Panasonic TX-40DS400 vs Panasonic TX-40DS500E vs Panasonic TX-40DX600
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Date Released What are They Best Used For Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

Panasonic TX-40DS400vsPanasonic TX-40DS500EvsPanasonic TX-40DX600

Panasonic TX-40DS400

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run and great value for money 40" Full HD TV, good for watching films
93
Value for Money
Excellent
69
Features
Good Features
82
Age
1 Year Old
88
Running Costs
£61 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
40" Full HD No 88mm Mar 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 88mm
Release Date Mar 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-40DS500E

78

Overall Score

78

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run but a little out of date 40" Full HD TV, with good features
73
Features
Good Features
83
Age
1 Year Old
91
Running Costs
£53 Over 5 Years
78
Overall Score
Very Good
40" Full HD No 47mm May 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 47mm
Release Date May 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-40DX600

85

Overall Score

85

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An affordable but marginally out of date 40" 4K TV, good for watching sport
95
Value for Money
Excellent
79
Features
Good Features
82
Age
1 Year Old
78
Running Costs
£86 Over 5 Years
85
Overall Score
Excellent
40" 4K No 49mm Mar 2016 B
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 49mm
Release Date Mar 2016
Energy Efficiency B
Panasonic TX-40DS400

84

Overall Score

84

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run and great value for money 40" Full HD TV, good for watching films
93
Value for Money
Excellent
69
Features
Good Features
82
Age
1 Year Old
88
Running Costs
£61 Over 5 Years
84
Overall Score
Excellent
40" Full HD No 88mm Mar 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 88mm
Release Date Mar 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-40DS500E

78

Overall Score

78

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run but a little out of date 40" Full HD TV, with good features
73
Features
Good Features
83
Age
1 Year Old
91
Running Costs
£53 Over 5 Years
78
Overall Score
Very Good
40" Full HD No 47mm May 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 47mm
Release Date May 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Panasonic TX-40DX600

85

Overall Score

85

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An affordable but marginally out of date 40" 4K TV, good for watching sport
95
Value for Money
Excellent
79
Features
Good Features
82
Age
1 Year Old
78
Running Costs
£86 Over 5 Years
85
Overall Score
Excellent
40" 4K No 49mm Mar 2016 B
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 49mm
Release Date Mar 2016
Energy Efficiency B

Top Prices

Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
RGB Direct
£329.00
Go to Store
Amazon UK
Panasonic VIERA TX-40DS400E 40" Full HD Wi-Fi Black LED TV - LED TVs (Full HD, A+, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 1080p, Black)
£1,100.00
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | £329.00-£1,100.00
No prices found
TPS
Out of stock
£399.00
Go to Store
Crampton and Moore
Panasonic TX-40DX600B 40"4K UHD LED Television
Out of stock
£439.00
Go to Store
Amazon UK
Panasonic VIERA TX-40DX600E 40" 4K Ultra HD Smart TV Wi-Fi Black LED TV - LED TVs (4K Ultra HD, Firefox OS, B, 16:9, 3840 x 2160, 2160p)
£508.51
Go to Store
Julipa
Out of stock
£539.00
Go to Store
Home Essentials
Out of stock
£549.00
Go to Store
Ambrose Wilson
Out of stock
£594.00
Go to Store
6 Prices from 6 Stores | £399.00-£508.51
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
20% Off
{Cello C32E69
£201.34
Was £252 (71 days ago)
Amazon UK
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
6 Reasons For
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 has a common interface (CI) slot, and so does the Panasonic TX-40DS500E, whereas the Panasonic TX-40DX600 does not have a common interface (CI) slot.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
Cheaper by £70
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 is £70 cheaper than the Panasonic TX-40DX600.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", whereas the Panasonic TX-40DS500E has a rating of "A+" and the Panasonic TX-40DX600 has a rating of "B".
Better for Watching Films
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 is better for watching films than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Better for Watching Sport
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 is better for watching sport than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
Better for Playing Games
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 is better for playing games than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E.
When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.
Read more Read less
4 Reasons For
Thinner
The Panasonic TX-40DS500E is a 47mm thick TV. That's 41mm thinner than the Panasonic TX-40DS400 (88mm) and 2mm thinner than the Panasonic TX-40DX600 (49mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The Panasonic TX-40DS500E has a common interface (CI) slot, and so does the Panasonic TX-40DS400, but the Panasonic TX-40DX600 does not.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
£33 Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the Panasonic TX-40DS500E only costs £53 to run whereas the Panasonic TX-40DS400 costs £61 to run (14% more) and the Panasonic TX-40DX600 costs £86 to run (63% more).
Read more Read less
Energy Efficiency Rating is Higher
The Panasonic TX-40DS500E has an energy efficiency rating of "A+", but the Panasonic TX-40DS400 has a rating of "A+" and the Panasonic TX-40DX600 has a rating of "B".
5 Reasons For
Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Panasonic TX-40DX600 is an 800Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 400Hz faster than the Panasonic TX-40DS400 and the Panasonic TX-40DS500E (400Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this TV remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Better for Watching Films
The Panasonic TX-40DX600 is better for watching films than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Better for Watching Sport
The Panasonic TX-40DX600 is better for watching sport than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
Better for Playing Games
The Panasonic TX-40DX600 is better for playing games than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E.
When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.
Read more Read less

