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is not 3D, but the LG 55UF850, the LG 55UF950 and the Samsung UE55JU6800 are.

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

Read more Read less | Edit
1,200Hz Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 200Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 1,200Hz slower than the Samsung UE55JU6800 (1,400Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
20W Lower RMS Rated Power
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as do the LG 55UF850 and the Samsung UE55JU6800), whereas the LG 55UF950 is a 40W RMS rated power TV (20W higher).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Only Two Loudspeakers
The number of loudspeakers on the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is two, and so do the LG 55UF850 and the Samsung UE55JU6800, but the LG 55UF950 only has four loudspeakers.

The number of loudspeakers is the total number of speakers provided with the TV, either inside the TV casing or as external speakers.

A greater number of speakers will allow for better quality audio and different frequencies. Multiple external speakers will enable to the TV to play surround sound audio.

Read more Read less | Edit
8.4mm Thicker
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 56mm thick TV, whereas the LG 55UF850 is a 50.8mm thick TV (5.2mm thinner), the LG 55UF950 is a 47.6mm thick TV (8.4mm thinner) and the Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 63.2mm thick TV (7.2mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not As Many Stockists
Only 3 stores sells the Panasonic TX-55CX680, however 4 sellers sell the LG 55UF950.
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Read more Read less
Six Months Older
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is older than the Samsung UE55JU6800 by six months. The Panasonic TX-55CX680 is the same age as the LG 55UF850 and the LG 55UF950.
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 55%
Over five years the Panasonic TX-55CX680 costs £162 to run which is £57 more than the LG 55UF850, £28 more than the LG 55UF950 and £57 more than the Samsung UE55JU6800. Show assumptions.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Inferior
The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has an energy efficiency rating of "B", but the LG 55UF850 has a rating of "A+" and the LG 55UF950 has a rating of "A".
Fewer Awards
Whilst the Panasonic TX-55CX680 has received 1 award, the LG 55UF850 has received 3 awards and the LG 55UF950 has received 7 awards.
Worse Brand
Panasonic TVs have an average rating of only 46.7%, however LG has an average rating of 86.5% and Samsung has an average rating of 90.7%.
8 Reasons Against
3x Slower High Frequency Rate
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a 60Hz refresh rate TV. That's 140Hz slower than the LG 55UF850 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 (200Hz).

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Read more Read less | Edit
Vastly Lower RMS Rated Power
The Samsung UE55JU6800 has an RMS rated power of 20W (as do the LG 55UF850 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680), however the LG 55UF950 is a 40W RMS rated power TV (20W higher).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Only Two Loudspeakers
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is a two loudspeaker TV, and so do the LG 55UF850 and the Panasonic TX-55CX680, whereas the LG 55UF950 only has four loudspeakers.

The number of loudspeakers is the total number of speakers provided with the TV, either inside the TV casing or as external speakers.

A greater number of speakers will allow for better quality audio and different frequencies. Multiple external speakers will enable to the TV to play surround sound audio.

Read more Read less | Edit
25% Thicker
The Samsung UE55JU6800 has a thickness of 63.2mm, however the LG 55UF850 is a 50.8mm thick TV (12.4mm thinner), the LG 55UF950 is a 47.6mm thick TV (15.6mm thinner) and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is a 56mm thick TV (7.2mm thinner).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£166 More Expensive
The Samsung UE55JU6800 is more expensive than the LG 55UF850 by £5 and more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55CX680 by £166.
Fewer Sellers
Only 2 shops sells the Samsung UE55JU6800, but 4 shops sell the LG 55UF950 and 3 sellers sell the Panasonic TX-55CX680.
The smaller the number of stores that stock this TV, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Read more Read less
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 1%
The running costs of the Samsung UE55JU6800 are £105 which is £1 more than the LG 55UF850 over five years. Show assumptions.
A Lot Lower User Review Score
The average user rating of the Samsung UE55JU6800 is 88%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 55UF950 is 94% (based on 18 reviews) and the Panasonic TX-55CX680 is 100% (based on 1 review).

