Panasonic TX-55CX700 vs Panasonic TX-55CX802 vs Panasonic TX-58DX750
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Reviews & Awards Date Released What are They Best Used For Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

Panasonic TX-55CX700vsPanasonic TX-55CX802vsPanasonic TX-58DX750

Panasonic TX-55CX700

79

Overall Score

79

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and award winning 55" 4K TV, with average running costs
92
Reviews
3 Reviews + 1 Award
88
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
64
Running Costs
£160 Over 5 Years
79
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 54mm Mar 2015 B
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 54mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency B
Panasonic TX-55CX802

77

Overall Score

77

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and critically acclaimed 55" 4K TV, good for playing games
86
Reviews
1 Review
53
Value for Money
Average
89
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
77
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 54mm Apr 2015
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 54mm
Release Date Apr 2015
Panasonic TX-58DX750

78

Overall Score

78

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but 2 year old 58" 4K TV, with average running costs but representing only middle of the road value for money
64
Value for Money
Good
90
Features
Fully-Featured
83
Age
1 Year Old
67
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
78
Overall Score
Very Good
58" 4K No 41mm Apr 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 58"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 41mm
Release Date Apr 2016
Energy Efficiency A
Panasonic TX-55CX700

79

Overall Score

79

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and award winning 55" 4K TV, with average running costs
92
Reviews
3 Reviews + 1 Award
88
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
64
Running Costs
£160 Over 5 Years
79
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 54mm Mar 2015 B
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 54mm
Release Date Mar 2015
Energy Efficiency B
Panasonic TX-55CX802

77

Overall Score

77

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and critically acclaimed 55" 4K TV, good for playing games
86
Reviews
1 Review
53
Value for Money
Average
89
Features
Fully-Featured
75
Age
2 Years Old
77
Overall Score
Very Good
55" 4K No 54mm Apr 2015
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date
Display Diagonal 55"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 54mm
Release Date Apr 2015
Panasonic TX-58DX750

78

Overall Score

78

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured but 2 year old 58" 4K TV, with average running costs but representing only middle of the road value for money
64
Value for Money
Good
90
Features
Fully-Featured
83
Age
1 Year Old
67
Running Costs
£140 Over 5 Years
78
Overall Score
Very Good
58" 4K No 41mm Apr 2016 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 58"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 41mm
Release Date Apr 2016
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
No prices found
RGB Direct
£1,399.00
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £1,399.00
TPS
£969.00
Go to Store
Crampton and Moore
Panasonic TX-58DX750B 58"4K UHD 3D LED Television
£1,049.00
Go to Store
RLR Distribution
Televisions Panasonic TX58DX750B 58" Ultra HD 4K Pro Smart 3D LED TV
£1,220.00
Go to Store
3 Prices from 3 Stores | £969.00-£1,220.00
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
29% Off
{Seiki SE24HD02UK
£119.98
Was £170 (29 days ago)
PC World Business
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
No data 3 Reasons For
A Lot Higher RMS Rated Power
The Panasonic TX-55CX802 has an RMS rated power of 40W, but the Panasonic TX-55CX700 and the Panasonic TX-58DX750 are both only 20W RMS rated power TVs (20W lower).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Expert Reviews Are Better
The average expert review score of the Panasonic TX-55CX802 is 90%, however the average rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is 83% (based on 4 reviews).
Better for Watching Films
The Panasonic TX-55CX802 is better for watching films than the Panasonic TX-55CX700.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
9 Reasons For
3" Larger Display Diagonal
The Panasonic TX-58DX750 has a display diagonal of 58", whereas the Panasonic TX-55CX700 and the Panasonic TX-55CX802 are both only 55" TVs (3" smaller).

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
1,000Hz Faster High Frequency Rate
The Panasonic TX-58DX750 has a high frequency rate of 1,800Hz, however the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is only an 800Hz refresh rate TV (1,000Hz slower) and the Panasonic TX-55CX802 is only a 1,600Hz refresh rate TV (200Hz slower).

