It looks like you are browsing from
Go to Close
TVs & Displays
Photography & Video
Cooking Appliances
White Goods
Household
Technology
Home TVs Panasonic TX-24C300 vs Samsung UE22H5600
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

Panasonic TX-24C300vsSamsung UE22H5600

Panasonic TX-24C300

77

Kagoo Score

77

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A low cost and classic 24", 61mm thick TV, but with only middle of the road features
86
Reviews
100 Reviews
59
Features
Average Features
83
Popularity
Lots of Positive Reviews
97
Value for Money
Excellent
72
Age
3 Years Old
77
Kagoo Score
Very Good
HD 24" No 61mm Apr 2015 A+
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type HD
Display Diagonal 24"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 61mm
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE22H5600

83

Kagoo Score

83

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A best selling and great value for money Full HD 22" TV, with good features and low running costs
96
Reviews
886 Reviews
66
Features
Good Features
94
Popularity
Amazon Bestseller
98
Value for Money
Excellent
65
Age
4 Years Old
71
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
83
Kagoo Score
Excellent
Full HD 22" No 52.3mm Jul 2014 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type Full HD
Display Diagonal 22"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 52.3mm
Release Date Jul 2014
Energy Efficiency A
Panasonic TX-24C300

77

Kagoo Score

77

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A low cost and classic 24", 61mm thick TV, but with only middle of the road features
86
Reviews
100 Reviews
59
Features
Average Features
83
Popularity
Lots of Positive Reviews
97
Value for Money
Excellent
72
Age
3 Years Old
77
Kagoo Score
Very Good
HD 24" No 61mm Apr 2015 A+
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type HD
Display Diagonal 24"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 61mm
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE22H5600

83

Kagoo Score

83

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A best selling and great value for money Full HD 22" TV, with good features and low running costs
96
Reviews
886 Reviews
66
Features
Good Features
94
Popularity
Amazon Bestseller
98
Value for Money
Excellent
65
Age
4 Years Old
71
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
83
Kagoo Score
Excellent
Full HD 22" No 52.3mm Jul 2014 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type Full HD
Display Diagonal 22"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 52.3mm
Release Date Jul 2014
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
loading image
13 hours agoPay in InstallmentsExcellent Customer Feedback
£154.98
Go to Store
RGB Direct
£169.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
21 hours agoAmazon A-Z GuaranteeExcellent Customer Feedback
£199.00
FREE Standard delivery
Go to Store
3 Prices from 3 Stores | £154.98-£199.00
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Searching for prices in the UK
Sorry, no matching prices found.
Techdna
£151.78
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
13 hours agoPay in InstallmentsExcellent Customer Feedback
£164.99
Go to Store
loading image
29 minutes agoAmazon A-Z GuaranteeExcellent Customer Feedback
£199.00
FREE Standard delivery
Go to Store
loading image
29 minutes agoAmazon A-Z GuaranteeExcellent Customer Feedback
£249.14
FREE Standard delivery
Go to Store
- Show less prices from Amazon UK
Very
£199.99
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
Ex-Display19 hours agoeBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
£300.00
Go to Store
loading image
19 hours agoeBay Money Back GuaranteeWorldwide Shipping
£395.03
Go to Store
- Show less prices from eBay
7 Prices from 5 Stores | £151.78-£395.03
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
1 Reason For
Energy Efficiency Rating is Better
The Panasonic TX-24C300 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", however the Samsung UE22H5600 has a rating of "A".
5 Reasons For
Cheaper by £3
The Samsung UE22H5600 costs £3.20 less than the Panasonic TX-24C300.
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
More Popular
The Samsung UE22H5600 is a more popular choice amongst buyers.
Better User Reviews
The Samsung UE22H5600 has an average user review score of 92%, however the Panasonic TX-24C300 has an average rating of 85% (based on 87 reviews).
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 91.1%, whereas Panasonic has an average rating of 73.2%.

Reviews & Awards

Average Expert Rating

Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
No reviews found
Best
5 stars
0 reviews
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Average User Rating

The Samsung UE22H5600 has better user reviews than the Panasonic TX-24C300. The average user reviews score for the Samsung UE22H5600 is 92% based on 1,474 reviews, where as the average score for the Panasonic TX-24C300 is 85% based on 87 reviews.
Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
5 stars
56 reviews
4 stars
14 reviews
3 stars
6 reviews
2 stars
4 reviews
1 star
7 reviews
Best
5 stars
1102 reviews
4 stars
262 reviews
3 stars
59 reviews
2 stars
24 reviews
1 star
27 reviews

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has a better average brand rating than Panasonic. The average brand rating for Samsung is 91.14% based on 109,170 reviews, where as the average brand rating for Panasonic is 73.23% based on 1,688 reviews.
Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Panasonic

73

73

Based on 1,688 reviews
Samsung

91

91

Based on 109,170 reviews

Date Released

Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
41 months old Best 51 months old

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you are viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600

Specification

 
 
 
Key Features Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
HD Type
Full HD
 Full HD
Full HD
 Full HD
Display Diagonal 24"
BEST
22"
Thickness 61mm 52.3mm
BEST
 
 
 
