Philips 40PUT6400 vs Samsung UE40JU6000
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reasons Against Reviews & Awards Date Released What are They Best Used For Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Review Analysis Specification
Share on

Philips 40PUT6400vsSamsung UE40JU6000

Philips 40PUT6400

78

Overall Score

78

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run and positively reviewed 40" 4K TV, with good features but representing only middle of the road value for money
88
Reviews
120 Reviews
66
Value for Money
Good
75
Features
Good Features
77
Age
2 Years Old
91
Running Costs
£55 Over 5 Years
78
Overall Score
Very Good
40" 4K No 83mm Jul 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 83mm
Release Date Jul 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE40JU6000

85

Overall Score

85

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An excellently reviewed and affordable 40" 4K TV, good for watching films
92
Reviews
78 Reviews
92
Value for Money
Excellent
77
Features
Good Features
79
Age
2 Years Old
82
Running Costs
£80 Over 5 Years
85
Overall Score
Excellent
40" 4K No 49.5mm Sep 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 49.5mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Philips 40PUT6400

78

Overall Score

78

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run and positively reviewed 40" 4K TV, with good features but representing only middle of the road value for money
88
Reviews
120 Reviews
66
Value for Money
Good
75
Features
Good Features
77
Age
2 Years Old
91
Running Costs
£55 Over 5 Years
78
Overall Score
Very Good
40" 4K No 83mm Jul 2015 A+
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 83mm
Release Date Jul 2015
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE40JU6000

85

Overall Score

85

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
An excellently reviewed and affordable 40" 4K TV, good for watching films
92
Reviews
78 Reviews
92
Value for Money
Excellent
77
Features
Good Features
79
Age
2 Years Old
82
Running Costs
£80 Over 5 Years
85
Overall Score
Excellent
40" 4K No 49.5mm Sep 2015 A
Display Diagonal HD Type OLED/QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
Display Diagonal 40"
HD Type 4K
OLED/QLED Technology No
Thickness 49.5mm
Release Date Sep 2015
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
RGB Direct
£369.00
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store | £369.00
RLR Distribution
Televisions Samsung UE40JU6000 40inch Smart 4K Ultra HD Freeview HD LED TV
£429.00
Go to Store
Amazon UK
Samsung UE40JU6000 4K Ultra HD Smart LED 40Inch Television (2015 Model)
£499.99
Go to Store
2 Prices from 2 Stores | £429.00-£499.99
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
3 Reasons For
£60 Cheaper
The Philips 40PUT6400 costs £60 less than the Samsung UE40JU6000.
31% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
The Philips 40PUT6400 only costs £55 to run over five years but the Samsung UE40JU6000 costs £80 to run (44% more).
Read more Read less
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Philips 40PUT6400 is "A+", however the rating of the Samsung UE40JU6000 is "A".
6 Reasons For
Local Dimming
The Samsung UE40JU6000 features local dimming, however the Philips 40PUT6400 does not feature local dimming.

'Local Dimming' on a TV is a function that dims certain sections of the backlight to control the level of light/color intensity in a given part of the screen.

Local dimming can be used to make blacks on the screen appear darker and richer by removing the backlight behind them.

Read more Read less | Edit
Vastly Thinner
The Samsung UE40JU6000 has a thickness of 49.5mm, however the Philips 40PUT6400 is an 83mm thick TV (33.5mm thicker).

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Read more Read less | Edit
Common Interface (CI) Slot
The Samsung UE40JU6000 has a common interface (CI) slot, whereas the Philips 40PUT6400 does not have a common interface (CI) slot.

A common interface slot provides compatibility with pay-per-view cards.

A common interface slot allows you to install pay per view cards. For example Sky TV sell pay per cards for watching football and boxing and WWE Network sell cards for watching wrestling.

Read more Read less | Edit
More Shops Are Selling it
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this TV and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
User Reviews Are a Bit Better
Based on 147 user reviews, the average review score of the Samsung UE40JU6000 is 87%, whereas the average rating of the Philips 40PUT6400 is 86% (based on 99 reviews).
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 90.7%, but Philips has an average rating of 84.3%.