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Read more Read less | Edit
1,000Hz Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Panasonic TX-58DX750 has a motion interpolation frequency of 1,800Hz, but the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is only an 800Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (1,000Hz slower) and the Panasonic TX-55CX802 is only a 1,600Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (200Hz slower).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Thinner
Panasonic TX-58DX750 is 41mm thick. That's 13mm thinner than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 and the Panasonic TX-55CX802 (54mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Cheaper by £430
The Panasonic TX-58DX750 costs £430 less than the Panasonic TX-55CX802.
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV.
13% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the Panasonic TX-58DX750 only costs £139 to run but the Panasonic TX-55CX700 costs £160 to run (15% more).
Read more Read less
Energy Efficiency Rating is Better
The Panasonic TX-58DX750 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", however the Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a rating of "B".
Better for Watching Films
The Panasonic TX-58DX750 is better for watching films than the Panasonic TX-55CX700.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less

Reasons Against

Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
11 Reasons Against
3" Smaller Display Diagonal
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a display diagonal of 55" (as does the Panasonic TX-55CX802), whereas the Panasonic TX-58DX750 is a 58" TV (3" larger).

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
Vastly Slower High Frequency Rate
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a high frequency rate of 800Hz, however the Panasonic TX-55CX802 is a 1,600Hz refresh rate TV (800Hz faster) and the Panasonic TX-58DX750 is a 1,800Hz refresh rate TV (1,000Hz faster).

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Read more Read less | Edit
2x Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 has a motion interpolation frequency of 800Hz, but the Panasonic TX-55CX802 is a 1,600Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (800Hz faster) and the Panasonic TX-58DX750 is a 1,800Hz motion interpolation frequency TV (1,000Hz faster).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Lower RMS Rated Power
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is a 20W RMS rated power TV, and so does the Panasonic TX-58DX750. That's 20W lower than the Panasonic TX-55CX802 (40W).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit
Thicker
Panasonic TX-55CX700 is 54mm thick, and so does the Panasonic TX-55CX802. That's 13mm thicker than the Panasonic TX-58DX750 (41mm).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Not Currently Available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product.
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Read more Read less
Older by Over One Year
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is one month older than the Panasonic TX-55CX802 and 13 months older than the Panasonic TX-58DX750.
£21 More Expensive to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the running costs of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 are £160 which is £21 more than the Panasonic TX-58DX750. Show assumptions.
Lower Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is "B", however the rating of the Panasonic TX-58DX750 is "A".
Expert Review Rating is Worse
The Panasonic TX-55CX700's average expert score is 83%, however the Panasonic TX-55CX802's is 90% (based on 1 review).
Worse for Watching Films
The Panasonic TX-55CX700 is worse for watching films than the Panasonic TX-55CX802 and Panasonic TX-58DX750.
When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!
Read more Read less
7 Reasons Against
6% Smaller Display Diagonal
The Panasonic TX-55CX802 is a 55" TV, and so does the Panasonic TX-55CX700. That's 3" smaller than the Panasonic TX-58DX750 (58").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
13% Slower High Frequency Rate
The Panasonic TX-55CX802 has a high frequency rate of 1,600Hz. That's 800Hz faster than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (800Hz) and 200Hz slower than the Panasonic TX-58DX750 (1,800Hz).

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Read more Read less | Edit
Slower Motion Interpolation Frequency
The Panasonic TX-55CX802 is a 1,600Hz motion interpolation frequency TV. That's 800Hz faster than the Panasonic TX-55CX700 (800Hz) and 200Hz slower than the Panasonic TX-58DX750 (1,800Hz).

The motion interpolation frequency is the frame rate which the TV is able to artificially create by inserting additional frames into the picture between the frames included in the original video source.

A faster motion interpolation frequency will result in smoother action scenes, less motion blur and a more life like image.

Read more Read less | Edit
Thicker
Panasonic TX-55CX802 is 54mm thick (as does the Panasonic TX-55CX700), but the Panasonic TX-58DX750 is a 41mm thick TV (13mm thinner).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
£430 More Expensive
The Panasonic TX-55CX802 is more expensive than the Panasonic TX-58DX750 by £430.
Less Retailers
Only 1 seller sell the Panasonic TX-55CX802, whereas 3 stores sell the Panasonic TX-58DX750.
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Read more Read less
One Year Older
The Panasonic TX-55CX802 is older than the Panasonic TX-58DX750 by one year.
1 Reason Against
Lower RMS Rated Power
The Panasonic TX-58DX750 is a 20W RMS rated power TV, and so does the Panasonic TX-55CX700. That's 20W lower than the Panasonic TX-55CX802 (40W).

