Philips 32PHH4101 vs Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Review Analysis Specification
Share on

Philips 32PHH4101vsSharp LC-40CFE5221

Philips 32PHH4101

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A positively reviewed and extremely economical to run 32", 77mm thick TV, but with only average features
96
Reviews
195 Reviews
59
Features
Average Features
83
Age
1 Year Old
95
Running Costs
£40 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
32" Not Supported No 77mm Apr 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 32"
HD Type Not Supported
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 77mm
Release Date Apr 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Sharp LC-40CFE5221

74

Overall Score

74

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A highly rated and very economical to run 40" Full HD TV, with good features
89
Reviews
200 Reviews
68
Features
Good Features
78
Age
2 Years Old
89
Running Costs
£61 Over 5 Years
74
Overall Score
Very Good
40" Full HD No 67.1mm Jul 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 67.1mm
Release Date Jul 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Philips 32PHH4101

75

Overall Score

75

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A positively reviewed and extremely economical to run 32", 77mm thick TV, but with only average features
96
Reviews
195 Reviews
59
Features
Average Features
83
Age
1 Year Old
95
Running Costs
£40 Over 5 Years
75
Overall Score
Very Good
32" Not Supported No 77mm Apr 2016 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 32"
HD Type Not Supported
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 77mm
Release Date Apr 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Sharp LC-40CFE5221

74

Overall Score

74

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A highly rated and very economical to run 40" Full HD TV, with good features
89
Reviews
200 Reviews
68
Features
Good Features
78
Age
2 Years Old
89
Running Costs
£61 Over 5 Years
74
Overall Score
Very Good
40" Full HD No 67.1mm Jul 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type Full HD
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 67.1mm
Release Date Jul 2015
Energy Efficiency A+

Top Prices

Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Dealbuyer.com
£199.95
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £199.95
No prices found
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
3 Reasons For
£21 Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the Philips 32PHH4101 is £21 cheaper to run than the Sharp LC-40CFE5221.
Read more Read less
Considerably Better User Reviews
Based on 190 user reviews, the Philips 32PHH4101 has an average review score of 92%, but the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has an average rating of 77% (based on 99 reviews).
Better Brand
Philips TVs have an average rating of 84.3%, however Sharp has an average rating of 25.2%.
6 Reasons For
8" Larger Display Diagonal
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 is a 40" TV. That's 8" larger than the Philips 32PHH4101 (32").

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Read more Read less | Edit
29% Brighter Display Brightness
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 is a 280 cd/m² display brightness TV. That's 80 cd/m² brighter than the Philips 32PHH4101 (200 cd/m²).

'Display Brightness' is a measure of how bright the screen on the TV is.

A brighter display means the screen will have a greater capacity for brightness. This can be useful in combating glare from the sun in very bright rooms, or for making the screen visible from further away.

Read more Read less | Edit
Internet TV
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 supports internet TV, but the Philips 32PHH4101 does not support internet TV.

Internet TVs allow you to access the internet directly through your TV. Connect your TV to your local network though WiFi or an ethernet cable.

Internet TVs let you watch movies and TV on the internet by connecting directly to services such as BBC iPlayer and YouTube without a computer.

Read more Read less | Edit
Ethernet Port
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has an ethernet port, however the Philips 32PHH4101 does not.

An ethernet port lets you connect the TV directly to your router with an ethernet cable.

An ethernet connection is more reliable than wifi and is useful if you do not have a wiki network or the wifi signal is weak. Depending on the speed of your wifi network and ethernet connection may be faster than wifi which means less buffering when streaming content to the TV.

Read more Read less | Edit
Thinner
Sharp LC-40CFE5221 is 67.1mm thick, but the Philips 32PHH4101 is a 77mm thick TV (9.9mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
PC in (D-Sub) Port
The Sharp LC-40CFE5221 has a PC in (D-Sub) port, however the Philips 32PHH4101 does not.

The socket (port) to receive input from a PC via a D-sub, which is a connector with a characteristic D-shaped metal shield. Also known as a VGA Port.

A D-sub port is needed to connect your TV to older devices and computers that use a VGA connection - generally those made before 2000.