Display Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
High Frequency Rate
Display Resolution
1920
 1920
1920
 1920
Motion Interpolation Frequency 200Hz
BEST
100Hz
Display Brightness
Horizontal Viewing Angle 150° Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
Display Diagonal (Metric) 61cm
BEST
54cm
Supported Graphics Resolutions
1366 х 768 1920 x 1080
 1366 х 768
 1920 x 1080
1366 х 768 1920 x 1080
 1366 х 768
 1920 x 1080
Vertical Viewing Angle 150° Unknown - Click to provide data
Luminance Unknown - Click to provide data 70%
 
 
 
Audio Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
RMS Rated Power Unknown - Click to provide data 20W
Loudspeaker 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Sound Modes
Movie Music
Speech
 Movie
 Music
 Speech
Movie Music
Speech
 Movie
 Music
 Speech
Speaker 2 2
 
 
 
Power Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Energy Efficiency Class
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
Power Consumption (Typical) 19W
BEST
22W
Power Consumption (Standby) 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Power Consumption (PowerSave) Unknown - Click to provide data 18W
Annual Energy Consumption 27kWh
BEST
31kWh
Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 39W
 
 
 
TV Tuner Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Tuner Type
Analog & Digital
 Analog & Digital
Analog & Digital
 Analog & Digital
Tuner Unknown - Click to provide data 3tuner(s)
 
 
 
Performance Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Teletext 1,000 Pages Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Packaging Content Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Cables Included
AC IR
 AC
 IR
AC IR
 AC
 IR
 
 
 
Management Features Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Number of OSD Languages 31
BEST
27
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Weight 3.8kg 3.4kg
BEST
Weight With Stand 4.2kg 3.6kg
BEST
Height (With Stand) 370mm 341.4mm
Width (With Stand) 554mm 519.6mm
BEST
Height 339mm 323.8mm
Width 554mm 519.6mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Headphone Outputs 1 1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1
RF Port Unknown - Click to provide data 2
SCART Port 1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port 1 2
BEST
HDMI Version
1.4a
 1.4a
1.4a
 1.4a
HDMI Port 2 2
Remote (IR) Output Unknown - Click to provide data 1
 
 
 
Packaging Data Panasonic TX-24C300 Samsung UE22H5600
Package Weight 5.6kg 4.6kg
BEST
Package Height Unknown - Click to provide data 430mm
Package Depth Unknown - Click to provide data 454mm
Package Width Unknown - Click to provide data 580mm

Other Similar Comparisons

loading image
Panasonic
TX-24C300
£154.98
Cheaper to run by £32 over five years
Thinner
VS
loading image
Cello
C32227
£155.99
Better brand
25% larger
display
diagonal
Internet TV
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
More popular
VS
loading image
Samsung
UE28J4100
£149.90
Marginally
better user
reviews
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
73% thinner
Higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
Toshiba
32L3753DB
£179.00
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
A lot larger
display
diagonal
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
£10 cheaper to run over five years
4W higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
JVC
LT-32C460
£129.97
£22 Cheaper
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
A lot larger
display
diagonal
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
VS
loading image
LG
28MT42
£130.00
£22 Cheaper
More popular
Better user
reviews
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
Considerably better user reviews
VS
loading image
Philips
24PFT5603
£133.00
£19 Cheaper
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
Better user reviews
75% higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
Philips
24PHH4000
£169.99
Better energy
efficiency
rating
A lot thinner
Larger display
diagonal
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
VS
loading image
Strong
SRT 24HZ4003NW
£168.98
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
A bit better user reviews
88% higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
Toshiba
24W3753
£139.00
£13 Cheaper
More popular
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
User reviews are moderately better
14W higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
Philips
24PHT4022
£164.55
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
£4 cheaper to
run over five
years
2" larger
display
diagonal
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
User reviews are significantly better
14W higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
Cello
C24230
£139.99
£12 Cheaper
Better energy
efficiency
rating
Larger display
diagonal
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
User reviews are better
Significantly thinner
VS
loading image
Toshiba
32W3753DB
£140.00
£12 Cheaper
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
User reviews are better
36.7mm thinner
VS
loading image
Toshiba
32W1633DB
£159.99
More popular
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Larger display
diagonal
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
User reviews are better
Superior energy efficiency rating
VS
loading image
Samsung
V24F39S
£159.95
More popular
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
Higher RMS rated power
Internet TV
VS
loading image
Philips
22PFS4022
£145.10
A lot thinner
£4 cheaper to
run over five
years
PC in (D-Sub)
port
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
Cheaper to run by £30 over five years
User reviews are a little better
VS
loading image
Cello
C32227
£155.99
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
A lot larger
display
diagonal
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
Better user reviews
VS
loading image
JVC
LT-32C670
£149.97
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
loading image
Panasonic
TX-24C300
£154.98
Cheaper to run by £13 over five years
A bit larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Samsung
T22E390
£156.31
Better brand
Thinner
Wider
horizontal
viewing angle
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
More popular
A lot faster motion interpolation frequency
£3 cheaper to run over five years
VS
loading image
Logik
L24HEDW15
£149.99
Better brand
2" larger
display
diagonal
loading image
Samsung
UE22H5600
£151.78
Better brand
14W higher RMS rated power
Thinner
VS
loading image
Philips
24PFS4032
£150.50
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
£3 cheaper to
run over five
years
9% larger
display
diagonal

×