Hoover SE71SZ04001 vs Samsung VC07F70
Compare All Vacuum Cleaners
Top Prices Reasons For Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

Hoover SE71SZ04001vsSamsung VC07F70

Hoover SE71SZ04001

73

Overall Score

73

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A top-rated and very economical to run 700W cylinder vacuum cleaner, with good features
92
Reviews
504 Reviews
68
Features
Good Features
79
Age
2 Years Old
82
Running Costs
£66 Over 10 Years
73
Overall Score
Very Good
700W Cylinder Wet 4.1kg Oct 2015 A
Maximum Input Power Type Cleaning Type Weight Release Date Energy Efficiency
Maximum Input Power 700W
Type Cylinder
Cleaning Type Wet
Weight 4.1kg
Release Date Oct 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung VC07F70

67

Overall Score

67

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run but 3 year old 700W drum vacuum, with good features
66
Features
Good Features
75
Age
2 Years Old
85
Running Costs
£66 Over 10 Years
67
Overall Score
Good
700W Drum Dry 4.6kg Apr 2015 A
Maximum Input Power Type Cleaning Type Weight Release Date Energy Efficiency
Maximum Input Power 700W
Type Drum
Cleaning Type Dry
Weight 4.6kg
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Hoover SE71SZ04001

73

Overall Score

73

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A top-rated and very economical to run 700W cylinder vacuum cleaner, with good features
92
Reviews
504 Reviews
68
Features
Good Features
79
Age
2 Years Old
82
Running Costs
£66 Over 10 Years
73
Overall Score
Very Good
700W Cylinder Wet 4.1kg Oct 2015 A
Maximum Input Power Type Cleaning Type Weight Release Date Energy Efficiency
Maximum Input Power 700W
Type Cylinder
Cleaning Type Wet
Weight 4.1kg
Release Date Oct 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung VC07F70

67

Overall Score

67

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run but 3 year old 700W drum vacuum, with good features
66
Features
Good Features
75
Age
2 Years Old
85
Running Costs
£66 Over 10 Years
67
Overall Score
Good
700W Drum Dry 4.6kg Apr 2015 A
Maximum Input Power Type Cleaning Type Weight Release Date Energy Efficiency
Maximum Input Power 700W
Type Drum
Cleaning Type Dry
Weight 4.6kg
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
Hitari
Out of stock
£60.10
Go to Store
1 Price from 1 Store
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
No prices found
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
10% Off
{Electrolux ZSPGREEN
£192.65
Was £213 (24 days ago)
Amazon UK
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
1 Reason For
500g Lighter
The Hoover SE71SZ04001 is a 4.1kg heavy vacuum cleaner. That's 500g lighter than the Samsung VC07F70 (4.6kg).

The weight of the vacuum cleaner, including all attachments that fit onto the device.

A lighter weight makes the vacuum easier to push, and makes carrying it up and down stairs less of a chore.

Read more Read less | Edit
3 Reasons For
Three Nozzles
The Samsung VC07F70 has three nozzles, however the Hoover SE71SZ04001 only has two nozzles.

This denotes the amount of nozzles the vacuum cleaner comes packaged with.

More nozzles means the device is more versatile, and can handle lots of different cleaning situations efficiently.

Read more Read less | Edit
Much Better User Reviews
The Samsung VC07F70 has an average user review score of 100%, but the Hoover SE71SZ04001 has an average rating of 85% (based on 347 reviews).
Better Brand
Samsung vacuum cleaners have an average rating of 81.9%, however Hoover has an average rating of 81.4%.

Reviews & Awards

Average User Rating

The Samsung VC07F70 has better user reviews than the Hoover SE71SZ04001. The average user reviews score for the Samsung VC07F70 is 100% based on 1 review, where as the average score for the Hoover SE71SZ04001 is 85% based on 347 reviews.
Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
5 stars
195 reviews
4 stars
98 reviews
3 stars
26 reviews
2 stars
8 reviews
1 star
20 reviews
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Average Brand Rating

Samsung has a better average brand rating than Hoover. The average brand rating for Samsung is 81.94% based on 114 reviews, where as the average brand rating for Hoover is 81.37% based on 5,045 reviews.
Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
Hoover

81

81

Based on 5,045 reviews
Samsung

82

82

Based on 114 reviews

Date Released

Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
28 months old Best 34 months old

Key Features

Weight

The weight of the vacuum cleaner, including all attachments that fit onto the device.