Reviews & Awards

Awards

The LG 55UF950 has the most awards out of the four TVs with 7 awards. The LG 55UF850 has the second most awards with 3 awards. The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has the third most awards with 1 award. Compare all award winning TVs.
LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
3 Awards
audiovision.de: Recommended avforums.com: Recommended Expert Reviews: Recommended
7 Awards Best
01net.com: 4 Star benchmark.pl: Good Product bozzabench.com: Ultimate Choice EISA.eu: EISA Best Product M3.idg.se: Recommended Pocket Lint: Recommended tek.no: Recommended
1 Award
Trusted Reviews: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has the best expert reviews out of the four TVs with an average review score of 90% based on 1 review. The LG 55UF950 has the second best expert reviews with an average review score of 79% based on 24 reviews. The LG 55UF850 has the third best expert reviews with an average review score of 77% based on 20 reviews.
LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
5 stars
5 reviews
4 stars
8 reviews
3 stars
1 review
2 stars
1 review
1 star
0 reviews
5 stars
8 reviews
4 stars
5 reviews
3 stars
2 reviews
2 stars
1 review
1 star
0 reviews
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

The Panasonic TX-55CX680 has the best user reviews out of the four TVs with an average review score of 100% based on 1 review. The LG 55UF950 has the second best user reviews with an average review score of 94% based on 18 reviews. The Samsung UE55JU6800 has the third best user reviews with an average review score of 88% based on 10 reviews. The LG 55UF850 has the fourth best user reviews with an average review score of 83% based on 18 reviews.
LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
5 stars
13 reviews
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
2 reviews
2 stars
1 review
1 star
2 reviews
5 stars
14 reviews
4 stars
3 reviews
3 stars
1 review
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
5 stars
7 reviews
4 stars
2 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
1 review

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has the best brand rating with an average brand rating of 90% based on 116,049 reviews. LG has the second best brand rating with an average brand rating of 86% based on 33,050 reviews. Panasonic has the third best brand rating with an average brand rating of 46% based on 1,991 reviews.
LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
LG

86

86

Based on 33,050 reviews
LG

86

86

Based on 33,050 reviews
Panasonic

47

47

Based on 1,991 reviews
Samsung

91

91

Based on 116,049 reviews

Date Released

LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
35 months old 35 months old 35 months old 29 months old Best

Manufacturer's Warranty

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

3D

‘3D’ describes whether the TV can display 3D movies and programmes. Requires compatible 3D glasses to properly function.

3D technology has become increasingly popular as the amount of 3D film and TV content has increased dramatically in recent years. All 3D TVs will also display regular 2D content and most will allow you to switch on and off the 3D effect on 3D content. 3D compatible TVs allow you to watch 3D content. For most TVs you will need to wear special glasses to see the 3D effect.

LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
Best
Yes
Best
Yes
No
Best
Yes

High Frequency Rate

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 55UF850
LG
55UF850
13 trees 0.52 tonnes CO2 (Best)
LG 55UF950
LG
55UF950
17 trees 0.67 tonnes CO2
Panasonic TX-55CX680
Panasonic
TX-55CX680
21 trees 0.8 tonnes CO2
Samsung UE55JU6800
Samsung
UE55JU6800
13 trees 0.52 tonnes CO2

Review Analysis

Picture Quality

Reviews for the LG 55UF850 mention that picture quality was excellent, and reviews for the LG 55UF950 mention that picture quality was very good.
LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
  • The picture quality is perfect…
    Amazon Customer - April 2017
  • The picture quality is superb, crisp…
    Amazon Customer - June 2016
  • For the price you are entitled to expect great picture quality…
    Hansolo AU - August 2015
  • Picture quality is incredible…
    EkronTharmer - May 2015
  • Picture quality is superb, takes a bit of tinkering to get it spot on.
    Paganbunion - May 2015
  • No data No data

    Remote Control

    Reviews of both the LG 55UF950 and the LG 55UF850 mention that the remote control was excellent.
    LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
  • The versatile remote control…
    Whathifi.com - May 2015
  • It was the right choice as picture is great and remote is great…
    The Sheep Pimp - April 2016
  • The magic remote is quite fun…
    Dave69 - June 2015
  • Brilliant remote too…
    Gerald - November 2015
  • The magic remote is just the best…
    Ricadus - December 2015
  • No data No data

