LG 55UH625 vs Panasonic TX-55DX650 vs Philips 55PUS6401 vs Samsung UE55KU6470
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Reviews & Awards Date Released Manufacturer's Warranty Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

LG 55UH625vsPanasonic TX-55DX650vsPhilips 55PUS6401vsSamsung UE55KU6470

LG 55UH625

76

Overall Score

76

Overall Score

LG 55UH625

£1,043.99
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but 2 year old 55" 4K TV, good for watching films
59
Value for Money
Average
83
Features
Fully-Featured
83
Age
1 Year Old
76
Running Costs
£100 Over 5 Years
76
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 56.7mm Apr 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56.7mm
Release Date Apr 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-55DX650

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A relatively new and fully featured 55" 4K TV, with satisfactory running costs
82
Features
Fully-Featured
88
Age
14 Months Old
67
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 69mm Dec 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 69mm
Release Date Dec 2016
Energy Efficiency A
Philips 55PUS6401

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very highly rated but 2 year old 55" 4K TV, good for watching films
90
Reviews
479 Reviews
71
Value for Money
Good
81
Features
Fully-Featured
82
Age
1 Year Old
78
Running Costs
£91 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 85mm Mar 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 85mm
Release Date Mar 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE55KU6470

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but 2 year old 55" 4K TV, with alright running costs
84
Features
Fully-Featured
83
Age
1 Year Old
69
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 55.2mm Mar 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 55.2mm
Release Date Mar 2016
Energy Efficiency A
LG 55UH625

76

Overall Score

76

Overall Score

LG 55UH625

£1,043.99
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but 2 year old 55" 4K TV, good for watching films
59
Value for Money
Average
83
Features
Fully-Featured
83
Age
1 Year Old
76
Running Costs
£100 Over 5 Years
76
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 56.7mm Apr 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 56.7mm
Release Date Apr 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-55DX650

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A relatively new and fully featured 55" 4K TV, with satisfactory running costs
82
Features
Fully-Featured
88
Age
14 Months Old
67
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 69mm Dec 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 69mm
Release Date Dec 2016
Energy Efficiency A
Philips 55PUS6401

82

Overall Score

82

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very highly rated but 2 year old 55" 4K TV, good for watching films
90
Reviews
479 Reviews
71
Value for Money
Good
81
Features
Fully-Featured
82
Age
1 Year Old
78
Running Costs
£91 Over 5 Years
82
Overall Score
Excellent
55" 4K No 85mm Mar 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 85mm
Release Date Mar 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE55KU6470

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but 2 year old 55" 4K TV, with alright running costs
84
Features
Fully-Featured
83
Age
1 Year Old
69
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 55.2mm Mar 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 55.2mm
Release Date Mar 2016
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Wellindal
LG 55 "tv
£1,043.99
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £1,043.99
Cherrywood AV
£831.13
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £831.13
Wellindal
Philips 55 "led tv
£920.99
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £920.99
No prices found
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
2 Reasons For
High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI)
The LG 55UH625 features High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI) (as do the Philips 55PUS6401 and the Samsung UE55KU6470), but the Panasonic TX-55DX650 does not feature High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI).

High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI) on a TV is a system that allows preserves details in the darkest and brightest areas of the screen that are lost using standard display methods.

HDRI on a TV allows for better contrast levels, greater brightness levels and a wider colour palette on films and TV programs. This translates into more natural, true-to-life colours that are closer to how we see them in real life.

Read more Read less | Edit
Energy Efficiency Rating is Higher
The LG 55UH625 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", but the Panasonic TX-55DX650 has a rating of "A", the Philips 55PUS6401 has a rating of "A+" and the Samsung UE55KU6470 has a rating of "A".
1 Reason For
Cheaper by £90
The Panasonic TX-55DX650 costs £212.86 less than the LG 55UH625 and costs £89.86 less than the Philips 55PUS6401.
5 Reasons For
High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI)
The Philips 55PUS6401 features High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI), and so do the LG 55UH625 and the Samsung UE55KU6470, whereas the Panasonic TX-55DX650 does not feature High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI).

High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI) on a TV is a system that allows preserves details in the darkest and brightest areas of the screen that are lost using standard display methods.

