It looks like you are browsing from
Go to Close
TVs & Displays
Photography & Video
Cooking Appliances
White Goods
Technology
Household
Home TVs LG 75SJ955 vs Samsung UE65JS9500
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Size and Dimensions Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

LG 75SJ955vsSamsung UE65JS9500

LG 75SJ955

74

Kagoo Score

74

Kagoo Score

LG 75SJ955

£2,399.00
£300.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and gigantic 4K 56mm thick TV, good for watching films
53
Value for Money
Average
86
Features
Fully-Featured
85
Age
18 Months Old
60
Running Costs
£250 Over 5 Years
69
Popularity
Widely Available
74
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 75" No 56mm Feb 2017 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 75"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 56mm
Release Date Feb 2017
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung UE65JS9500

78

Kagoo Score

78

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 4K 65" TV, with an Editor's Choice award from five expert review websites and 9 further awards from other expert sites
94
Reviews
64 Reviews + 13 Awards
86
Features
Fully-Featured
71
Age
3 Years Old
63
Running Costs
£190 Over 5 Years
76
Popularity
Lots of Positive Reviews
78
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 65" No Yes May 2015 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology 3D Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 65"
OLED / QLED Technology No
3D Yes
Release Date May 2015
Energy Efficiency A
LG 75SJ955

74

Kagoo Score

74

Kagoo Score

LG 75SJ955

£2,399.00
£300.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and gigantic 4K 56mm thick TV, good for watching films
53
Value for Money
Average
86
Features
Fully-Featured
85
Age
18 Months Old
60
Running Costs
£250 Over 5 Years
69
Popularity
Widely Available
74
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 75" No 56mm Feb 2017 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 75"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 56mm
Release Date Feb 2017
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung UE65JS9500

78

Kagoo Score

78

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 4K 65" TV, with an Editor's Choice award from five expert review websites and 9 further awards from other expert sites
94
Reviews
64 Reviews + 13 Awards
86
Features
Fully-Featured
71
Age
3 Years Old
63
Running Costs
£190 Over 5 Years
76
Popularity
Lots of Positive Reviews
78
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 65" No Yes May 2015 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology 3D Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 65"
OLED / QLED Technology No
3D Yes
Release Date May 2015
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
loading image
Store
10 hours agoExcellent Customer Feedback
£2,399.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
RGB Direct
£2,699.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Max Electrical
£2,798.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Appliance Electronics
£2,798.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Atlantic Electrics Ltd
£2,798.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Radiocraft
£2,798.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
6 Prices from 6 Stores | £2,399.00-£2,798.99
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
No prices found
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
No data 3 Reasons For
Cheaper to Run by £60 Over Five Years
The Samsung UE65JS9500 only costs £188 to run over five years however the LG 75SJ955 costs £248 to run (32% more).
Read more Read less
Expert Reviews Are a Lot Better
The average expert review score of the Samsung UE65JS9500 is 85% based on 50 reviews, whereas the average rating of the LG 75SJ955 is 67% (based on 1 review).
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 91.1%, but LG has an average rating of 87.4%.

Size and Dimensions

Reviews & Awards

Awards

LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
No awards found
13 Awards
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image

Average Expert Rating

The Samsung UE65JS9500 has better expert reviews than the LG 75SJ955. The average expert reviews score for the Samsung UE65JS9500 is 85% based on 50 reviews, where as the average score for the LG 75SJ955 is 67% based on 1 review.
LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
5 stars
0 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
Best
5 stars
19 reviews
4 stars
10 reviews
3 stars
3 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Average User Rating

LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
No reviews found
Best
5 stars
11 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
2 reviews

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has a better average brand rating than LG. The average brand rating for Samsung is 91.07% based on 104,675 reviews, where as the average brand rating for LG is 87.39% based on 36,239 reviews.
LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
LG

87

87

Based on 36,239 reviews
Samsung

91

91

Based on 104,675 reviews

Date Released

LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
18 months old Best 40 months old

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you are viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
LG 75SJ955
LG
75SJ955
32 trees 1.2 tonnes CO2
Samsung UE65JS9500
Samsung
UE65JS9500
24 trees 0.93 tonnes CO2 (Best)

Specification

 
 
 
Key Features LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
HD Type
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
Display Diagonal 75"
BEST
65"
Thickness 56mm Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Display LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
High Frequency Rate
Display Resolution
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
Motion Interpolation Frequency 200Hz
BEST
Display Brightness
Supported Video Mode
2160p
 2160p
2160p
 2160p
PQI (Picture Quality Index) Unknown - Click to provide data 2400
Colour Depth Unknown - Click to provide data 10
Display Technology
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
Display Diagonal (Metric) Unknown - Click to provide data 163cm
Supported Graphics Resolutions
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 
 
 
Audio LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Subwoofer RMS Power Unknown - Click to provide data 20W
RMS Rated Power 60W
BEST
40W
Loudspeaker Unknown - Click to provide data 2
Speaker Unknown - Click to provide data 2
 
 
 
Smart TV LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Lifestyle Apps
Skype
 Skype
Skype
 Skype
Smart Modes
Game Movie
Natural Sports
 Game
 Movie
 Natural
 Sports
Game Movie
Natural Sports
 Game
 Movie
 Natural
 Sports
 
 
 
