AEG L99699 vs Hoover WDXA496A2 vs Indesit XWDA 751280

AEG L99699
Hoover WDXA496A2
Indesit XWDA 751280

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
23% larger washing capacity Edit
The AEG L99699 has a washing capacity of 9kg (as does the Hoover WDXA496A2), however the Indesit XWDA 751280 is only a 7kg capacity washer dryer (2kg smaller).
Larger drying capacity Edit
The AEG L99699 has a drying capacity of 6kg (as does the Hoover WDXA496A2), but the Indesit XWDA 751280 is only a 5kg drying capacity washer dryer (1kg smaller). Read more

The total amount of clothes that can be put in the tumble dryer or washer/dryer in a single dry.

25% higher maximum spin speed Edit
The AEG L99699 has a maximum spin speed of 1,600 RPM, however the Hoover WDXA496A2 is only a 1,400 RPM spin speed washer dryer (200 RPM lower) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is only a 1,200 RPM spin speed washer dryer (400 RPM lower).
Lower annual water consumption washing & drying Edit
AEG L99699 is 13,800L washing & drying annual water consumption. That's 12,200L lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (18,400L) and 4,600L lower than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (18,400L).
236kWh lower annual energy consumption washing & drying Edit
The AEG L99699 is a 734kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer, whereas the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 970kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer (236kWh higher) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 952kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer (218kWh higher).
11L larger drum volume Edit
The AEG L99699 has a drum volume of 63L, whereas the Indesit XWDA 751280 is only a 52L drum volume washer dryer (11L smaller).
£2,131.06 cheaper to run
The AEG L99699 is £2,131.06 cheaper to run than the Hoover WDXA496A2 and £1,664.32 cheaper to run than the Indesit XWDA 751280 over five years. Read more
Higher energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the AEG L99699 is "A", but the rating of the Hoover WDXA496A2 is "A" and the rating of the Indesit XWDA 751280 is "A".
7 Reasons For
Larger washing capacity Edit
Hoover WDXA496A2 is 9kg capacity, and so does the AEG L99699. That's 2kg larger than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (7kg).
1kg larger drying capacity Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 6kg drying capacity washer dryer, and so does the AEG L99699. That's 1kg larger than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (5kg). Read more

The total amount of clothes that can be put in the tumble dryer or washer/dryer in a single dry.

8dB lower noise level (drying) Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 51dB drying noise level washer dryer. That's 8dB lower than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (59dB).
2dB lower noise level (spin) Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 78dB spin noise level washer dryer, whereas the Indesit XWDA 751280 is an 80dB spin noise level washer dryer (2dB higher).
31% shorter cycle time washing Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has a cycle time washing of 130 min. That's 40 min shorter than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (170 min).
2,000L lower annual water consumption washing Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 9,800L annual water consumption when washing washer dryer. That's 2,000L lower than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (11,800L).
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", whereas the AEG L99699 has a rating of "A" and the Indesit XWDA 751280 has a rating of "A".
6 Reasons For
13% lower noise level (wash) Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a noise level (wash) of 54dB. That's 7dB lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (54dB).
16.00 quantity of washing programss Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has 16.00 quantity of washing programss, however the Hoover WDXA496A2 only has three quantity of washing programss. Read more

We do not know the number of quantity of washing programss on the AEG L99699. It is possible that it does not have any quantity of washing programss.

Lower connected load Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 1,850W connected load washer dryer. That's 350W lower than the AEG L99699 (1,850W).
9% lower annual energy consumption washing Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has an annual energy consumption washing of 210kWh. That's 18kWh lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (210kWh).
Vastly lower energy consumption washing per cycle Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has an energy consumption washing per cycle of 1.05kWh, however the AEG L99699 is a 1.69kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer (0.64kWh higher) and the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 1.14kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer (0.09kWh higher).
Energy efficiency rating is higher
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has an energy efficiency rating of "A", but the AEG L99699 has a rating of "A" and the Hoover WDXA496A2 has a rating of "A".

Reasons Against

2 Reasons Against
Higher connected load Edit
The AEG L99699 has a connected load of 2,200W, but the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 1,850W connected load washer dryer (350W lower).
Higher energy consumption washing per cycle Edit
The AEG L99699 has an energy consumption washing per cycle of 1.69kWh. That's 0.55kWh higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (1.05kWh) and 0.64kWh higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (1.05kWh).
9 Reasons Against
Higher noise level (wash) Edit
Hoover WDXA496A2 is 61dB wash noise level. That's 7dB higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (54dB).
Only three quantity of washing programss Edit
The number of quantity of washing programss on the Hoover WDXA496A2 is three, but the Indesit XWDA 751280 only has 16.00 quantity of washing programss. Read more

We do not know the number of quantity of washing programss on the AEG L99699. It is possible that it does not have any quantity of washing programss.

