Close

Loading image...
Salora 55UHC9102
5 Images

Salora 55UHC9102

55" Active Apr 2015
Display Diagonal HD Type 3D 3D Type Release Date
A
£185.56 Electricity cost over 5 years. Calculate
Available from international sellers only
Tell Me When It Becomes Available
You are subscribed to price alerts for this product
Unsubscribe
Searching for international prices ...

Assumed Exchange Rates

Searching for prices in ...

7 Reasons For

Supports Smart TV

Like most of the other TVs of this type and age, the 55UHC9102 supports smart TV.

Chart Edit

Three USB 2.0 Ports Quantitys

three USB 2.0 ports quantitys

Most 4K and 8K TVs that were launched more than a year ago have between one and three USB 2.0 ports quantitys, including the 55UHC9102 which has three USB 2.0 ports quantitys.

Chart Edit

Four HDMI Ports Quantitys

four HDMI ports quantitys

The 55UHC9102 is a four HDMI ports quantity TV.

Chart Edit

Fairly High RMS Rated Power

At 25 Watts, the Salora 55UHC9102 has a fairly high RMS rated power compared to most of the other TVs of this age and spec. The RMS rated powers of 4K and 8K TVs that have been on the market for a similar time to the 55UHC9102 range from 8W to 120W.

Chart Edit

Features Two Lifestyle Appss

features two lifestyle appss

The 55UHC9102 has a greater number of lifestyle apps than most comparable spec TVs that have been around for more than a year. The most frequently featured lifestyle apps is Google Apps, but this lifestyle apps is not featured on this TV. The lifestyle appss Facebook and Twitter are also featured on this Salora TV.

Chart Edit

Features Two Video Appss

The 55UHC9102 has a greater number of video apps than most televisions of this age and spec. This TV features a NetFlix video apps, which is the most commonly featured video apps featured on TVs that have been on the market for more than a year. The video apps "YouTube" is also featured on this television.

Chart Edit

Very Fast Response Time

The 55UHC9102 has a fairly fast response time (only 6 milliseconds) compared to most of the other TVs of this type and age. Across all the 4K and 8K TVs that have been around for a similar time to the 55UHC9102 the response times range from 5ms to 180ms, and the average response time is 14ms.

Chart Edit

5 Reasons Against

Does Not Have a Wi-Fi

Most of the other 4K and 8K TVs that have been around for around the same time as the 55UHC9102 have a wi-Fi, however the Salora 55UHC9102 does not have a wi-Fi.

Chart Edit

Does Not Have a Built-In Camera

The 55UHC9102 does not have a built-in camera. Most of the other 4K and 8K TVs that are a similar age to the 55UHC9102 also do not have a built-in camera.

There are a number of alternative TVs which also have a built-in camera that you might want to consider including the Samsung UN65JS9500[plb_2756557_price], or the LG 105UC9[plb_2828825_price] which also has a higher rating.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Does Not Feature OLED Technology

The 55UHC9102 does not feature OLED technology. Most of the other televisions that are a comparable age to the 55UHC9102 also do not feature OLED technology.

Other TVs which also feature OLED technology that you might also want to look at include the 55EG9609[pl_2899573_price], or the 65EG9609[pl_2938944_price] both from LG.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Quite Slow Motion Interpolation Frequency

Across all the TVs of this spec and age the motion interpolation frequencys range from 100Hz to 3,000Hz, and the average motion interpolation frequency is 770Hz. The 55UHC9102 has one of the slowest motion interpolation frequencys (only 100 hertz) amongst televisions of this age.

Chart Edit

Quite High Annual Energy Consumption

The 55UHC9102 has one of the higher annual energy consumptions (163 kilowatt hours) amongst TVs of this age. The annual energy consumptions of comparable spec TVs that were launched around the same time as the 55UHC9102 range from 61kWh to 550kWh.

Chart Edit

3 Other reasons to consider the Salora 55UHC9102

4K Ultra HD HD Type

4K Ultra HD HD type

The display resolution of this TV is 4K Ultra HD, which is typical of many TVs that have been on the market for a comparable time to it. 4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.

4K Ultra HD TVs have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels.

Read more Less Chart Edit

Released Over a Year Ago

This Salora TV was released over a year ago.

