Loading image...
Panasonic TX-65CXW414
4 Images

Panasonic TX-65CXW414

65" Active Jun 2015
Display Diagonal HD Type 3D 3D Type Release Date
£192.12 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

6 Reasons For

Good Brand

Panasonic 4K and 8K TVs have good ratings on average and across all televisions Panasonic is one of the better rated brands.

Supports Smart TV

Like most of the other televisions of this spec and age, the TX-65CXW414 supports smart TV.

We compared all the other TVs which support smart TV to this TV and we think because of it's better review score, the Samsung UE55JU7590 is also worth considering.

Read more Less Chart Edit

LED Display Technology

The display technology of this television is LED, which is typical of many TVs of a similar age and type to it.

Chart Edit

2 HDMI Version

This television has a 2 HDMI version, which is the most frequently found HDMI version on similar spec televisions that were released around the same time as it.

Chart Edit

Quite Low Power Consumption (off)

When compared to other TVs of a similar type and age to the TX-65CXW414 that we have checked the power consumption (off) of, the TX-65CXW414's power consumption (off) of only 0.01 Watts is one of the lowest. The average power consumption (off) of 4K and 8K TVs that are a comparable age to the TX-65CXW414 is 0.32W.

Chart Edit

Has Three Sound Modess

The number of sound modes found on the TX-65CXW414 is more than most TVs of this age and type. This Panasonic TV has a Music sound modes, which is the most commonly found sound modes found on TVs that have been available for a similar time to the TX-65CXW414. The sound modess "Game" and "Movie" are also found on this TV.

Chart Edit

5 Reasons Against

Does Not Have a Wi-Fi

The TX-65CXW414 does not have a wi-Fi. Most of the other TVs of a similar age and spec to the TX-65CXW414 do have a wi-Fi.

Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

The TX-65CXW414 does not have a built-in camera, although this is within the context that most of the other televisions of this type and age also do not have a built-in camera.

There are a number of other televisions which also have a built-in camera that you might want to look at including the Samsung UN65JS9500, or the LG 105UC9.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

Most comparable spec TVs that were released around the same time as the TX-65CXW414 do not feature OLED technology. The Panasonic TX-65CXW414 is no exception to this as it too does not feature OLED technology.

It is worth also looking at other TVs which also feature OLED technology including the 55EG9609, or the 65EG9609 both from LG.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Only Supports One Video Formats Supported

The TX-65CXW414 has a greater number of video formats than most 4K and 8K TVs that were released around the same time as it. The most commonly supported video formats supported is AVI, but this video formats supported is not supported by this TV. The video formats supporteds H.265 are also supported by this Panasonic television.

Chart Edit

Fairly High Annual Energy Consumption

The TX-65CXW414 has one of the higher annual energy consumptions (172 kilowatt hours) amongst comparable spec televisions of this age. The lowest annual energy consumption of televisions that have been around for a similar time to the TX-65CXW414 is 61kWh and the highest is 550kWh.

Chart Edit

4 Other reasons to consider the Panasonic TX-65CXW414

4K Ultra HD HD Type

4K Ultra HD HD type

The display resolution of this TV is 4K Ultra HD, which is the most commonly found HD type on comparable spec TVs that were launched more than a year ago. 4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.

4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Released Over a Year Ago

This Panasonic television was released over a year ago.

Running Costs Are Average

This TV has an energy efficiency classification of A+, and the TX-65CXW414 is typical compared to the other 474 4K and 8K TVs that have been on the market for more than a year that we have analysed for 5 year running costs. Based on typical usage levels and energy prices, we estimate the 5 year running cost of the TX-65CXW414 is £193.


Average Depth

At 65 millimeters, the Panasonic TX-65CXW414 has a pretty typical depth compared to most of the other TVs of this age and spec.

If you are not concerned about having a thicker depth then you might want to look at the Panasonic TX-48CX400 (£609.88) (65mm).

Read more Less Chart Edit


Display Diagonal
HD Type
3D Type
LED Backlighting Type
Screen Shape
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Motion Interpolation Technology
Display Resolution
Aspect Ratio
Display Technology
Screen Format Adjustments
Display Diagonal (metric)
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Supported Graphics Resolutions
Viewing Angle, Vertical
TV Tuner
Digital Signal Format System
Smart TV
Smart TV
Internet TV
Built-In Speaker(s)
Sound Modes
Ports & Interfaces
Common Interface Plus (CI+)
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Ports
SCART Ports Quantity
Composite Video in
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) in
USB 2.0 Ports Quantity
DVI Port
HDMI Version
HDMI Ports Quantity
Ethernet LAN
Management Features
On Screen Display (OSD)
Electronic Programme Guide (EPG)
Number of OSD Languages
Video Formats Supported
Teletext Function
Game Mode
Colour of Product
VESA Mounting
Power Consumption (typical)
Power Consumption (standby)
Energy Efficiency Class
Annual Energy Consumption
Power Consumption (off)
AC Input Voltage
AC Input Frequency
Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) Certified
Weight & Dimensions
Depth (with Stand)
Height (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Packaging Content
Desktop Stand
Handheld Remote Control

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on £189.08
Electricity cost when on standby £3.04
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years £192.12
Running costs for this TV have been estimated based on other similar TVs. If you know how much electricity and water the Panasonic TX-65CXW414uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Energy Rating
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.95 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 25 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers panasonic 65cxw414
Barcodes 00502523818075, 05025232818075

Save Money with These Great TV Vouchers & Offers

Save £100
Save £100 Off the marked price on all TVs £1499 and over
Offer ends in 5 hours!
£75 Off
£75 Off all orders over £999 (excludes warranties)
Valid 12 Jan 17 - 2 Feb 17
£20 Off
£20 Off £60+ spend
Valid 23 Jan 17 - 31 Jan 17
£20 Discount
£20 Discount when you spend £801 - £1000 with the voucher code
Valid until 31 Mar 17

See How Other TVs Compare to the Panasonic TX-65CXW414

LG 70UF770 vs Panasonic TX-65CXW414

LG 70UF770 vs Panasonic TX-65CXW414
LG 70UF770 Panasonic TX-65CXW414
£ 2,499.99
Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Superior Energy Efficiency Rating
Moderately Thinner
Larger Screen Size
Only Two USB 2.0 Ports
One Less HDMI Port

LG 65EF950 vs Panasonic TX-65CXW414

LG 65EF950 vs Panasonic TX-65CXW414
LG 65EF950 Panasonic TX-65CXW414
£ 2,999.00
Energy Efficiency Rating is Superior
Newer by Three Months
Cheaper to Run by £7.62
One Less USB 2.0 Port
Only Three HDMI Ports

UE55JU6410 vs TX-65CXW414

Samsung UE55JU6410 vs Panasonic TX-65CXW414
Samsung UE55JU6410 Panasonic TX-65CXW414
£ 819.00
44.9mm Thinner
Significantly Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Energy Efficiency Rating is Higher
54kWh Lower Annual Energy Consumption
19% Smaller Screen Size
Not 3D Compatible