Read more Read less | Edit

Reasons Against

Reviews & Awards

Average User Rating

The Philips 32PHH4101 has better user reviews than the Sharp LC-40CFE5221. The average user reviews score for the Philips 32PHH4101 is 92% based on 190 reviews, where as the average score for the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 is 77% based on 99 reviews.
Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Best
5 stars
126 reviews
4 stars
53 reviews
3 stars
8 reviews
2 stars
1 review
1 star
2 reviews
5 stars
49 reviews
4 stars
19 reviews
3 stars
13 reviews
2 stars
3 reviews
1 star
15 reviews

Average Brand Rating

Philips has a better average brand rating than Sharp. The average brand rating for Philips is 84.33% based on 3,865 reviews, where as the average brand rating for Sharp is 25.24% based on 3,182 reviews.
Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Philips

84

84

Based on 3,865 reviews
Sharp

25

25

Based on 3,182 reviews

Date Released

Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
22 months old Best 31 months old

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Philips 32PHH4101
Philips
32PHH4101
5 trees 0.2 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Sharp LC-40CFE5221
Sharp
LC-40CFE5221
8 trees 0.3 tonnes CO2

Review Analysis

Price

Reviewers thought the price of both the Philips 32PHH4101 and the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 was excellent.
Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • Great quality for the price…
    Rob - July 2016
  • Good for the price overall…
    Sarah - September 2016
  • Great price…
    Matt - October 2016
  • Excellent value for money…
    Phil - August 2016
  • Very good value for money…
    Scribes 79 - November 2016
  • It's good quality for the price…
    Yidarmy - August 2016
  • Very reasonable price, quick to set up…
    Tess - September 2016
  • Good quality at a great price…
    Sharon - July 2016
  • Bought this for my mum and she loves it so simple to use and brilliant picture quality and amazing price…
    Shaz - October 2016
  • For the price you can't go wrong! *****…
    Shazzy - October 2016
  • This is an incredible television for an amazing price
    Mrs marion ross - August 2016
  • What's not to like? Fantastic value for money
    JoBo - January 2016
  • Excellent quality for a great price
    Laura.butler - January 2016
  • This is excellent, great price and looks great in our girls bedroom
    Laura.butler - January 2016
  • Excellent bargain for a quality product
    Michael collins - January 2016
  • Brilliant! Great price
    Offbeat Dave - February 2016
  • Horror of horrors, this piece of cheap tat has only got bass
    Zephyr Man - July 2016
  • The price you can't go wrong picture quality is good
    Paul A. Davies - July 2016
  • For the price you can't go wrong picture quality is good
    Paul A. Davies - July 2016
  • The photos and music are ok, overall a fantastic piece of equipment and at a good price
    Richard C - January 2016
  • Product Quality

    Reviewers of the Philips 32PHH4101 thought the product quality was excellent, and thought the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 product quality was good.
    Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • Good quality.
    Rccc - October 2016
  • Great quality for the price…
    Rob - July 2016
  • It was very easy to set-up and the picture quality is excellent, although the sound is not 100%.
    Radox - August 2016
  • It's good quality for the price…
    Yidarmy - August 2016
  • Makes playing video games far more enjoyable as the picture quality is far better than that of my previous screen…
    YoungM823 - October 2016
  • It's a shame the picture quality was not as good as from some other makes on the market…
    Mikey - December 2016
  • Good quality at a great price…
    Sharon - July 2016
  • Bought this for my mum and she loves it so simple to use and brilliant picture quality and amazing price…
    Shaz - October 2016
  • This television is amazing quality and is great value for money…
    Shelby - August 2016
  • Simple to install easy instructions, quality design and build…
    Smiffy - November 2016
  • Very happy with the quality and discounted price
    James Sorrell - January 2016
  • Excellent quality for a great price
    Laura.butler - January 2016
  • Picture is great quality and sounds great too
    Laura.butler - January 2016
  • The sound and picture quality is fantastic
    Lorraine - April 2016
  • Excellent bargain for a quality product
    Michael collins - January 2016
  • Poor picture quality and build quality is much below what
    Thomas Oldbury - November 2015
  • Poor picture quality and build quality is much below what would be expected from Sharp
    Thomas Oldbury - November 2015
  • This television has an excellent picture quality; the sound is okay
    Val of London - April 2016
  • Good quality and sleek
    Zak Inshya - December 2015
  • A good quality of build
    Zephyr Man - July 2016
  • Ease of Use