Lower maximum spin speed Edit
Hoover WDXA496A2 is only 1,400 RPM spin speed. That's 200 RPM lower than the AEG L99699 (1,200 RPM) and 200 RPM higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (1,200 RPM).
A lot higher annual water consumption washing & drying Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 26,000L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer, whereas the AEG L99699 is a 13,800L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer (12,200L lower) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is an 18,400L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer (7,600L lower).
25% higher annual energy consumption washing & drying Edit
The Hoover WDXA496A2 has an annual energy consumption washing & drying of 970kWh. That's 236kWh higher than the AEG L99699 (952kWh) and 18kWh higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (952kWh).
8% higher annual energy consumption washing Edit
Hoover WDXA496A2 is 228kWh annual energy consumption when washing. That's 18kWh higher than the Indesit XWDA 751280 (210kWh).
Moderately higher energy consumption washing per cycle Edit
Hoover WDXA496A2 is 1.14kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing, but the AEG L99699 is a 1.69kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer (0.55kWh higher) and the Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 1.05kWh per cycle energy consumption when washing washer dryer (0.09kWh lower).
Older by five months
The Hoover WDXA496A2 is five months older than the AEG L99699. The Hoover WDXA496A2 is the same age as the Indesit XWDA 751280.
Higher running costs over five years by £2,131.06
Over five years the Hoover WDXA496A2 costs £4,379.58 to run which is £2,131.06 more to run than the AEG L99699 and £466.74 more to run than the Indesit XWDA 751280. Show assumptions.
12 Reasons Against
Smaller washing capacity Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a washing capacity of 7kg. That's 2kg smaller than the AEG L99699 and the Hoover WDXA496A2 (7kg).
Smaller drying capacity Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 5kg drying capacity washer dryer. That's 1kg smaller than the AEG L99699 and the Hoover WDXA496A2 (5kg). Read more

The total amount of clothes that can be put in the tumble dryer or washer/dryer in a single dry.

Higher noise level (drying) Edit
Indesit XWDA 751280 is 59dB drying noise level. That's 8dB higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (59dB).
2dB higher noise level (spin) Edit
Indesit XWDA 751280 is 80dB spin noise level, but the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 78dB spin noise level washer dryer (2dB lower).
34% lower maximum spin speed Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 has a maximum spin speed of 1,200 RPM. That's 400 RPM lower than the AEG L99699 (1,200 RPM) and 200 RPM lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (1,200 RPM).
40 min longer cycle time washing Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 170 min washing cycle time washer dryer. That's 40 min longer than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (170 min).
Higher annual water consumption washing & drying Edit
Indesit XWDA 751280 is 18,400L washing & drying annual water consumption, but the AEG L99699 is a 13,800L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer (4,600L lower) and the Hoover WDXA496A2 is a 26,000L washing & drying annual water consumption washer dryer (7,600L higher).
218kWh higher annual energy consumption washing & drying Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 952kWh washing & drying annual energy consumption washer dryer. That's 218kWh higher than the AEG L99699 (952kWh) and 18kWh lower than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (952kWh).
Higher annual water consumption washing Edit
Indesit XWDA 751280 is 11,800L annual water consumption when washing. That's 2,000L higher than the Hoover WDXA496A2 (11,800L).
11L smaller drum volume Edit
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is a 52L drum volume washer dryer. That's 11L smaller than the AEG L99699 (52L).
Older by five months
The Indesit XWDA 751280 is five months older than the AEG L99699. The Indesit XWDA 751280 is the same age as the Hoover WDXA496A2.
Higher running costs over five years by £1,664.32
Over five years the Indesit XWDA 751280 costs £3,912.84 to run which is £1,664.32 more to run than the AEG L99699. Show assumptions.

Date Released

31 months Ago 36 months Ago 36 months Ago

Manufacturer's Warranty

No data 1 Year No data

Running Costs Over 10 Years

Electricity cost - switched on £ 2,248.52
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ -
Total running cost £ 2,248.52
Electricity cost - switched on £ 2,971.47
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ 1,408.11
Total running cost £ 4,379.58
Electricity cost - switched on £ 2,916.33
Electricity cost - standby £ -
Water cost £ 996.51
Total running cost £ 3,912.84

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

11T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 11 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
286
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
15T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 15 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
378
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1,501 baths
Running this washer dryer over over 10 years will use 405,000 litres of water. That's the same as having 1,501 baths.
14T
Running this washer dryer over 10 years will generate 14 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
371
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
1,062 baths
Running this washer dryer over over 10 years will use 287,000 litres of water. That's the same as having 1,062 baths.