Reasons Against

Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
5 Reasons Against
Vastly Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 has a motion interpolation frequency of 400Hz (as does the Panasonic TX-40DS500E), however the Panasonic TX-40DX600 is an 800Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (400Hz faster).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
47% Thicker
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 has a thickness of 88mm. That's 41mm thicker than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E (47mm) and 39mm thicker than the Panasonic TX-40DX600 (49mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Fewer Sellers
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 is only stocked by 2 stores, but the Panasonic TX-40DX600 is stocked by 6 retailers.
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Read more Read less
Older by Two Months
The Panasonic TX-40DS400 is two months older than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E. The Panasonic TX-40DS400 is the same age as the Panasonic TX-40DX600.
Higher Running Costs Over Five Years by £8
Over five years the Panasonic TX-40DS400 costs £61 to run which is £8 more than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E. Show assumptions.
5 Reasons Against
400Hz Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Panasonic TX-40DS500E has a motion interpolation frequency of 400Hz (as does the Panasonic TX-40DS400), whereas the Panasonic TX-40DX600 is an 800Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (400Hz faster).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not Currently Available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product.
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Read more Read less
Worse for Watching Films
The Panasonic TX-40DS500E is worse for watching films than the Panasonic TX-40DS400 and Panasonic TX-40DX600.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
Worse for Watching Sport
The Panasonic TX-40DS500E is worse for watching sport than the Panasonic TX-40DS400 and Panasonic TX-40DX600.
When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.
Read more Read less
Worse for Playing Games
The Panasonic TX-40DS500E is worse for playing games than the Panasonic TX-40DS400 and Panasonic TX-40DX600.
When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.
Read more Read less
5 Reasons Against
A Little Thicker
Panasonic TX-40DX600 is 49mm thick, but the Panasonic TX-40DS400 is an 88mm thick TV (39mm thicker) and the Panasonic TX-40DS500E is a 47mm thick TV (2mm thinner).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£70 More Expensive
The Panasonic TX-40DX600 is more expensive than the Panasonic TX-40DS400 by £70.
Two Months Older
The Panasonic TX-40DX600 is older than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E by two months. The Panasonic TX-40DX600 is the same age as the Panasonic TX-40DS400.
63% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
The Panasonic TX-40DX600 costs £86 to run which is £26 more than the Panasonic TX-40DS400 and £33 more than the Panasonic TX-40DS500E over five years. Show assumptions.
Energy Efficiency Rating is Lower
The Panasonic TX-40DX600 has an energy efficiency rating of "B", however the Panasonic TX-40DS400 has a rating of "A+" and the Panasonic TX-40DS500E has a rating of "A+".

Date Released

Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
23 months old 21 months old Best 23 months old

What are They Best Used For

Watching Films

When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!

Compare the best TVs for film.

Watching Sport

When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.

Compare the best TVs for sport.

Playing Games

When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.

Compare the best TVs for gaming.