RMS rated power stands for Root Mean Square rated power and it is typically used to measure the power output of the audio element of the TV.

A higher RMS rated power means that the audio system on the TV is more powerful and will be able to play the audio at higher volumes. A higher RMS power may also result in better quality audio at normal volume levels.

Read more Read less | Edit

Reviews & Awards

Awards

Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
1 Award
01net.com: 4 Star
No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

The Panasonic TX-55CX802 has better expert reviews than the Panasonic TX-55CX700. The average expert reviews score for the Panasonic TX-55CX802 is 90% based on 1 review, where as the average score for the Panasonic TX-55CX700 is 83% based on 4 reviews.
Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
2 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
No reviews found No reviews found
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Date Released

Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
35 months old 34 months old 21 months old Best

What are They Best Used For

Watching Films

When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!

Compare the best TVs for film.

Watching Sport

When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.

Compare the best TVs for sport.

Playing Games

When ranking TVs for games, we’ve concentrated on a number of key attributes: primarily ‘motion interpolation frequency’ and ‘high refresh rate’. Both connect to the quality of the image coming from the games console to the TV - both reduce instances of blurring caused by fast moving objects on the screen, and allow the image to appear more detailed and cleaner.

Compare the best TVs for gaming.

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

High Frequency Rate

The refresh rate (also known as the high frequency rate) is the number of times that the image on the screen is refreshed per second. It affects how smoothly motion on the screen appears.

Action will appear smoother on TVs with a higher frequency rate: a TV with a high frequency rate of 30Hz refreshes the image on the screen once every 30 times every second. However a TV with a high frequency rate of 60Hz would refresh the image on the screen 60 times every second which means that action scenes would appear smoother.

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
No data

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Panasonic TX-55CX700
Panasonic
TX-55CX700
20 trees 0.8 tonnes CO2
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
18 trees 0.69 tonnes CO2 (Best)

Specification

 
 
 
Display Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Display Diagonal 55" 55" 58"
BEST
HD Type
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
High Frequency Rate 800Hz
BEST
1,600Hz 1,800Hz
Display Resolution
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
3840 x 2160 (4K)
 3840 x 2160 (4K)
Motion Interpolation Frequency 800Hz
BEST
1,600Hz 1,800Hz
Display Brightness
Horizontal Viewing Angle 176° 176° Unknown - Click to provide data
Supported Video Mode
2160p
 2160p
2160p
 2160p
2160p
 2160p
Display Diagonal (metric) 139cm 139cm 146cm
BEST
Supported Graphics Resolutions
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
Vertical Viewing Angle 176° 176° Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Audio Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Subwoofer RMS Power Unknown - Click to provide data 20W Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power 20W 40W
BEST
20W
Loudspeaker 2 2 2
Sound Modes
Standard Music
Ambience
 Standard
 Music
 Ambience
Standard Music
Ambience
 Standard
 Music
 Ambience
Standard Music
Ambience
 Standard
 Music
 Ambience
Speaker 2 2 2
 
 
 
Smart TV Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Video App
Netflix YouTube
 Netflix
 YouTube
Netflix YouTube
 Netflix
 YouTube
Netflix YouTube
 Netflix
 YouTube
Lifestyle Apps
Facebook Twitter
 Facebook
 Twitter
Facebook Twitter
 Facebook
 Twitter
Facebook Twitter
 Facebook
 Twitter
 
 
 
Other Features Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Sound Enhancement Technology Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Multimedia Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Speakers Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Picture Enhancement Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVB Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Smart TV Applications Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Content Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Power Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Energy Efficiency Class
A
 A
A
 A
A
 A
Power Consumption (typical) 129W Unknown - Click to provide data 113W
BEST
Power Consumption (standby) 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption (average) 129W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption 179kWh Unknown - Click to provide data 156kWh
BEST
Power Consumption (off) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
 