A lighter weight makes the vacuum easier to push, and makes carrying it up and down stairs less of a chore.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Vacuum cleaner running costs calculated based on an average of 2 hours of use per week. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the vacuum cleaner and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving vacuum cleaners.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these vacuum cleaners for 10 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
8 trees 0.33 tonnes CO2
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
8 trees 0.33 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Power Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
Maximum Input Power 700W 700W
Suction Power Unknown - Click to provide data 180W
Energy Efficiency Class
A
 A
A
 A
Annual Energy Consumption 28kWh 28kWh
 
 
 
Design Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
Dust Capacity 1.5L 2L
BEST
 
 
 
Performance Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
Cleaning Type
wet
 wet
wet
 wet
Operating Radius Unknown - Click to provide data 12m
Noise Level 85dB Unknown - Click to provide data
Hard Floor Cleaning Performance Class
A
 A
A
 A
Carpet Cleaning Performance Class
D
 D
D
 D
Dust Re-Emission Class
D
 D
D
 D
 
 
 
Ergonomics Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
Cord Length 5m 9m
BEST
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
Weight 4.1kg
BEST
4.6kg
Height 260mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth 380mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width 260mm Unknown - Click to provide data
 
 
 
Packaging Content Hoover SE71SZ04001 Samsung VC07F70
Nozzle 2 3
BEST
Floor Nozzle Cleaning Width Unknown - Click to provide data 280mm

Other Similar Comparisons

Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
£448.85 cheaper to run
92% lighter
VS
Electrolux UltraPerformer UPORIGIN
Electrolux
UltraPerformer UPORIGIN
£39.26
Better brand
7% quieter
noise level
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
27% lighter
VS
Imetec Extreme Pro
Imetec
Extreme Pro
£62.22
Quieter noise
level
Cheaper to run
by £0.94
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
A bit lighter
VS
Grundig VCC 7670 A
Grundig
VCC 7670 A
£133.10
Cheaper to run
by £1 over
five years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
£106 cheaper to run over five years
User reviews are better
23% higher suction power
9% lighter
VS
Polti Forzaspira MC330 Turbo
Polti
Forzaspira MC330 Turbo
£119.99
More popular
Better brand
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Superior energy efficiency rating
42% lighter
Cheaper to run by £8 over five years
VS
AEG ASPC7110
AEG
ASPC7110
£109.99
Better brand
Hugely higher
suction power
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Better brand
85% lighter
VS
Hoover PU71EN01
Hoover
PU71EN01
£89.00
Cheaper to run
by £2 over
five years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
User reviews are vastly better
VS
Samsung VC07H40
Samsung
VC07H40
£79.00
More popular
6% higher
suction power
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Better brand
3.5kg lighter
VS
Hoover Turbopower TP71
Hoover
Turbopower TP71
£74.99
More popular
Cheaper to run
by £2 over
five years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Vastly better user reviews
Energy efficiency rating is better
5% cheaper to run over five years
Slightly lighter
VS
Zanussi ZAN1930UEL
Zanussi
ZAN1930UEL
£70.97
More popular
Better brand
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
More popular
A bit lighter
VS
Clatronic BS 1294
Clatronic
BS 1294
£59.64
5% cheaper to
run over five
years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Significantly better user reviews
Better brand
1kg lighter
VS
Hoover WR71WR01
Hoover
WR71WR01
£53.99
£2 cheaper to
run over five
years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
3% lighter
VS
Clatronic BS 1295
Clatronic
BS 1295
£50.18
4% cheaper to
run
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
Lighter
VS
Bestron Ecosenzo
Bestron
Ecosenzo
£64.99
Quieter noise
level
£3.06 cheaper
to run
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
Lighter
2% quieter noise level
Brush tool
VS
Dyson DC41
Dyson
DC41
£60.87
Better brand
Better user
reviews
Cheaper to run
by £9.40
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
User reviews are a lot better
Lighter
Brush tool
VS
VAX Energise Vibe C86
VAX
Energise Vibe C86
£40.99
Better brand
13% cheaper to
run
5dB quieter
noise level
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
Cheaper to run by £105.75
Brush tool
VS
AEG Rapidclean AG 71a
AEG
Rapidclean AG 71a
£59.99
User reviews
are a lot
better
Better brand
Lighter
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
VS
Dyson DC35
Dyson
DC35
£59.15
User reviews
are marginally
better
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
VS
Clatronic BS 1296
Clatronic
BS 1296
£56.09
2x lighter
Cheaper to run
by £4 over
five years
Quieter noise
level
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
400g lighter
VS
Clatronic BS 1304 P
Clatronic
BS 1304 P
£54.99
Cheaper to run
by £2 over
five years
3% quieter
noise level
Hoover SE71SZ04001
Hoover
SE71SZ04001
£0.00
Higher energy efficiency rating
£12.22 cheaper to run
VS
Taurus Vitara 3000
Taurus
Vitara 3000
£54.29
7dB quieter
noise level
Slightly
lighter