Reasons Against

Reviews & Awards

Average Expert Rating

Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
Best
5 stars
0 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
1 review
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

The Samsung UE40JU6000 has better user reviews than the Philips 40PUT6400. The average user reviews score for the Samsung UE40JU6000 is 87% based on 147 reviews, where as the average score for the Philips 40PUT6400 is 86% based on 99 reviews.
Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
5 stars
52 reviews
4 stars
37 reviews
3 stars
2 reviews
2 stars
3 reviews
1 star
5 reviews
Best
5 stars
107 reviews
4 stars
17 reviews
3 stars
3 reviews
2 stars
4 reviews
1 star
16 reviews

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has a better average brand rating than Philips. The average brand rating for Samsung is 90.66% based on 116,049 reviews, where as the average brand rating for Philips is 84.33% based on 3,865 reviews.
Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
Philips

84

84

Based on 3,865 reviews
Samsung

91

91

Based on 116,049 reviews

Date Released

Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
31 months old 29 months old Best

What are They Best Used For

Watching Films

When ranking TVs for their suitability to display films, we’ve concentrated on several key attributes. These include contrast ratio and local dimming, which allow the dark colours on the screen to look deeper and richer - helpful for nighttime scenes. Also the screen resolution plays a part - 4K and higher resolutions mean that the image will be clearer and more detailed. Finally the size of the screen is also important - explosions and big dramatic reveals are so much more effective when you don’t have to squint to see the screen!

Compare the best TVs for film.

Watching Sport

When ranking TVs for sport, we’ve concentrated primarily on the most important attributes. First off, we concentrate on the ‘motion interpolation frequency’. This is important for fast-moving spots, since it reduces the amount of blurring on screen. We also take the size of the screen into account - sports matches are far more immersive when viewed on a giant screen! Finally, we look at display brightness and display resolution, so that the games always appear as fully-detailed and bright.

Compare the best TVs for sport.

Key Features

Thickness

The thickness of a TV measured from the back of the TV to the front of the TV. Curved TVs will have quite a big depth as this dimension is measured from the back of the centre of the screen to the front of the edges of the screen.

A thinner TV has the advantage of appearing more elegant and will also mean that the TV will not stick out as much when mounted on a wall.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000

Running Costs Over 5 Years

TV running costs calculated based on an average of 5 hours of use per day. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the TV and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving TVs.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Philips 40PUT6400
Philips
40PUT6400
7 trees 0.27 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Samsung UE40JU6000
Samsung
UE40JU6000
10 trees 0.4 tonnes CO2

Review Analysis

Price

People thought both the Samsung UE40JU6000 and the Philips 40PUT6400 price was very good.
Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
  • Great product at really good price, easy to set up…
    Ginger - January 2016
  • Good picture quality and value for money…
    Catia - January 2016
  • Extremely good value and free delivery…
    R2lcnlouise - February 2016
  • Great telly and great price…
    Pleb - January 2016
  • Good value for money…
    Lozi - January 2016
  • Excellent value for money…
    Amazon Customer - June 2016
  • Excellent value for the price picture quality is fantastic easy to set up…
    Graeme - December 2015
  • Overall it should be a good one at that price…
    Alan - December 2015
  • Excellent buy for the price and would recommend it to anyone…
    Happychappie - December 2015
  • The picture is first class and the sound is brilliant also for sale at a great price…
    Special K - December 2015
  • Exceptional value for money
    MR IAN WAY - July 2016
  • Superb Value
    Robert W - March 2016
  • The remote is a cheap piece of junk
    Christopher M. - June 2016
  • Great deal for this model ideal for video
  • Great value
    Amazon Customer - April 2016
  • You cant get better for this price so very happy indeed
    Jameson VII - January 2016
  • Ease of Use