 
 
TV Tuner Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Tuner Type
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
Analog
 Analog
 
 
 
Performance Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Compatible Memory Cards
SD
 SD
SD
 SD
SD
 SD
Video Formats Supported
MP4 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MKV
VOB AVCHD
M4V TS
AVC 3GPP
VRO PS
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
MP4 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MKV
VOB AVCHD
M4V TS
AVC 3GPP
VRO PS
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
MP4 WMV
AVI FLV
3GP MKV
VOB AVCHD
M4V TS
AVC 3GPP
VRO PS
 MP4
 WMV
 AVI
 FLV
 3GP
 MKV
 VOB
 AVCHD
 M4V
 TS
 AVC
 3GPP
 VRO
 PS
Audio Formats Supported
FLAC MP2
MP3 WAV
WMA AC3
EAC3 RTX
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP2
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AC3
 EAC3
 RTX
 AAC++
FLAC MP2
MP3 WAV
WMA AC3
EAC3 RTX
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP2
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AC3
 EAC3
 RTX
 AAC++
FLAC MP2
MP3 WAV
WMA AC3
EAC3 RTX
AAC++
 FLAC
 MP2
 MP3
 WAV
 WMA
 AC3
 EAC3
 RTX
 AAC++
Image Formats Supported
JPG MPO
 JPG
 MPO
JPG MPO
 JPG
 MPO
JPG MPO
 JPG
 MPO
Processor Cores Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4
Teletext 1,500 Pages 1,500 Pages 1,500 Pages
Google Application
YouTube
 YouTube
YouTube
 YouTube
YouTube
 YouTube
Social Network Service
Twitter Facebook
 Twitter
 Facebook
Twitter Facebook
 Twitter
 Facebook
Twitter Facebook
 Twitter
 Facebook
 
 
 
Management Features Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Smart Modes
Cinema Game
Dynamic Normal
True Cinema Custom
Personal
 Cinema
 Game
 Dynamic
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Personal
Cinema Game
Dynamic Normal
True Cinema Custom
Personal
 Cinema
 Game
 Dynamic
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Personal
Cinema Game
Dynamic Normal
True Cinema Custom
Personal
 Cinema
 Game
 Dynamic
 Normal
 True Cinema
 Custom
 Personal
Number of OSD Languages 26 Unknown - Click to provide data 27
BEST
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Thickness 54mm 54mm 41mm
BEST
Weight 18kg
BEST
20.5kg 23kg
Package Dimensions (WxDxH) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand 19kg
BEST
22.5kg 24kg
Depth (with Stand) 242mm 246mm 234mm
BEST
Height (with Stand) 762mm 754mm 805mm
Width (with Stand) 1,237mm
BEST
1,237mm
BEST
1,290mm
Height 717mm 719mm 753mm
Width 1,237mm 1,237mm 1,290mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Headphone Outputs 1 1 1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1 1
SCART Port 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1 1
Composite Video in 1 1 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in 1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port 2 2 2
USB 3.0 Port 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port 3 3 3
USB 3.0 Type-A Port 1 1 1
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3
 
 
 
Packaging Data Panasonic TX-55CX700 Panasonic TX-55CX802 Panasonic TX-58DX750
Package Weight 24kg
BEST
29kg 32kg
Package Height 837mm
BEST
864mm 857mm
Package Width 1,615mm 1,557mm 1,494mm
BEST