    Reviewers of the Philips 32PHH4101 thought the ease of use was excellent, and thought the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 ease of use was very good.
    Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • Overall it's easy to use and picture is great on it…
    Sadieg7701 - October 2016
  • Menu can be slow and clumsy at times…
    Sarah - September 2016
  • It was very easy to set-up and the picture quality is excellent, although the sound is not 100%.
    Radox - August 2016
  • Really easy to set up - very pleased…
    Maria dm - November 2016
  • Easy enough to setup, decent picture…
    Paul - October 2016
  • Very easy to set up, has all the necessary sockets etc…
    Wolstej - October 2016
  • Very reasonable price, quick to set up and looks great…
    Tess - September 2016
  • Bought this for my mum and she loves it so simple to use and brilliant picture quality…
    Shaz - October 2016
  • It's so easy to use…
    Skizz - October 2016
  • Amazing value for money and so easy to use…
    Smeghead - August 2016
  • Handy for bedroom only
    Mrs. N. M. Derrick - January 2016
  • It was easy to set up
    Mrs marion ross - August 2016
  • It was easy to set up straight from the box
    Mrs marion ross - August 2016
  • The stand is easy to assemble, just two screws
    Mrs marion ross - August 2016
  • Easy to set up and use
    James Sorrell - January 2016
  • Needed to search for correct code to use our sky remote
    James Sorrell - January 2016
  • Despite going into the sound menu and trying different settings the quality is not very good
    Annabel Sallis - March 2016
  • Excellent picture, Excellent price so am very well pleased and would have no trouble at all to recommend to all, hubby says very easy to set up too
    C. D. Pointon - June 2016
  • Was easy to set up
    Djc14b - January 2016
  • The menu system is pretty clear
    Guy - December 2015
  • Picture Quality

    Reviewers thought the Philips 32PHH4101 picture quality was excellent, and thought the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 picture quality was good.
    Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • It was very easy to set-up and the picture quality is excellent, although the sound is not 100%.
    Radox - August 2016
  • Makes playing video games far more enjoyable as the picture quality is far better than that of my previous screen…
    YoungM823 - October 2016
  • It's a shame the picture quality was not as good as from some other makes on the market…
    Mikey - December 2016
  • Ideal for playing games on…
    Misst - December 2016
  • Bought this for my mum and she loves it so simple to use and brilliant picture quality and amazing price…
    Shaz - October 2016
  • The picture quality is amazing and only takes a little bit of tweaking the settings for the optimal gaming quality…
    Swift Blade - November 2016
  • The picture quality is very good…
    Chris - August 2016
  • The picture quality is excellent…
    Debso - July 2016
  • It's fabulous for sport, nature or drama programmes, would greatly recommend this product to other buyers…
    Chelseadave - August 2016
  • Picture quality is great would recommend to anyone who is looking for a small to…
    Barby - October 2016
  • The sound and picture quality is fantastic
    Lorraine - April 2016
  • Poor picture quality and build quality is much below what
    Thomas Oldbury - November 2015
  • Poor picture quality and build quality is much below what would be expected from Sharp
    Thomas Oldbury - November 2015
  • This television has an excellent picture quality; the sound is okay
    Val of London - April 2016
  • The price you can't go wrong picture quality is good
    Paul A. Davies - July 2016
  • For the price you can't go wrong picture quality is good
    Paul A. Davies - July 2016
  • The picture quality is good
    Susan - February 2016
  • Picture quality is good
    Annabel Sallis - March 2016
  • The picture quality is faultless really
    Arc - January 2016
  • Very good Value for Money and picture quality is perfect
    Amazon Customer - February 2016
  • Design

    For both the Philips 32PHH4101 and the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 reviewers mentioned that the design was very good.
    Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • A nice looking very lightweight television…
    Scribes 79 - November 2016
  • Beautiful looking product and works terrific for my grandsons Games Console…
    Tony - October 2016
  • Simple to install easy instructions, quality design and build…
    Smiffy - November 2016
  • Nice style, great size…
    Dk - November 2016
  • Speakers are pretty quiet on it, so have to have the volume pretty loud…
    El - September 2016
  • Bought for kitchen, easy set up, neat design and good picture…
    Ashy - August 2016
  • Good design, picture and sound quality…
    Buzz - August 2016
  • Second one has been pretty good
    N. Trew - April 2016
  • It has been smooth so far
    Amazon Customer - January 2016
  • Pretty disappointing overall
    A. Murdoch - April 2016
  • The menu system is pretty clear and easy to navigate
    Guy - December 2015
  • Remote Control

    Reviewers of the Philips 32PHH4101 thought the remote control was excellent, and thought the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 remote control was good.
    Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • It came properly packaged with the remote…
    Sadieg7701 - October 2016
  • The buttons are big enough on the remote for her to see with or without glasses…
    Mikey - December 2016
  • Set up was easy, however response is slow when using the remote, You have to be patient, Remote buttons far too small for large fingers…
    Jules - September 2016
  • The remote is utterly useless
    Mr G. - July 2016
  • She's very pleased anyway and the remote is easy to use! Which is a bonus as she's only 7
    Helenb - January 2016
  • The remote has a few issues with responsiveness
    D87JS - June 2016
  • Sound Quality