HDRI on a TV allows for better contrast levels, greater brightness levels and a wider colour palette on films and TV programs. This translates into more natural, true-to-life colours that are closer to how we see them in real life.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The Philips 55PUS6401 has a common interface (CI) slot (as does the Samsung UE55KU6470), whereas the Panasonic TX-55DX650 does not have a common interface (CI) slot.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
DVI Port
The Philips 55PUS6401 has a DVI port, whereas the LG 55UH625, the Panasonic TX-55DX650 and the Samsung UE55KU6470 do not.
Edit
Cheaper to Run by £53 Over Five Years
The Philips 55PUS6401 is £11 cheaper to run than the LG 55UH625, £53 cheaper to run than the Panasonic TX-55DX650 and £47 cheaper to run than the Samsung UE55KU6470 over five years.
Read more Read less
Superior Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Philips 55PUS6401 is "A+", whereas the rating of the LG 55UH625 is "A+", the rating of the Panasonic TX-55DX650 is "A" and the rating of the Samsung UE55KU6470 is "A".
5 Reasons For
High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI)
The Samsung UE55KU6470 features High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI) (as do the LG 55UH625 and the Philips 55PUS6401), whereas the Panasonic TX-55DX650 does not feature High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI).

High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI) on a TV is a system that allows preserves details in the darkest and brightest areas of the screen that are lost using standard display methods.

HDRI on a TV allows for better contrast levels, greater brightness levels and a wider colour palette on films and TV programs. This translates into more natural, true-to-life colours that are closer to how we see them in real life.

Read more Read less | Edit
Bluetooth
The Samsung UE55KU6470 supports Bluetooth, however the Panasonic TX-55DX650 does not support Bluetooth.

A Bluetooth connection on your TV means it can send and receive data from Bluetooth-enabled devices, such as headphones, mobile phones or remotes.

A Bluetooth connection on your phone allows you to use many newer wireless devices with your TV, such as wireless headphones and controlling your TV using your phone.

Read more Read less | Edit
54% Thinner
The Samsung UE55KU6470 has a thickness of 55.2mm. That's 1.5mm thinner than the LG 55UH625 (56.7mm), 13.8mm thinner than the Panasonic TX-55DX650 (69mm) and 29.8mm thinner than the Philips 55PUS6401 (85mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The Samsung UE55KU6470 has a common interface (CI) slot, and so does the Philips 55PUS6401, whereas the Panasonic TX-55DX650 does not have a common interface (CI) slot.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 90.7%, but LG has an average rating of 86.5%, Panasonic has an average rating of 46.7% and Philips has an average rating of 84.3%.

Reasons Against

LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
5 Reasons Against
3% Thicker
The LG 55UH625 is a 56.7mm thick TV. That's 12.3mm thinner than the Panasonic TX-55DX650 (69mm), 28.3mm thinner than the Philips 55PUS6401 (85mm) and 1.5mm thicker than the Samsung UE55KU6470 (55.2mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Expensive by £213
The LG 55UH625 is £213 more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55DX650 and £123 more expensive than the Philips 55PUS6401.
Older by Eight Months
The LG 55UH625 is eight months older than the Panasonic TX-55DX650.
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by £11
The LG 55UH625 costs £102 to run which is £11 more than the Philips 55PUS6401 over five years. Show assumptions.
Worse Brand
LG TVs have an average rating of only 86.5%, however Samsung has an average rating of 90.7%.
4 Reasons Against
Thicker
Panasonic TX-55DX650 is 69mm thick. That's 12.3mm thicker than the LG 55UH625 (56.7mm), 16mm thinner than the Philips 55PUS6401 (85mm) and 13.8mm thicker than the Samsung UE55KU6470 (55.2mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£53 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the running costs of the Panasonic TX-55DX650 are £144 which is £42 more than the LG 55UH625, £53 more than the Philips 55PUS6401 and £6 more than the Samsung UE55KU6470. Show assumptions.
Lower Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Panasonic TX-55DX650 is "A", however the rating of the LG 55UH625 is "A+", the rating of the Philips 55PUS6401 is "A+" and the rating of the Samsung UE55KU6470 is "A".
Worse Brand
Panasonic TVs have an average rating of only 46.7%, whereas LG has an average rating of 86.5%, Philips has an average rating of 84.3% and Samsung has an average rating of 90.7%.
4 Reasons Against
A Lot Thicker
The Philips 55PUS6401 has a thickness of 85mm, however the LG 55UH625 is a 56.7mm thick TV (28.3mm thinner), the Panasonic TX-55DX650 is a 69mm thick TV (16mm thinner) and the Samsung UE55KU6470 is a 55.2mm thick TV (29.8mm thinner).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£90 More Expensive
The Philips 55PUS6401 is more expensive than the Panasonic TX-55DX650 by £90.
Nine Months Older
The Philips 55PUS6401 is older than the LG 55UH625 by one month and older than the Panasonic TX-55DX650 by nine months. The Philips 55PUS6401 is the same age as the Samsung UE55KU6470.
Worse Brand
Philips TVs have an average rating of only 84.3%, but LG has an average rating of 86.5% and Samsung has an average rating of 90.7%.
4 Reasons Against
Not Currently Available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product.
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Read more Read less
Older by Nine Months
The Samsung UE55KU6470 is one month older than the LG 55UH625 and nine months older than the Panasonic TX-55DX650. The Samsung UE55KU6470 is the same age as the Philips 55PUS6401.
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by £47
The running costs over five years of the Samsung UE55KU6470 are £137 which is £35 more than the LG 55UH625 and £47 more than the Philips 55PUS6401. Show assumptions.
Worse Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Samsung UE55KU6470 is "A", whereas the rating of the LG 55UH625 is "A+", the rating of the Panasonic TX-55DX650 is "A" and the rating of the Philips 55PUS6401 is "A+".

