It looks like you are browsing from
Go to Close
TVs & Displays
Photography & Video
Cooking Appliances
White Goods
Technology
Household
Home TVs Samsung UE65JS9500 vs Samsung UE75KS8000
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

Samsung UE65JS9500vsSamsung UE75KS8000

Samsung UE65JS9500

78

Kagoo Score

78

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 4K 65" TV, with an Editor's Choice award from five expert review websites and 9 further awards from other expert sites
94
Reviews
64 Reviews + 13 Awards
86
Features
Fully-Featured
71
Age
3 Years Old
63
Running Costs
£190 Over 5 Years
76
Popularity
Lots of Positive Reviews
78
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 65" No Yes May 2015 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology 3D Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 65"
OLED / QLED Technology No
3D Yes
Release Date May 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung UE75KS8000

74

Kagoo Score

74

Kagoo Score

Samsung UE75KS8000

£3,199.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and gigantic 4K 49.9mm thick television, good for watching films
53
Value for Money
Average
86
Features
Fully-Featured
81
Age
2 Years Old
64
Running Costs
£190 Over 5 Years
65
Popularity
A Less Popular Choice
74
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 75" No 49.9mm Aug 2016 A+
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 75"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 49.9mm
Release Date Aug 2016
Energy Efficiency A+
Samsung UE65JS9500

78

Kagoo Score

78

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 4K 65" TV, with an Editor's Choice award from five expert review websites and 9 further awards from other expert sites
94
Reviews
64 Reviews + 13 Awards
86
Features
Fully-Featured
71
Age
3 Years Old
63
Running Costs
£190 Over 5 Years
76
Popularity
Lots of Positive Reviews
78
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 65" No Yes May 2015 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology 3D Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 65"
OLED / QLED Technology No
3D Yes
Release Date May 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung UE75KS8000

74

Kagoo Score

74

Kagoo Score

Samsung UE75KS8000

£3,199.00
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and gigantic 4K 49.9mm thick television, good for watching films
53
Value for Money
Average
86
Features
Fully-Featured
81
Age
2 Years Old
64
Running Costs
£190 Over 5 Years
65
Popularity
A Less Popular Choice
74
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 75" No 49.9mm Aug 2016 A+
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 75"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 49.9mm
Release Date Aug 2016
Energy Efficiency A+

Top Prices

Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
No prices found
RGB Direct
£3,199.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Audio Visual Online
£3,699.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
HiFix UK
£3,699.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
19 hours agoExcellent Customer Feedback
£3,999.00
Go to Store
4 Prices from 4 Stores | £3,199.00-£3,999.00
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
1 Reason For
2% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the Samsung UE65JS9500 is £4 cheaper to run than the Samsung UE75KS8000.
Read more Read less
1 Reason For
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Samsung UE75KS8000 is "A+", however the rating of the Samsung UE65JS9500 is "A".

Reviews & Awards

Awards

Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
13 Awards
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Best
5 stars
19 reviews
4 stars
10 reviews
3 stars
3 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Best
5 stars
11 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
2 reviews
No reviews found

Date Released

Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
40 months old 24 months old Best

Key Features

Display Diagonal

‘Display Diagonal’ is the measure of the size of the TV screen from top-left to bottom-right corner, excluding any frame or border.

One of the most important considerations when choosing the right screen size for your TV is the typical distance from which you will be viewing the screen. TVs with a bigger display diagonal allow you to make the most of HD content and are great for watching movies. A good rule of thumb is to multiply the display diagonal by 2.5 to determine the viewing distance. So a 40 inch TV is best viewed from 100 inches away, which is equivalent to 8.3 feet or 2.54m. For home cinema setups and a truly immersive experience this ratio can be reduced to 1.2. This will give a screen size that fills 40 degrees of the viewer's field of vision. So if you are viewing from a distance of 6ft (72 inches) you would need a TV display diagonal of 60 inches.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Samsung UE65JS9500
Samsung
UE65JS9500
24 trees 0.93 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Samsung UE75KS8000
Samsung
UE75KS8000
24 trees 0.95 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Key Features Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
HD Type
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
Display Diagonal 65" 75"
BEST
Thickness Unknown - Click to provide data 49.9mm
 