    Reviewers of the Samsung UE40JU6000 thought the ease of use was excellent, and thought the Philips 40PUT6400 ease of use was very good.
    Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
  • Easy to set up…
    Dariusz - January 2016
  • Great product at really good price, easy to set up and use…
    Ginger - January 2016
  • This is very good to use which good quality of picture…
    Dorje - February 2016
  • A short while adjusting the sliders in "advanced settings" and the picture was excellent…
    BJG1956 - January 2016
  • Easy to set up and connect to a wireless network (if you want to…
    Tomer - January 2016
  • Easy to set up and use…
    Lozi - January 2016
  • Easy to setup, easy to use excellent picture quality…
    Dazzlerw - December 2015
  • Excellent value for the price picture quality is fantastic easy to set up and use…
    Graeme - December 2015
  • Fantastic picture quality, simple to use and set up…
    Sandy - October 2015
  • Really easy to set up and get watching, highly recommended…
    Ruma - December 2015
  • The remote is easy to use
    Mo - December 2015
  • Easy to use, fantastic crystal clear colors
    MR IAN WAY - July 2016
  • It was easy to set up
    Liz - April 2016
  • Was very easy to set up, works well with an aerial
    Dave Waller - January 2016
  • It even makes the endless reruns of friends look better! User interface is great, really like the keyboard typing shortcuts using the remote, intuitive
    Denz - December 2015
  • Easy to set up (but they usually are
    Denz - December 2015
  • Easy to set up resulting in a top quality picture A+++++++
    Trevor J Mortimer - December 2015
  • Picture Quality

    For both the Samsung UE40JU6000 and the Philips 40PUT6400 people mentioned that the picture quality was very good.
    Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
  • Image quality is great…
    Pcadvisor.co.uk - November 2015
  • Good picture quality and value for money…
    Catia - January 2016
  • THIS IS NOT MOTION BLUR AS THE PICTURE IS ONLY ZOOMING IN…
    121BRAD - January 2016
  • Picture clarity is good…
    Jackson - January 2016
  • Good picture quality…
    Reza - January 2016
  • Very good picture quality…
    Tattyoldgit - February 2016
  • The picture quality is sharp…
    Kim - February 2016
  • Easy to setup, easy to use excellent picture quality…
    Dazzlerw - December 2015
  • Excellent picture quality…
    Chris - December 2015
  • Excellent value for the price picture quality is fantastic easy to set up…
    Graeme - December 2015
  • Easy to use, fantastic crystal clear colors and great sound
    MR IAN WAY - July 2016
  • Picture quality is fantastic, sharp, detailed
    Ready Eddie - December 2015
  • No good for gaming
    Oliver - December 2015
  • Perfect clarity
  • To be immersed in what you are watching the picture quality is supreme
    Amazon Customer - June 2016
  • Could not have asked for better, easy set up, superb picture quality and can now have everything on one screen
    Alan jones - December 2015
  • Rich colours and deep blacks
    Amazon Customer - June 2016
  • Product Quality

    For both the Philips 40PUT6400 and the Samsung UE40JU6000 people mentioned that the product quality was very good.
    Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
  • Image quality is great…
    Pcadvisor.co.uk - November 2015
  • This is very good to use which good quality of picture and sound system…
    Dorje - February 2016
  • Good picture quality and value for money…
    Catia - January 2016
  • Yes the sound quality is not fantastic…
    Bubbles - February 2016
  • Good picture quality…
    Reza - January 2016
  • Very light weight, good design, sound quality was ok, picture was really good on some programmes.
    Tickers24 - January 2016
  • Very good picture quality…
    Tattyoldgit - February 2016
  • The picture quality is sharp…
    Kim - February 2016
  • Easy to setup, easy to use excellent picture quality…
    Dazzlerw - December 2015
  • Excellent picture quality…
    Chris - December 2015
  • Good quality
    LynneB - March 2016
  • It's packed with tons of features and the picture and sound quality is superb
    M. Seaborne - December 2015
  • Picture quality is fantastic, sharp, detailed
    Ready Eddie - December 2015
  • It has an optical out for audio so you can hook it up to a home cinema system and the quality from this is great
    Ready Eddie - December 2015
  • Great television, poor sound quality, had to return
    Beverley Webb - June 2016
  • To be immersed in what you are watching the picture quality is supreme
    Amazon Customer - June 2016
  • Could not have asked for better, easy set up, superb picture quality and can now have everything on one screen
    Alan jones - December 2015
  • Very poor quality
    Julian B. - July 2016
  • Easy to set up resulting in a top quality picture A+++++++
    Trevor J Mortimer - December 2015
  • Sound Quality