    Product Quality

    Reviewers of the LG 55UF850 thought the product quality was excellent, and thought the LG 55UF950 product quality was very good.
    LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
  • You have to remember that it’s a poor quality channel to start with…
    Mr. M. Armstrong - December 2015
  • On good quality content, you hardly see any, its nice…
    Mr. M. Armstrong - December 2015
  • The picture quality is perfect…
    Amazon Customer - April 2017
  • Picture and sound quality is great…
    BigBear - December 2015
  • The picture quality is superb, crisp…
    Amazon Customer - June 2016
  • For the price you are entitled to expect great picture quality…
    Hansolo AU - August 2015
  • Picture quality is incredible…
    EkronTharmer - May 2015
  • Picture quality is superb, takes a bit of tinkering to get it spot on.
    Paganbunion - May 2015
  • No data No data

    Specification

     
     
     
    Display LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
    Display Diagonal 55" 55" 55" 60"
    BEST
    HD Type
    4K
     4K
    4K
     4K
    4K
     4K
    4K
     4K
    High Frequency Rate 200Hz 200Hz 60Hz
    BEST
    Display Resolution
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    Motion Interpolation Frequency 200Hz
    BEST
    1,400Hz
    Display Brightness
    Horizontal Viewing Angle Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 176° Unknown - Click to provide data
    Visible Diagonal Screen Size Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 139.7cm
    Supported Video Mode
    2160p 1080i
    1080p 720p
    480i 480p
     2160p
     1080i
     1080p
     720p
     480i
     480p
    2160p 1080i
    1080p 720p
    480i 480p
     2160p
     1080i
     1080p
     720p
     480i
     480p
    2160p 1080i
    1080p 720p
    480i 480p
     2160p
     1080i
     1080p
     720p
     480i
     480p
    2160p 1080i
    1080p 720p
    480i 480p
     2160p
     1080i
     1080p
     720p
     480i
     480p
    PQI (Picture Quality Index) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Display Refresh Rate Supported
    60 Hz 50 Hz
    30 Hz 25 Hz
    24 Hz
     60 Hz
     50 Hz
     30 Hz
     25 Hz
     24 Hz
    60 Hz 50 Hz
    30 Hz 25 Hz
    24 Hz
     60 Hz
     50 Hz
     30 Hz
     25 Hz
     24 Hz
    60 Hz 50 Hz
    30 Hz 25 Hz
    24 Hz
     60 Hz
     50 Hz
     30 Hz
     25 Hz
     24 Hz
    60 Hz 50 Hz
    30 Hz 25 Hz
    24 Hz
     60 Hz
     50 Hz
     30 Hz
     25 Hz
     24 Hz
    Colour Depth Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Screen Format Adjustments
    Zoom
     Zoom
    Zoom
     Zoom
    Zoom
     Zoom
    Zoom
     Zoom
    Display Diagonal (metric) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 139cm 152cm
    BEST
    Supported Graphics Resolutions
    3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
    1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
    1600 x 1200 (UXGA) 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
    1600 x 900 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
    1440 x 900 1366 х 768
    1280 x 800 (WXGA) 1280 x 800
    1152 x 870 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
    1280 x 720 (HD 720) 1024 x 768 (XGA)
    1024 x 768 832 x 624
    800 x 600 (SVGA) 800 x 600
    720 x 576 720 x 480
    640 x 480 640 x 480 (VGA)
    720 x 400 1280
     3840 x 2160
     4096 x 2160
     1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
     1920 x 1080
     1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
     1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
     1600 x 900
     1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
     1440 x 900
     1366 х 768
     1280 x 800 (WXGA)
     1280 x 800
     1152 x 870
     1152 x 864 (XGA+)
     1280 x 720 (HD 720)
     1024 x 768 (XGA)
     1024 x 768
     832 x 624
     800 x 600 (SVGA)
     800 x 600
     720 x 576
     720 x 480
     640 x 480
     640 x 480 (VGA)
     720 x 400
     1280
    3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
    1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
