It looks like you are browsing from
Go to Close
TVs & Displays
Photography & Video
Cooking Appliances
White Goods
Technology
Household
Home TVs Samsung UE65JS9500 vs Sony KD-65AF8
Compare All TVs
Top Prices Reasons For Reviews & Awards Date Released Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

Samsung UE65JS9500vsSony KD-65AF8

Samsung UE65JS9500

78

Kagoo Score

78

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 4K 65" TV, with an Editor's Choice award from five expert review websites and 9 further awards from other expert sites
94
Reviews
64 Reviews + 13 Awards
86
Features
Fully-Featured
71
Age
3 Years Old
63
Running Costs
£190 Over 5 Years
76
Popularity
Lots of Positive Reviews
78
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 65" No Yes May 2015 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology 3D Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 65"
OLED / QLED Technology No
3D Yes
Release Date May 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Sony KD-65AF8

76

Kagoo Score

76

Kagoo Score

Sony KD-65AF8

£3,094.00
£201.00
Our Verdict:
A recently released and fully featured 4K 65" television, with average running costs and one of the largest display diagonals available
53
Value for Money
Average
85
Features
Fully-Featured
93
Age
5 Months Old
61
Running Costs
£230 Over 5 Years
75
Popularity
Widely Available
76
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 65" No 55mm Mar 2018 B
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 65"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 55mm
Release Date Mar 2018
Energy Efficiency B
Samsung UE65JS9500

78

Kagoo Score

78

Kagoo Score
Our Verdict:
A fully featured and multi award winning 4K 65" TV, with an Editor's Choice award from five expert review websites and 9 further awards from other expert sites
94
Reviews
64 Reviews + 13 Awards
86
Features
Fully-Featured
71
Age
3 Years Old
63
Running Costs
£190 Over 5 Years
76
Popularity
Lots of Positive Reviews
78
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 65" No Yes May 2015 A
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology 3D Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 65"
OLED / QLED Technology No
3D Yes
Release Date May 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Sony KD-65AF8

76

Kagoo Score

76

Kagoo Score

Sony KD-65AF8

£3,094.00
£201.00
Our Verdict:
A recently released and fully featured 4K 65" television, with average running costs and one of the largest display diagonals available
53
Value for Money
Average
85
Features
Fully-Featured
93
Age
5 Months Old
61
Running Costs
£230 Over 5 Years
75
Popularity
Widely Available
76
Kagoo Score
Very Good
4K 65" No 55mm Mar 2018 B
HD Type Display Diagonal OLED / QLED Technology Thickness Release Date Energy Efficiency
HD Type 4K
Display Diagonal 65"
OLED / QLED Technology No
Thickness 55mm
Release Date Mar 2018
Energy Efficiency B

Top Prices

Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
No prices found
loading image
4 hours agoChoose Your Own Delivery Date and We Will Text You a One Hour Time SlotRemove Your Old TV for £19.99
£3,094.00
Standard delivery: £4.99
Go to Store
TPS
£3,095.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Best AV Deals
£3,199.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
AV Lounge
£3,199.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Calverts
£3,299.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Euronics UK
£3,299.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
Hills Radio
£3,299.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
2 hours agoReceive It Tomorrow5 Year Guarantee
£3,299.00
FREE Standard delivery
Go to Store
George Fry
£3,299.00
Delivery unknown
Go to Store
loading image
12 hours agoExcellent Customer Feedback
£3,299.00
Go to Store
10 Prices from 10 Stores | £3,094.00-£3,299.00
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?

Reasons For

Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
3 Reasons For
18% Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
The Samsung UE65JS9500 is £42 cheaper to run than the Sony KD-65AF8 over five years.
Read more Read less
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Samsung UE65JS9500 is "A", however the rating of the Sony KD-65AF8 is "B".
Better Brand
Samsung TVs have an average rating of 91.1%, whereas Sony has an average rating of 83.7%.
No data

Reviews & Awards

Awards

Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
13 Awards
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
loading image
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Best
5 stars
19 reviews
4 stars
10 reviews
3 stars
3 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Best
5 stars
11 reviews
4 stars
1 review
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
2 reviews
No reviews found

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has a better average brand rating than Sony. The average brand rating for Samsung is 91.07% based on 104,675 reviews, where as the average brand rating for Sony is 83.74% based on 6,369 reviews.
Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Samsung

91

91

Based on 104,675 reviews
Sony

84

84

Based on 6,369 reviews

Date Released

Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
40 months old 5 months old Best

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these TVs for 5 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Samsung UE65JS9500
Samsung
UE65JS9500
24 trees 0.93 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Sony KD-65AF8
Sony
KD-65AF8
29 trees 1.1 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Key Features Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
HD Type
4K
 4K
4K
 4K
Display Diagonal 65" 65"
Thickness Unknown - Click to provide data 55mm
 
 
 
Display Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
High Frequency Rate
Display Resolution
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
Motion Interpolation Frequency 200Hz
BEST
Display Brightness
Supported Video Mode
2160p
 2160p
2160p
 2160p
PQI (Picture Quality Index) 2400 Unknown - Click to provide data
Colour Depth 10 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
LED OLED
 LED
 OLED
LED OLED
 LED
 OLED
Screen Format Adjustments
16:9 4:3
Auto
 16:9
 4:3
 Auto
16:9 4:3
Auto
 16:9
 4:3
 Auto
Display Diagonal (Metric) 163cm 164cm
BEST
Supported Graphics Resolutions
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 
 
 
Audio Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Subwoofer RMS Power 20W Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Power 40W 50W
BEST
Loudspeaker 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Speaker 2 5
 