Key Features

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Panasonic TX-40DS400
Panasonic
TX-40DS400
8 trees 0.3 tonnes CO2
Panasonic TX-40DS500E
Panasonic
TX-40DS500E
7 trees 0.26 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
11 trees 0.43 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Display Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Display Diagonal 40" 40" 40"
HD Type
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
High Frequency Rate
Display Resolution
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
Motion Interpolation Frequency 400Hz 400Hz 800Hz
BEST
Display Brightness
Supported Video Mode
1080p 2160p
 1080p
 2160p
1080p 2160p
 1080p
 2160p
1080p 2160p
 1080p
 2160p
Display Technology
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
LED
 LED
Screen Format Adjustments
16:9
 16:9
16:9
 16:9
16:9
 16:9
Display Diagonal (metric) 100cm 100cm 100cm
Supported Graphics Resolutions
1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
3840 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 3840 x 2160
1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
3840 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 3840 x 2160
1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) 1920 x 1080
3840 x 2160
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080
 3840 x 2160
 
 
 
Audio Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
RMS Rated Power 20W 20W 20W
Loudspeaker 2 2 2
Sound Modes
Speech Standard
Music Ambience
 Speech
 Standard
 Music
 Ambience
Speech Standard
Music Ambience
 Speech
 Standard
 Music
 Ambience
Speech Standard
Music Ambience
 Speech
 Standard
 Music
 Ambience
Speaker 2 2 2
 
 
 
Smart TV Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Video App
YouTube
 YouTube
YouTube
 YouTube
YouTube
 YouTube
 
 
 
Power Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Energy Efficiency Class
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
Power Consumption (typical) 48W 42W
BEST
68W
Power Consumption (standby) 0.3W 0.2W
BEST
0.5W
Power Consumption (PowerSave) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption 67kWh 59kWh
BEST
95kWh
Power Consumption (off) 0.3W 0.2W
BEST
0.5W
 
 
 
TV Tuner Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Tuner Type
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
 
 
 
Performance Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Video Formats Supported
MP4 AVI
FLV 3GP
MKV VOB
M4V TS
3GPP VRO
WMV PS
H.265
 MP4
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 WMV
 PS
 H.265
MP4 AVI
FLV 3GP
MKV VOB
M4V TS
3GPP VRO
WMV PS
H.265
 MP4
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 WMV
 PS
 H.265
MP4 AVI
FLV 3GP
MKV VOB
M4V TS
3GPP VRO
WMV PS
H.265
 MP4
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 M4V
 TS
 3GPP
 VRO
 WMV
 PS
 H.265
Audio Formats Supported
FLAC MP3
WAV WMA
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
FLAC MP3
WAV WMA
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
FLAC MP3
WAV WMA
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AAC++
Image Formats Supported
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
Processor Cores Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4
Teletext 1,000 Pages 1,000 Pages 1,000 Pages
 
 
 
Management Features Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Smart Modes
Normal True Cinema
Custom Cinema
Dynamic
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Cinema
 Dynamic
Normal True Cinema
Custom Cinema
Dynamic
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Cinema
 Dynamic
Normal True Cinema
Custom Cinema
Dynamic
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Cinema
 Dynamic
Number of OSD Languages 27 27 27
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Thickness 88mm 47mm
BEST
49mm
Weight 8kg 10.5kg
BEST
12kg
Weight With Stand 8.5kg 12.5kg
BEST
14kg
Depth (with Stand) 238mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 364mm
Height (with Stand) 569mm 567mm 573mm
Width (with Stand) 902mm
BEST
904mm 904mm
Height 522mm 518mm 518mm
Width 902mm 904mm 904mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Headphone Outputs 1 1 1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1 1
SCART Port 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port 1 1 1
HDMI Port 2 2 3
BEST
USB 3.0 Type-A Port Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version 1.3 1.3 1.3
 
 
 
Packaging Data Panasonic TX-40DS400 Panasonic TX-40DS500E Panasonic TX-40DX600
Package Weight 11kg
BEST
15kg 17kg
Package Height 662mm 647mm
BEST
680mm
Package Width 983mm 1,302mm
BEST
1,345mm

