Loading image...
Panasonic TX-24DW334

Panasonic TX-24DW334

24" Flat 61mm Sep 2016
Display Diagonal Screen Shape Depth Release Date
£33.49 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

6 Reasons For

Low Running Costs

This TV has an efficiency rating of A+. The TX-24DW334 is in the cheapest 15% of all 41 small display diagonal TVs that have been around for the last year that we have analysed for 5 year running costs. Based on average energy prices and usage levels, we estimate the 5 year running cost of the TX-24DW334 is only £34.

Just Released Five Months Ago

Panasonic only released the TX-24DW334 five months ago. Newer TVs like this one are likely to have better features.

Good Brand

Small display diagonal TVs built by Panasonic have good ratings on average. We also checked the reviews for all TVs (not just small display diagonal TVs) and found that Panasonic also has good ratings across its entire range.

Supports Thirteen Video Formats Supporteds

supports thirteen video formats supporteds

The TX-24DW334 has a greater number of video formats than most small display diagonal TVs that were released in the last 12 months. The most frequently supported video formats supported is MPEG4, but this video formats supported is not supported by this Panasonic television. The video formats supporteds 3GP, 3GPP, AVI, FLV, H.265, M4V, MKV, MP4, PS, TS, VOB, VRO and WMV are also supported by this TV.

MP4 stands for Moving Pictures Expert Group 4.

WMV stands for Windows Media Video.

AVI stands for Audio Video Interleave.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Quite High RMS Rated Power

At 12 Watts, the Panasonic TX-24DW334 has a quite high RMS rated power compared to most of the other new similar spec TVs. The RMS rated powers of small display diagonal TVs that have been on the market for a similar time to the TX-24DW334 range from 4W to 20W.

Chart Edit

Very Low Annual Energy Consumption

The average annual energy consumption of similar spec TVs that were released in the last 12 months is 34kWh, and the annual energy consumptions range from 20kWh to 55kWh. With an annual energy consumption of only 27 kilowatt hours, the TX-24DW334 has one of the lower annual energy consumptions amongst small display diagonal TVs of this age.

Chart Edit

7 Reasons Against

Not 3D

The TX-24DW334 is not 3D, although it is worth keeping in mind that most of the other small display diagonal TVs that have been on the market for the last year are also not 3D.

Chart Edit

Does Not Support Smart TV

Like most of the other latest comparable spec televisions, the TX-24DW334 does not support smart TV.

We compared all the other TVs which also support smart TV to this TV and we think the HG24EE460 (£179.38), or the HG24EE690 (£256.97) both from Samsung or the LG 32LH590 (£274.24) is also worth considering.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Wi-Fi

The TX-24DW334 does not have a wi-Fi. Most of the other recently released small display diagonal TVs also do not have a wi-Fi.

It is worth also looking at alternative TVs which also have a wi-Fi including the Panasonic TX-24DS500 (£169.99), the LG 32LH590 (£274.24), or the Samsung HG24EE690 (£256.97).

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

The TX-24DW334 does not have a built-in camera, although it is worth keeping in mind that most of the other TVs that came out around the same time as the TX-24DW334 also do not have a built-in camera.

Chart Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

Like most of the other small display diagonal TVs that have been on the market for the last year, the TX-24DW334 does not feature OLED technology.

Chart Edit

Only Supports Four Audio Formats Supporteds

The TX-24DW334 has a greater number of audio formats than most recently released small display diagonal TVs. The most frequently supported audio formats supported is MP3, but this audio formats supported is not supported by this television. The audio formats supporteds AAC, FLAC, WAV and WMA are also supported by this TV.

Chart Edit

Quite Thick

At 61 millimeters, the TX-24DW334 has a quite thick depth compared to most of the other televisions that were launched in the last year. The thinnest depth of new TVs is 35mm and the thickest is 80mm.

If you are not bothered about having a thicker depth then you might also want to look at the Samsung HG28EE690 (£342.00) (62.9mm).

Read more Less Chart Edit


Display Diagonal
HD Type
Screen Shape
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Motion Interpolation Technology
Display Resolution
Supported Video Modes
Aspect Ratio
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
Display Technology
Screen Format Adjustments
Display Diagonal (metric)
Supported Graphics Resolutions
TV Tuner
Auto Channel Search
Digital Signal Format System
Tuner Type
RMS Rated Power
Number of Loudspeakers
Built-In Speaker(s)
Ports & Interfaces
Digital Audio Coaxial Out
Common Interface Plus (CI+)
Common Interface (CI)
SCART Ports Quantity
Composite Video in
USB 2.0 Ports Quantity
PC in (D-Sub)
HDMI Ports Quantity
Common Interface Plus (CI+) Version
Management Features
On Screen Display (OSD)
Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
Number of OSD Languages
Hotel Mode
Video Formats Supported
Audio Formats Supported
Image Formats Supported
Teletext Function
Colour of Product
VESA Mounting Interfaces
On/off Switch
VESA Mounting
Power Consumption (typical)
Power Consumption (standby)
Energy Efficiency Class
Annual Energy Consumption
Power Consumption (off)
AC Input Voltage
AC Input Frequency
Power Consumption (max)
Weight & Dimensions
Package Weight
Weight With Stand
Height (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Package Height
Package Width
Packaging Content
Handheld Remote Control

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on £30.45
Electricity cost when on standby £3.04
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years £33.49
Running costs for this TV have been estimated based on other similar TVs. If you know how much electricity and water the Panasonic TX-24DW334uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Energy Rating
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 5 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers panasonic 24dw334, panasonic tx24dw334
Barcodes 05025232847310

Save Money with These Great TV Vouchers & Offers

Save £100
Save £100 Off the marked price on all TVs £1499 and over
Valid 19 Jan 17 - 24 Jan 17
£75 Off
£75 Off all orders over £999 (excludes warranties)
Valid 12 Jan 17 - 2 Feb 17
£10 Off
£10 Off a £30+ spend
Offer ends tomorrow!
£20 Discount
£20 Discount when you spend £801 - £1000 with the voucher code
Valid until 31 Mar 17

See How Other TVs Compare to the Panasonic TX-24DW334

TX-24DS500 vs TX-24DW334

Panasonic TX-24DS500 vs Panasonic TX-24DW334
Panasonic TX-24DS500 Panasonic TX-24DW334
£ 169.99
50% Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
13% Lower Annual Energy Consumption
2mm Thinner
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 105%
Lower RMS Rated Power

HG28EE470 vs TX-24DW334

Samsung HG28EE470 vs Panasonic TX-24DW334
Samsung HG28EE470 Panasonic TX-24DW334
£ 218.34
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
A Lot Higher RMS Rated Power
4" Larger Screen Size
One Less HDMI Port
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 29%

HG28EE690 vs TX-24DW334

Samsung HG28EE690 vs Panasonic TX-24DW334
Samsung HG28EE690 Panasonic TX-24DW334
£ 342.00
Two USB 2.0 Ports
One More HDMI Port
Larger Screen Size
67% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Energy Efficiency Rating is Worse