 
 
Smart TV Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Video App
Amazon Video YouTube
Maxdome
 Amazon Video
 YouTube
 Maxdome
Amazon Video YouTube
Maxdome
 Amazon Video
 YouTube
 Maxdome
Lifestyle Apps
Skype
 Skype
Skype
 Skype
Smart Modes
Game Movie
Natural Sports
 Game
 Movie
 Natural
 Sports
Game Movie
Natural Sports
 Game
 Movie
 Natural
 Sports
 
 
 
Power Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Energy Efficiency Class
A
 A
A
 A
Power Consumption (Typical) 153W
BEST
186W
Power Consumption (Standby) 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption 212kWh
BEST
258kWh
Maximum Power Consumption 366W Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
TV Tuner Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Tuner Type
Analog & Digital
 Analog & Digital
Analog & Digital
 Analog & Digital
Tuner 2tuner(s) Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Performance Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Video Formats Supported
ASF AVI
 ASF
 AVI
ASF AVI
 ASF
 AVI
Audio Formats Supported
MP3
 MP3
MP3
 MP3
Image Formats Supported
JPG
 JPG
JPG
 JPG
Processor Cores 8 Unknown - Click to provide data
Teletext Unknown - Click to provide data 1,000 Pages
 
 
 
Packaging Content Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Cables Included
AC IR
 AC
 IR
AC IR
 AC
 IR
 
 
 
Networking Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Wi-Fi Standards
IEEE 802.11ac
 IEEE 802.11ac
IEEE 802.11ac
 IEEE 802.11ac
 
 
 
Management Features Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Number of OSD Languages 27 Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Weight 32.3kg 24.4kg
BEST
Weight With Stand 35.5kg 28kg
BEST
Depth (With Stand) 379.2mm 255mm
BEST
Height (With Stand) 917.2mm 841mm
Width (With Stand) 1,450.2mm 1,447mm
BEST
Height 838.3mm 836mm
Width 1,450.2mm 1,447mm
 
 
 
Ports & Interfaces Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Headphone Outputs 1 1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port 1 1
RF Port 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
RS-232 Port 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Audio Optical Out 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Composite Video in 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port 3
BEST
2
HDMI Port 4 4
Remote (IR) Output 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Audio (L,R) Out 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version 1.3 Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Packaging Data Samsung UE65JS9500 Sony KD-65AF8
Package Weight 43.8kg 36kg
BEST
Package Height 948mm
BEST
956mm
Package Depth 230mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Package Width 1,632mm 1,575mm
BEST

Other Similar Comparisons

loading image
Samsung
UE65JS9500
£0.00
37W higher RMS rated power
Faster motion interpolation frequency
Larger display diagonal
VS
loading image
Logik
L20HE15
£75.00
£164 cheaper
to run over
five years
More popular
Better brand
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
£2 cheaper to run over five years
VS
loading image
LG
75UH855V
£3,299.00
Better brand
Better energy
efficiency
rating
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Higher energy efficiency rating
£2 cheaper to run over five years
VS
loading image
LG
75UH780
£2,999.00
£95 Cheaper
Better brand
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
VS
loading image
LG
75SK8100
£2,999.00
£95 Cheaper
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
VS
loading image
Samsung
UE75KS8000
£3,199.00
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
£38 cheaper to
run over five
years
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
VS
loading image
LG
OLED55E8
£2,949.99
£144 Cheaper
Better brand
Cheaper to run
by £89 over
five years
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Better brand
VS
loading image
Panasonic
TX75FX750B
£3,279.00
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
£42 cheaper to run over five years
VS
loading image
Samsung
UE78KU6500
£2,899.00
£195 Cheaper
Better brand
Better energy
efficiency
rating
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Better brand
VS
loading image
LOEWE
bild 5.55
£3,290.00
19% cheaper to
run over five
years
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
10W higher RMS rated power
£21 cheaper to run over five years
VS
loading image
Samsung
QE75Q7F
£2,875.00
£219 Cheaper
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
superior
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Cheaper to run by £14 over five years
VS
loading image
Samsung
UE75JU7000
£3,033.86
£60 Cheaper
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
higher
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Cheaper to run by £32 over five years
VS
loading image
Samsung
UE82NU8000
£3,375.00
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
VS
loading image
LG
OLED65B8PLA
£2,799.00
£295 Cheaper
Better brand
Energy
efficiency
rating is
better
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
VS
loading image
LG
OLED65G7
£3,395.00
Better brand
Higher energy
efficiency
rating
£40 cheaper to
run over five
years
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Better 01net.com review score
Expert reviews are appreciably better
8% cheaper to run over five years
VS
loading image
Samsung
QE75Q8
£2,719.99
£374 Cheaper
Four more
awards
Better brand
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Superior energy efficiency rating
VS
loading image
LG
75UV341C
£2,711.98
£382 Cheaper
Better brand
28% cheaper to
run over five
years
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Better Chip.de review score
Expert reviews are a little better
Thinner
VS
loading image
LG
OLED65G6
£3,499.00
16 more awards
Better brand
Better Stuff.tv
review score
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Expert reviews are appreciably better
User reviews are moderately better
£23 cheaper to run over five years
VS
loading image
Samsung
UE82MU7000
£2,675.00
£419 Cheaper
Better brand
Better energy
efficiency
rating
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
VS
loading image
LG
OLED65C8
£2,999.00
£95 Cheaper
Better brand
Superior energy
efficiency
rating
loading image
Sony
KD-65AF8
£3,094.00
Better brand
VS
loading image
Panasonic
TX-47AS802
£3,103.75
Superior energy
efficiency
rating

×