    1600 x 1200 (UXGA) 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
    1600 x 900 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
    1440 x 900 1366 х 768
    1280 x 800 (WXGA) 1280 x 800
    1152 x 870 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
    1280 x 720 (HD 720) 1024 x 768 (XGA)
    1024 x 768 832 x 624
    800 x 600 (SVGA) 800 x 600
    720 x 576 720 x 480
    640 x 480 640 x 480 (VGA)
    720 x 400 1280
     3840 x 2160
     4096 x 2160
     1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
     1920 x 1080
     1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
     1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
     1600 x 900
     1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
     1440 x 900
     1366 х 768
     1280 x 800 (WXGA)
     1280 x 800
     1152 x 870
     1152 x 864 (XGA+)
     1280 x 720 (HD 720)
     1024 x 768 (XGA)
     1024 x 768
     832 x 624
     800 x 600 (SVGA)
     800 x 600
     720 x 576
     720 x 480
     640 x 480
     640 x 480 (VGA)
     720 x 400
     1280
    3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
    1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
    1600 x 1200 (UXGA) 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
    1600 x 900 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
    1440 x 900 1366 х 768
    1280 x 800 (WXGA) 1280 x 800
    1152 x 870 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
    1280 x 720 (HD 720) 1024 x 768 (XGA)
    1024 x 768 832 x 624
    800 x 600 (SVGA) 800 x 600
    720 x 576 720 x 480
    640 x 480 640 x 480 (VGA)
    720 x 400 1280
     3840 x 2160
     4096 x 2160
     1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
     1920 x 1080
     1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
     1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
     1600 x 900
     1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
     1440 x 900
     1366 х 768
     1280 x 800 (WXGA)
     1280 x 800
     1152 x 870
     1152 x 864 (XGA+)
     1280 x 720 (HD 720)
     1024 x 768 (XGA)
     1024 x 768
     832 x 624
     800 x 600 (SVGA)
     800 x 600
     720 x 576
     720 x 480
     640 x 480
     640 x 480 (VGA)
     720 x 400
     1280
    3840 x 2160 4096 x 2160
    1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
    1600 x 1200 (UXGA) 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
    1600 x 900 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
    1440 x 900 1366 х 768
    1280 x 800 (WXGA) 1280 x 800
    1152 x 870 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
    1280 x 720 (HD 720) 1024 x 768 (XGA)
    1024 x 768 832 x 624
    800 x 600 (SVGA) 800 x 600
    720 x 576 720 x 480
    640 x 480 640 x 480 (VGA)
    720 x 400 1280
     3840 x 2160
     4096 x 2160
     1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
     1920 x 1080
     1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
     1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
     1600 x 900
     1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
     1440 x 900
     1366 х 768
     1280 x 800 (WXGA)
     1280 x 800
     1152 x 870
     1152 x 864 (XGA+)
     1280 x 720 (HD 720)
     1024 x 768 (XGA)
     1024 x 768
     832 x 624
     800 x 600 (SVGA)
     800 x 600
     720 x 576
     720 x 480
     640 x 480
     640 x 480 (VGA)
     720 x 400
     1280
    Vertical Viewing Angle Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 176° Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Audio LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
    Subwoofer RMS Power Unknown - Click to provide data 20W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    RMS Rated Power 20W 40W
    BEST
    20W 20W
    Loudspeaker 2 4
    BEST
    2 2
    Audio System Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Sound Modes
    Standard Music
     Standard
     Music
    Standard Music
     Standard
     Music
    Standard Music
     Standard
     Music
    Standard Music
     Standard
     Music
    Speaker 2 4 2 2
     
     
     