    Reviews for the Philips 40PUT6400 mention that sound quality was very good, and reviews for the Samsung UE40JU6000 mention that sound quality was good.
    Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
  • The sound is also great…
    Denn - January 2016
  • Yes the sound quality is not fantastic…
    Bubbles - February 2016
  • A truly magnificent picture and acceptable sound…
    Arthur - January 2016
  • Separate speakers are definitely better at listening…
    Alexandra - January 2016
  • Sound is good.
    Alexandra - January 2016
  • It also has great sound…
    Kim - February 2016
  • Very light weight, good design, sound quality was ok, picture was really good on some programmes.
    Tickers24 - January 2016
  • The speakers are quite quiet.
    Bexleyheath - December 2015
  • Well impressed, down side sound no brilliant.
    Donk - December 2015
  • Sound isn't perfect…
    Dan - December 2015
  • The sound is good for a flat screen
    Mo - December 2015
  • The surround sound mode works best
    Mo - December 2015
  • Easy to use, fantastic crystal clear colors and great sound
    MR IAN WAY - July 2016
  • It's packed with tons of features and the picture and sound quality is superb
    M. Seaborne - December 2015
  • The picture jumped occasionally and the sound was not the best (no bass
    Kevin Andrews - February 2016
  • Great television, poor sound quality, had to return
    Beverley Webb - June 2016
  • There is still sound (sometimes).
    Julian B. - July 2016
  • Great sound, awesome picture
    Ian stanley - May 2016
  • Specification

     
     
     
    Display Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Display Diagonal 40" 40"
    HD Type
    4K
     4K
    4K
     4K
    High Frequency Rate
    Display Resolution
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    3840 x 2160 (4K)
     3840 x 2160 (4K)
    Motion Interpolation Frequency 700Hz
    BEST
    Display Brightness 300 Cd/m²
    BEST
    PQI (Picture Quality Index) Unknown - Click to provide data
    Display Technology
    LED
     LED
    LED
     LED
    Screen Format Adjustments
    16:9
     16:9
    16:9
     16:9
    Display Diagonal (metric) 102cm
    BEST
    101cm
    Supported Graphics Resolutions
    3840 x 2160
     3840 x 2160
    3840 x 2160
     3840 x 2160
     
     
     
    Audio Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    RMS Rated Power 20W 20W
    Loudspeaker Unknown - Click to provide data 2
    Speaker Unknown - Click to provide data 2
     
     
     
    Smart TV Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Video App
    Netflix YouTube
     Netflix
     YouTube
    Netflix YouTube
     Netflix
     YouTube
    Music Apps
    Spotify
     Spotify
    Spotify
     Spotify
    Operating System Version Unknown - Click to provide data
    User Memory 8GB Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Power Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Energy Efficiency Class
    A+
     A+
    A+
     A+
    Power Consumption (typical) 41W
    BEST
    64W
    Power Consumption (standby) 0.5W 0.3W
    BEST
    Annual Energy Consumption 61kWh
    BEST
    89kWh
    Power Consumption (off) 0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data
    Maximum Power Consumption Unknown - Click to provide data 123W
     
     
     
    TV Tuner Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Tuner Type
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog
     Analog
    Analog Signal Format System
    PAL SECAM
    NTSC
     PAL
     SECAM
     NTSC
    PAL SECAM
    NTSC
     PAL
     SECAM
     NTSC
     
     
     