Performance

Washing Capacity
9kg
BEST
9kg
BEST
7kg
Drying Capacity
6kg
BEST
6kg
BEST
5kg
Load Balancing System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Load balancing system
Unknown - Click to provide data
Quantity of Drying Programs
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 12
Noise Level (drying)
Unknown - Click to provide data 51dB
BEST
59dB
Noise Level (spin)
Unknown - Click to provide data 78dB
BEST
80dB
Noise Level (wash)
Unknown - Click to provide data 61dB 54dB
BEST
Adjustable Spin Speed
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Adjustable spin speed
 Adjustable spin speed
Delay Start (max)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 9h
Delayed Start Timer
 Delayed start timer
 Delayed start timer
 Delayed start timer
Half-Load
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Half-load
Residual Moisture
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 53%
Washing Program
 Cold
 Cold
 Cold
Quantity of Washing Programs
Unknown - Click to provide data 3 16
BEST
Drying Class
 B
 B
 B
BEST
Washing Class
 A
BEST
 A
 A
BEST
Minimum Spin Speed
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 600 RPM
Maximum Spin Speed
1,600 RPM
BEST
1,400 RPM 1,200 RPM
Cycle Time Washing & Drying
Unknown - Click to provide data 59 min Unknown - Click to provide data
Cycle Time Washing
Unknown - Click to provide data 130 min
BEST
170 min

Other Features

Spin-Drying Class
 A
 A
 A

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A
 A
 A
Energy Consumption Washing & Drying Per Cycle
3.67kWh
BEST
4.85kWh 4.76kWh
Water Consumption Washing & Drying Per Cycle
Unknown - Click to provide data 130L 92L
BEST
Water Consumption Washing Per Cycle
Unknown - Click to provide data 49L
BEST
59L
Connected Load
2,200W Unknown - Click to provide data 1,850W
BEST
Annual Water Consumption Washing & Drying
13,800L
BEST
26,000L 18,400L
Annual Energy Consumption Washing & Drying
734kWh
BEST
970kWh 952kWh
Annual Water Consumption Washing
Unknown - Click to provide data 9,800L
BEST
11,800L
Annual Energy Consumption Washing
Unknown - Click to provide data 228kWh 210kWh
BEST
Energy Consumption Washing Per Cycle
1.69kWh 1.14kWh 1.05kWh
BEST
AC Input Voltage
 230
 230
 230
Current
10A Unknown - Click to provide data 10A
AC Input Frequency
 50
 50
 50

Ergonomics

Child Lock
 Child lock
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Remaining Time Indication
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Remaining time indication
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.7m
Sensor Program Selection
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sensor program selection
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Loading Type
 Front-load
 Front-load
 Front-load
Door Hinge
 Left
 Left
 Left
Colour of Product
 White
 White
 White
Drum Volume
63L
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 52L
Drum Material
 Stainless steel
 Stainless steel
 Stainless steel
Viewing Window
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Viewing window
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Built-In Display
 Built-in display
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Built-in display
Control Type
 Rotary
 Buttons
 Rotary
 Buttons
 Rotary
 Buttons
Case Design
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
 Freestanding
Reversible Doors
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Reversible doors
Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Height
870mm 850mm 850mm
Width
600mm 600mm 595mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 73kg 66.5kg
BEST
Depth
639mm 540mm 540mm
Package Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 890mm 890mm
Package Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 600mm 590mm
BEST
Package Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 650mm 645mm
BEST

Drying Programs

Synthetics Drying Program
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Cotton Drying Program
 Cotton drying program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cotton drying program
Wool Drying Program
 Wool drying program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Wool drying program

Washing Programs

Synthetics Washing Program
 Synthetics washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Synthetics washing program
Sport Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Sport washing program
Quick Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick washing program
Pre-Wash Program
 Pre-wash program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Hand/wool Washing Program
 Hand/wool washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Hand/wool washing program
Eco Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Delicate/silk Washing Program
 Delicate/silk washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Delicate/silk washing program
Cotton Washing Program
 Cotton washing program
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Cotton washing program
Black Washing Program
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback