Miele Classic C1 vs Samsung VC07F70
Compare All Vacuum Cleaners
Top Prices Reasons For Reviews & Awards Date Released Key Features Energy Efficiency Price Trend Specification
Share on

Miele Classic C1vsSamsung VC07F70

Miele Classic C1

73

Overall Score

73

Overall Score

Miele Classic C1

£160.00
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run and top-rated 800W cylinder vacuum, with good features but representing only moderate value for money
85
Reviews
526 Reviews
53
Value for Money
Average
77
Features
Good Features
76
Age
2 Years Old
86
Running Costs
£66 Over 10 Years
73
Overall Score
Very Good
800W Cylinder Dry 4.3kg Jun 2015 A
Maximum Input Power Type Cleaning Type Weight Release Date Energy Efficiency
Maximum Input Power 800W
Type Cylinder
Cleaning Type Dry
Weight 4.3kg
Release Date Jun 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung VC07F70

67

Overall Score

67

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run but 3 year old 700W drum vacuum, with good features
66
Features
Good Features
75
Age
2 Years Old
85
Running Costs
£66 Over 10 Years
67
Overall Score
Good
700W Drum Dry 4.6kg Apr 2015 A
Maximum Input Power Type Cleaning Type Weight Release Date Energy Efficiency
Maximum Input Power 700W
Type Drum
Cleaning Type Dry
Weight 4.6kg
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Miele Classic C1

73

Overall Score

73

Overall Score

Miele Classic C1

£160.00
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run and top-rated 800W cylinder vacuum, with good features but representing only moderate value for money
85
Reviews
526 Reviews
53
Value for Money
Average
77
Features
Good Features
76
Age
2 Years Old
86
Running Costs
£66 Over 10 Years
73
Overall Score
Very Good
800W Cylinder Dry 4.3kg Jun 2015 A
Maximum Input Power Type Cleaning Type Weight Release Date Energy Efficiency
Maximum Input Power 800W
Type Cylinder
Cleaning Type Dry
Weight 4.3kg
Release Date Jun 2015
Energy Efficiency A
Samsung VC07F70

67

Overall Score

67

Overall Score
Our Verdict:
A very economical to run but 3 year old 700W drum vacuum, with good features
66
Features
Good Features
75
Age
2 Years Old
85
Running Costs
£66 Over 10 Years
67
Overall Score
Good
700W Drum Dry 4.6kg Apr 2015 A
Maximum Input Power Type Cleaning Type Weight Release Date Energy Efficiency
Maximum Input Power 700W
Type Drum
Cleaning Type Dry
Weight 4.6kg
Release Date Apr 2015
Energy Efficiency A

Top Prices

Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
DR Electrical
Out of stock
£150.00
Go to Store
Buywise
£160.00
Go to Store
Saras Vac Shack
Miele Classic C1 Titan Mango Red Canister Vacuum Cleaner (Brand new, unopened) - on
£433.98
Go to Store
3 Prices from 3 Stores | £160.00-£433.98
 Show All Prices - Show Fewer Prices
No prices found
Report an incorrect price | Found it cheaper elsewhere?
41% Off
{Dyson Light Ball Multifloor Upright Bagless Vacuum Cleaner
£199.98
Was £340 (26 days ago)
PC World Business
View More Amazing Deals

Reasons For

Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
3 Reasons For
300g Lighter
Miele Classic C1 is 4.3kg heavy, but the Samsung VC07F70 is a 4.6kg heavy vacuum cleaner (300g heavier).

The weight of the vacuum cleaner, including all attachments that fit onto the device.

A lighter weight makes the vacuum easier to push, and makes carrying it up and down stairs less of a chore.

Read more Read less | Edit
£0 Cheaper to Run Over Five Years
Over five years the Miele Classic C1 is £0 cheaper to run than the Samsung VC07F70.
Read more Read less
Better Brand
Miele vacuum cleaners have an average rating of 93.6%, however Samsung has an average rating of 81.9%.
1 Reason For
Better User Reviews
The Samsung VC07F70 has an average user review score of 100%, however the Miele Classic C1 has an average rating of 94% (based on 427 reviews).

Reviews & Awards

Average Expert Rating

Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
1 review
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews
No reviews found

Average User Rating

The Samsung VC07F70 has better user reviews than the Miele Classic C1. The average user reviews score for the Samsung VC07F70 is 100% based on 1 review, where as the average score for the Miele Classic C1 is 94% based on 427 reviews.
Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
5 stars
348 reviews
4 stars
49 reviews
3 stars
13 reviews
2 stars
6 reviews
1 star
11 reviews
Best
5 stars
1 review
4 stars
0 reviews
3 stars
0 reviews
2 stars
0 reviews
1 star
0 reviews

Average Brand Rating

Miele has a better average brand rating than Samsung. The average brand rating for Miele is 93.6% based on 4,792 reviews, where as the average brand rating for Samsung is 81.94% based on 114 reviews.
Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
Miele

94

94

Based on 4,792 reviews
Samsung

82

82

Based on 114 reviews

Date Released

Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
33 months old Best 34 months old

Key Features

Maximum Input Power

This measures the power level of the vacuum cleaner, rated in watts.

The input power directly links to the suction power of the vacuum - a higher power means more suction, which means more efficient cleaning.

Operating Radius

The radius is a meausrement from the centre to the circumference (edge) of a circle or sphere. It is equal to half the diameter.

Weight

The weight of the vacuum cleaner, including all attachments that fit onto the device.

A lighter weight makes the vacuum easier to push, and makes carrying it up and down stairs less of a chore.

Energy Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Class

Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Vacuum cleaner running costs calculated based on an average of 2 hours of use per week. The running cost comprises the electricity cost when using the vacuum cleaner and the electricity standby cost. Compare all energy saving vacuum cleaners.

Environmental Impact

We have calculated the amount of CO2 that will be generated by running each of these vacuum cleaners for 10 years. We have then converted that into the number of tree seedlings that you would need to plant and grow for 10 years in order to offset that amount of CO2.
Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
8 trees 0.33 tonnes CO2 (Best)
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
8 trees 0.33 tonnes CO2

Specification

 
 
 
Power Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
Maximum Input Power 800W
BEST
700W
Suction Power Unknown - Click to provide data 180W
Energy Efficiency Class
A
 A
A
 A
Annual Energy Consumption 27.9kWh
BEST
28kWh
 
 
 
Design Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
Dust Capacity 4.5L
BEST
2L
 
 
 
Performance Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
Cleaning Type
dry
 dry
dry
 dry
Operating Radius 9m
BEST
12m
Noise Level 77dB Unknown - Click to provide data
Hard Floor Cleaning Performance Class
D
 D
D
 D
Carpet Cleaning Performance Class
D
 D
D
 D
Dust Re-Emission Class
B
 B
B
 B
 
 
 
Ergonomics Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
Cord Length 5.5m 9m
BEST
 
 
 
Weight & Dimensions Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
Weight 4.3kg
BEST
4.6kg
 
 
 
Packaging Content Miele Classic C1 Samsung VC07F70
Nozzle Unknown - Click to provide data 3
Floor Nozzle Cleaning Width Unknown - Click to provide data 280mm

Other Similar Comparisons

Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
£160.00
7% cheaper to run
VS
Severin BC 7055
Severin
BC 7055
£155.99
£4 Cheaper
Expert reviews
are slightly
better
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
More popular
A bit lighter
VS
Clatronic BS 1294
Clatronic
BS 1294
£59.73
5% cheaper to
run over five
years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
A bit lighter
VS
Grundig VCC 7670 A
Grundig
VCC 7670 A
£133.29
Cheaper to run
by £1 over
five years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
£106 cheaper to run over five years
More popular
User reviews are better
23% higher suction power
9% lighter
VS
Polti Forzaspira MC330 Turbo
Polti
Forzaspira MC330 Turbo
£119.99
Better brand
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Superior energy efficiency rating
42% lighter
Cheaper to run by £8 over five years
VS
AEG ASPC7110
AEG
ASPC7110
£109.99
Better brand
Hugely higher
suction power
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Better brand
85% lighter
VS
Hoover PU71EN01
Hoover
PU71EN01
£89.00
Cheaper to run
by £2 over
five years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
User reviews are vastly better
VS
Samsung VC07H40
Samsung
VC07H40
£79.00
More popular
6% higher
suction power
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Better brand
3.5kg lighter
VS
Hoover Turbopower TP71
Hoover
Turbopower TP71
£74.99
More popular
Cheaper to run
by £2 over
five years
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Vastly better user reviews
Energy efficiency rating is better
5% cheaper to run over five years
Slightly lighter
VS
Zanussi ZAN1930UEL
Zanussi
ZAN1930UEL
£64.49
More popular
Better brand
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
Significantly better user reviews
Better brand
1kg lighter
VS
Hoover WR71WR01
Hoover
WR71WR01
£53.99
£2 cheaper to
run over five
years
Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
£160.00
Better brand
VS
Bosch BCH625K2GB
Bosch
BCH625K2GB
£165.00
Moderately
lighter
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
3% lighter
VS
Clatronic BS 1295
Clatronic
BS 1295
£50.25
4% cheaper to
run
Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
£160.00
Lighter
15% quieter noise level
VS
Shark NV600
Shark
NV600
£179.98
Better brand
£4 cheaper to
run over five
years
Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
£160.00
Better brand
200g lighter
VS
Bosch GL40
Bosch
GL40
£179.00
66% cheaper to
run
Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
£160.00
Better brand
170g lighter
VS
Electrolux ZSPGRN-TOY
Electrolux
ZSPGRN-TOY
£175.62
£3.52 cheaper
to run
Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
£160.00
Better brand
5% lighter
VS
Bosch BGL4SIL69C
Bosch
BGL4SIL69C
£146.33
£14 Cheaper
66% cheaper to
run
Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
£160.00
Quieter noise level
VS
Shark HV320UKT
Shark
HV320UKT
£169.99
Better Trusted
Reviews review
score
User reviews
are moderately
better
Expert reviews
are
significantly
better
Cheaper to run
by £20 over
five years
Better brand
Lighter
Miele Classic C1
Miele
Classic C1
£160.00
Better brand
User reviews are appreciably better
Cheaper to run by £20.21
VS
Dyson DC59
Dyson
DC59
£154.49
£6 Cheaper
Hugely lighter
Bigger Trusted
Reviews review
score
Expert reviews
are a lot
better
Samsung VC07F70
Samsung
VC07F70
£0.00
VS
VAX U85-AS-PPE
VAX
U85-AS-PPE
£139.98
Cheaper to run
by £10.34