Reviews & Awards

Average Expert Rating

LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
No reviews found No reviews found
Best
5 stars
0 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
No reviews found No reviews found
Best
5 stars
643 reviews
4 stars
165 reviews
3 stars
20 reviews
2 stars
13 reviews
1 star
21 reviews
No reviews found

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has the best brand rating with an average brand rating of 90% based on 116,049 reviews. LG has the second best brand rating with an average brand rating of 86% based on 33,050 reviews. Philips has the third best brand rating with an average brand rating of 84% based on 3,865 reviews. Panasonic has the fourth best brand rating with an average brand rating of 46% based on 1,991 reviews.
LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
LG

86

86

Based on 33,050 reviews
Panasonic

47

47

Based on 1,991 reviews
Philips

84

84

Based on 3,865 reviews
Samsung

91

91

Based on 116,049 reviews

Date Released

LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
22 months old 14 months old Best 23 months old 23 months old

Manufacturer's Warranty

Key Features

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 55UH625
LG
55UH625
13 trees 0.51 tonnes CO2
Panasonic TX-55DX650
Panasonic
TX-55DX650
18 trees 0.71 tonnes CO2
Philips 55PUS6401
Philips
55PUS6401
12 trees 0.45 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
17 trees 0.68 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Display LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Display Diagonal 55" 55" 55" 55"
HD Type
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
High Frequency Rate 1,000Hz
BEST
Display Resolution
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
Motion Interpolation Frequency 1,500Hz
BEST
Display Brightness 350 Cd/m²
BEST
Supported Video Mode
2160p
 2160p
2160p
 2160p
2160p
 2160p
2160p
 2160p
PQI (Picture Quality Index) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
PMI (Picture Mastering Index) 1,200 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
Screen Format Adjustments
Zoom 16:9
 Zoom
 16:9
Zoom 16:9
 Zoom
 16:9
Zoom 16:9
 Zoom
 16:9
Zoom 16:9
 Zoom
 16:9
Display Diagonal (metric) 139cm
BEST
139cm
BEST
139cm
BEST
138cm
Supported Graphics Resolutions
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 
 
 
Audio LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
RMS Rated Power 20W 20W 20W 20W
Loudspeaker 2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Audio System Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Sound Modes
Standard Music
Movie Sports
Game Ambience
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Ambience
Standard Music
Movie Sports
Game Ambience
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Ambience
Standard Music
Movie Sports
Game Ambience
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Ambience
Standard Music
Movie Sports
Game Ambience
 Standard
 Music
 Movie
 Sports
 Game
 Ambience
Speaker 2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
 
 
 
Smart TV LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Video App
YouTube Netflix
 YouTube
 Netflix
YouTube Netflix
 YouTube
 Netflix
YouTube Netflix
 YouTube
 Netflix
YouTube Netflix
 YouTube
 Netflix
Lifestyle Apps
Google Apps Google
Facebook Twitter
 Google Apps
 Google
 Facebook
 Twitter
Google Apps Google
Facebook Twitter
 Google Apps
 Google
 Facebook
 Twitter
Google Apps Google
Facebook Twitter
 Google Apps
 Google
 Facebook
 Twitter
Google Apps Google
Facebook Twitter
 Google Apps
 Google
 Facebook
 Twitter
Operating System Version Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
User Memory Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 8GB Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Other Features LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Sound Enhancement Technology Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Multimedia Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Picture Enhancement Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVB Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Dimming Type Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Smart TV Applications Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Content Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Design LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Peak Luminance Ratio 65% Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Power LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Energy Efficiency Class
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
Power Consumption (typical) 78W Unknown - Click to provide data 69W 111W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby) 0.3W
BEST
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
Power Consumption (average) Unknown - Click to provide data 115W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption 114kWh 160kWh 101kWh
BEST
154kWh
Power Consumption (off) Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 170W Unknown - Click to provide data 170W
 