Running Costs Are OK

The efficiency rating of this TV is A, and the average running cost of the 55UHC9102 is £186 over 5 years based on typical usage levels and energy prices, which is typical compared to the other 465 4K and 8K TVs that were released more than a year ago.

Chart

Specification

Display
Display Diagonal
HD Type
3D
3D Type
Screen Shape
OLED Technology
Motion Interpolation Frequency
Motion Interpolation Technology
Response Time
Display Brightness
Display Resolution
Aspect Ratio
Display Diagonal (metric)
Viewing Angle, Horizontal
Viewing Angle, Vertical
TV Tuner
Digital Signal Format System
Tuner Type
Smart TV
Smart TV
Internet TV
Lifestyle Apps
Video Apps
Audio
Audio System
RMS Rated Power
Number of Loudspeakers
Built-In Speaker(s)
Ports & Interfaces
Headphone Outputs
Digital Audio Coaxial Out
Common Interface Plus (CI+)
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Ports
RF Ports Quantity
SCART Ports Quantity
Digital Audio Optical Out
USB 2.0 Ports Quantity
DVI Port
PC in (D-Sub)
HDMI Ports Quantity
VGA (D-Sub) Ports Quantity
Networking
Wi-Fi
WLAN-Ready
Ethernet LAN
Performance
Teletext Function
Teletext
Design
Colour of Product
Ergonomics
VESA Mounting Interfaces
VESA Mounting
Power
Power Consumption (typical)
Power Consumption (standby)
Energy Efficiency Class
Annual Energy Consumption
Certificates
Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) Certified
Weight & Dimensions
Depth (with Stand)
Height (with Stand)
Width (with Stand)
Height
Width
Package Height
Package Width
Packaging Content
3D Glasses Included
3D Glasses Quantity

Running Cost

Hours of Use Per Day: hours
Show running costs over: years
Electricity cost when switched on £179.47
Electricity cost when on standby £6.09
@ £0.139 per kwh - Edit electricity price and usage
kwh per hour
kwh per hour left on standby
Electricity price £per kilowatt hour
Annual electricity price inflation %
Water cost when switched on
@ £0.003474 per litre - Edit water usage and price
litres per hour
Water price £per litre
Annual water price inflation %
Submit Energy Consumption Figures
Total running cost over 5 years £185.56
Running costs for this TV have been estimated based on other similar TVs. If you know how much electricity and water the Salora 55UHC9102uses then please let us know by entering those figures in the boxes above.
Energy Rating
0.92T
Running this TV over 5 years will generate 0.92 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
24
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant 24 tree seedlings and grow them for 10 years.

Product Identifiers

Manufacturer Part Numbers salora 55uhc9102, salora 55uhc9102m, salora 55uhc9102ms
Barcodes 08718868053367

Save Money with These Great TV Vouchers & Offers

£75 Off
Voucher
£75 Off all orders over £999 (excludes warranties)
Offer ends tomorrow!
£20 Discount
Voucher
£20 Discount when you spend £801 - £1000 with the voucher code
Valid until 31 Mar 17
£35 Off
Voucher
£35 Off all TVs over £499
Offer ends tomorrow!
£15 Discount
Voucher
£15 Discount when you spend £601 - £800 with the voucher code
Valid until 31 Mar 17

See How Other TVs Compare to the Salora 55UHC9102

LG 70UF772 vs Salora 55UHC9102

LG 70UF772 vs Salora 55UHC9102
LG 70UF772 Salora 55UHC9102
£ 2,339.00
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
One More RF Port
Four Loudspeakers
15" Larger Screen Size
Only Two USB 2.0 Ports
One Less HDMI Port

LG 65EF950 vs Salora 55UHC9102

LG 65EF950 vs Salora 55UHC9102
LG 65EF950 Salora 55UHC9102
£ 2,999.00
One More RF Port
Higher Energy Efficiency Rating
Six Months Newer
16% Larger Screen Size
Only Two USB 2.0 Ports
One Less HDMI Port

Samsung UE55J5570 vs Salora 55UHC9102

Samsung UE55J5570 vs Salora 55UHC9102
Samsung UE55J5570 Salora 55UHC9102
£ 550.00
Faster Motion Interpolation Frequency
Better Energy Efficiency Rating
39% Lower Annual Energy Consumption
27% Cheaper to Run
Only Two USB 2.0 Ports
One Less HDMI Port
Feedback