Close
Share on
Panasonic TX-32CSW514
Panasonic TX-32CSW514
9 Images

Loading image...

Panasonic TX-32CSW514

32" Flat 69mm Apr 2015
A
Display Diagonal Screen Shape Wi-Fi Depth Release Date Energy Efficiency Rating
Panasonic has good reviews for its TVs
Supports Wi-Fi
Not 3D

Available from international sellers only

Tell Me When It Becomes Available See International Prices
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe

Reviews

Panasonic Has Good Reviews for Its TVs

We checked 377 expert and user reviews (including 16 verified purchases) for Panasonic televisions and found that on average Panasonic has good reviews. We also found that Panasonic has good reviews specifically for its small display diagonal TVs.


Networking

Supports Wi-Fi

supports Wi-Fi

The TX-32CSW514 supports Wi-Fi. Most of the other TVs of this age and type do not support Wi-Fi.

There are a number of other TVs which support Wi-Fi currently available which you might also want to look at including the TX-L32E30, or the TX-39ASW654 both from Panasonic which has better reviews.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has an Ethernet Port

The TX-32CSW514 has an ethernet port, which is unusual. Most of the other televisions that are a comparable age to this TV do not have an ethernet port.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Performance

Features Voice Control

The TX-32CSW514 features voice control. Most of the other small display diagonal TVs that have been on the market for around the same time as this TV also feature voice control.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Features Local Dimming

The TX-32CSW514 features local dimming. Most of the other TVs of this spec and age do not feature local dimming.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Has an Ambient Light Sensor

The TX-32CSW514 has an ambient light sensor. Most of the other small display diagonal TVs that are a comparable age to this TV also have an ambient light sensor.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Smart TV

Has an Internet TV Function

The TX-32CSW514 has an internet TV function, unlike most of the other small display diagonal TVs that have been on the market for a comparable time to this TV which do not have an internet TV function.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Management Features

Has an Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)

The TX-32CSW514 has an Electronic Programme Guide (EPG), as do most of the other televisions of a similar type and age to this television.

Chart Hide Chart Edit

Audio

Quite High RMS Rated Power

With an RMS rated power of 20 Watts, the TX-32CSW514 has a fairly high RMS rated power compared to most of the other TVs of this age and spec. Across all the small display diagonal TVs that were released more than two years ago the RMS rated powers range from 2W to 40W.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Display

Not 3D

The TX-32CSW514 is not 3D. Most of the other small display diagonal TVs that were released more than two years ago are also not 3D.

If you want a TV that is 3D then you might want to consider the Samsung UE32H6200.

Read more Less Chart Hide Chart Edit

Other

Released Over Two Years Ago

It was April 2017 when Panasonic released the TX-32CSW514.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers panasonic tx32csw514s, panasonic 32csw514s
Barcodes 05025232812844, 05025232812875

Other TVs to Consider

LC-40CFE5221 vs TX-32CSW514

Sharp LC-40CFE5221 vs Panasonic TX-32CSW514
Sharp LC-40CFE5221 Panasonic TX-32CSW514
£ 299.99 £0.00
Two USB 2.0 Ports
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
One More HDMI Port
59% Higher Running Costs Over Five Years
Lower RMS Rated Power

48 VLE 5520 vs TX-32CSW514

Grundig 48 VLE 5520 vs Panasonic TX-32CSW514
Grundig 48 VLE 5520 Panasonic TX-32CSW514
£ 480.70 £0.00
24mm Thinner
Higher Energy Efficiency Rating
Two USB 2.0 Ports
50% Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
More Expensive to Run Over Five Years by 106%
Higher Annual Energy Consumption

32 VLE 597 vs TX-32CSW514

Grundig 32 VLE 597 vs Panasonic TX-32CSW514
Grundig 32 VLE 597 Panasonic TX-32CSW514
£ 254.83 £0.00
100Hz Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Energy Efficiency Rating is Better
One More USB 2.0 Port
Three HDMI Ports
Thicker
A Little Higher Annual Energy Consumption
Feedback