Hoover SE71SZ04001 vs Samsung VC07F70

(212)
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Samsung VC07F70

Top Prices

No prices found
Amazon UK
Checked 13 hours ago
Standard delivery: £46.00
In stock
Amazon UK
Checked 2 days ago
FREE Standard delivery
In stock

Reasons For

1 Reason For
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Hoover SE71SZ04001 is "A", whereas the rating of the Samsung VC07F70 is "A".
5 Reasons For
0.5L larger dust capacity Edit
The Samsung VC07F70 is a 2L dust capacity vacuum cleaner. That's 0.5L larger than the Hoover SE71SZ04001 (2L). Read more

The space that the product e.g. vacuum cleaner,vacuum cleaner bag has for dust.

45% longer cord length Edit
Samsung VC07F70 is 9m power cord. That's 4m longer than the Hoover SE71SZ04001 (9m).
Three number of nozzless Edit
The Samsung VC07F70 has three number of nozzless, however the Hoover SE71SZ04001 only has two number of nozzless.
Energy efficiency rating is higher
The Samsung VC07F70 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", but the Hoover SE71SZ04001 has a rating of "A".
Much better user reviews
Based on 1 user review, the average review score of the Samsung VC07F70 is 100%, but the average rating of the Hoover SE71SZ04001 is 84% (based on 212 reviews).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
0.5L smaller dust capacity Edit
The Hoover SE71SZ04001 has a dust capacity of 1.5L, however the Samsung VC07F70 is a 2L dust capacity vacuum cleaner (0.5L larger). Read more

The space that the product e.g. vacuum cleaner,vacuum cleaner bag has for dust.

Significantly shorter cord length Edit
The Hoover SE71SZ04001 is a 5m power cord vacuum cleaner, whereas the Samsung VC07F70 is a 9m power cord vacuum cleaner (4m longer).
One less number of nozzles Edit
The number of number of nozzless on the Hoover SE71SZ04001 is two, but the Samsung VC07F70 only has three number of nozzless.
Not currently available
This vacuum cleaner does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
A lot Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Hoover SE71SZ04001 is 84%, whereas the average user rating of the Samsung VC07F70 is 100% (based on 1 review).
1 Reason Against
Older by six months
The Samsung VC07F70 is six months older than the Hoover SE71SZ04001.

Average User Rating

Date Released

16 months Ago 22 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Power

Maximum Input Power
700W 700W
Suction Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 180W
Energy Efficiency Class
 A
 A
Annual Energy Consumption
28kWh 28kWh

Design

Type
 Cylinder
 Cylinder
Dust Container Type
 Bagless
 Bagless
Tube Type
 Telescopic
 Telescopic
Wheels Material
 Rubber
 Rubber
Dust Capacity
1.5L 2L
BEST
Colour of Product
 Orange
 White
 Red
 Orange
 White
 Red

Performance

Cleaning Type
 Wet
BEST
 Wet
Operating Radius
Unknown - Click to provide data 12m
Noise Level
85dB Unknown - Click to provide data
Proper Use
 Home
 Home
Hard Floor Cleaning Performance Class
 A
BEST
 A
Carpet Cleaning Performance Class
 D
BEST
 D
Dust Re-Emission Class
 D
BEST
 D
Cleaning Surfaces
 Carpet
 Hard floor
 Carpet
 Hard floor
Floor Surfaces Supported
 Wood
 Parquet
 Laminate
 Tiles
 Carpet
 Linoleum
 Wood
 Parquet
 Laminate
 Tiles
 Carpet
 Linoleum

Ergonomics

Cord Length
5m 9m
BEST
Automatic Cord Rewinder
 Automatic cord rewinder
 Automatic cord rewinder
Carrying Handle(s)
 Carrying handle(s)
Unknown - Click to provide data
Park/storage Assist
 Park/storage assist
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Weight
4.1kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
260mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth
380mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width
260mm Unknown - Click to provide data

Packaging Content

Brush Tool
 Brush tool
Unknown - Click to provide data
Crevice Tool
 Crevice tool
Unknown - Click to provide data
Hard Floor Brush
 Hard floor brush
 Hard floor brush
Number of Nozzles
2 3
BEST
Floor Nozzle Cleaning Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 280mm
Cleaning Brush
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cleaning brush
Feedback