Close
JVC LT32C461
JVC LT-32C461
Share on

Loading image...

58

Overall Score

JVC LT32C461

£179.98
A low cost 32" HD Ready TV with remarkably low running costs but poor features
32" HD Ready No No Nov 2014
Display Diagonal HD Type 3D OLED Technology Release Date
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
PC World Business
JVC LT-32C461
JVC LT-32C461 32"LED TV - White
£179.98
Go to Store
Currys
JVC LT-32C461 +1 More
JVC LT-32C461 32" LED TV White HD Ready 720p Freeview HD Tuner HDMI x 2 (Brand new, unopened) - on
£179.99
Go to Store
Currys
JVC LT-32C461
32"JVC LT-32C461 LED TV - White, White
£179.99
Go to Store
- Less from Currys
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
3 Prices from 2 Stores | £179.98-£179.99
Get Price Alerts
Sorry, no international prices found
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

JVC LT-32C461 Review

Representing excellent value for money and with very low running costs, we have ranked the JVC LT-32C461 number 606 across all TVs.
96
Excellent
35
Missing Some Features
58
2 Years Old
91
£50 Over 5 Years
Overall Score
58
Average

Why Has it Scored 59?

Samsung televisions have excellent reviews in general.
It is over 2 years old and it is likely that newer, better TVs are available. View the latest TVs 2017.
This TV has an energy efficiency classification of A+, and its running costs of only £50 over 5 years are in the cheapest 8% of all 4,025 televisions that we have compared it to. View all energy saving TVs.
It is missing some features:
Quite small display diagonal
Only HD Ready
Does not feature OLED technology
Not 3D

Should You Buy it Now?

Our unique forecasting algorithm looks at historic price trends and predicts the most likely price change over the next 2 weeks. You may want to consider buying now before the price goes up.
There is a 69% chance that the price will go up. However the future is never certain and there remains a chance that the price will actually go down. Get Price Alerts.
PC World Business £179.98 Go to Store
Currys £179.99
FREE Standard delivery
Go to Store

JVC LT-32C461 In-Depth Analysis

Reviews

Unexceptional Brand

We calculated the average ratings for all JVC TVs and found that JVC had unexceptional ratings.


Value For Money

Excellent Value for Money

The product has mediocre features and is over 6 months old but at £179.98 it is cheaper than 93% of TVs.

Price Has Gone Up by £60 (33%)

There was a cheaper price of £120 on eBay 78 days ago.

Sign up to price alerts to be notified when the price goes back down.

Chart Hide Chart View full price history

Features

Quite Small Display Diagonal

The LT-32C461's display diagonal of only 32" is quite small compared to most other TVs. It is in the smallest 16% of all TVs when ordered by this feature. The average display diagonal of all TVs is 46", with the smallest being 2" and the largest being 110".

What does "display diagonal" mean? Less Edit

Only HD Ready

The LT-32C461 has a maximum resolution of HD Ready. That's 56% less resolution than a Full HD television, which is the most frequently found resolution and is in fact the worst resolution amongst all TVs.

An 8K HD type is the best resolution across similar types of television.

What does "HD type" mean? Less Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

The LT-32C461 does not feature OLED technology, although keep in mind that 98% of TVs also do not feature OLED technology.

What is OLED technology? Less Edit

Not 3D

Like most other TVs, the LT-32C461 is not 3D. 74% of televisions are not 3D.

What does "3D" mean? Less Edit

Does Not Support Wi-Fi

The LT-32C461 does not support Wi-Fi, unlike most other televisions. 59% of TVs support Wi-Fi.

What is Wi-Fi? Less Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

The JVC LT-32C461 does not have a built-in camera, although this is within the context that 98% of TVs also do not have a built-in camera.

What is a built-in camera? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Only 1366 X 768 Pixels Display Resolution

The LT-32C461 supports a maximum display resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels. That's 49% lower display resolution than the most frequently found resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Across all televisions the resolution ranges from 1024 x 768 pixels (worst) to 5120 x 2160 pixels (best).

What does "display resolution" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Low RMS Rated Power

The LT-32C461's RMS rated power of only 16W is fairly low compared to most other TVs. It is in the lowest 22% of all TVs when ranked by this feature. TVs have RMS rated powers of between 2W and 120W, and the average RMS rated power is 21W.

What does "RMS rated power" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Quite Dim Display Brightness

The JVC LT-32C461's display brightness of only 220 cd/m² is in the dimmest 14% of all TVs when sorted by this feature. Across all the TVs the display brightnesses range from 50 cd/m² to 4,000 cd/m², and the average display brightness is 340 cd/m².

What does "display brightness" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Very Slow High Frequency Rate

The high frequency rate of the LT-32C461 of only 60Hz is fairly slow compared to most other TVs. It is in the slowest 21% of all televisions when sorted by this feature. Across all the TVs the high frequency rates range from 20Hz to 3,000Hz, and the average high frequency rate is 260Hz.

What does "high frequency rate" mean? Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Age

Released Over Two Years Ago

This TV was released in November 2014.


Running Costs

Very Low Running Costs

This TV has an energy efficiency classification of A+, and the LT-32C461 is one of the most economic to run TVs that we have analysed for 5 year running costs. Based on fine energy prices and usage levels, we estimate the 5 year running cost of the LT-32C461 is only £50.

Calculate your own running costs

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers jvc n153135w
Barcodes 04975769439353

Other Popular Comparisons With The JVC LT-32C461

Frequently Asked Questions About the JVC LT-32C461

£2 Cheaper
27% brighter display brightness
A lot lower RMS rated power
£5 Cheaper
20% higher RMS rated power
Higher running costs over five years by £56.32

Feedback