Other Similar Comparisons

Panasonic TX-40DS400
Panasonic
TX-40DS400
£329.00
70% higher RMS rated power
Energy efficiency rating is superior
18.5" larger display diagonal
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
VS
Megasat Royal Line 22 Deluxe
Megasat
Royal Line 22 Deluxe
£328.23
£1 Cheaper
Vastly thinner
Cheaper to run
by £20.77
PC in (D-Sub)
port
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
5.2mm thinner
Internet TV
Screen mirroring
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
VS
Samsung HG40EE670
Samsung
HG40EE670
£422.97
Better brand
Cheaper to run
by £33.08
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Common
interface (CI)
slot
DVI port
PC in (D-Sub)
port
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
21% cheaper to run over five years
Moderately thinner
VS
Samsung UE49MU6120
Samsung
UE49MU6120
£400.00
Better brand
Better for
watching films
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
Larger display
diagonal
Better for
watching sport
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
5.2mm thinner
Average for watching sport
VS
Samsung UE40MU6470U
Samsung
UE40MU6470U
£389.99
£9 Cheaper
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
Very good for
watching films
10% cheaper to
run
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
34.2mm thinner
Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
VS
Philips 50PUS6162
Philips
50PUS6162
£409.00
97% cheaper to
run over five
years
Better brand
Better energy
efficiency
rating
10" larger
display
diagonal
Better for
watching sport
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Cheaper to run by £83 over five years
27% thinner
VS
Hisense LTDN55K390
Hisense
LTDN55K390
£416.99
Better brand
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
Larger display
diagonal
Better for
playing games
3D
PC in (D-Sub)
port
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Significantly thinner
£28.10 cheaper to run
Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
VS
Hisense H50M3300
Hisense
H50M3300
£419.00
Better brand
Better energy
efficiency
rating
10" larger
display
diagonal
Good for
watching sport
Good for
playing games
PC in (D-Sub)
port
More popular
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Average for watching sport
Average for playing games
6.1mm thinner
VS
Samsung UE40K5510
Samsung
UE40K5510
£379.00
£20 Cheaper
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
Cheaper to run
by £18.77
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Better for watching sport
Moderately thinner
Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
VS
Samsung UE40H6400
Samsung
UE40H6400
£378.00
£21 Cheaper
Better brand
£37 cheaper to
run over five
years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
3D
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Significantly faster motion interpolation frequency
82% thinner
Better for playing games
Better for watching sport
VS
Samsung UE40K6300
Samsung
UE40K6300
£429.00
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
21% cheaper to
run over five
years
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
64% thinner
A lot faster motion interpolation frequency
Better for watching sport
VS
Panasonic TX-49DS500
Panasonic
TX-49DS500
£399.00
Same Price
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
Better for
watching films
9" larger
display
diagonal
1% cheaper to
run over five
years
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
13% thinner
VS
Samsung UE49M5500
Samsung
UE49M5500
£429.00
Better brand
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
19% larger
display
diagonal
£8 cheaper to
run over five
years
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Thinner
Cheaper to run by £55 over five years
VS
Hisense H55M3300
Hisense
H55M3300
£429.00
Better brand
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
28% larger
display
diagonal
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Better for watching sport
2% thinner
VS
Samsung UE40JU6000
Samsung
UE40JU6000
£429.00
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
Better for
watching films
7% cheaper to
run over five
years
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Better brand
Cheaper to run by £76.83
A lot thinner
Average for watching sport
20% higher RMS rated power
VS
Haier LEF42V200
Haier
LEF42V200
£368.89
£30 Cheaper
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
Very good for
watching films
5% larger
display
diagonal
OLED/QLED
technology
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
£26 cheaper to run over five years
5.8mm thinner
VS
Samsung UE49MU6400
Samsung
UE49MU6400
£430.00
Better brand
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
Better for
watching films
19% larger
display
diagonal
Better for
watching sport
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Average for watching sport
Average for playing games
VS
Samsung HG40ED790
Samsung
HG40ED790
£436.97
Better brand
37% cheaper to
run
Better energy
efficiency
rating
Moderately
thinner
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
VS
LG 43UH668
LG
43UH668
£360.00
£39 Cheaper
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
21% cheaper to
run over five
years
A little larger
display
diagonal
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
Superior energy efficiency rating
VS
LG 49UF640V
LG
49UF640V
£399.00
Same Price
Better brand
19% larger
display
diagonal
£0 cheaper to
run over five
years
Common
interface (CI)
slot
Panasonic TX-40DX600
Panasonic
TX-40DX600
£399.00
37% thinner
VS
Philips 43PUS6262
Philips
43PUS6262
£399.00
Same Price
Better brand
34% cheaper to
run over five
years
Better energy
efficiency
rating
7% larger
display
diagonal