 
 
Display Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
High Frequency Rate
Display Resolution
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
Motion Interpolation Frequency 200Hz
BEST
Display Brightness
Supported Video Mode
2160p
 2160p
2160p
 2160p
PQI (Picture Quality Index) 2400 2300
Colour Depth 10 10
Display Technology
LED QLED
 LED
 QLED
LED QLED
 LED
 QLED
Screen Format Adjustments
16:9
 16:9
16:9
 16:9
Display Diagonal (Metric) 163cm 189cm
BEST
Supported Graphics Resolutions
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 
 
 
Audio Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Subwoofer RMS Power 20W Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power 40W 60W
BEST
Loudspeaker 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Speaker 2 4
 
 
 
Smart TV Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Video App
Netflix YouTube
 Netflix
 YouTube
Netflix YouTube
 Netflix
 YouTube
Lifestyle Apps
Skype Samsung Billing
Samsung Smart View
 Skype
 Samsung Billing
 Samsung Smart View
Skype Samsung Billing
Samsung Smart View
 Skype
 Samsung Billing
 Samsung Smart View
Smart Modes
Game Movie
Natural Sports
 Game
 Movie
 Natural
 Sports
Game Movie
Natural Sports
 Game
 Movie
 Natural
 Sports
 
 
 
Other Features Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Sound Enhancement Technology Unknown - Click to provide data Dolby Digital Plus
Multimedia Unknown - Click to provide data Screen Mirroring
Picture Enhancement Unknown - Click to provide data SUHD Remastering
DVB Unknown - Click to provide data DVB-T2 Freeview HD Tuner X 2 - DVB-S2 Freesat HD Tuner X 2
Smart TV Applications Unknown - Click to provide data Catch Up TV: BBC IPlayer, ITV Player, My5 - Streaming: Netflix 4k, Amazon Prime 4k - App Store: Samsung TV Apps - Custom Homepage - Full Internet Browser - Social Media: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube - Gaming Apps
Packaging Content Unknown - Click to provide data Samsung UE75KS8000 Smart 4k Ultra HD HDR 75" LED TV - Smart Remote Control - Standard Remote Control - User Manual - E-Manual - AC Power Cable
 
 
 
Design Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Year of Production Unknown - Click to provide data 2016
 
 
 
Power Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Energy Efficiency Class
A+
 A+
A+
 A+
Power Consumption (Typical) 153W
BEST
156W
Power Consumption (Standby) 0.3W 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption 212kWh
BEST
216kWh
Maximum Power Consumption 366W 365W
BEST
 
 
 
TV Tuner Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Tuner Type
Analog & Digital
 Analog & Digital
Analog & Digital
 Analog & Digital
Tuner 2tuner(s) 2tuner(s)
 
 
 
Performance Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Video Formats Supported
ASF AVI
H.265
 ASF
 AVI
 H.265
ASF AVI
H.265
 ASF
 AVI
 H.265
Audio Formats Supported
MP3
 MP3
MP3
 MP3
Image Formats Supported
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
Processor Cores 8
BEST
4
Google Application
YouTube
 YouTube
YouTube
 YouTube
Social Network Service
Facebook Twitter
 Facebook
 Twitter
Facebook Twitter
 Facebook
 Twitter
 
 
 
Packaging Content Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Remote Control Type Unknown - Click to provide data TM1680A + TM1240A
Cables Included
AC IR
 AC
 IR
AC IR
 AC
 IR
 
 
 
Networking Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Wi-Fi Standards
IEEE 802.11ac
 IEEE 802.11ac
IEEE 802.11ac
 IEEE 802.11ac
 
 
 