    Smart TV LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
    Video App
    Netflix YouTube
     Netflix
     YouTube
    Netflix YouTube
     Netflix
     YouTube
    Netflix YouTube
     Netflix
     YouTube
    Netflix YouTube
     Netflix
     YouTube
    Lifestyle Apps
    Skype Samsung Smart View
    Samsung Smart Vi
     Skype
     Samsung Smart View
     Samsung Smart Vi
    Skype Samsung Smart View
    Samsung Smart Vi
     Skype
     Samsung Smart View
     Samsung Smart Vi
    Skype Samsung Smart View
    Samsung Smart Vi
     Skype
     Samsung Smart View
     Samsung Smart Vi
    Skype Samsung Smart View
    Samsung Smart Vi
     Skype
     Samsung Smart View
     Samsung Smart Vi
     
     
     
    Other Features LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
    Dimensions (WxDxH) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Sound Enhancement Technology Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Multimedia Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Stereo Sound Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Picture Enhancement Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Audio Power Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Dimming Type Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Smart TV Applications Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Packaging Content Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Dimensions (WxHxD) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
    Product Dimensions (without Stand, Metric) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Power LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
    Energy Efficiency Class
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    Power Consumption (typical) 80W 105W
    BEST
    130W 85W
    Power Consumption (standby) 0.3W
    BEST
    Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.3W
    BEST
    Power Consumption (average) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 130W Unknown - Click to provide data
    Annual Energy Consumption 117kWh
    BEST
    153kWh 181kWh 118kWh
    Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 256W
     
     
     
    TV Tuner LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
    Tuner Type
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
    Tuner Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2tuner(s)
     
     
     