    Performance Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Video Formats Supported
    WMV AVI
    MPEG MPEG1
    MPEG2 MPEG4
    MKV VC-1
    WMV9 AVC
    H.265
     WMV
     AVI
     MPEG
     MPEG1
     MPEG2
     MPEG4
     MKV
     VC-1
     WMV9
     AVC
     H.265
    WMV AVI
    MPEG MPEG1
    MPEG2 MPEG4
    MKV VC-1
    WMV9 AVC
    H.265
     WMV
     AVI
     MPEG
     MPEG1
     MPEG2
     MPEG4
     MKV
     VC-1
     WMV9
     AVC
     H.265
    Audio Formats Supported
    MP3 WAV
    WMA AAC++
     MP3
     WAV
     WMA
     AAC++
    MP3 WAV
    WMA AAC++
     MP3
     WAV
     WMA
     AAC++
    Image Formats Supported
    JPG PNG
    GIF BMP
    MPO JPS
    PNS
     JPG
     PNG
     GIF
     BMP
     MPO
     JPS
     PNS
    JPG PNG
    GIF BMP
    MPO JPS
    PNS
     JPG
     PNG
     GIF
     BMP
     MPO
     JPS
     PNS
    Processor Cores 2 4
    BEST
    Teletext 1,000 Pages Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Packaging Content Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Remote Control Type Unknown - Click to provide data
    Cables Included
    AC
     AC
    AC
     AC
     
     
     
    Networking Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Wi-Fi Standards
    802.11n
     802.11n
    802.11n
     802.11n
     
     
     
    Management Features Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Smart Modes
    Natural Game
    Movie Sports
     Natural
     Game
     Movie
     Sports
    Natural Game
    Movie Sports
     Natural
     Game
     Movie
     Sports
    Number of OSD Languages Unknown - Click to provide data 27
     
     
     
    Weight & Dimensions Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Thickness 83mm 49.5mm
    BEST
    Weight 7.8kg 7.8kg
    Weight With Stand 9kg 8kg
    BEST
    Depth (with Stand) 213mm 201.4mm
    BEST
    Height (with Stand) 575mm 596.1mm
    Width (with Stand) 904mm
    BEST
    931.2mm
    Height 526mm 535.7mm
    Width 904mm 917.7mm
     
     
     
    Ports & Interfaces Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Headphone Outputs 1 1
    Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1
    RF Port 1 2
    BEST
    SCART Port 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1
    Composite Video in Unknown - Click to provide data 1
    Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in 1 1
    USB 2.0 Port 3
    BEST
    2
    HDMI Port 4
    BEST
    3
    Audio (L,R) in 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
    Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version Unknown - Click to provide data 1.3
     
     
     
    Operational Conditions Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Operating Temperature (T-T) Unknown - Click to provide data
     
     
     
    Packaging Data Philips 40PUT6400 Samsung UE40JU6000
    Package Weight 10.1kg 10.1kg
    Package Height 625mm 602mm
    BEST
    Package Depth Unknown - Click to provide data 602mm
    Package Width 1,060mm
    BEST
    1,082mm