Other Features LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
USB Port 3 Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Power LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Energy Efficiency Class
A
 A
A
 A
Power Consumption (Typical) 202W 153W
BEST
Power Consumption (Standby) 0.3W 0.3W
Power Consumption (PowerSave) 0.8W Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption 280kWh 212kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 366W
 
 
 
TV Tuner LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Tuner Type
Analog & Digital
 Analog & Digital
Analog & Digital
 Analog & Digital
Tuner Unknown - Click to provide data 2tuner(s)
 
 
 
Performance LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Video Formats Supported
ASF AVI
 ASF
 AVI
ASF AVI
 ASF
 AVI
Audio Formats Supported
AAC AC3
DTS EAC3
HE-AAC MP2
MP3 PCM
WMA
 AAC
 AC3
 DTS
 EAC3
 HE-AAC
 MP2
 MP3
 PCM
 WMA
AAC AC3
DTS EAC3
HE-AAC MP2
MP3 PCM
WMA
 AAC
 AC3
 DTS
 EAC3
 HE-AAC
 MP2
 MP3
 PCM
 WMA
Image Formats Supported
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
Processor Cores Unknown - Click to provide data 8
 
 
 
Packaging Content LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Cables Included
AC IR
 AC
 IR
AC IR
 AC
 IR
 
 
 
Networking LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Wi-Fi Standards
IEEE 802.11ac
 IEEE 802.11ac
IEEE 802.11ac
 IEEE 802.11ac
 
 
 
Management Features LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Number of OSD Languages Unknown - Click to provide data 27
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Weight 46.8kg 32.3kg
BEST
Weight With Stand 50.3kg 35.5kg
BEST
Depth (With Stand) 341mm
BEST
379.2mm
Height (With Stand) 1,021mm 917.2mm
Width (With Stand) 1,681mm 1,450.2mm
BEST
Height 959mm 838.3mm
Width 1,681mm 1,450.2mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Headphone Outputs 1 1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1
RF Port 2 2
RS-232 Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port 2 3
BEST
HDMI Version
2.0b
 2.0b
2.0b
 2.0b
HDMI Port 4 4
Remote (IR) Output Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio (L,R) Out Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 3.0 Type-A Port 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3
 
 
 
Packaging Data LG 75SJ955 Samsung UE65JS9500
Package Weight 61.7kg 43.8kg
BEST
Package Height 1,116mm
BEST
948mm
Package Depth 231mm 230mm
BEST
Package Width 1,823mm 1,632mm
BEST

Other Similar Comparisons

loading image
LG
75SJ955
£2,399.00
Superior energy efficiency rating
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Samsung
QE65Q9F
£2,349.99
£49 Cheaper
31.1mm thinner
Better brand
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
VS
loading image
Toshiba
32D3753DB
£179.99
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
VS
loading image
Toshiba
24W3753
£110.00
More popular
Marginally
better user
reviews
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
Vastly higher RMS rated power
75% faster motion interpolation frequency
VS
loading image
JVC
LT-24C661
£124.97
87% cheaper to
run over five
years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
User reviews are a little better
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Toshiba
32D3754
£145.00
£145 cheaper
to run over
five years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
24W higher RMS rated power
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
JVC
LT-32C461
£149.97
£148 cheaper
to run over
five years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
More popular
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
150Hz faster motion interpolation frequency
41" larger display diagonal
3D
VS
loading image
Logik
L24HEDW15
£149.99
Cheaper to run
by £156 over
five years
Better brand
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
75% higher RMS rated power
43" larger display diagonal
3D
VS
loading image
Samsung
T22E390
£156.31
Cheaper to run
by £148 over
five years
More popular
PC in (D-Sub)
port
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
User reviews are hugely better
51% larger display diagonal
A lot higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
Samsung
T32E310
£169.95
£149 cheaper
to run over
five years
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
Hugely larger display diagonal
3D
VS
loading image
LG
28LF491
£222.99
£155 cheaper
to run over
five years
User reviews
are better
More popular
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Faster motion interpolation frequency
37W higher RMS rated power
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Logik
L24HED16
£94.97
£163 cheaper
to run over
five years
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
33" larger display diagonal
50% higher RMS rated power
3D
VS
loading image
Samsung
UE32J5100
£245.99
£147 cheaper
to run over
five years
Better user
reviews
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
VS
loading image
Toshiba
49U6763DB
£275.00
£97 cheaper to
run over five
years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
30W higher RMS rated power
Larger display diagonal
Faster motion interpolation frequency
VS
loading image
Samsung
UE32J4000
£290.69
£151 cheaper
to run over
five years
Considerably
better user
reviews
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
Better for watching sport
Better for playing games
VS
loading image
LG
42LB580
£309.00
£119 cheaper
to run over
five years
User reviews
are appreciably
better
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
30W higher RMS rated power
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
LG
32LJ610V
£374.00
76% cheaper to
run over five
years
More popular
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
20W higher RMS rated power
Better for watching films
VS
loading image
Philips
50PUS6162
£379.00
£185 cheaper
to run over
five years
More popular
User reviews
are better
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
50% higher RMS rated power
Better for watching sport
VS
loading image
LG
43UJ635V
£379.00
User reviews
are appreciably
better
Better for
watching films
More popular
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
Higher RMS rated power
Hugely larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Philips
24PHT4031
£99.00
Cheaper to run
by £158 over
five years
User reviews
are a lot
better
DVI port
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
37W higher RMS rated power
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Logik
L20HE15
£75.00
£164 cheaper
to run over
five years
More popular
Better brand

×