Management Features Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Number of OSD Languages 27 27
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Weight 32.3kg
BEST
41.7kg
Package Dimensions (WxDxH) Unknown - Click to provide data 970.7 X 1682.8 X 49.9
Weight With Stand 35.5kg
BEST
46kg
Depth (With Stand) 379.2mm
BEST
438.9mm
Height (With Stand) 917.2mm 1,071.1mm
Width (With Stand) 1,450.2mm
BEST
1,682.8mm
Height 838.3mm 970.7mm
Width 1,450.2mm 1,682.8mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Headphone Outputs 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1
RF Port 2
BEST
1
RS-232 Port 1 1
Digital Audio Optical Out 1 1
Composite Video in 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port 3 3
HDMI Port 4 4
Remote (IR) Output 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio (L,R) Out 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version 1.3 1.3
 
 
 
Packaging Data Samsung UE65JS9500 Samsung UE75KS8000
Package Weight 43.8kg
BEST
59kg
Package Height 948mm 1,105mm
BEST
Package Depth 230mm 200mm
BEST
Package Width 1,632mm
BEST
1,811mm

Other Similar Comparisons

loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
37W higher RMS rated power
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Logik
L20HE15
£75.00
£164 cheaper
to run over
five years
More popular
Better brand
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
Vastly higher RMS rated power
75% faster motion interpolation frequency
VS
loading image
JVC
LT-24C661
£124.97
87% cheaper to
run over five
years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
VS
loading image
Panasonic
75EX750B
£2,695.00
£504 Cheaper
£21 cheaper to
run over five
years
3D
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
Higher RMS rated power
57% thinner
VS
loading image
Sony
KD65ZD9
£2,699.00
£500 Cheaper
3D
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
30W higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
Sony
KD75XD8505
£2,699.00
£500 Cheaper
Cheaper to run
by £9 over
five years
0.9mm thinner
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
Energy efficiency rating is higher
VS
loading image
LG
75UV341C
£2,711.98
£487 Cheaper
13% cheaper to
run over five
years
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
Better energy efficiency rating
A lot thinner
VS
loading image
LG
OLED65G6
£3,499.00
Better for
watching films
Cheaper to run
by £4 over
five years
3D
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
Better energy efficiency rating
VS
loading image
LG
OLED65C8
£2,999.00
£200 Cheaper
Cheaper to run
by £6 over
five years
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
15% larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Sony
KD65AF8BU
£3,095.00
£104 Cheaper
Five years
longer
manufacturer's
guarantee
OLED/QLED
technology
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
Hugely higher RMS rated power
38% larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Panasonic
TX-47AS802
£3,103.75
£95 Cheaper
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
3D
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
Better energy efficiency rating
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
LOEWE
bild 5.55
£3,290.00
Higher RMS
rated power
3% cheaper to
run over five
years
PC in (D-Sub)
port
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
A lot higher RMS rated power
25% larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
LG
49UJ635V
£385.00
User reviews
are appreciably
better
Better for
watching sport
Better for
watching films
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
Higher RMS rated power
Hugely larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Philips
24PHT4031
£99.00
Cheaper to run
by £158 over
five years
User reviews
are a lot
better
DVI port
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
VS
loading image
Toshiba
24W3753
£110.00
More popular
Marginally
better user
reviews
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
User reviews are a little better
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Toshiba
32D3754
£145.00
£145 cheaper
to run over
five years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
Hugely larger display diagonal
3D
VS
loading image
LG
28LF491
£222.99
£155 cheaper
to run over
five years
User reviews
are better
More popular
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
Better brand
24W higher RMS rated power
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
JVC
LT-32C461
£149.97
£148 cheaper
to run over
five years
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
More popular
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
150Hz faster motion interpolation frequency
41" larger display diagonal
3D
VS
loading image
Logik
L24HEDW15
£149.99
Cheaper to run
by £156 over
five years
Better brand
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
75% higher RMS rated power
43" larger display diagonal
3D
VS
loading image
Samsung
T22E390
£156.31
Cheaper to run
by £148 over
five years
More popular
PC in (D-Sub)
port
loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
User reviews are hugely better
51% larger display diagonal
A lot higher RMS rated power
VS
loading image
Samsung
T32E310
£169.95
£149 cheaper
to run over
five years
More popular
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher

×