 
 
TV Tuner LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Tuner Type
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
Analog Signal Format System
PAL SECAM
NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
PAL SECAM
NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
PAL SECAM
NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
PAL SECAM
NTSC
 PAL
 SECAM
 NTSC
 
 
 
Performance LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Video Formats Supported
H.265 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MPEG
MPEG4 MKV
VOB TS
3GPP VRO
PMP PS
 H.265
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MPEG
 MPEG4
 MKV
 VOB
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 PMP
 PS
H.265 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MPEG
MPEG4 MKV
VOB TS
3GPP VRO
PMP PS
 H.265
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MPEG
 MPEG4
 MKV
 VOB
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 PMP
 PS
H.265 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MPEG
MPEG4 MKV
VOB TS
3GPP VRO
PMP PS
 H.265
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MPEG
 MPEG4
 MKV
 VOB
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 PMP
 PS
H.265 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MPEG
MPEG4 MKV
VOB TS
3GPP VRO
PMP PS
 H.265
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MPEG
 MPEG4
 MKV
 VOB
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 PMP
 PS
Audio Formats Supported
FLAC MP3
WAV WMA
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
FLAC MP3
WAV WMA
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
FLAC MP3
WAV WMA
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
FLAC MP3
WAV WMA
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
Image Formats Supported
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
Processor Cores 4
BEST
4
BEST
2 4
BEST
Teletext 2,000 Pages
BEST
1,000 Pages 1,000 Pages Unknown - Click to provide data
Google Application
YouTube
 YouTube
YouTube
 YouTube
YouTube
 YouTube
YouTube
 YouTube
Social Network Service
Twitter Facebook
 Twitter
 Facebook
Twitter Facebook
 Twitter
 Facebook
Twitter Facebook
 Twitter
 Facebook
Twitter Facebook
 Twitter
 Facebook
 
 
 
Packaging Content LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Battery Type Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Remote Control Type Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Cables Included
AC SCART
 AC
 SCART
AC SCART
 AC
 SCART
AC SCART
 AC
 SCART
AC SCART
 AC
 SCART
 
 
 
Networking LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Wi-Fi Standards
802.11n IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
802.11n IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
802.11n IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
802.11n IEEE 802.11n
 802.11n
 IEEE 802.11n
 
 
 
Management Features LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Smart Modes
Vivid Cinema
Game Energy saving
Standard Sports
Photo Movie
Music Store
Custom Natural
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Movie
 Music
 Store
 Custom
 Natural
Vivid Cinema
Game Energy saving
Standard Sports
Photo Movie
Music Store
Custom Natural
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Movie
 Music
 Store
 Custom
 Natural
Vivid Cinema
Game Energy saving
Standard Sports
Photo Movie
Music Store
Custom Natural
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Movie
 Music
 Store
 Custom
 Natural
Vivid Cinema
Game Energy saving
Standard Sports
Photo Movie
Music Store
Custom Natural
 Vivid
 Cinema
 Game
 Energy saving
 Standard
 Sports
 Photo
 Movie
 Music
 Store
 Custom
 Natural
Number of OSD Languages Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 27
Programming Period 8 Day(s) Unknown - Click to provide data 8 Day(s) Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Thickness 56.7mm 69mm 85mm 55.2mm
BEST
Weight 17.8kg 18kg 16kg 16.9kg
BEST
Package Dimensions (WxDxH) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand 18.1kg 21kg 16.3kg
BEST
19.1kg
Depth (with Stand) 237mm 364mm 232mm
BEST
334.1mm
Height (with Stand) 778mm 776mm 780mm 787.7mm
Width (with Stand) 1,240mm 1,244mm 1,239mm 1,237.2mm
BEST
Height 722mm 776mm 725mm 716.1mm
Width 1,240mm 1,244mm 1,239mm 1,237.2mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Headphone Outputs 1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1 1 1
RF Port 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 2
BEST
SCART Port Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1 1 1
Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in 1 1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port 1 1 3
BEST
2
HDMI Version
2.0a
 2.0a
2.0a
 2.0a
2.0a
 2.0a
2.0a
 2.0a
HDMI Port 3 3 4
BEST
3
Audio (L,R) in Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB 3.0 Type-A Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version 1.3 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3
 
 
 