    Performance LG 55UF850 LG 55UF950 Panasonic TX-55CX680 Samsung UE55JU6800
    Network Streaming Service
    BBC iPlayer Facebook
    Full internet browser Twitter
    All 4 App store: Samsung App Store
    Blu-Ray and Home Theatr Demand 5
    ITV player Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
    Skype TV Player
    Amazon Prime Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
    built-in UHD content App store
    Netflix
     BBC iPlayer
     Facebook
     Full internet browser
     Twitter
     All 4
     App store: Samsung App Store
     Blu-Ray and Home Theatr
     Demand 5
     ITV player
     Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
     Skype
     TV Player
     Amazon Prime
     Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
     built-in UHD content
     App store
     Netflix
    BBC iPlayer Facebook
    Full internet browser Twitter
    All 4 App store: Samsung App Store
    Blu-Ray and Home Theatr Demand 5
    ITV player Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
    Skype TV Player
    Amazon Prime Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
    built-in UHD content App store
    Netflix
     BBC iPlayer
     Facebook
     Full internet browser
     Twitter
     All 4
     App store: Samsung App Store
     Blu-Ray and Home Theatr
     Demand 5
     ITV player
     Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
     Skype
     TV Player
     Amazon Prime
     Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
     built-in UHD content
     App store
     Netflix
    BBC iPlayer Facebook
    Full internet browser Twitter
    All 4 App store: Samsung App Store
    Blu-Ray and Home Theatr Demand 5
    ITV player Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
    Skype TV Player
    Amazon Prime Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
    built-in UHD content App store
    Netflix
     BBC iPlayer
     Facebook
     Full internet browser
     Twitter
     All 4
     App store: Samsung App Store
     Blu-Ray and Home Theatr
     Demand 5
     ITV player
     Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
     Skype
     TV Player
     Amazon Prime
     Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
     built-in UHD content
     App store
     Netflix
    BBC iPlayer Facebook
    Full internet browser Twitter
    All 4 App store: Samsung App Store
    Blu-Ray and Home Theatr Demand 5
    ITV player Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
    Skype TV Player
    Amazon Prime Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
    built-in UHD content App store
    Netflix
     BBC iPlayer
     Facebook
     Full internet browser
     Twitter
     All 4
     App store: Samsung App Store
     Blu-Ray and Home Theatr
     Demand 5
     ITV player
     Please note: Apps shown are available or coming soon on all 2015 Smart TV models
     Skype
     TV Player
     Amazon Prime
     Blu-Ray and Home Theatre Players.
     built-in UHD content
     App store
     Netflix
    Video Formats Supported
    DIVX MP4
    WMV AVI
    FLV 3GP
    MKV VOB
    M4V TS
    3GPP VRO
    ASF MOV
    M-JPEG MPG
    MPEG MPEG1
    MPEG2 H.263
    H.264 M2TS
    TP TRP
    MTS VP6
    VP8 M2T
    H.265 VP9
    PS SVI
     DIVX
     MP4
     WMV
     AVI
     FLV
     3GP
     MKV
     VOB
     M4V
     TS
     3GPP
     VRO
     ASF
     MOV
     M-JPEG
     MPG
     MPEG
     MPEG1
     MPEG2
     H.263
     H.264
     M2TS
     TP
     TRP
     MTS
     VP6
     VP8
     M2T
     H.265
     VP9
     PS
     SVI
    DIVX MP4
    WMV AVI
    FLV 3GP
    MKV VOB
    M4V TS
    3GPP VRO
    ASF MOV
    M-JPEG MPG
    MPEG MPEG1
    MPEG2 H.263
    H.264 M2TS
    TP TRP
    MTS VP6
    VP8 M2T
    H.265 VP9
    PS SVI
     DIVX
     MP4
     WMV
     AVI
     FLV
     3GP
     MKV
     VOB
     M4V
     TS
     3GPP
     VRO
     ASF
     MOV
     M-JPEG
     MPG
     MPEG
     MPEG1
     MPEG2
     H.263
     H.264
     M2TS
     TP
     TRP
     MTS
     VP6
     VP8
     M2T
     H.265
     VP9
     PS
     SVI
    DIVX MP4
    WMV AVI
    FLV 3GP
    MKV VOB
    M4V TS
    3GPP VRO
    ASF MOV
    M-JPEG MPG
    MPEG MPEG1
    MPEG2 H.263
    H.264 M2TS
    TP TRP
    MTS VP6
    VP8 M2T
    H.265 VP9
    PS SVI
     DIVX
     MP4
     WMV
     AVI
     FLV
     3GP
     MKV
     VOB
     M4V
     TS
     3GPP
     VRO
     ASF
     MOV
     M-JPEG
     MPG
     MPEG
     MPEG1
     MPEG2
     H.263
     H.264
     M2TS
     TP
     TRP
     MTS
     VP6
     VP8
     M2T
     H.265
     VP9
     PS
     SVI
    DIVX MP4
    WMV AVI
    FLV 3GP
    MKV VOB
    M4V TS
    3GPP VRO
    ASF MOV
    M-JPEG MPG
    MPEG MPEG1
    MPEG2 H.263
    H.264 M2TS
    TP TRP
    MTS VP6
    VP8 M2T
    H.265 VP9
    PS SVI
     DIVX
     MP4
     WMV
     AVI
     FLV
     3GP
     MKV
     VOB
     M4V
     TS
     3GPP
     VRO
     ASF
     MOV
     M-JPEG
     MPG
     MPEG
     MPEG1
     MPEG2
     H.263
     H.264
     M2TS
     TP
     TRP
     MTS
     VP6
     VP8
     M2T
     H.265
     VP9
     PS
     SVI
    Audio Formats Supported
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    eAAC+ HE-AAC
    RA-Lossless EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ FLAC
    WAV AIFF
    APE MIDI
    M4A OGG
    MPA MID
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     RA-Lossless
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     FLAC
     WAV
     AIFF
     APE
     MIDI
     M4A
     OGG
     MPA
     MID
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    eAAC+ HE-AAC
    RA-Lossless EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ FLAC
    WAV AIFF
    APE MIDI
    M4A OGG
    MPA MID
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     RA-Lossless
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     FLAC
     WAV
     AIFF
     APE
     MIDI
     M4A
     OGG
     MPA
     MID
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    eAAC+ HE-AAC
    RA-Lossless EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++ FLAC
    WAV AIFF
    APE MIDI
    M4A OGG
    MPA MID
     MP2
     MP3
     WMA
     AC3
     eAAC+
     HE-AAC
     RA-Lossless
     EAC3
     AAC HE
     HE-A
     AAC++
     FLAC
     WAV
     AIFF
     APE
     MIDI
     M4A
     OGG
     MPA
     MID
    MP2 MP3
    WMA AC3
    eAAC+ HE-AAC
    RA-Lossless EAC3
    AAC HE HE-A
    AAC++