    Other Similar Comparisons

    Philips 40PUT6400
    Philips
    40PUT6400
    £369.00
    A bit better user reviews
    Cheaper to run by £11.34
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    VS
    Samsung UE48J5100
    Samsung
    UE48J5100
    £369.00
    Same Price
    Better brand
    A lot thinner
    Larger display
    diagonal
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    11% thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE40KU6400
    Samsung
    UE40KU6400
    £439.00
    User reviews
    are a little
    better
    3% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Vastly thinner
    Better brand
    10W higher RMS rated power
    Cheaper to run by £10.87
    VS
    Toshiba 49U5766DB
    Toshiba
    49U5766DB
    £375.00
    £54 Cheaper
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    19% larger
    display
    diagonal
    Built-in
    subwoofer
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    65% thinner
    One more loudspeaker
    Better for watching films
    4W higher RMS rated power
    Internet TV
    Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    VS
    Philips 49PFS4131
    Philips
    49PFS4131
    £481.49
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Larger display
    diagonal
    Cheaper to run
    by £3 over
    five years
    DVI port
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    VS
    Samsung UE40H6400
    Samsung
    UE40H6400
    £378.00
    £51 Cheaper
    User reviews
    are marginally
    better
    38% cheaper to
    run
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    33.7mm thinner
    £1 cheaper to run over five years
    Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
    VS
    Philips 50PUS6262
    Philips
    50PUS6262
    £479.00
    More popular
    User reviews
    are a lot
    better
    Better energy
    efficiency
    rating
    10" larger
    display
    diagonal
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    Average for watching films
    Thinner
    VS
    LG 43LW641H
    LG
    43LW641H
    £477.00
    £34.24 cheaper
    to run
    Higher energy
    efficiency
    rating
    7% larger
    display
    diagonal
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    User reviews are better
    Larger display diagonal
    Internet TV
    Wi-Fi
    Ethernet port
    VS
    Avtex L216DRS
    Avtex
    L216DRS
    £387.48
    £42 Cheaper
    1mm thinner
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    User reviews are appreciably better
    5.6mm thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE49K5510
    Samsung
    UE49K5510
    £469.00
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Larger display
    diagonal
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    Better for watching films
    17.6mm thinner
    Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certified
    VS
    Philips 43PUS6162
    Philips
    43PUS6162
    £389.00
    £40 Cheaper
    User reviews
    are better
    Better energy
    efficiency
    rating
    32% cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    7% larger
    display
    diagonal
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    65% thinner
    Cheaper to run by £3 over five years
    VS
    LG 49UH620
    LG
    49UH620
    £390.00
    £39 Cheaper
    Much better
    user reviews
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Better for
    watching sport
    Larger display
    diagonal
    Better for
    watching films
    3D
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Average for watching films
    Slightly thinner
    VS
    Samsung HG40EE690
    Samsung
    HG40EE690
    £452.97
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    superior
    Cheaper to run
    by £26.00
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    Better for watching films
    Moderately thinner
    Ethernet port
    VS
    LG 50UH635
    LG
    50UH635
    £449.99
    Considerably
    better user
    reviews
    Better for
    watching sport
    20% larger
    display
    diagonal
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    84% thinner
    Higher RMS rated power
    £33 cheaper to run over five years
    VS
    Toshiba 55U5766DB
    Toshiba
    55U5766DB
    £449.00
    Better energy
    efficiency
    rating
    Better for
    watching sport
    28% larger
    display
    diagonal
    Better for
    watching films
    Built-in
    subwoofer
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Average for watching films
    Average for watching sport
    Thinner
    Local dimming
    VS
    Samsung UE48H6400
    Samsung
    UE48H6400
    £418.90
    £10 Cheaper
    Slightly better
    user reviews
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    better
    8" larger
    display
    diagonal
    8% cheaper to
    run
    3D
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    A lot thinner
    Common interface (CI) slot
    VS
    Samsung UE40J6300
    Samsung
    UE40J6300
    £418.98
    £10 Cheaper
    Better user
    reviews
    Energy
    efficiency
    rating is
    higher
    £21 cheaper to
    run over five
    years
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Better brand
    Thinner
    £33.70 cheaper to run
    4W higher RMS rated power
    VS
    Hisense H49N5700
    Hisense
    H49N5700
    £419.90
    £9 Cheaper
    9" larger
    display
    diagonal
    Average for
    watching sport
    Good for
    watching films
    3D
    Common
    interface (CI)
    slot
    Philips 40PUT6400
    Philips
    40PUT6400
    £369.00
    Better brand
    38% cheaper to run
    Higher RMS rated power
    VS
    Sharp LC-49SFE7451
    Sharp
    LC-49SFE7451
    £369.95
    25% brighter
    display
    brightness
    21% thinner
    Larger display
    diagonal
    3D
    PC in (D-Sub)
    port
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Cheaper to run by £33 over five years
    11% thinner
    VS
    Samsung UE49MU6400
    Samsung
    UE49MU6400
    £430.00
    More popular
    User reviews
    are better
    9" larger
    display
    diagonal
    Samsung UE40JU6000
    Samsung
    UE40JU6000
    £429.00
    Energy efficiency rating is superior
    VS
    Samsung HG40EE460
    Samsung
    HG40EE460
    £428.14
    £1 Cheaper
    Higher energy
    efficiency
    rating
    £13.71 cheaper
    to run