    For both the Philips 32PHH4101 and the Sharp LC-40CFE5221 people mentioned that the sound quality was very good.
    Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
  • It was very easy to set-up and the picture quality is excellent, although the sound is not 100%.
    Radox - August 2016
  • Sound is good…
    Prepar - October 2016
  • Excellent picture sound ok…
    Ollie - November 2016
  • Easy enough to setup, decent picture and sound OK…
    Paul - October 2016
  • The sound is terrible, sounding as though it's coming through a tin can…
    Unhappy viewer - November 2016
  • Sound is not too bad…
    Steptoe - August 2016
  • Great picture and sound quality! Looks great in our living room! A steal for that price!
    Tamzojack - September 2016
  • Picture good and sound OK…
    Cjoin - November 2016
  • Picture and sound quality are good…
    Clarelouise - August 2016
  • The sound could be better…
    Debso - July 2016
  • Sound is really good too
    Offbeat Dave - February 2016
  • Picture is great quality and sounds great too
    Laura.butler - January 2016
  • The sound is terrible
    Mr G. - July 2016
  • This television has an excellent picture quality; the sound is okay
    Val of London - April 2016
  • Put it on the movie setting and the bass speakers are so distorted
    Zephyr Man - July 2016
  • It can be enhanced with added speakers if you so wished
    Susan - February 2016
  • The picture quality and sound quality is so crisp
    Amazon Customer - January 2016
  • Sound quality is good
    Amazon Customer - January 2016
  • Both the picture and audio are excellent, especially when you consider the price
    Alien937 - February 2016
  • The sound isn't brilliant.
    Flossy - December 2015
  • Specification

     
     
     
    Display Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Display Diagonal 32" 40"
    BEST
    HD Type
    Full HD
     Full HD
    Full HD
     Full HD
    High Frequency Rate
    Display Resolution
    1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
     1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
    1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
     1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
    Motion Interpolation Frequency 200Hz
    BEST
    Display Brightness 200 Cd/m² 280 Cd/m²
    BEST
    Dynamic Contrast Ratio
    1000000:1
     1000000:1
    1000000:1
     1000000:1
    Supported Video Mode
    720p
     720p
    720p
     720p
    Screen Format Adjustments
    Auto Zoom
     Auto
     Zoom
    Auto Zoom
     Auto
     Zoom
    Display Diagonal (metric) 80cm Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Audio Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    RMS Rated Power 16W 16W
    Loudspeaker Unknown - Click to provide data 2
    Speaker Unknown - Click to provide data 2
     
     
     
    Power Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Energy Efficiency Class
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    Power Consumption (typical) 30W
    BEST
    65W
    Power Consumption (standby) 0.3W
    BEST
    0.5W
    Power Consumption (average) Unknown - Click to provide data 45W
    Annual Energy Consumption 44kWh
    BEST
    66kWh
    Power Consumption (off) 0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data
    Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 80W
    Voltage Tolerance Unknown - Click to provide data 20%
     
     
     
    TV Tuner Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Tuner Type
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog Signal Format System
    PAL SECAM
    NTSC
     PAL
     SECAM
     NTSC
    PAL SECAM
    NTSC
     PAL
     SECAM
     NTSC
     
     
     
    Performance Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Video Formats Supported
    WMV AVI
    MPEG MPEG1
    MPEG2 MPEG4
    H.264 MKV
    VC-1 WMV9
    AVC
     WMV
     AVI
     MPEG
     MPEG1
     MPEG2
     MPEG4
     H.264
     MKV
     VC-1
     WMV9
     AVC
    WMV AVI
    MPEG MPEG1
    MPEG2 MPEG4
    H.264 MKV
    VC-1 WMV9
    AVC
     WMV
     AVI
     MPEG
     MPEG1
     MPEG2
     MPEG4
     H.264
     MKV
     VC-1
     WMV9
     AVC
    Audio Formats Supported
    MP3 WAV
    WMA AAC++
     MP3
     WAV
     WMA
     AAC++
    MP3 WAV
    WMA AAC++
     MP3
     WAV
     WMA
     AAC++
    Image Formats Supported
    JPG PNG
    GIF BMP
     JPG
     PNG
     GIF
     BMP
    JPG PNG
    GIF BMP
     JPG
     PNG
     GIF
     BMP
    Teletext 1,000 Pages Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Packaging Content Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Cables Included
    AC
     AC
    AC
     AC
     