Other Similar Comparisons

Panasonic TX-55CX700
Panasonic
TX-55CX700
£0.00
31" larger display diagonal
50% higher RMS rated power
Thinner
6° wider horizontal viewing angle
3D
Internet TV
Wi-Fi
Ethernet port
VS
LG 24MT46
LG
24MT46
£139.98
80% cheaper to
run over five
years
Better brand
Better energy
efficiency
rating
OLED/QLED
technology
PC in (D-Sub)
port
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
3D
VS
Samsung MU8000
Samsung
MU8000
£998.00
Better brand
50% higher RMS
rated power
11% larger
display
diagonal
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
800Hz faster motion interpolation frequency
Better for playing games
Better for watching sport
10" larger display diagonal
VS
Samsung UE48JU7500
Samsung
UE48JU7500
£955.00
£14 Cheaper
Better brand
20W higher RMS
rated power
Cheaper to run
by £34 over
five years
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
72% cheaper to run
Thinner
VS
Samsung UE60JU6800
Samsung
UE60JU6800
£989.00
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
2" larger
display
diagonal
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
3D
VS
LG 60UF695
LG
60UF695
£949.00
£20 Cheaper
Better brand
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
£9 cheaper to
run over five
years
1.9mm thinner
4% larger
display
diagonal
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
95% faster high frequency rate
21mm thinner
Better for playing games
3D
VS
LG 65UH661
LG
65UH661
£948.00
£21 Cheaper
Better brand
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Cheaper to run
by £40 over
five years
Larger display
diagonal
Better for
watching films
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Better for watching films
Better for playing games
Better for watching sport
Larger display diagonal
3D
VS
Philips 49HFL7011
Philips
49HFL7011
£943.98
£25 Cheaper
Better brand
Higher RMS
rated power
19% cheaper to
run over five
years
DVI port
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
47.4mm thinner
1,600Hz faster high frequency rate
1,600Hz faster motion interpolation frequency
Better for playing games
Better for watching sport
3D
VS
Samsung UE55KS7500
Samsung
UE55KS7500
£995.00
Better brand
A lot higher
RMS rated power
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Cheaper to run
by £33 over
five years
Larger display
diagonal
Better for
watching films
Two point one
loudspeakers
DVI port
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
Larger display diagonal
3D
VS
LG 43UV661H
LG
43UV661H
£996.23
Better brand
Cheaper to run
by £50 over
five years
Better for
watching sport
Better for
watching films
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
3D
VS
Samsung UE60JU6000
Samsung
UE60JU6000
£999.00
Better brand
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Cheaper to run
by £23 over
five years
4% larger
display
diagonal
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
27% cheaper to run over five years
3D
VS
Samsung UE65MU6220
Samsung
UE65MU6220
£979.90
Better brand
11% larger
display
diagonal
Better for
watching films
DVI port
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
Hugely thinner
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Better for playing games
Better for watching sport
9" larger display diagonal
3D
VS
Samsung UE49KS9000
Samsung
UE49KS9000
£999.00
Better brand
67% higher RMS
rated power
Two point one
more
loudspeakers
25% cheaper to
run over five
years
Better for
watching films
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
Faster high frequency rate
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Larger display diagonal
3D
VS
Sony KD-55XD8599
Sony
KD-55XD8599
£999.00
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
Cheaper to run
by £10.20
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
Thinner
3D
VS
LG 65UJ701V
LG
65UJ701V
£999.00
Better brand
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Larger display
diagonal
Cheaper to run
by £11 over
five years
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
3D
VS
LG 65UJ651
LG
65UJ651
£999.00
Better brand
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
Larger display
diagonal
Cheaper to run
by £9 over
five years
0.3mm thinner
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
Thinner
Cheaper to run by £52 over five years
3D
VS
Samsung UE65MU6100
Samsung
UE65MU6100
£999.00
Better brand
Larger display
diagonal
Better for
watching films
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
3D
VS
Samsung UE65KU6100
Samsung
UE65KU6100
£999.00
Better brand
Higher RMS
rated power
7" larger
display
diagonal
Better for
watching films
2% cheaper to
run over five
years
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
6% larger display diagonal
3D
VS
Samsung 55MU8000
Samsung
55MU8000
£999.00
Better brand
Higher RMS
rated power
3% cheaper to
run over five
years
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
700Hz faster motion interpolation frequency
3" larger display diagonal
Local dimming
VS
Samsung UE55JU6500
Samsung
UE55JU6500
£957.72
£11 Cheaper
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
26% cheaper to
run over five
years
Built-in camera
DVI port
Panasonic TX-58DX750
Panasonic
TX-58DX750
£969.00
23.6mm thinner
26% cheaper to run over five years
3D
Bluetooth
VS
Samsung UE65KU6020
Samsung
UE65KU6020
£979.00
Better brand
Larger display
diagonal
Better for
watching films
PC in (D-Sub)
port