Operational Conditions LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Operating Temperature (T-T) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Packaging Data LG 55UH625 Panasonic TX-55DX650 Philips 55PUS6401 Samsung UE55KU6470
Package Weight 22.2kg 25kg 20.5kg
BEST
25.4kg
Package Height 810mm
BEST
812mm 840mm 819mm
Package Width 1,330mm
BEST
1,675mm 1,420mm 1,425mm

Other Similar Comparisons

LG 55UH625
LG
55UH625
£1,043.99
Cheaper to run by £28 over five years
Better for watching films
13% thinner
VS
LG 65UJ750
LG
65UJ750
£1,049.00
Larger display
diagonal
Better for
watching sport
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Vastly faster motion interpolation frequency
Larger display diagonal
High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI)
VS
Samsung UE49K5510
Samsung
UE49K5510
£469.00
Cheaper to run
by £57.08
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Slightly
thinner
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
Hugely faster motion interpolation frequency
Very good for watching films
Excellent for watching sport
Excellent for playing games
A lot larger display diagonal
Higher RMS rated power
VS
Toshiba 40L5453
Toshiba
40L5453
£299.00
Cheaper to run
by £77.88
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
3D
PC in (D-Sub)
port
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
Vastly higher RMS rated power
Larger display diagonal
VS
JVC LT-48C770
JVC
LT-48C770
£319.00
Cheaper to run
by £52.76
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Faster motion interpolation frequency
VS
Logik L55UE17
Logik
L55UE17
£399.00
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
Better brand
Cheaper to run
by £27.30
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
28% larger display diagonal
VS
Panasonic TX-40EX700
Panasonic
TX-40EX700
£399.99
Cheaper to run
by £58 over
five years
15.2mm thinner
7% faster
motion
interpolation
frequency
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
11% larger display diagonal
VS
LG 49LF630
LG
49LF630
£439.00
48% cheaper to
run
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
1% thinner
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Thinner
6" larger display diagonal
VS
Samsung UE49M6320
Samsung
UE49M6320
£439.89
£57.15 cheaper
to run
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Very good for watching sport
28% larger display diagonal
VS
Samsung UE40H6400
Samsung
UE40H6400
£460.99
53% cheaper to
run
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
3D
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
28% larger display diagonal
Picture-in-Picture
VS
Samsung UE40MU6470U
Samsung
UE40MU6470U
£489.00
Cheaper to run
by £59 over
five years
A bit thinner
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Higher RMS rated power
A lot larger display diagonal
VS
Logik L32HE17
Logik
L32HE17
£148.99
Cheaper to run
by £97 over
five years
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Better brand
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
5" larger display diagonal
VS
Panasonic TX-50EX700
Panasonic
TX-50EX700
£489.99
A lot thinner
Cheaper to run
by £35 over
five years
Faster motion
interpolation
frequency
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
1,300Hz faster motion interpolation frequency
Better manufacturer's guarantee by one year
6" larger display diagonal
VS
Samsung UE49KS7000
Samsung
UE49KS7000
£499.00
Higher RMS
rated power
£32 cheaper to
run over five
years
28% thinner
Zero point one
more
loudspeakers
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
Very good for watching sport
28% larger display diagonal
VS
Philips 40PFS6909
Philips
40PFS6909
£499.99
Cheaper to run
by £78.95
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
Average for
watching films
3D
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Larger display diagonal
VS
Sony KD-49XD8088
Sony
KD-49XD8088
£514.00
£34 cheaper to
run over five
years
11.2mm thinner
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
4W higher RMS rated power
Better for watching sport
VS
Philips 55PUS6262
Philips
55PUS6262
£528.00
£52.61 cheaper
to run over
five years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
Better for
watching films
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
Very good for watching sport
VS
Philips 55PFT6550
Philips
55PFT6550
£529.00
42% cheaper to
run
Better energy
efficiency
rating
Average for
watching films
3D
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
42% larger display diagonal
VS
Panasonic TX-L32E30
Panasonic
TX-L32E30
£536.00
£18.02 cheaper
to run
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Higher RMS rated power
A lot larger display diagonal
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
VS
Samsung HG32EE460
Samsung
HG32EE460
£159.00
Cheaper to run
by £95.30
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
DVI port
PC in (D-Sub)
port
Samsung UE55KU6470
Samsung
UE55KU6470
£0.00
Better brand
Significantly higher RMS rated power
60% larger display diagonal
VS
Cello C22230DVB
Cello
C22230DVB
£137.25
Cheaper to run
by £107 over
five years
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
16% thinner
PC in (D-Sub)
port