     
     
    Management Features Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Programming Period 8 Day(s) Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Weight & Dimensions Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Thickness 77mm 67.1mm
    BEST
    Weight 4.9kg
    BEST
    7.3kg
    Weight With Stand 5kg
    BEST
    7.6kg
    Height (with Stand) 477mm Unknown - Click to provide data
    Width (with Stand) 726mm
    BEST
    916.8mm
    Height 439mm 532.9mm
    Width 726mm 916.8mm
     
     
     
    Ports & Interfaces Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Headphone Outputs 1 1
    Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    RF Port 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    SCART Port 1 1
    Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1
    Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    USB 2.0 Port 1 2
    BEST
    HDMI Port 2 3
    BEST
    Audio (L,R) in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    Audio (L,R) Out Unknown - Click to provide data 1
     
     
     
    Operational Conditions Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Operating Temperature (T-T) Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Technical Details Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    RF Input Unknown - Click to provide data 1
     
     
     
    Packaging Data Philips 32PHH4101 Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Package Height 506mm Unknown - Click to provide data
    Package Width 786mm Unknown - Click to provide data

    Other Similar Comparisons

    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    Better brand
    25% higher RMS rated power
    VS
    JVC LT-32C666
    JVC
    LT-32C666
    £199.97
    Same Price
    Brighter
    display
    brightness
    £1 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    Energy efficiency rating is superior
    Cheaper to run by £5 over five years
    Thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE32K4100
    Samsung
    UE32K4100
    £200.00
    Same Price
    Better brand
    4W higher RMS
    rated power
    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    63% higher RMS rated power
    VS
    LG 32LF510
    LG
    32LF510
    £197.99
    £2 Cheaper
    Better user
    reviews
    Better brand
    £6 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Thinner
    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    A bit better user reviews
    Energy efficiency rating is better
    Higher RMS rated power
    8" larger display diagonal
    VS
    LG 24MT48
    LG
    24MT48
    £209.47
    Better brand
    Thinner
    £9.05 cheaper
    to run
    50 cd/m²
    brighter
    display
    brightness
    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    VS
    LG 32LH570D
    LG
    32LH570D
    £189.95
    £10 Cheaper
    Better brand
    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    11W higher RMS rated power
    Higher energy efficiency rating
    16% larger display diagonal
    VS
    Samsung V27F39S
    Samsung
    V27F39S
    £209.95
    Better brand
    Brighter
    display
    brightness
    2% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    Marginally better user reviews
    £8 cheaper to run over five years
    14mm thinner
    2W higher RMS rated power
    Common interface (CI) slot
    VS
    Hisense H32M2600
    Hisense
    H32M2600
    £189.90
    £10 Cheaper
    Better brand
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    Better energy efficiency rating
    25% cheaper to run over five years
    VS
    Hisense LHD32K370
    Hisense
    LHD32K370
    £210.99
    Better brand
    Thinner
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    Philips 32PHH4101
    Philips
    32PHH4101
    £199.95
    Marginally better user reviews
    Energy efficiency rating is higher
    38% higher RMS rated power
    £5 cheaper to run over five years
    VS
    Samsung UE32J4500
    Samsung
    UE32J4500
    £215.00
    Better brand
    8mm thinner
    10% brighter
    display
    brightness
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Sharp
    LC-40CFE5221
    £0.00
    VS
    LG 24MT46
    LG
    24MT46
    £119.99
    48% cheaper to
    run
    Considerably
    better user
    reviews
    Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Sharp
    LC-40CFE5221
    £0.00
    63% higher RMS rated power
    Energy efficiency rating is superior
    16" larger display diagonal
    18% brighter display brightness
    Ethernet port
    More popular
    VS
    Cello C24EFF
    Cello
    C24EFF
    £186.64
    Better brand
    A bit better
    user reviews
    Thinner
    Cheaper to run
    by £1.87
    3D
    Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Sharp
    LC-40CFE5221
    £0.00
    Energy efficiency rating is better
    Higher RMS rated power
    21% cheaper to run
    8" larger display diagonal
    3% thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE32M4000
    Samsung
    UE32M4000
    £195.00
    Better brand
    Sharp LC-40CFE5221
    Sharp
    LC-40CFE5221
    £0.00
    75% faster motion interpolation frequency
    Superior energy efficiency rating
    A lot higher RMS rated power
    Larger display diagonal
    PC in (D-Sub) port
    More popular
    VS
    LG 32LJ590
    LG
    32LJ590
    £210.00
    Better brand
    16% cheaper to
    run
    Wi-Fi